Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Shark

beej67's page

1,214 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists.


RSS

1 to 50 of 1,214 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Gauss wrote:
beej67, except that the BMI is just so wrong. It is not an accurate measurement of "fatness". Link

BMI is an accurate measure of fatness in my fantasy game world. So there.


Tin Foil Yamakah wrote:
beej67 wrote:

Limited Wish is pretty awesome, but it's expensive.

You are right on that, but our group does not play with spell components.

SM7 is never a bad choice

Well hot damn.

If your GM allows you to eschew all mat components regardless of their cost, then Limited Wish is not only the obvious choice, it's game breakingly obvious, in such a traumatic way that you can expect your GM to reverse his decision with regard to that spell within three to four gaming sessions.


Limited Wish is pretty awesome, but it's expensive.

Greater Shadow Conjuration is absolute quality for a sorcerer with a limited spell selection, and would be my choice.

Form of the Dragon II is also highly useful and you can still cast spells in the form.


I demand someone do BMI calcs for each race and rank them in order of fatness.

Go.


ALL GUNSLINGERS


Ascalaphus wrote:
@CraziFuzzy: if the 3rd-level crafter is more or less within WBL, can he even afford CL-17 items?

Candle of Invocation is the example I like to default to. Which, you know, opens a gate to another plane of existence and yanks an entity through it.

Hard to justify a world where the evil cultists don't have a crapton of those laying around, if you stick with the core crafting rules.


Even if it did, the magical beasts the Druid would have access to all suck at the allowable sizes.


More seriously, AFAIK the whole point of the Inquisitor class was to approximate the Catholic inquisitors of the past, who's primary tool to root out heresy was torture in the name of the greater good. It's, like, their whole point. I'm honestly surprised they don't have torture based CLAs in the core rules.


So you think you are strong because you can survive the soft cushions.

Well, we shall see.

Biggles! Put her in the Comfy Chair!


Oh man, if you think sneak attack is too much, wait til your players discover Power Attack.


Lincoln Hills wrote:
beej67 wrote:
...In the end, most class names aren't really in-game 'names' for what a person does. Most of them are just rules descriptors.
Yeah, the Oracle is particularly guilty here. You'd think according to the name that they'd get augury, divination and commune for free at the appropriate levels, but it turns out the majority of them have very little skill at seeing the unseen, knowing the unknown or scruting the inscrutable.

Or, you know, at least have perception as a class skill.


My male witch called himself a "hermit."

In the end, most class names aren't really in-game 'names' for what a person does. Most of them are just rules descriptors.


Vampire Druid can make sure it's always cloudy.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

We dumped it a decade ago. Best decision we ever made. We just rank when the story is done, and then pass the hat to the next Player-GM with a story to tell.


So what were the lessons like?

Was it just gaming, or were there other lesson plans tied to the game? Like, "Write a five part essay on the best way to sweep and clear goblins from a cave" or "rank these three concepts for burst DPS" or "develop a Visual Basic program that can allocate skill and attribute points on a character sheet" or something?

I'd love to see some of these lesson plans.


Ravingdork wrote:

I'm pretty creative, but I can't think of too many instances where I knowingly stretched RAW. Perhaps you could cite a few examples from the gallery.

In any case, even if you can, the point is moot. If a program doesn't have the versatility to allow you to do that, it's basically worthless in a game of imagination (which, by definition, is supposed to have far fewer limits than, say, a video game).

I paid $15 for iPad Numbers and once I had my basic framework of a spreadsheet built, I can do anything HeroLab does for no additional cost, by copy/pasting text from d20pfsrd.com.

THAT is the real great thing that Pathfinder has, imo, over 3.5. d20pfsrd.com is a fantastic resource.

I can also build in any custom buffs I want in boolean boxes, and the like, customize my sheet layout, and all the same sorts of stuff I used to do with pen and paper on blank sheets instead of with pregenned character sheets, so I don't have to play with a laptop eating up my table space. It's nice to play from a couch.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

It's at least 4.5 times more fun than mowing your lawn.


If I own a car, and the car is missing the right front wheel, then I can still probably drive that car as long as I put a bunch of weight in the back left seat and only make slow right hand turns.

Is that car "not always broken" ..?


Crystal Frasier wrote:
Um... we don't write for a target demographic.

Begging your pardon of course, but the OP shows some pretty definitive evidence to the contrary.

Liz Courts wrote:
If by "target demographic" you mean "gamers who are interested in playing and seeing all kinds of people in their choice of roleplaying game" then yes, we are writing to that demographic. :D

..and who may be slightly more interested in reading about sexy bisexual female demons than sexy bisexual male demons. At least according to the statistics presented at the beginning of the thread.

I'm not saying there's anything wrong with it. I wouldn't go to Hooters if half the wait staff was dudes in jock straps. For the record, I have brought my wife to strip bars, and if she wanted me to come with her to a similar bar with male dancers I'd do it. I probably wouldn't order the hot wings though.

This whole thing reminds me a lot of the big feminist outcry about how Marvel Comics shows women's butts and oversexualizes women's bodies in their comics. Which .. well .. yeah, but have you paid attention to what they do to men? It ain't like they're being particularly realistic with the male forms of their super heros either. I just wish everyone would lighten up and treat sex in fantasy media as fun and interesting instead of some kind of morality statement. Next month someone will post the LG dress code.


To the OP:

I said this in an earlier post, but it got bilged, perhaps because its language was judged to be too pejorative. Which it probably was. I'll try and say this more nicely.

One:
Paizo are such nice guys that they made their whole system open source. That means anyone can write an adventure path for it, not just Paizo.

Two:
Paizo are clearly writing material for a certain target demographic. Just like Marvel Comics. Or Hooters Restaurants. If you don't like the target demographic for whom they're writing, you are free to write and publish material for a different demographic.

Three:
I'm sure a certain demographic would flock to a story line driven by gay incubi NPCs, and if you believe that market is large enough to turn a profit on an adventure path, you should write one for that market and get rich. There is nothing structurally within the rules that prevents such an adventure path from being written, so they are not discriminating. They are merely meeting what they perceive to be the demand. Just like Hooters. Or Marvel Comics.


The way we solve this in our campaign is by making all male elves gay.


The NPC wrote:
What were they running from?

Thanos.


The CR system was built for your problem.

Shoot for 3-5 monsters and follow the CR rules in the GMing guidelines. Run the encounter, see how well they do. If they spank it, add 1 to the CR of the next encounter. If they spank that, add one more. You can easily manipulate CR on the fly between encounters by adding the advanced template, or adding an extra monster.

It's harder to do this with NPCs, so try to stick to some monster-only fights for a bit. Use the monster template generator over on d20pfsrd to swap templates in and out. Once you get a firm grasp on what CR your party is actually performing at, draw up your NPC encounters to properly entertain that CR.


Epic charades game.


Need goblin for the +4 dex.

So would you do a 50/50 Monk/Fighter then? If you're going to go Monk/fighter, why go with "unarmed fighter," when you get most of that from Many Style Monk anyway? Wouldn't there be a better fighter template to adopt?


Never has a PC needed an immovable rod more than this guy.

(Y'all do know you can sink boats with those things, right?)


Mathius wrote:

I am going to be running Skull and shackles soon. I know the player a monk is going to want to be launched from a siege engine as means of boarding an enemy vessel.

Pretty sure a huge trebuchet can launch him but I am not sure how I should run the actual mechanics. He wants to end up near the rigging and use slow fall to avoid damage.

1)

Make sure you roll to hit to see if the trebuchet does indeed get him to the rigging. Follow the siege weapon rules.

2)
Calculate the height of the trajectory using this:
http://www.virtualtrebuchet.com/
(you can save your boat's trebuchet characteristics with a link at the bottom)

3)
Slow fall comes off that total height, as does anything he gets from rolling with the fall using acrobatics.

4)
Don't be a dork. Let him do it if the numbers work out. It's a pretty cool idea.


Dork Lord wrote:
What restrictions are there for a CN character? I'd like to hear what folks think Chaotic Neutral should truly be all about.

Not everyone has fun playing an alignment. I'm fine with players using CN as a dumping ground for unaligned PCs.


Yes but you don't get the ninja tricks to spend on the extra feats. Right? I would think that would be a slower build to the trick, with less skill points to spend, and no sneak attack dice.


But you need Improved Unarmed Strike for the Panther Claw thing as well. Won't it be something like level 10 before you get the full trick off going Monk/Fighter?


link?


Okay, so getting all the feats in line for this trick/combo within a reasonable level progression is proving difficult. Can anyone beat this?

(1) Monk 1 (Master of Many Styles) - Unarmed Strike, Panther Style, base feat Weapon Finesse
(2) Ninja 1
(3) Ninja 2 Trick: Dodge, base feat Mobility
(4) Ninja 3
(5) Ninja 4 (Scout Rouge Archetype) Scout Charge, Trick: Roll With it, Chosen feat: Underfoot
(6) Monk 2 (Master of Many Styles) - bonus feat: Panther Claw
(7) (doesn't matter) - Chosen feat: Tangle Feet

That's 7 levels to pull the whole thing off, then the thing to do in future levels is probably pick up spring attack and another combat style, since Master of Many Styles allows 2 active.

Any quicker way to do it? There's a lot of feats in there.


Oh this is cool:

Quote:
If the ninja possesses levels in another class that grants points to a ki pool, ninja levels stack with the levels of that class to determine the total number of ki points in the combined pool, but only one ability score modifier is added to the total. The choice of which score to use is made when the second class ability is gained, and once made, the choice is set. The ninja can now use ki points from this pool to power the abilities of every class she possesses that grants a ki pool.

So if a ninja splashes one level of Monk, he can tie his wisdom to the ki pool instead of his charisma, which allows a third dump stat as long as he doesn't intend on picking up CHA based ninja tricks.

Very slick, and pretty important for the Goblin with -2 CHA.


Isn't restorative touch a standard action, though? If so, it doesn't really help the action economy any, since the staggered condition will go away in a round regardless.

Panther Style is intriguing. Roll With It doesn't state it can only be used once in a round. It's conceivable this build could go bouncing around the board two or three times, and with Panther Style could make attacks at a lot of different people along the way. That's wild.

I think an agile returning dagger could be a real winner here. You Tangle Feet someone, move away, throw the dagger, and they can't pursue without falling over. Repeat. Could allow you to easily solo large targets with poor acrobatics. The returning dagger also gives you something to do in the rounds you're staggered.

After a review of Ninja, I'm leaning that way, since any of the combat feat prereqs can be taken as ninja tricks. Now, how to cram Panther Style in there. Perhaps 1 level dip in Monk to get unarmed strike, WIS AC, and Combat Reflexes, while spending Ninja tricks on the other feat prereqs for Tangle Feet. Then apply the Scout rogue template to the levels of Ninja, which again allows precision dice damage on the partial charge during the staggered round.

Yes. That sounds nice.

How much CHA does this concept really need? If I'm going with the monk/ninja spread and leaning on agile weapons, I can dump STR and INT to dirt. If I presume I'm going to be able to avoid most damage with Roll With It, I can dump CON pretty low as well.


On a reexamination, I agree. I'm not abandoning the concept yet, though.

They're both great synergies with the Acrobatics skill, and a really twinked "roll with it" character might be able to dump CON on the expectation that any major damage he takes he'll be able to avoid.

If you're building around an agile weapon, you may also dump STR, presuming you can keep your encumbrance down. Goblins get +4 DEX. Presume we dump CHA (goblin yo!) you're talking 3 dump stats and 1 stat through the roof. That alone can produce some really effective builds.

So Magus stands out to me, since rapier is kind of an obvious choice for an agile weapon build and is also a Magus staple. Could work well with single swings after movement. Seems like a long way to go, though, since Magi are so feat starved anyway. It'd be nice to catch something where the tangle feet prereqs are bonus feats. That leads me to either Monk, or some kind of Fighter multiclass.

Ninja? Idk much about them.


For me, that party makeup screams "Summoning Druid."

Gives you full column caster plus melee potential, many of the divine support spells you're lacking, as well as spontaneously cast summon fodder for the Bard to buff and to provide flanking for the Paladin. Plus, you know, all the other broken druid stuff.

And you can please all these weirdos looking for tiny PCs in their "tiny party thread" by wildshaping into tiny sized animals.


These two in combination intrigue me, but I'm not sure how best to combo them for effectiveness - in terms of what classes and other periphery feats to take.

Seems to me that any goblin build with both of them is going to lean on Weapon Finesse and an Agile weapon, so lets presume that as a starting point. (or Monk and an Agile Might Fists amulet)

What's the best route to max this combo's potential? Any ideas?


These two in combination intrigue me, but I'm not sure how best to combo them for effectiveness - in terms of what classes and other periphery feats to take.

Seems to me that any goblin build with both of them is going to lean on Weapon Finesse and an Agile weapon, so lets presume that as a starting point. (or Monk and an Agile Might Fists amulet)

What's the best route to max this combo's potential? Any ideas? My first pass seems like Monk is the way to go.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Indagare wrote:
I've said this a couple times, but I'm going to repeat it here: I really dislike "enemy races". The concept as a whole offends me. The idea that a group of adventurers is entirely justified in killing something and looting its body because it's a goblin or orc or whatever strikes me as very video-gamey.

Or, you know, "historically accurate."

Hell, it wasn't two centuries ago that people in the United States of America were totally justified in buying, selling, owning, whipping, and killing if they so chose, an entire race of people.

Shoot, the Hutus were doing that to the Tutsis a decade ago. And I can't even tell the Hutus and Tutsis apart!

Racial genocide and looting of dead corpses is sorta the way humans have always worked. And we may think we're better than that now, but we're still turning a blind eye to it whenever it suits us to do so. (Rwanda) Doesn't seem video gamey at all to me. Seems almost too real.


Follow the Yellow Brick Road. Follow the Yellow Brick Road.
Follow, follow, follow, follow,
Follow the Yellow Brick Road.
Follow the Yellow Brick, Follow the Yellow Brick,
Follow the Yellow Brick Road.

Not my kind of game either.


dot.

Let me know when you get to 18th level. I've got some highly sketchy ipad numbers spreadsheets I'm using now, which I'd love to vet against another source.


I do believe you'd forget your spell column due to dying, would you not? Might impede your ability to get a great advantage out of this in combat.

Otherwise, sounds like a great idea.


bfobar wrote:

Here is what I would do. Go along with your dominated orders and go investigate things like they tell you. At the next evil monster combat doing this task, drop a protection or magic circle against evil as a party buff.

Everybody gets another save. If some people start saving successfully, they can start dropping more protections, dispel magic, break enchantment, whatever, and break the domination in the middle of combat.

That was my first thought. Then I thought maybe having everyone switch to Liches and Grave Knights and Antipaladins and the like might make for a much more entertaining story arc.


Don't forget to make him old age category, and get "Breadth of Experience" feat.

One of the best in the game, and only available to old gnomes or elves. Also helps you crowbar your stats a little.


May I suggest ...

ANTIPALADIN!

It's a great way to kick back, relax, and justify your actions as you rule the kingdom with an iron fist. You might even be able to convince your GM to allow you to turn the tables, and take one of those succubi as your demon companion, and start giving her orders for a change.


The fundamental problem with synthesist is that it broke the same thing Druids broke in 3.5, in that it allows you to dump three physical stats and then replace them. All you need to do, to fix synthesist, is put it back on the same sort of track that Druid is in Pathfinder, since that was implemented to fix the same problem the last time around.

(why the modern paizo developers made the same error with synthesist that the previous round of guys made with druid is another question, I suppose)

So instead of having it replace physical stats, have it modify them.

In other words, do this:

Quote:

You might find this topic interesting: http://paizo.com/threads/rzs2pga0&page=1?Synthesist-Reborn

There they also rebuild the synthesist summoner and one of the things they did is that it's more like polymorph effects. for example the eidolon gives an enhancement bonus to your physical stats instead of replacing them. Instead of getting temporary hitpoint it simply increases your constitution. They also make some things, like pounce, available from level 4 instead of level 1. I'm using that rebuild synthesist summoner version now and it's working quite well so far and it's very clear how it works, compared to the mess which is the standard synthesist summoner.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I don't see how you can have this discussion without first establishing the setting. "Pathfinder" is just the set of physics and metaphysics in which characters (PCs and NPCs) live. It has nothing to do with sex.

If your setting is Greek, then your male leads are going to banging each other in the hangar while the women stay at home and raise little Greeks. If your setting is Norse, then your male leads are going to be raping village wenches every time they hit the shore line, and probably lopping the heads off any homosexuals they find. If your setting is Japanese, then your samurai are going to be offered the choice of sleeping with village cortesans who are either adult females or underage males, whenever they show up to a town.

I think pretty much all other settings fall somewhere inside those extremes. But any attempt to pull this question out of a setting is meaningless, because it's a culture dependent question.


Artanthos wrote:
beej67 wrote:

Strength 8 power attack, eh?

The DM made a questionable decision.

I wonder why all the other players aren't equally completely exploiting the Dervish Dancer feat as well. Also all the monsters.

Seems to me the thing to do is get the whole rest of the party to dump STR to an 8 as well, and splash one level in Bard:Dervish.


Strength 8 power attack, eh?


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Because that way Cthulhu eats you first!

1 to 50 of 1,214 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2014 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.