Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Elan

enaudible's page

FullStarFullStarFullStar Pathfinder Society GM. 78 posts (150 including aliases). 3 reviews. 2 lists. No wishlists. 15 Pathfinder Society characters. 1 alias.



Sign in to create or edit a product review.

Our Price: $3.99

Add to Cart

Poor GMing can ruin your life...

**( )( )( )

(my opinion shifted considerably after reading the scenario...)

All of the critiques listed to-date added up to a very negatively received scenario. Overall, it felt contrived and was tedious for a non-optimized mid-tier group.

A scenario that I wish I had never played and would never want to run and advise anyone else to avoid playing winds up as the least enjoyable scenario I have played to date. (This changed after reading the scenario - it motivated me to want to run it so I could try a bit harder than my GM to do it properly.)

This type of material (GMing, ultimately), encountered regularly, would discourage me from playing PFS entirely. As it stands, I reconsider my interest in higher tier content. Congratulations on a clever, well-built scenario that eroded any sense of pleasure as a PC (thanks to the GM).

Edit: After reading the scenario, it appears the GM used a flip-map in place of the proper map for the final encounter, as well as applying the 4-player modifications incorrectly (affecting NPC reach and size) and positioning the NPCs in a highly disadvantageous location (immediately adjacent to all the hostile NPCs) relative to the intended scenario placement.

Edit: After re-reading the scenario, the GM ran the first encounter ignoring the tactics written and somehow giving 2 critical NPCs the equivalent of blindsense/tremorsense/scent when the only thing they have is "blind-fight". How a highly experienced Venture-Captain GM can make so many egregious errors, I do not know. This was the 3rd time he reportedly was running this at Origins, so that would be 18 players subjected to the thorough incorrect running of this scenario.

What we have is an experience that goes from a no-star review, to a one star-review, to a two-star review, to a tentative three-star review. I'm thinking this scenario is considerably better than what I experienced, but I will likely never experience it as intended as a player. A cautionary tale, perhaps?


Add Print Edition: $19.99

Add PDF: $13.99

Add Non-Mint: $19.99 $14.99

Pulling my hair out over the maps...

****( )

1 square = 10 ft... really? Since when?

I am not sure of the rationale behind it, but it is wreaking havoc on my ability to reproduce the map in a reasonable way that doesn't undermine what at first glance seemed like some fun and interesting maps...

I haven't made it through all the dungeon levels yet for my group, but I would otherwise probably rate it a 4/5 thus far based on writing and design.


Add Folio: $19.99

Add PDF: $13.99

Hoping for more...

**( )( )( )

FYI - this is the SAME map included with the Inner Sea World Guide with 2 small differences...

1 - Higher resolution

2 - Additional landmark labels

Worth another $14 on top of the Inner Sea World Guide? I think not...



©2002–2014 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.