|Paizo Pathfinder® Paizo Games|
|About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ|
If an attack of opportunity disrupts your action can you change your action if the initial action can't be completed?
If I decide to move, and get tripped can I use that move action to do something else instead, such as stand up?
This has cone up several times, and no answer has been given. I know how I think it works, but that won't settle any debates. As always the actual FAQ question will be at the bottom of this post.
The rules state the following.
This just gives us the knowledge that the invisible creature is somewhere in the area.
The rules then go on to tell us how to find the actual square the creature is in instead of just knowing it is around.
So now we know it is a base DC of 40 to find the square before any other modifiers come into play.
However it doesn't end there.
Invisibility table wrote:
That pushed the base DC up to 60 if they are not moving.
Once again this tale is still not over. If you are using stealth you also get to add your stealth roll to either the +40 or +60 DC
Invisibility table wrote:
So the DC is either 40+stealth or 60+stealth.
The above is not counting other modifiers that can give a penalty to the perception DC such as being in combat or moving at full speed.
The actual FAQ question is bolded at the bottom.
One argument is that the sneak attack damage is completely separate from the spell damage.
Another argument is that sneak attack damage deals whatever type of damage the spell deals and is therefore part of the spell's damage.
In addition this FAQ has a save for a fireball with sneak attack added which makes it seem like it could be part of the spell's damage.
Of course this could also be a special case for this PrC, and not a general rule for any other instance of sneak attack being combined with spells.
Do metamagic feats such as empower and maximize apply to the sneak attack damage that occurs when it is used with a spell?
The actual question is bolded at the bottom. Everything else is just evidence to support a possible point.
In addition I do not have access to the Ultimate Intrigue so if it has more information I do not have it.
Whatever you think the answer is I would like for you to press the FAQ button. Thanks.
The CRB says:
Action: Most Perception checks are reactive, made in response to observable stimulus. Intentionally searching for stimulus is a move action.
However "observable stimulus" has never really ever been explained.
Many of use who came from 3.5 assumed that you must intentionally look for a trap or hidden door, but the rules dont really say that.
The unchained book which changes how actions work says the following:
Search: You use Perception to search a room for salient hidden creatures or clues, or you make a detailed search of a 10-foot-square area to detect traps, triggers, hidden objects, or footprints. When you search an area, this action has the complex subtype
That shows evidence that the move action is the intent, but it is not absolute proof.
Later Mark(game rules designer) says:
While the other designers have told me it was an omission, we certainly need to state it and rectify the omission, to prevent the confusion that has led to the current state of affairs. In my mind, Unchained is a good start. I'll try to get it up on the FAQ for a wider audience as well!
This still does not make it a 100% certifiable rule since it was not actually written that way.
The goal of this post is to get an answer as to whether or not the Unchained book saying that checks for traps and limited to a 10 foot area is accurate.
Now I have to write the question so it can be FAQ'd.
Is it correct that the rules for searching for a trap, hidden door and similar things require a move action, and limit you to checking a 10 foot area?
I am not putting this in the rules section because I am just curious as to how many people enforce this with reach weapons or monsters that have reach.
I have never enforced this, even after I found out about it, and no GM I have played under has ever enforced it. I was wondering if it is strange(abnormal) that I have never seen this enforced or if this is one of those rules that nobody(not literally) cares to use.
Does Dimensional Slide require only a move action or is the intent to actually move(change location) even when not withdrawing?
Dimensional Slide (Su): The arcanist can expend 1 point from her arcane reservoir to create a dimensional crack that she can step through to reach another location. This ability is used as part of a move action or withdraw action, allowing her to move up to 10 feet per arcanist level to any location she can see. This counts as 5 feet of movement. She can only use this ability once per round. She does not provoke attacks of opportunity when moving in this way, but any other movement she attempts as part of her move action provokes as normal.
PS: Withdraw is actually mentioned as a withdraw action<---Just wanted to point out that while it actually uses a full round action it uses that term(withdraw action) in the book. Hopefully this avoids any derails.
A prepared caster such as a wizard or cleric can prepared a lower level spell in a higher level slot.
A spontaneous caster can use a higher level slot to cast a slot level spell.
A spellcaster always has the option to fill a higher-level spell slot with a lower-level spell.
Can the arcanist cast a spell prepared as a 3rd level spell using one of his higher level daily allotment of spells. As an example could I cast fireball(3rd level spell) with one of my daily slots that is assigned to 4th level spells?
It seems as if some people are not clear on how rings are activated so I am posting this FAQ in order to get a final answer.
The ring specific rules for activation are as follows.
Activation: A ring's ability is usually activated by a spoken command word (a standard action that does not provoke attacks of opportunity) or its effects work continually. Some rings have unusual activations, as mentioned in the ring's specific description.
Are the methods to activating a ring limited to command words, the effect continually being in place, and whatever method would be described in a ring's specific description?
If a ring just says it has to be activated, but does not specifically say "on command" or have a special method of activation listed how is that ring activated?
An example of this is the ring of invisibility which just says "By activating this simple silver ring, the wearer can benefit from invisibility, as the spell".
The specific FAQ question is bolded at the bottom.
The entry in the APG says that "Many traits grant a new type of bonus: a "trait" bonus. Trait bonuses do not stack".
However, there are traits such as Ease of Faith which do not specifically call out a bonus given by a trait as a trait bonus.
Your mentor, the person who invested your faith in you from an early age, took steps to ensure that you understood that what powers your divine magic is no different than that which powers the magic of other religions. This philosophy makes it easier for you to interact with others who may not share your views. You gain a +1 bonus on Diplomacy checks, and Diplomacy is always a class skill for you.
Are we to assume that all bonuses given by a trait or trait bonuses unless specifically called out as untyped or another type of bonus?Or, is a bonus given by a trait not a trait bonus unless it is specifically identified as a trait bonus in the rules text?
If I gain the ability such as a feat or class feature that allows me to perform an act by using a faster action instead am I restricted to only the faster action?
Examples(the following are not actual abilities that exist officially):
A question has come up a few times on the forums, and the rules don't exactly allow it, but they do hint towards it.
An action's type essentially tells you how long the action takes to perform
Here is the exact question.
Can you use an action type to perform an act that is normally assigned to an action type that normally takes up less time?
If the answer is yes then I have "bonus considerations" at the bottom of this post.
Can I use a standard or move action to do an act that normally requires a swift action?
Cam I use a standard or move action to do an act that normally requires an immediate action.
Round 1: I use my immediate action to do something. By the rules I lose my swift action on my next turn if the immediate action is taken between turns.
Round 2: I want to use my move or standard action to do an act that normally requires a swift action.
1. "If I can use a move action to perform a swift action can I still do so when I am limited to only a move action such as from the nauseated condition?
2. If I use a Swift action in a round, can I use a Move or Standard action to perform another act that calls for a swift action?
PS: It is understood that a standard action can be used for a move action. This FAQ is more about replacing swift and immediate actions.
Before I get started I want to make a something clear.
1. This post is not about which one is better. More on that below. It will be bolded.
2. If this is in the wrong section feel free to flag it and have it moved to another section.
The phrase "if you roleplayed instead of rollplayed" or any similar phrase is offensive, even if you don't mean for it to be, and it should not be used here. It implies a "one correct way to play the game" perspective. Aligning yourself more or less with the rules or being in character is not a better or worse way to play no matter where you fall on the spectrum. It is only a preference.
If you say or imply that if someone were to be less mechanically efficient and/or worry more about the personality aspect of the character they would have more fun as if it is a fact, that is not much better.
In case anyone wants to try the, "but it's not against the rules or guidelines so it is ok" approach.
community guidelines wrote:
There are all kinds of gamers here on paizo.com. Use of derogatory labels for other gamers can be hurtful and isolate others who enjoy different styles of play. You may find yourself in a debate on our messageboards, and disagreements are bound to happen. Focus on challenging the idea, rather than the others in the conversation. Remember that there’s another person on the other side of the screen. Please help us keep it fun!
That is all.
PS: That is not nearly as long as I thought it was going to be.
This topic has come up several times, and while I knew how it worked in 3.5, Pathfinder is not 3.5, and rather than wait for a blog I will do individual questions over the coming days.
In the chapter on invisibility it says that if someone is using stealth and they are invisible the perception DC to locate the creature is a +20 to the stealth roll.
As an example if I roll a 35 for my stealth check the DC is 55, assuming no other modifiers are in play.
The FAQ question is below.
Is the +20 from invisibility that is added to the stealth roll to "notice" or "pinpoint the square" of the invisible creature in this case?
It is a flat DC 20 notice the presence of a creature that is invisible withing 20 feet, but it is a +20 to the DC to pinpoint the creature according to the glossary in the CRB<---not trying to use stealth
If the +20 to stealth is pinpoint a creature then it may be easier to pinpoint someone who is actively trying to hide, but with a low modifier, than it is to find(pinpoint) someone who is not trying to hide at all.That does not really make sense.
Not hiding(20)+20(pinpoint)=40 to locate square
Low roll trying to hide(18)+20(pinpoint)=38
I am thinking the person trying to hide would have a 58, but there has been enough debate on the topic over the years that it deserves a final answer.
No matter what you think the answer is, pressing the FAQ button would be appreciated.
How long does the staggered condition last from this ability if they fail to save to avoid being staggered?
I think they forgot to put the duration in there. I would put it at 3 days, and I will also press the FAQ button so it is brought to the attention of Paizo. Even if the duration is permanent it still needs to be mentioned.
Evil Eye (Su) Three times per day, a sea hag can cast her dire gaze upon any single creature within 30 feet. The target must succeed on a DC 14 Will save or be staggered as strange nebulous distress and a gnawing sense of impending doom plagues the victim. If a sea hag uses her evil eye on someone already afflicted by this curse, the victim must make a DC 14 Fortitude save or be overwhelmed with fright and collapse into a comatose state for 3 days. Each day that passes, the comatose victim must make a DC 14 Fortitude save or perish. The evil eye is a mind-affecting fear effect. The save DCs are Charisma-based.Evil Eye Curse: Gaze—failed save; save Will DC 14; frequency1/day; effect staggered (or fall comatose if already under the effects of the evil eye).
In another thread there was a discussion on Broken Wing Gambit.
Broken Wing Gambit wrote:
It was brought up that there with reference to the bolded area that there is a possibility the opponent may choose to attack without accepting the +2 bonus, meaning BWG(Broken Wing Gambit) would not be in play.
Another reading is that whoever has BWG is granting the bonus automatically by putting themselves in harm's way so if someone swings the feat automatically activates.
FAQ Question below:
There have been several cases of the "ally" FAQ making people think they get to always count themselves as an ally due to the very loose wording involved. I don't expect for an FAQ to cover every situation, but I think we can cover the teamwork feats.
The exact wording in the APG is this:
Now there is nothing saying that it has to be another ally despite the inquisitor needing a class feature to bypass at least part of the requirements.
It is generally understood that unless there is another creature other than yourself that you can not use the feat.
I wish to get this cleared up so the question below is what I am FAQ'ing.
FAQ Question:Do all of the teamwork feats require another ally besides yourself in order to use the feat as a general rule or is the general rule that you can count as your own ally, even if you do not have something like the inquistor Solo Tactics class feature
There is some confusion in another thread about whether or not all ranged attacks suffer the -4 penalty for when someone is in melee.
There is also confusion about whether or not the precise shot feat applies to removing penalties that apply to all ranged attacks because it uses the "ranged weapon" verbage.
Some parts of the game use the term "ranged weapon" instead of "ranged attack".
If you shoot or throw a ranged weapon at a target engaged in melee with a friendly character, you take a –4 penalty on your attack roll.
The specific FAQ question is bolded below.
Do spells such as Acid Splash and similar effects which are not "weapons", but do use ranged attacks suffer the same -4 penalty to attacks when firing at an opponent in melee, even though they are not weapons?
There have been quiet a few times people had disagreements in the rules forum because one was discussing what he thought the most literal interpretation of a rule was, and another person was discussing how they thought the PDT intended for a rule to be ran when they made it.
A few posters have also told me they thought most people came to the rules forum to find out the most literal interpretation of what the book said.
Myself and other people try to figure out intent. As an example there is a feat which says it removes all penalties when using Two-weapon fighting. Most agree that this means you don't suffer the TWF penalties, but a very literal interpretation would mean that you actually ignore all penalties on attack rules when weilding a shield with another weapon.
My reason for doing this is to have a record of the community's default position. So as an example if "what the words say" is an overwhelming majority people can specify that they want to know the opinion on intent, and vice versa.
I think it will help with a large number of debates by having a standard.
Please use the following posts to vote with. "Favorite" the one which matches your opinion.
Is Limited Wish intended to bypass True Resurrection(a higher level spell)?
According to the rules raise dead line of spells it takes True Ressurection to bring an outside back to life.
According to Limited Wish it can not duplicate a higher level spell.
According to the outsider entry:
When an outsider is slain, no soul is set loose. Spells that restore souls to their bodies, such as raise dead, reincarnate, and resurrection, don't work on an outsider. It takes a different magical effect, such as limited wish, wish, miracle, or true resurrection to restore it to life.
Limited Wish not only saves the party 23500 gold peices, but it is a lower level spell than True Resurrection.
It is my opinion that when the outsider entry was written that Limited Wish was included by accident.
PS: I am well aware of what the book says. <----In before someone points out the exact wording of the outsider entry.
In the book and on grids the monster's dimensions are done in squares which are 2-dimensional. However most of us apply it so that the monster is a cube shaped.
I figured since this is a fairly easy rule I could FAQ it and get an official answer.
Question is bolded below:
Is the 3rd dimension of a monster on a map equivalent to the other 2 dimensions? As an example if a large* giant is listed as 15 feet tall would his space on the grid be 10x10x10 or 10x10x15?
*That was referring to the size category applied to creatures in the game.
According to the feat section:
According to the Ability Score section in the CRB we have two quotes.
Ability score increases with a duration of 1 day or less give only temporary bonuses.
Permanent Bonuses: Ability bonuses with a duration greater than 1 day actually increase the relevant ability score after 24 hours. Modify all skills and statistics related to that ability. This might cause you to gain skill points, hit points, and other bonuses. These bonuses should be noted separately in case they are removed.
The second quote makes it sound like ability scores increase with a duration of longer than 24 hours are the only way to really increase you score, but the first ability score quote seems to go against that.
Here is my main FAQ question---> Can you gain a feat with only a temporary increase to your ability score?
Second Question: If the answer is yes then what is the difference between a permanent increase and a temporary one with regard to mechanical benefits?
PS: This question is due to this thread
PS2: I know you(PDT) only like one FAQ question per post so I am more concerned with the first question.
Many people go to the rules forum to find out how the rules are intended to work in the game. I think that is the majority intention of most who ask questions there.
As we know sometimes what they rules say, and what the rules mean do no match up well. The recent flying skill FAQ is an example of that.
This discussion however is not about the words not matching up. It is about the posters.
Sample Conversation:I am going to use an extreme example, but focus on the point which I will state afterwards.
Poster A: Can I take actions after I die.
Poster B: When you die your character is out of play. The devs assumed we had enough common sense to know that so they didn't state it like they did for the paralyzed condition.
Poster C: The rules do not say you are not allowed to have your actions so you do not lose them.
.......Poster C continue to argue this point vs other posters for several pages
Poster B: Do you play it that way at home?
Poster C: I was just arguing what the book says. I know it does not work that way.
Now it is obvious that poster A and poster B were discussing how things were intended to actually work in gameplay.
Poster C is arguing the most literal interpretation.
A discussion on what the rules say, and what the rules are supposed to do at the table are two very different arguments in many cases.
If you as poster know that someone is asking how things are expected to play out in a game, and you argue from a different viewpoint then you should acknowledge that. Otherwise due to the differing goals, there will never be a consensus. It is just common sense.
What is the point of entering the discussion from that angle and not acknowledge it?
I have my opinion, but I would like to hear someone who has done this explain it.
Possible answers are:
A. The rules to me are what is in the book, not what Paizo intends them to mean.
B. I honestly didn't think people wanted intent.
C. I just wanted to play devil's advocate, and thought it would be better if nobody knew I actually understood the rule.
D. other reason not mentioned
The zealot has to spend talents to get full access to all of its spellcasting. Flavor reasons aside, I don't see one talent that compares with spells. I think Paizo should just go ahead and give the Zealot the spells, and create new talents or up the usefulness of the other talents.
However if I was reading too fast and overlooked something let me know.
It seems like we have flavor text mixed in with the mechanical text, but I am not all of these contain flavor text.
This is mostly for the PDT, but others can feel free to chime in.
However before I get into the flavor based questions I want to point out a contradiction.
From what I understand the intent is to let the vigilante bypass the DR or hardness and then the GM comes up with how it happened. If this is the case then it should be noted that the beginning text is flavor text. However as written it could seem as if the materials needed have to already be in place. If this is the case then this ability is very circumstantial.
If this is another GM discretion ability then it should noted so players know up front.
I read this one as the vigilante has a means to deal extra damage to an opponent that is adjacent to the targeted opponent. However if the first opponent is a stone golem(just one example) I can see a GM calling for a strength check or combat maneuver check. Is the "shove" flavor text?
The following are not flavor based questions.
Is this saying he gain an "additional" number of spells that he can cast beyond what the spellcasting table for the class gives, or is the intent that you must take the other divine training in order to cast spells normally?
I found the answer. The book says "* A zealot vigilante only knows spells of this level only if he has the appropriate talent to cast spells of this level."
Whenever the point-buy or rolling discussions start some says point-buy enables/encourages min-maxing because people put the dump the stat they dont need such as charisma.
If someone can explain this I am all ears.
When classes such as sorcerers or bloodragers get free bonus spells known due to their class features, such as the sorcerer bloodline, how is the level of the spell determined? <---FAQ question.
For those of you who may want to say just go by whatever level it normally counts as for that class I agree, but the oracle gets a spell early due to an FAQ. There may also be times when a class gets access to a spell it does not normally have access to, such as an arcane class gaining access to a divine spell.
I thought there was a rule or dev comment on it, but I was not able to find it.
During actual gameplay higher level characters not backed by magic can fall from incredible heights and walk away and survive in fire for a ridiculously long time by normal person standards.
In your games do you assume a transformation into superheroes or do you use some combination of flavor and/or handwaving certain things that are beyond any human with regard to taking damage?
Cowering: The character is frozen in fear and can take no actions. A cowering character takes a –2 penalty to Armor Class and loses his Dexterity bonus (if any).
Dazed: The creature is unable to act normally. A dazed creature can take no actions, but has no penalty to AC.
Stunned: A stunned creature drops everything held, can't take actions, takes a –2 penalty to AC, and loses its Dexterity bonus to AC (if any).
In the game the conditions listed above say you can not take actions. I am sure they mean you can not use the game term of "actions", but they may also apply to the non-game definition and other cases that are not directly spelled out.
In a game similar to Pathfinder that shall not be named there were other things you could not do. Examples follow from official sources:
In general, if you cannot use a standard action during your turn, you also cannot make an attack of opportunity during someone else's turn. When the notes on conditions in Part One say that you cannot act (for example, when stunned), you cannot make an attack of opportunity.
You can take a 5-foot step anytime you don't otherwise move across the battlefield. You usually take a 5-foot step before, after, or during another action. The rules don't say so, but it's best to assume that you cannot take a 5-foot step unless you can take at least a move action during your turn.
Here is my question for the PDT team, and for everyone who is curious to FAQ. Do these(cowering, dazed, stunned) conditions allow someone to take a 5-foot step, take attacks of opportunity or other non-actions such as delaying.
PS: The 3.5 rules are simply there for precedence in case anyone is wondering why others would make such statements. I do no leg in this race with regard to if they are upheld or not. I just want an answer.
It seems that different people have different ideas on what counts as immediate dangers and distractions that would make taking 10 not possible. I understand that every possible case can not be listed, but I think the following list can be answered and if possible we would like a good rule of thumb to follow.
Do the following prevent taking 10 while not in combat?
Perception (to locate a trap)
Perception (reactive check to locate hiding enemy)
Disable device (disarm a trap)
The question for FAQ is --> Is the signature skill unlock for the Use Magic Device skill supposed to work when you roll a natural 1 and fail the check?
Below are the skill unlocks for use magic device. They both imply that if you roll a natural you take a -10 penalty on a reattempt, however you can reroll with no penalty by the normal rules anyway. The rules is that if you roll a natural 1 and you fail then you can not use that item for 24 hours.
Mark Seifter intended for the "If you roll a natural 1...." to be "If you roll a natural 1 and fail to activate an item...."
Mark Seifter wrote:
Huh, I actually changed it to "If you roll a natural 1 and fail to activate an item"...
This change allows for this skill unlock to actually work.
Press the FAQ button please.
How does burrowing work?
I ask because when Pathfinder was made a few definitions/rules did not get copy and pasted over, but the abilities made the transition from 3.5 to Pathfinder. With Pathfinder wanting to be its own game we can't just say "well use 3.5".
Here is 3.5 burrow:
I am not suggesting that Paizo use 3.5's definition, but I am suggesting that we get a rule so we know how it works. It would help to know if the creature does or does not leave an hole behind, as an example.
The purpose of this is to get it FAQ's so Paizo can give us an official definition/rule.
It seems as though there is going to be an FAQ or errata to the rules saying that a 10 by 10 area is the limit for move action perception checks.
Some interpret that to mean you need them to pick up on things that a reactive check is used for "observable stimulus", may not notice.
The question is "what counts as observable stimulus"?
I understand that a complete list can't be given but examples would help.
Would a hidden door that is in line of sight count?
Would a hidden door count that is behind a curtain?
Would you get a reactive check to notice someone hiding by using stealth and/or invisibility?
Press the FAQ button please. If they are going to errata perception I think it makes sense to get as many questions out of the way at one time instead of having one FAQ/errata spawn more FAQ's.
This will consist of more than one question to avoid multiple FAQ's.
1. Can you jump while charging and still complete the charge?
2. If you can jump while charging, is there a point where you jump high enough to no longer be considered "moving in a straight line" and therefore end the charge, or make the charge not rules legal?
3. If there is a limit to how high you can jump, and still charge what is that limit?
To those of you reading this no matter what your opinion is I would like for you to press the FAQ button.
PS: I know the words "straight line" are not in the book, but that is basically what is implied.
I have a decent, but not really good amount of info on Dark Sun*. If I use it I will follow the core setting, and there is a 99% I will not have clerics or paladin. I have not decided on oracles yet.
I know about defilers, scarcity of water, Thri-kreen, psionics, dragon kings, and a the races that are setting specific.
Now to the question. Which AP(3.5 and Pathfinder) would work there? I understand that I have to modify locations, and maybe even create a few of my own, but I want the general story idea to be in tact.
*I know about the 3.5 site and I have the documents. I just have not read them in detail yet.
Many times when discussing wizards and sorcerers the notion that they may not have the "right" spell comes up. However for all of my gaming career needing the right(perfect) spell for a situation is not really needed. Many times there are several ways to overcome a problem, so even if you have not prepared or learn the best spell you often have a spell that is good enough to work. That is why I think the arcanist quick study is over rated unless you(general statement) just have the bad luck of not picking any spell, and/or nobody else in the party can solve the problem.
Short version: How common is it for the party wizards and sorcerers to not be able to do something to contribute to a problem, that nobody else can solve either?
This FAQ was presented before by Jiggy, and it was marked as "answered in FAQ", but it has not been answered so I am going to try this again.
I have always seen the Mage's Disjunction spell as a magical affect that come into play shut down other magic an go away, but leaving lasting affects.
However there is nothing in the book to support that. I understand that with regard to spells they undo spells completely, but for magical items they are only turned them off, so per RAW you should be able to dispel a mage's disjunction. The fact that I have never seen it mentioned in anywhere has made me wonder if others just made the same assumption that I did, or has it just not been mentioned for other reason.
For the sake of anyone wishing to FAQ this the question is "Can you dispel or disjunction Mage's Disjunction?".
edit: heavily edited due to a rules error on my part.
Below is a slightly altered build I had before.
Igor the Invesigator
Half-orc investigator 11 (Pathfinder RPG Advanced Class Guide 30)
LN Medium humanoid (human, orc)
Init +1; Senses darkvision 60 ft.; Perception +26
AC 20, touch 12, flat-footed 19 (+7 armor, +1 deflection, +1 Dex, +1 natural)
hp 69 (11d8+11)
Fort +9, Ref +11, Will +11
Defensive Abilities orc ferocity, trap sense +3; Immune poison
Speed 30 ft.
Melee +2 inspired sword cane +19/+14 (1d6+11) or
. . dagger +17/+12 (1d4+9/19-20) or
. . morningstar +17/+12 (1d8+9)
Ranged +1 adaptive composite shortbow +15/+10 (1d6+10/×3)
Special Attacks studied combat (+5, 4 rounds), studied strike +4d6
Investigator Extracts Prepared (CL 11th; concentration +15)
. . 4th—echolocation[UM], freedom of movement, restoration
. . 3rd—fly (2), haste (2), tongues
. . 2nd—barkskin (2), investigative mind[ACG], invisibility (2)
. . 1st—comprehend languages, cure light wounds, disguise self, identify, long arm[ACG] (2)
Str 19, Dex 13, Con 12, Int 19, Wis 12, Cha 9
Base Atk +8; CMB +17; CMD 24
Feats Extra Investigator Talent[ACG], Extra Investigator Talent[ACG], Furious Focus[APG], Great Fortitude, Power Attack, Skill Focus (Perception)
Skills Acrobatics +5, Appraise +8, Bluff +16, Climb +8, Diplomacy +16, Disable Device +22, Disguise +16, Intimidate +4, Knowledge (arcana) +11, Knowledge (dungeoneering) +8, Knowledge (engineering) +8, Knowledge (geography) +8, Knowledge (history) +8, Knowledge (local) +12, Knowledge (nature) +8, Knowledge (nobility) +9, Knowledge (planes) +8, Knowledge (religion) +8, Linguistics +18, Perception +26, Sense Motive +15, Sleight of Hand +5, Spellcraft +18, Stealth +25; Racial Modifiers +2 Intimidate
Languages Abyssal, Celestial, Common, Draconic, Dwarven, Elven, Giant, Gnome, Goblin, Halfling, Infernal, Orc, Polyglot, Sylvan, Tengu, Tien, Varisian
SQ alchemy (alchemy crafting +11), inspiration (9/day), investigator talents (charmer, coax information, combat inspiration, eidetic recollection, expanded inspiration, honeyed words, mutagen), keen recollection, mutagen (+4/-2, +2 natural armor, 110 minutes), orc blood, poison lore, swift alchemy, trapfinding +5
Other Gear +3 shadow, improved mithral chain shirt, +1 adaptive composite shortbow (+2 Str), +2 inspired sword cane, arrows (40), blunt arrows (40), dagger, morningstar, amulet of natural armor +1, belt of giant strength +2, circlet of persuasion, cloak of resistance +3, eyes of the eagle, handy haversack, headband of vast intelligence +2, ring of protection +1, alchemy crafting kit, backpack, bedroll, belt pouch, flint and steel, ink, black, inkpen, masterwork thieves' tools, mess kit, pot, soap, torch (10), trail rations (5), waterskin, 4,874 gp
Alchemy +11 (Su) +11 to Craft (Alchemy) to create alchemical items, can Id potions by touch.
Charmer (3/day) (Ex) Can roll 2d20 for Diplomacy check and take the better result.
Circlet of persuasion +3 competence bonus to CHA-based checks (skills already included).
Coax information (Ex) Can use Bluff or Diplomacy to force an opponent to act friendly.
Combat Inspiration (Ex) Applying inspiration to attacks/saves only costs 1 point.
Darkvision (60 feet) You can see in the dark (black and white vision only).
Eidetic Recollection (Su) Can always take 10 on Knowledge checks, use 1 inspiration to take 20.
Expanded Inspiration (Ex) Free Inspiration on Diplomacy, Heal, Perception, Profession, Sense Motive (if trained).
Furious Focus If you are wielding a weapon in two hands, ignore the penalty for your first attack of each turn.
Honeyed Words (3/day) (Ex) Can roll 2d20 for Bluff check and take the better result.
Immunity to Poison You are immune to poison.
Inspiration (+1d6, 9/day) (Ex) Use 1 point, +1d6 to trained skill or ability check. Use 2 points, to add to attack or save.
Mutagen This discovery gives the alchemist the mutagen class ability, as described in the Advanced Player's Guide. (This discovery exists so alchemist archetypes who have variant mutagens, such as the mindchemist, can learn how to make standard mutage
Mutagen (DC 19) (Su) Mutagen adds +4 to a physical & -2 to a mental attribute, and +2 nat. armor for 110 minutes.
Orc Blood Half-orcs count as both humans and orcs for any effect related to race.
Orc Ferocity (1/day) If brought below 0 Hp, can act as though disabled for 1 rd.
Poison Lore (Ex) After 1 min can use Know to ID poisons, 1 min more to neutralize with Craft (alchemy).
Power Attack -3/+6 You can subtract from your attack roll to add to your damage.
Studied Combat (+5, 4 rounds) (Ex) As a move action, study foe to gain bonus to att & dam for duration or until use studied strike.
Studied Strike +4d6 (Ex) As a free action on a melee hit, end studied combat vs. foe to add precision dam.
Swift Alchemy (Ex) You can construct alchemical items in half the normal time.
Trap Sense +3 (Ex) +3 bonus on reflex saves and AC against traps.
Trapfinding +5 Gain a bonus to find or disable traps, including magical ones.
For purpose of studied strike I will assume studied combat was in play for the first attack, and then turned off for all other attacks in that round
No mutagen no extract, no mutagen, no haste just studied combat and studied strike with power attack and furious focus.
DPR 36.58 This numbers seems a bit high, but not more than 2 or 3 so I will say it is a nonfactor.
Now to add in the mutagen giving strength a +4 alchemical bonus, haste, and flanking.
Now of this version also has the inspiring enhancement, but it can only be used for 10 attacks, assuming it never comes up at any other point, since this investigator has 10 uses. Each use last for one attack, not for the entire round.
It is a free action however and with the talent and inspriration that 1d6 is doubled for an average of 7 to the attack roll.
Adding this to the 2nd iterative attack from haste pushes the DPR up to 81.21.
I do not know which extracts would best boost DPR so I will let someone else make a suggestion or if you have an investigator build present it. You can do the math or I can do the math.
The idea is to have a build that is playable in a real game, not something that has saves of +3 at level 11 and an AC of 15 just to do a lot of damage.
Disclaimer: I am just asking a question. I am not attacking anyone. <-----In before someone assumes I am.
There are certain topics that come up all the time. They typically go the same way every time with regard to point/counterpoint. Sometimes a new person will bring up the topic again, but sometimes someone who is very aware of these topics will do so. I know this because they will say something such as "It seems the common opinion on the boards is ......"
My question is this---> What are you/they(for those who have not done so) expecting to happen? Do you have a new thought that has never been presented? Is there something that gives you a reason to think things will be different this time?
Before someone comes in and says:
"Why are you so angry?"
"If you don't like it don't read it."
or tries to perform some other mind reading attempt I will remind you, that none of those apply to this topic---> I am just asking a question.
I might not even reply unless prompted because Wraithstrike is in listening mode, not debate mode, at least for this topic. :)
PS: I am not referring to "paladin fall" threads because they normally are unique situations, even if the answer is normally clear.
PS2: I am not referring to rules threads either such as stealth and grapple.
The spell itself says that scrying can be used to satisfy view once.
Discern Location wrote:
This spell says it gives you the exact location. However later on it says it gives you the name. Some are saying it gives you the name, but you do know where the place is, which to me means you do not know the exact location. I can drive through or to a small town without knowing the name. I can also know the name of a place I can't find so I don't see knowing where something is, and knowing the name as being equivalent.
The question is this--> How does Discern Location factor in when used with Scrying to qualify as familiarity for the Teleport spell?
In a recent thread someone pointed out that you can use aid another to aid someone who is affected by a spell, but the rule is not clear on what this aid is. It could be throwing water on someone to give them a second save. It could be using a standard action to wake someone up from a sleep spell. It could mean they actually get a +2 to any saving throw somehow.
Here is the text:
So the question is in what way can you use aid another to assist someone affected by a spell. Is it intended to give a +2 to the save against any spell or is there another meaning behind the wording?
Every time I run a campaign I try a new rule out. One of my next experiments is to change the TWF'ing rules do they take up two less feats. I was going to do this by allowing the two weapon fighting feat to scale automatically based on your BAB.
So at BAB of +6 you get your second offhand attack, and at a BAB of +11 you get the third off hand attack. However I wanted to also know if anyone else has tried this, and has it caused any problem?
Does anyone see any potential problems?
Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, Starfinder, the Starfinder logo, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc. The Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Legends, Pathfinder Online, Starfinder Adventure Path, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.