Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
White Dragon

Xexyz's page

Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber. 1,070 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists.


RSS

1 to 50 of 1,070 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber
Aron Kir wrote:
Recharge this card to add 1d6 plus the scenario's adventure deck number to any Strength, Melee, or Disable check by a character at your location; then if you don't have a role card, bury any cards that have the Liquid trait.

The art for this card depicts a character that looks a little tipsy... I like to think that you have to banish liquid trait cards because he drinks all your booze - or at least everything he thinks is booze. Please tell me this is the case with the character in the AP.


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber
Sandslice wrote:
Bad news on Barracuda Aiger: choosing not to acquire him is the same thing isn't evading him; it's choosing to fail to acquire him. You still discard if your non-check doesn't have Squashbuckling.

He only forces you to discard cards if your check to acquire lacks the swashbuckling trait. Since you can choose not to make the attempt, he's banished before you would even get to that step.


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber

I'm pretty sure there's been a discussion of what everyone's favorite card is, so I want to talk about something different: that card you hate. You know, the one card that makes you grit your teeth and fume every time it turns up. Three in particular come to mind for me:

Barracuda Aiger - before I realized I wasn't forced to try to acquire him, I hated his guts. I'd seemingly always encounter him and immediately have to discard cards because I didn't have swashbuckling. Now that I know I don't have to try to get him, he doesn't bother me so much.

Coral Capuchin - I don't think anyone's surprised by this. Is there a more useless ally in existence? You can't explore with him, which of course automatically disqualifies him from the majority of ally consideration. But not only can you not explore with him, you can't recharge or discard him for his power - which to my knowledge is the only ally in the game that works like this - so he just sits in your hand and takes up valuable space. And his power sucks; revealing him and discarding another card for a d6 or situational d10 is extremely weak. I'm pretty sure in all my games of S&S, no one has ever voluntarily picked this ally up.

And to top it all off he's neither basic nor elite, so he never goes away. He's like herpes.

Ivory Dice - I hate this damn card. I almost always run scouting cards when I can, so seeing this card show up when there's a location whose contents I've carefully ordered makes me rageface. Inevitably, I'll fail the purely random roll to pick it up - which I'm forced to make, by the way, since the card instructs me to make the roll as soon as I encounter it - and it will find its way into the location I've scouted and screw everything up. I've never forget the time when my Seoni scryed a disintegrate spell to the top of a deck and was planning on getting it as soon as her turn popped up, when the following happened:

-Another player at another location encountered the Ivory Dice and failed to pick them up.
-The Ivory Dice ended up in the location I scryed, forcing a shuffle.
-The villain happened to be in that deck and we encountered it before the disintegrate.
-The villain was defeated, and my precious disintegrate made its way back to the box.

I will never, ever, forgive the Ivory Dice for that.


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber

After much deliberation, I ended up choosing Hexer. I chose that role mostly due to the fact that at the end of deck 3 we had yet to even encounter a Blessing of Hshurha - let alone acquire one - while I picked up my fifth Pharasma during the last scenario.

I chose the Pharasma recharge power for my first ability. Haven't decided what my next power will be though.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber
Rynjin wrote:
TBH I think it's barely worth a 2nd level spell slot.

I wouldn't even waste a 1st level spell slot on it. It lasts 1 round per 2 levels, and to make it so that it only affects ammo from one direction - so your enemies' arrows don't also gain its effects - the duration is cut in half. So a 9th level wizard casting the spell to only benefit her allies would have a duration of a whopping 2 rounds.

Awful, awful, spell.


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber

The scenario Wardstone Legacy says:

The Wardstone Legacy wrote:
When you play a blessing that has the Iomedae trait, you may put it on top of another character's deck instead of discarding it. When you play any other blessing and it does not have the Corrupted trait, banish it and replace it with a random blessing that has the Corrupted trait from the box.

So, what happens if there aren't enough blessings with the Corrupted trait in the box to grab?


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber
Jaunt wrote:
I'm with Haveatya. If the PCs are constantly interloping, by all means, use it as an opportunity to ambush them. But on the other hand, if they're just friends with a guy who has a valuable book...trade him for the book. Unless they really fear retribution, this seems like a case of Lawful Evil vs Stupid Evil.

So I've been thinking about this and you're right; the most logical course of action is a straight exchange. However that's not necessarily very exciting for the players, so it's my job to spruce it up.

Eltacolibre wrote:

Alright going to assume since she is suffering and hatred, analogue wise, can go for something like Zon-Kuthon.

So clerics with Erinye and shadows are approriate.

With pain and suffering as the theme:

-Humanoid Vampires (Monster codex has a few them) could be good ones too.
-Kytons are excellent with theme of pain and suffering, Kyton evangelists and Kyton Sacristan would be the recommended ones here, depend how many of them with the setup.

-Scarred Rager (barbarian)
-Vivisectionist (Alchemist)
-Rangers (Favored enemies)
-Bone devils with inquisitor levels.

I'll think about some appropriate enemies; Shaeleen is Chaotic Evil so devils aren't exactly thematic. Kytons are a possibility given their theme, though I'd have to work out the alignment differences.


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber
Jaunt wrote:
I'm with Haveatya. If the PCs are constantly interloping, by all means, use it as an opportunity to ambush them. But on the other hand, if they're just friends with a guy who has a valuable book...trade him for the book. Unless they really fear retribution, this seems like a case of Lawful Evil vs Stupid Evil.

The PCs have other motivations as well. Followers of the church attacked the home village of a couple of the PCs and murdered several villagers, including the family of the captive. The captive (who is a former PC whose player had to leave the game due to scheduling conflicts) doesn't want to give them the book since his family died to protect it from the evil church.

So it's likely even if they completed the trade the PCs would still want justice for their village.

Also, the church wants the captive dead in the end because he's a witch.


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber
Eltacolibre wrote:

Like is it happening in Golarion or homebrew setting? Is it a specific evil cult (like worshiping a certain deity, Great Old one) etc...as people part of an evil church, while they can do the same thing as mentioned above, people worshiping Asmodeus for example, will favor magic and trickery. People worshiping a martial deity, would have battle clerics and warpriests. People worshiping Cthulhu would have aberrations and the likes with them. People worshiping a long dead serpent god could be serpentfolks etc...

Usually I tend to go with the theme of the deity first, as people dedicating their life and religious beliefs to one, tend to act a certain way.

It's a homebrew game, and the captors are followers of Shaeleen, the Goddess of hatred and suffering.


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber

@Eltacolibre - What additional details would be helpful?

@Hogeyhead - The public meeting place has potential. I'll have to think carefully about how to set one up, since the evil church is outlawed everywhere and any members who are identified as such would be hunted by their nemesis faith.


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber

For the past couple of sessions the PCs have been trying to find and rescue their friend, who has been abducted by an evil church. He was abducted because he has a book that they want, and they've been torturing him to try to find its location.

The PCs have access to the book, and have been communicating with their imprisoned friend via sending spells. They've told their friend that they found the book and want to set up an exchange with his captors; his freedom for the book. He has relayed this to his captors who have told him they're amenable to such an exchange and will give him a time, date, and location for the exchange (they've correctly assumed that he's communicating with the PCs via sendings.

Naturally, being the evil bastards they are, they don't intend to honor any exchange agreement; they'll try to kill the PCs and take the book. What I'm looking for are some proposal ideas for setting up an interesting encounter for the six PCs, who just reached 10th level last session. I've got two weeks to come up with something.


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber
wraithstrike wrote:

So is it th degree or the knowledge that is giving you problems?

Also how much of the game are you willing to rewrite?

I'll do a little. I'll adjust prices based on the area the PCs are in. I try not to think about the rest because it'll just make my brain hurt.


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber
Ross Byers wrote:
If you can accept the Pathfinder ecology, you should be able to accept the economy.

I don't have a degree in biology or zoology so I'm cool there. I do have a degree in economics though, so it's more difficult for me to look past the economic nonsense of the game.


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber
Jeff Merola wrote:
Each ray.

Do you have a source?


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber

This came up last session: A party member with fire resistance got hit by several rays from a single scorching ray spell. Does his fire resistance apply to each ray or only once for the whole spell?


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber

Thanks Hawkmoon. I don't have a pdf editor so I ended up creating an MS Word doc that had everything on one page.


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber
Samasboy1 wrote:


Bestiary, Ability Scores, pg 6 wrote:
The creature’s ability scores are listed here. Unless otherwise indicated, a creature’s ability scores represent the baseline of its racial modifiers applied to scores of 10 or 11. Creatures with NPC class levels have stats in the standard array (13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8), while creatures with character class levels have the elite array (15, 14, 12, 11, 10, 8); in both cases, the creature’s ability score modifiers are listed at the end of its description.

So, since Mongrelmen have less than 4 Racial HD and no levels in any class....

+4 Str, +2 Dex, +4 Con, +2 Wis, -4 Cha

Just like David said.

If it had more HD, you would have to figure where its ability increase went, and if it had levels it would use one of the arrays.

Don't forget, if you add levels to a monster with racial HD you add +4, +4, +2, +2, +0, and –2 adjustments to their ability scores, assigned in a manner that enhances their class abilities.

That's what I thought too, but where I'm getting hung up is that it conflicts with the few examples listed in the ARG. For example, the stats in the bestiary for the ogre are as follows:

Str 21
Dex 8
Con 15
Int 6
Wis 10
Cha 7

So if you apply the rule in the Bestiary you end up with +10 Str, -2 Dex, +4 Con, -4 Int, +0 Wis, and -2 Cha. However, according to the ARG an ogre's modifiers are +6 Str, -2 Dex, +2 Con, -2 Int, and -2 Cha.

Does any one know if it's a deliberate change between the Beastiary and ARG, or merely an oversight?


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber

Hmm...

I've used all three methods but haven't been able to match them to the racial modifiers listed in the Race Guide. The 13,12,11,10,9,8 array comes the closest, but it's still off. Are the racial modifiers listed in the race guide different for some reason?


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber

Is there any way to manipulate the PDF so the deck list fits on one sheet?


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber
Frencois wrote:
First World Bard wrote:


Nothing says Balazar can't start with Cures.
You don't have any in your initial deck as per the rulebook... So by the book you need to acquire them. Which is far from easy with your wisdom....

The deck lists in the back of the rulebook are only suggestions. Per the rules when constructing your character deck for the first time you can have any boons with the basic trait. So Balazar can in fact start with cures if he wants.


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber
David knott 242 wrote:

Since this creature has racial hit dice, you subtract 10 (if the ability score is even) or 11 (if the ability score is odd) from the listed ability score. In the case of the Mongrelman, that gives you:

Str +4
Dex +2
Con +2
Int +0
Wis +2
Cha -4

Nice! This was exactly what I was looking for. Is this written down somewhere in a book by chance?


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber

Is some baseline stat array monsters get that I can use in order to derive what a creature's racial bonuses might be? For example, the mongrelman from the beastiary has the following stats:

Str 14
Dex 13
Con 15
Int 10
Wis 12
Cha 7

So given this, is there a way to determine what the mongrelman's racial bonuses are so I can use a different baseline array or a point buy in order to generate a different set of stats?


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber

Crowe's been pretty challenging to play so far. His hand cycles poorly due to starting with 5 weapons and 2 spells he has to banish to cast. If he could actually pick up boons I could use his bury ability a little more freely but with 4 blessings and 0 (1 now that I spent a card feat) allies he has few explores.

Once I complete AD1 and am able to get the Arcane Skill for him with his power feat and a Life Drain and scale, I think things will start to go better for him.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber
kestral287 wrote:
She basically has to do this to survive, honestly. Even then it's a gamble-- do those in power know where she is and that she isn't, ah, particularly fond of them?

Haven't really thought that far into it yet. So far this is all just a hypothetical in my head; she doesn't yet exist in my game and there is no Dragon Guard - though if I continue to develop this little story I'll likely find somewhere to include it.

What I was going for originally is a morally complex character to present to my group when the time is right - someone whom the PCs will sit and debate among themselves as to what the best course of action is toward approaching the entire situation. As it stands, I'm really liking the idea of her being LE and glad that LE being her alignment seems to be the most common response. The PCs are pretty much good and neutral alignments (CG barb, LN magus, NG sorc, N inqu, NG cleric, N ranger) so her being LE but having a sympathetic backstory can serve - I'm hoping - to divide up the party nicely.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber
Tacticslion wrote:


This is one thing I'm curious about. I may have missed it in the OP's posts somewhere, but does she have an "official" death-warrant on her head, yet, or merely the (presumably illegal?) assassination attempts? It was my understanding that she was thrown out but not condemned to death... except by a few acting illegally.

The way I see it in my head she was dismissed from the Dragon Guard and while she was in the midst of returning to her village is when some corrupt members of the guard tried to murder her. She killed most of the would-be assassins but didn't pursue those that fled - who in turn reported back to their superiors that she was the aggressor who killed them out of revenge. Murder of her fellow guardsmen was added to the list of offenses that was used to justify kicking her out in the first place, but they didn't pursue her after that out of a combination of knowing the truth about the incident, desire to put things behind them, and fear of her. So she was never officially charged with murder, and instead the story was concocted that she attempted to murder her fellow guardsmen and was killed in the attempt.

She's not really aware of all of that; she simply fought off her attackers and continued back toward her village.

One thing I think may be relevant is that in order to protect her village from suspicion is that she waits until after visiting guard/nobles she marks for death leave her village and carefully plans their executions to ensure their deaths are unlikely to be traced back to her village, even if it means waiting weeks for the opportunity. So even though she's driven by anger and hatred, she's not stupid.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber
Grey_Mage wrote:


Does she defend the village because she knows the area and inhabitants, and this means she can lash out with a modicum of safety? This could empower her to use the villagers as an excuse to lash out at nobility. In this case she'd be NE. Even if she handed out the money and valuables she gained, its really only seed money to ensure future village loyalty towards her.

Does she defend it out of loyalty to the village and simply sees herself more aware of the threat than others? If shes absolutely sure the legal system is incapable of dealing with these knights, she could even be CG.

I'm thinking she does so for two reasons. First, because she loves her village and wants to protect it from monsters so the citizens can live peaceful lives.

The second reason is pride. Selflessly protecting the village (she receives no pay or compensation for doing so) proves that she truly embodies the principles of the Dragon Guard and therefore is morally superior to those [Dragon Guard & nobles] who do not. Therefore she still considers herself a fundamentally good person and can excuse herself for getting angry and killing them occasionally for minor transgressions.


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber

From a lawfulness standpoint, how much difference is there between these two scenarios:

1. The Dragon Guard have a code of conduct they're supposed to uphold, so any guardsman who comes to her village and sullies that code disgraces the Dragon Guard with his actions and must be punished with death. In the end, whether or not he lives or dies depends on his adherence to the code.

2. The Dragon Guard have a code of conduct they're supposed to uphold. She watches any guardsman who comes to her village for any transgression against the code, and then uses any misstep as justification for indulging in her hatred and killing him out of anger. In the end, whether or not he lives or dies depends on his adherence to the code.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber

Holy crap lots of responses and lots of alignment opinions.

-She has no interest in trying to reform nobles or the Dragon Guard. She tried that when she was a member and her reward was to be charged with false crimes as a pretense for kicking her out. While she recognizes there are still some decent and honorable members of the Dragon Guard, the nobles are corrupt, one and all.

-The amount of slack she's willing to cut visiting nobles/guard is inversely proportional to how much she hates those particular individuals. Which she believes nobles to be corrupt, she's willing to allow them to remain unharmed if they act like decent, honorable individuals toward the people of her community. On the other hand, if one of the guard who conspired against her were to show his face in her community she'd kill him on sight unless he immediately upon seeing her he grovelled before her in apology and convinced her that he was repentant - and even then it might not save him.

-Some examples of "disrespect" that she would kill a noble for: Striking or otherwise harming a commoner for not prostrating before them, ripping off or intimidating a shopkeeper to get an unfair deal, general bullying, and needless to say any behavior that's even worse.

-While she's utterly ruthless toward the objects of her hatred, the vast majority of her days are spent protecting her community - since it's somewhat remote nobles/dragon guard rarely visit or pass through; maybe a few times per year.


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber

Not sure if this should go here or in general discussion. Anyway, here's a character:

She's from a small village in a remote part of the country. Growing up her dream was to become a member of the Dragon Guard - an elite division of the military whose role is to protect the citizens from rampaging and otherwise troublesome monsters. The happiest day of her life was when she gained acceptance into their ranks after proving her strength and capability. Unfortunately, her idealism was soon challenged when she learned that the vast majority of the Dragon Guard were the children of the nobility whose acceptance into the order was mostly due to familial connections instead of ability. She was looked down upon due to her common origins, but rose in rank due to her outstanding skills and prowess - which only brought more resentment from her genteel comrades.

Her idealism was further eroded when she began to realize that the Dragon Guard had fallen far from its purpose as protectors of the citizens and instead become a tool for noble families to use for their own political intrigues. Her attempts to combat the corruption of the guard ended in disaster as certain members, jealous of her strength and disgusted by her convictions and roots as a commoner, conspired against her and got her framed for trumped up charges. She was stripped of her rank and expelled from the Dragon Guard in disgrace.

Her dreams shattered, she made her return to her village. Dismissal not enough for some of the conspirators, they attempt to then assassinate her but are killed by her in the attempt. She's charged in absentia for their murders, but not really pursued as those in charge prefer to simply let the matter be at rest.

She returns to her village and decides to protect it herself, and doing so very successfully. She tries her best to forget about her past but the anger of being betrays still burns within her. Occasionally some members of the Dragon Guard will pass through her village, and she tolerates it so long as they act in accordance of the Dragon Guard's principles - protecting the village from monsters and in exchange enjoying the hospitality of the village, as is tradition. However, if they neglect their duties or don't treat the villagers respectfully, she kills them. She hates the nobility even more, and if any nobles visit the village and treat the commoners badly she kills them as soon as she can do so without putting the village at risk or giving herself away. Her hatred of the nobility is immense and as far as she's concerned they're the reason the Dragon Guard became corrupt. Any amount of disrespect or mistreatment toward herself or the common people by a noble merits a death sentence in her eyes.

So, given this background, what alignment best fits her?


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber
Vic Wertz wrote:
Whether or not you read the cards in advance is part of what Mike refers to as "the social contract"—the code of "outside-the-rulebook rules" that each gaming group develops. (Other "social contract" issue include things like whether or not players are allowed to make decisions that harm other players, or how you divvy up Loot cards.) We avoid making rules that impinge on the social contract (though we occasionally have to make them for Organized Play in particular. But I will say that the designers do *not* assume that the players have read cards outside of play.

I always read all of the cards when I get a new deck/set, but always forget about them immediately after I read them, especially the banes. Often times I'll encounter a villain, then encounter it again at another location the next turn or two and will have already forgotten everything about it. Even important stuff like the nasty things it does to me before I can attempt a check to defeat it.

So I guess I have the best of both worlds.


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber
Jason S wrote:

While I fully realize campaign loot and boons are more powerful, I thought it would be more interesting to pick from the class decks.

I'd also classify some of the promo cards as some of the most powerful cards in the game as well.

Weapon: Invigorating Kukri (recharges to heal). For characters with a lot of weapons (and probably no healing), the flexibility this weapon offers is great.

Spells: Bewilder (more explorations) and Life Leech (arcanist heal spell).

Armor: Reflecting Buckler. Reduces almost all damage by 2 with the option to reveal and recharge it.

Items: Staff of Heaven and Earth. Diverse, can buff combat or remove barriers.

Allies: Fortune-Teller. The ultimate exploration ally.

Blessings: Nethys in a 6 player game (how can you beat exploration, scouting and evasion in a single card?), Lamashtu (or any blessing that will buffs your combat) in 4 player, Gozreh solo/duo.

I actually prefer Dominate to Bewilder. Being able to look at an entire deck and grab the best boon in it is incredible.


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber

My group just played through the base set adventure. No deaths, but most scenarios weren't won until there were 5 or so blessings left. Some thoughts I have:

1. At least with my group, some of the 'difficulty' of the set is due to people not re-adjusting their playstyle having gone from advanced characters to starting characters.

2. Maybe it's just because it's the base set, but boons seem really weak. It seemed there were hardly any upgrades over the basic cards people started with.

3. Things are more extreme than in previous sets. For example, of the 25 barriers that come in the base set, 9 don't do any harm at all, while the remaining 16 tend to be very vicious. Also compare locations such as the Manor House and Armory to places like the Abbatior and Torture Chamber.


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber
Lisa Stevens wrote:
PS: It is good to have cards that you hate in the game. Makes you feel really good when you overcome them. It is like triumphing against adversity.

Stuff like that fills me with dread more than actual hate; but I agree you need cards like this. The anxiety of going through a heavy-barrier deck and running across Crawling Cyclops Hand or Albatross Soup ensured I kept a blessing around for such occasions.

(As far as actual hate, I don't think I'll ever hate a card as much as I hate the Ivory Dice.)


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber

Here are the pros of each role as I see them.

Sea Witch:

++Ability to recharge instead of discard an ally to get a spell back.
++Blessing of Hshurha is better than Blessing of Pharasma. Also being able to recharge a blessing on any aquatic bane check is better than recharging to pick up an ally.
+Getting +2d4 on a Fortitude and eventually Survival check.
+Being able to move after closing a location.

Hexer:

++Succeed at a Craft and eventually Arcane check to potentially draw a card.
+Recharge Blessing of Pharasma.
+Swap an evaded monster for one in the box.

I'll have to see how deck 3 plays out. If I can get my hands on some Blessings of Hshurha I'll definitely go Sea Witch, but if not I may end up going Hexer since I already have 4 Blessings of Pharasma.


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber

Speaking of Ekkie, is she being released as a playable character ala Ranzak?


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber

I'm playing Feiya with my friend playing Heggal and we're about to start deck 3. I'm leaning Sea Witch but haven't decided yet, but I have 4 Blessings of Pharasma already and no Blessings of Hshurha.

Any Feiya players want to chime in?


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber

But that's not until after our game today! *whine*


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber

They're not on the downloads page yet and everyone in my group is chomping at the bit to get them.


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber
Orbis Orboros wrote:
Calthaer wrote:
Elizabeth Corrigan wrote:
As long as there's no goose in the rigging.
It's my initial estimate is that the Demonic Horde barrier (IIRC that's the name of the card - the one where a random party member has to fight the servitor, times the number of party members) is going to be more...provocative...than any of the ones already mentioned.
Wait, so if it's encountered in a party of six, some poor random schmuck in the party has to fight something SIX times?

Not exactly. Each character randomly chooses a character to encounter the demon. So only if you're really unlucky will one character have to fight all of them.


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber

When will the WotR character sheets be available for download?


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber

I also didn't get Andowyn's character card; I double-checked and there were 110 cards in the box.


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber

I was looking at this since I have some ideas for custom monsters in my campaign, but the process looks a little intimidating.


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber

I'm a subscriber, so it looks like I should be getting it soon?


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber

I thought the game didn't come out until the 27th. What's going on?


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber
Casual Mishap wrote:
Heavily, since they wear heavy armour.

And easily, since most don't put a lot into Dex.


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber
bookrat wrote:
I'll add on to it from an in-game point of view: most people in a polythiestic society freely worship all deities, depending on the prayer and the associated events (harvest, travel, etc...). I would easily consider these worshipers to be devoted for the purposes of your spell restrictions.

OMG, this is a great point and one I totally forgot about when I first posted. You're right, most of the people in the world would be Polytheistic: A farmer gets up in the morning and says a prayer to Belan, God of Wind and the Sky, because she needs the rains to come so her crop will be successful. That evening at dinner she and her family offers thanks to Redeif, God of Wealth and the Hearth for the prosperity they enjoy, and at night before she goes to bed she offers thanks to Lynnain, Goddess of Life, for the fact she and her family are healthy.

So having rethought this, now I'm more inclined to think that the good and neutral gods would not be so strict, but the evil gods would.


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber
Grey_Mage wrote:

What happens to the souls of the fallen?

If they go to the plane of their deity, then your idea works perfectly, as the deity's followers "release" the soul as the spell is cast. The deity may choose release the soul soul even if someone outside the faith casts raise dead.

If they go to an underworld, like Hades, you can flavor the spell effect as the deity's minions mount an escape for it. In this case the deity and followers wouldn't take this risk for someone outside their faith.

Hmmm... I haven't really thought about this.


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber

@Decimus - Witches are looked down upon in my homebrew world by divine types not just because of being able to raise dead but because of the source of their magic period.

As far a the scroll issue is concerned I looked back on my notes and can't find evidence I gave the PCs a scroll of Raise Dead like I thought I did, so it may be a moot issue.

@VRMH - I was thinking along those lines. Something like if you're not a follower of the god you can get raised but you'll owe the faith a service (in addition to the normal cost of being raised).

@archmagi1 - Yeah, I really like the idea of having to go to some witch in order to get raised if you want to avoid a church.


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber
Decimus Drake wrote:

I think it depends on how likely death is for your players and how accessible alternative means raising the dead are. Also it could be considered unfair if you're only just introducing this restriction to a game in progress. As a player I'd be ok with such a restriction if I'm made aware of it before I create my character so that I can take it into consideration.

I do kind of like the idea from a thematic stand point though. Will you be having witches and if so how does their ability to raise the dead relate to these pantheons?

1. I would be introducing this in game.

2. One of my players had a witch character (player unfortunately had to quit due to scheduling conflicts) so it's established they exist. Witches in my game however are looked upon with suspicion by divine types and keep a low profile. Since they're not divine casters, however, their raise spells would work as normal.
3. The one thing I'm not so sure about are those spells being cast from scrolls. The PCs do have a scroll of raise dead in their possession, so it's something I'd have to figure out.


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber

My group is pretty large so people missing sessions is quite common. We'll always go back to let someone play a scenario they missed so long as it's within 1 deck of where the advanced characters are. Myself and a couple other regulars have several characters going at once, so we usually have an appropriately advanced character to play with those who lag behind.

1 to 50 of 1,070 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2015 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.