I received the poster in the rolled cardboard container and the container was damaged. When I pulled out the poster it was crinkled and ripped the entire left side of the poster because of the package being damaged. Product - Pathfinder Module: The Dragon's Demand Marketing Poster Rolled Can I send it back or submit pictures to get a new one.
danielc wrote: Just curious, is this site still active? The link to their forum no longer works. The database is still usable and can keep track of your miniature collection, but not active per say. Maybe he has not put attention towards the project. Kor - Orc Scrollkeepr wrote: I have spoken to the current host and the site is essentially still active. The host is interested in adding Pathfinder Battles content to the site and I have offered any assistance I can provide to help make that happen. It also seems that he is able to be contacted yet and willing to do more. Hopefully this has made him want to make those links on his database active again.
I love the site and going to bookmark it.
Sara Marie wrote:
It is customer service like that is why I have stayed with you guys for 7 years. Keep up the excellent work, I could send the damaged copy back to you if you want, not a problem. Thanks again, Fred
I wanted to send a note that I received my shipment for this order and everything was great except that I ended up with a damaged copy of Pathfinder Adventure Path #43: Haunting of Harrowstone (Carrion Crown 1 of 6)(PFRPG) The cover was scored, and about half of the pages look like they were tri-folded at an angle and crumbled up with a couple of pages ripped. Is there any way to fix this? Fred Victor
Hello, I placed this order with it being moved to my normal subscription order I get every month for the past 3 years and never had a problem with you guys, till now. I received everything in my order except for what I was really looking forward to, Pathfinder Adventure Path #34: Blood for Blood (Kingmaker 4 of 6)(PFRPG) Print Edition.
Fred Victor
We are. I have applied the discount to your order and sent you a new confirmation email. thanks,
Thanks for fixing that:) But, looking at my statement for my card that was charged, it shows that I was charged 44.73 on June 25th, when it should have been 40.38 just want to make sure that I am not charged for both email confirmation that was sent to me and seems I was chrged the wrong price.Thanks,
I had placed this order today, and did not receive the 15% pathfinder subscription discount. Are you guys giving this out anymore?
Dear Fred, Thank you for placing Paizo Order #954114, submitted June 24, 2008 at 07:37 AM (US/Eastern). The order contains the following items: 1 x Pathfinder Chronicles: Gazetteer (OGL) Print Edition @ 17.99 = $17.99
Subtotal (4 Items): $39.11
I have just found out the news. . . and speechless
This is a very bad year for me, to say the least. I have never met Gary, but have been a fan of D&D since 1981, and have been playing and running the game ever since. I loved what he has done for the D&D world, his vision was fantastic. One of my favorite works that he did being the Tomb of Horrors and why he created that module in the first place. The world of Greyhawk, great stuff, along with the novels that he has done from the past and the game of Dragonchess, I even created the 3D game for actual play. He has inspired me to keep my imagination going and molded me into something I am glad to have become to this day. I will never forget you Gary Gygax, my next session this sunday will be dedicated to you. I will toast my glass to you and forever rest in piece friend. This truly saddens me :( Fred Victor
Hello, I am posting this to let someone know that in order #870339 I was sent Gamemastery Module J2: Gaurdians of Dragonfall, but was suppose to receive Gamemastery Module U2: Hangman's Noose. Seems to have been some sort of mix-up when my order was picked and shipped. Can I send the module back to you and get the right module sent to me? What address would I send it too? Fred Victor
Hello, I have received order # 870339 with eager anticipation and to my surprise was sent the wrong module for my Game Mastery Module subscription. I was to get U2: Hangman’s Noose, but instead received the Game mastery Module J2: Guardians of Dragonfall. Everything else was right with the order. What would I need to do to fix this issue? Below is a copy of my order.
Fred Victor Shipped via USPS Package Service (estimated 3 to 10 business days in transit) to:
I have searched high and low for an answer. Really, would have been nice if they did clarify more on some of these spells. I do have to agree with maybe reducing the concealment bonus to a 20%, because it should be effected in some way. But within my search there are so many opinions on this matter, especially on wizards message board. For one, Faerie Fire states within its spell that you put the target in a Outlining pale glow which they do not benefit from any concealment normally provided by darkness,(magical darkness functions normally), blur, displacement, invisibility, or similar effects. Glitterdust states A cloud of golden particles covers everyone and everything in the area, causing creatures to become blinded and visibly outlining invisible things for the duration of the spell. Now there are some that say Glitterdust works the same way as Faerie Fire, but others say Glitterdust is only dust, unlike Faerie fire which is a pale glow. Glitterdust I would think reduce the concealment chance, and that you would need the other spells See Invisibility and Invisibility purge to cut through the concealment altogether. There is also an article on wizards site There, not there Parts 1 and 2
Marking an Invisible Creature: Since a visible object stays visible when an invisible creature picks it up (at least until the invisible creature tucks the object into its clothing), you may make an invisible thing visible (or at least reveal its location) by dousing it with something visible. My own favorite device for doing this is a bag packed with about a pound of flour. You could just as easily use ink or paint. Toss the bag of flour just like a splash weapon. A direct hit leaves an invisible creature smeared with flour, which reveals the creature's location. An invisible creature caught in the flour's splash effect can attempt a Reflex save (DC 20) to avoid getting covered with flour. A creature can shed its outer clothing (at least a full-round action) and be rid of the flour. Otherwise, it must bathe or wait for the flour to wear off on its own (which takes an hour or two in dry conditions). It states here about making something visible or at least reveal it's location. SO If they fail the Reflex save they lose their concealment, and if they make their save - then What? Is their concealment reduced or do they keep their concealment and you can just locate it, instead of attacking blindly for it. Now with mundane items used to spot and cover invisible like this, what of the spells in question I have been asking. Take the spells as read or figure out a happy median. Fred Victor
Within the spell it does not state anything about effecting the concealment from invisibility, just the hide checks. This would make it easier to spot an invisible creature, the reason for the outline and also for the -40 to hides checks. In the DMG page 295 it states "An invisible creature in the water displaces water, revealing its location. The invisible creature, however, is still hard to see and benefits from concealment." I would think that See Invisibility or Invisibility Purge would allow you to bypass the concealment of something invisible, because now you can see it, and glitterdust was meant to allow to pinpoint the creature more easier to spot it, reason for taking a -40 to hide check, and be able to hit it. Can some more people elaborate on this subject, would love to hear what others think on this. Fred Victor
I had a D&D session the other night. The group was attacked by a pair of invisible stalkers. The wizard cast a Glitterdust spell to help find the creatures. The argument is this, Is the Glitterdust spell capable of reducing the concealment of a creature for being invisible? As I see it, according to the spell, it helps to spot the creatures and not having to blinly look for the creature, after all the spell states "Any creature covered by the dust takes a -40 penalty to Hide checks." According to the DM guide it happens to be the same bonus to spot an Invisible being, so my understanding is that the spell just puts an end to having to pinpoint where an invisible being is at, but since it still is invisible would still get the concealment bonus. Can anyone put some other input into this, would really appreciate it. Fred Victor
Victor wrote:
It shows that there was a post left by jeff alvaraz, but I am not seeing the post listed.
I paid for 5 more subscriptions to Dragon magazine to be able to finish out the Issues to the end, and I shouls have had to only pay for 4. But my final Issue for the subscriptions are showing at #357. Fred Victor
Hey there, I have purchased 3 issues in the one order, and seen that the purchase did not take me to the end of the subscriptions for the final issue of Dragon magazine, and I think that it should have with 1 issue remaining. So I then purchased another 2 issues to try and get the the final issue to #359, and it still did not do that, it shows final issue being #358. Is there some way that this could be fixed, I have already did the transition for the extra issues for dungeon magazines, If I have purchased extra magazines for dragon, what can be done to fix it then? Fred Victor
Looking for another player for the Age of Worms Campaign. We currently have 4 players, all around 7th level with the following classes being played. Half-Orc Barbarian/Scout(7th), Half-Orc paragon races in both Half-Orc and Human(5th), Human Sorcerer(7th), and High-Elf wizard(7th). We have been playing this campaign since Oct. 2005, with all players having some good experience behind them. One has started playing D&D for the first time with this campaign. Loves the game to no end. They are currently getting ready to start the 4th Installment path of the Age of Worms, roughly within the next 4 to 5 sessions. This is a really good time to jump in with a freshly created character to join in on this campaign. New and experienced players or GMs welcome. We are looking for someone that loves them game and can play in this campaign for the long haul. I have over 23 years experience with DMing and playing all editions of D&D, and have learned from many experiences from game conventions, Gen Con, and numerous campaigns I have ran in the past. I keep up on things that can make a game fun and great to play in. I use Handouts, Background music & sound, Roleplaying of NPCs, characters with a background, the use of miniatures, both plastic and metal. We currently play in a gaming room within the household to add atmosphere to our gaming experience. We ask that someone who would be interested, that they be reliable in coming to play. We get together once every 2 weeks to play on a Sat. night, with starting time around 5 pm till midnight.
Fred Victor
A replacement is on it's way! cos Hey Cosmo Thanks, That was very prompt and quickly answered. I love the way you guys handle the customer service aspect to everyone here at Paizo. I love everything that you guys do for the gaming industry. Keep up the great work :)I was wondering if there was an answer to the shortage of magazine's to certain subscribers. Was there a magazine Ogre using them for fuel on a fire or did he misplace the stamps needed to send some of them out. Was just curious to what had happened, seeing that it had happened to others besides me. Again, Thank you,
Thank You :-)
The feat Point Blank shot states - You are skilled at making well-placed shots with ranged weapons at close range.
My question is, Can this feat be applied to Thrown Weapons?
Thanks for the Input, I looked up Dungeon #106, that seems the way to go. That was a big help, will go with that. Will fit into story line for the barbarian, Group will be surprised when they face these black orcs.
I have been looking all over on the internet, web sights, search engines, to try to find Stat for a Black Orc within D&D 3rd edition game. I swore I saw the stats for it at one time looking trough some magazines of either Dragon or Dungeon, but not sure. I am a Dm for the current AOW campaign I am running at the barbarian within the group has his background linked with some Black Orcs and would like to have the group face some.
Nice to see alot going on in here :)
|