|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I was surprised by the wholesale rejection of the Bloc in Quebec. That's very good news for the country as a whole. I'm disappointed by the Harper majority - the contempt of Parliament conviction and the Bev Oda scandal are very important to me - but I'm heartened that the NDP can oppose every little details without running into the minority Parliament brinksmanship that Harper excels at. As for the Liberals being crushed...well, we saw the PCs reduced to two seats in 1993 and then rise again after a merger with the righter-wing (remember, US readers, our most right-wing politician is still somewhat to the left of Bernie Saunders by your reckoning [grin]) Reform Party...so the Grits will return. Interesting times...especially with all the neophyte NDP MPs. My riding elected a freshly graduated high school teacher. Let's see what she can do! GregH wrote:
There's orange everywhere! And yet, west of Quebec, it's looking mighty blue... It's Federal Election Day! We've had four minority governments in a row...is this the election where we have a party in the majority, or will we have a new flavour of minority Parliament. No matter which party you support, in a race this tight, your vote matters (if nothing else, it's worth 2 bucks in federal campaign funding to your party for the next election). Polls close in four hours (EST)...I'm looking forward to a night of watching the results! pres man wrote:
It's a glorified Tinkerbell outfit, not a thong. My daughter wears stuff like that all the time. Kevin Mack wrote: Wolverines son turned him into dog food but dont worry he got better (if being a frankinstine style monster can be classed as better) Ironicly this makes me prefer the character a lot more. Wolverine has a son? Norman Osborne isn't dead? Kidz these days with their crazy comics. They're destroying the fabric of our society! I'm going back to my cave and wait for Jim Shooter's latest revamp of Magnus Robot Fighter and Solar, Man of the Atom. fray wrote: I'm curious to see what people think of these books. I wrote lengthy reviews of them for the d20zines site, and eventually cross-posted the links in my reviews of books in the Paizo store. Here's the link to my review of the fourth volume, which contains links to the earlier three books: Warlords of the Accordlands: The Campaign Adventure In short, I loved 'em (because I'm a huge fan of the CCG setting). Mechanically, it's on the thin edge between wonky-cool and wonky-broken. Montalve wrote:
This is the most oddly compelling thread I've followed on Paizo in ages! I guess I should thank you! (and them!) I'm building up a set of free quickstart/demo RPG products for a project, and this is a great addition. I work on the theory that the heart of the game is what can be summarized in the quickstart - it'll be interesting to see what WotC considers the heart of 4e...and then to compare the quickstart rules here with those in the Starter Set (who knows, maybe they're identical). The Painted Oryx wrote:
Really? I was there at the beginning of March, and the walls were full of stuff! That's disppointing. I'm from Montreal, and I only get out West every couple of years, but the Comic Shop is one of my regular stops. Erik Mona wrote:
Really, you could use the banhammer on these topics right now and I'd be thrilled. I'm tired of the same dozen or posters unwilling to change their mind and unable to change the subject. d13 wrote:
::applause:: Andrew Turner wrote: As bad as us recycling British TV ideas is the fact that we don't tend to publicize the fact--I wouldn't be surprised to learn that most Americans have no idea The Office is a BBC clone; and most of us would probably think you stole it from Hollywood. We're very Chekovian that way... Heck, Three's Company was a remake of a British show...it's been going on for a long time. Pop'N'Fresh wrote: Wow, 20 bucks, that is cheap! I have the other 3 books in PDF format for this, but I am wondering if this will be useful to me as I do not use the d20 system. I use Savage Worlds, which tends to be rules-light. The only thing I'm really interested in with this book is the fluff that goes along with all the races, classes, gear, and such. For instance, are the organizations of each of the prestige classes presented in this book in any kind of detail, aside from what is mentioned in the Atlas? This is mostly d20 crunch compared to the other books, but there's stil lots of good fluff for the races and classes, not so much for gear. There's a surprising amount of fluff for the race/class combos (an elf fighter gets different feats than a nothrog fighter, for example). The prestige class organizations are mentioned, but not detailed. Arnwyn wrote: "What do you mean I can't get all the older products that previously came out?" The exclusivity aspect has always been controversial. I've always thought "the more, the merrier" when it comes to letting new patrons access old works, since all the heavy creative lifting has already been done prior to publication. They're buying a product, not buying into a project, as it were. Besides, more money to the creators encourages more patronage projects. On the other hand, exclusivity has a certain cachet to it - my inner Smaug is perfectly happy to treat the OD books like treasures in the hoard - and patrons do generally feel pride in their ownership of the finished work. It's nice to know that the work is always going to be a rarity - and it's a good way to entice patrons to buy in. As business models go, there's certainly a trade-off between guaranteed, though limited, patron sales, versus potentially unlimited, though vastly uncertain, general public sales. hogarth wrote: The idea is interesting, but it's definitely not for me. I like to see a finished product for myself and/or see positive reviews before I buy anything. For instance, I wouldn't even buy a Paizo adventure path until all of the modules were published and I could get them all at once (yay for the Shackled City hardcover!). On the other hand, you can guide the direction of the project before it's published by participating in the polls and forum discussions. If you sign up at the basic patron levels (I know OD offers one, and so does Rite Publishing), you pay a lower price that reduces the financial risk of disappointment. That's what I did for the first Open Design - I signed up for the lowest possible level, saw how the project evolved, loved the finished product, and then kept up my membership ever since. (DISCLOSURE - I'm the regular layout kobold on the OD projects, and have been ever since I got my hands on the elusive Steam & Brass). Craig Shackleton wrote:
You're right - Erikson is a gamer. The whole Malazan series is his homebrew campaign setting, along with writing partner/fellow gamer Ian Cameron Esselmont. The books are all extraordinarily bewildering and good. I'm on volume 7 right now - Reaper's Gale - with volume 8 - Toll the Hounds - sitting on my bookshelf. And I just saw Cameron's prequel, the Crimson Guard, at a store. I need more time! Daigle wrote: I use AVG. I second that. I've never had any problems, and it's saved my files on a couple of occasions. Jeremy Mac Donald wrote:
Yup! The quickstart rules are clear and consistent, and there's more enough material to create multiple adventures - although you will always have to use the same pregen characters, which, as others have pointed out, is kind of a downer. I have to say that I'm impressed with the mini-Monster Manual at the back of the DM booklet. Reading up on the monsters was what got me hooked on the game, way way back in the day. I picked up the 4e D&D Starter Set at my FLGS this afternoon, flipped over the box to read the contents...and saw a new d20 logo on the back! I didn't know they'd keep using that trademark, especially since the books with the 3.5 version of the d20 logo aren't at all compatible...but, there you go. I think that's neat.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
