Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | My Wishlists | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
About Paizo   Messageboards   News   Paizo Blog   Help/FAQ  
Search

Links
Shop
Recent Reviews

Lord of the Rings: The One Ring RPG—Tales from the Wilderland
***** by Megan Robertson

Pathfinder Adventure Path #56: Raiders of the Fever Sea (Skull & Shackles 2 of 6) (PFRPG)
***** by Talyseon

Pathfinder Society Scenario #4–17: Tower of the Ironwood Watch (PFRPG) PDF
****( ) by Itzeebitzee

Pathfinder Battles—Shattered Star: Gug
***** by Itzeebitzee

Pathfinder Battles—Shattered Star: Iron Golem
***( )( ) by Itzeebitzee

Paizo People
RSS RSS RSS RSS Facebook Twitter Email

Verik Vancaskerkin

Veldan Rath's page

Goblin Squad Member. Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber. 112 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists.

RSS

Search Posts
Search Veldan Rath's posts:

1 to 50 of 112 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>

Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

Oooo, this needs to get into Hero Lab.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber
1 person marked this as a favorite.

I do think that we will be rocking the action economy against the baddies.

Healing will be the interesting part. The druid and the pally will take care of themselves I'm sure. I will be able to heal every one once/day with a hex, and I will be making a ton of scrolls...the rest will come down to wands...and avoiding damage to begin with. (Hmmm...baddie has to roll twice, take the lowest and is -2 to -4 on top of that...tee hee)


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

Would it be that horrible to just give the class Full BAB and d10 HD?

Would that even help?


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

So, our DM has generously given us a 20 pt buy and here is the party break down so far.

Halfling Cavalier (Emissary)
Combat Druid (AC probably a bear)
Paladin (prob Weapon Bond)
Switch hitter Ranger (Witchguard)
Human Witch (me!)

DM suggested as I'm a witch and ranger is taking Witchguard that we ran from Irresen.

So my back story is that I'm a renegade Jadwiga, and as neither of us had the temperament for the brutality expected of us, we ran with some assistance with the more 'liberal' stilyagi. Thus, I'm starting off with more defensive hexes, Ward and Healing, Scribe Scroll (CLW, Hex Ward will be crafted right away) and my character's intent WAS to be a peacenik, but by L2 will pull out Evil Eye and will Extra Hex it at level 3 and 5 to get REALLY into rebuffing mode so I can squeeze in Cackle, Misfortune, and Flight by level 5.

I will be taking the Agility Patron (hello Haste at 6th my party of melee dudes).

STR 10
DEX 14
CON 10
INT 19
WIS 10
CHR 12

How doomed are we?


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

Looking at AP's and other modules, NPC mooks tend not to be optimized...so I would not expect NPC non-adventurers to be either.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

Some backstory:
I’ve have a lousy track record with running dragons as a real threat to my players.

The best dragon combat I have run was from Dragon Mountain…and that one WAS very memorable, with 2nd place being the Blue Dragon at the Moathouse in Return to the Temple of Elemental Evil…

Other than that, my dragon encounters have been…blah.

In order to give dragons more flexibility and staying power, I was thinking of the following changes to help my apparent blind side in dragon tactics, make the battles more memorable, and to help them stick it out in combat, and rattle my players expectations on what dragons can do…what would ya’ll say should be the increase in CR?

DR: X/Magic? Blech…by the time you are fighting dragons…that is not an issue…I would make that DR X/-
Too much?

Breath Weapon: Just having one type of effect (line, cone) is BORING, and with Knowledge Scores being easy to reach…then they are also predictable by the party. I would give the dragon the following choices when using its breath weapon.

Line: 5 to 10 feet wide (up to 15’ for colossal) and how long depends upon size or age as well , and I would hash that out later (maybe 20’ per age category)

Cone: 5 wide base but would increase based upon size above and would be much shorter than the line (5’ long per age category?)

Burst: Medium range (100’ + 10’ per age category) with a radius based upon age or size category, like 5’ then 10’, then 15’, then 20’ for the Ancient Wyrm for example…

Cloud: Dragon breaths on itself, causing a cloud area of effect around (and on) itself . The area around could start off at 5’ then get bigger per every few age categories, eventually going to as far as 15 to 20’
I could see these being choices becoming available as the dragon gets older, or get them all at once.

So, rough ball park on CR bump?


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

Exactly, when making up new characters as a group, we pick each other's brain to from a team to kill the DM's baddies :). BUT we don't dictate to each other either.

Based upon the OP's info provided. He was TOLD to make a cleric (gives me the ickies) but use any Pathfinder stuff from Paizo.

Then he did. And the DM didn't like it. It does not sound like the rest of the players had any issues. Just the DM.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber
1 person marked this as a favorite.

FINE!

Ordered.
>:(

:)


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

I was looking at a Summoner (Synth) X/Gunslinger (Mysterious Stranger) 1 for Skull and Shackles...


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

Balors explode like a warp core breach when they die...not much left to animate.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

To some, the Summoner might just be too complicated to play or in the mood for. Fighters on the other hand offer some cool versatility, and do not require the same level of paperwork at all.

Eidolons are great but they begin to lose ground compared to the Fighter as they are tied to the Summoner's progression. They get full BAB, but as they don't level every time the Summoner does, it's really 3/4. Evolutions make up for this, but then there is the lack of gear as it has to share with the Summoner.

Also, if I was playing a fighter and had a summoner in the group, I would LOVE it. Something that scary will pull the attacks in it's direction, yay for me!


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber
Ilja wrote:


Veldan Rath wrote:

Very true. The Summoner gets a great selection, but can only pick a very few. Some are must haves, thus making the selections even fewer.

Mage Armor
Evolution Surge(s)
Haste
Slow
Rejuvenate Eidolon
etc...

I don't see mage armor, evolution surges, slow and rejuvenate eidolon as must-haves at all,...

Mage Armor on your eidolon makes him that much more of a badass. Allows you to get to L2.

Glitterdust is better than Slow for a Summoner, very true, forgot about the Conj part on that one.

My main point still stands, the Summoner has very few slots to access their very good spell list. They are not uber casters (they are really good casters though)


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber
Pinky's Brain wrote:
Veldan Rath wrote:
Then the 1st Level Wiz with a 7 Wis is worse off than the fighter in Will AND Fort Saves...icky.
Getting attached to level 1-3 characters is generally a mistake any way.

How is that relevant?

Characters are disposable, but I wouldn't make one a pure throw away either no matter the level.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

Very true. The Summoner gets a great selection, but can only pick a very few. Some are must haves, thus making the selections even fewer.

Mage Armor
Evolution Surge(s)
Haste
Slow
Rejuvenate Eidolon
etc...


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

It's not bothering me in the least. Just refuting that 3 7's in your stats do not cause survivability issues.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

All above is true Ragnarok Aeon, but:

Since you are getting the spells at lower level, when you get them means the duration is shorter.

Haste, get at 4th level, means 4 rounds of haste and you can only cast it 2 or 3 times a day. Granted, at 5th you have the same duration as a Wizard (5 rounds) who just got it, but the Wizard may not be so inclined to memorize the spell since you can 'spam' it.

Some of these faster access spells can be a trap in that you really can run out of spells fast.

Also, item creation feats? Not many would take them as a Summoner when they may look at those pretty Summoner Feats (Extra Evolution, Extra Summons, Vigilant Eidolon, etc...)


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber
Kamelguru wrote:


Dump charisma and str, not wis. You are going to fail charisma skills and melee combat anyway, due to not having the skill set and BAB to back you up, so it changes very little. There is little difference in having -2 and +4 in CMB when the DC is 25.

My response was to the Wiz that is dumping STR, WIS and CHR to 7, and saying they are not having any issues. (See above posts)


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

<chuckle>

Imagine being the poor DM who has both a Summoner and a Druid (with a big cat) as characters...(then throw in a Ranger with Boon Companion...)


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

Then the 1st Level Wiz with a 7 Wis is worse off than the fighter in Will AND Fort Saves...icky.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

A 1st level Wizard with a 7 Wiz has a +0 Will Save.

While it has been pointed out that a 1st level fighter would have the same, great, then you BOTH failed the save vs Fear (along with the sneaky dude most likely), leaving the cleric to figure out how to take on the Thing that made everyone panic. (Most likely run away too)

Congrats.

Or worse, as those gimpy stats tend not to be improved upon, a DM may just decide to send level appropriate ability damaging critters. 3 7's in a stat array make you extra vulnerable to MORE of those monsters...and now the cleric has to suck up more restoration spells. Or Dispels when you get charmed (that he was saving for the fighter). Or when the enemy notes that carrying your staff appears to be causing you to breath hard, nails you with a Ray of Enfeeblement, or worse yet...Cloudkill and rolls an 8 for Con Damage.

Again, Congrats.

This is draining the party's resources due to gimping yourself so you can uber high DC's. That's not teamwork, that's selfish.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber
1 person marked this as a favorite.

Just watch some JayWalking on Jay Leno...


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

So far, all of the AP's we have run have been 25 pt buy except Skull and Shackles, which was 15 but we played a mini game before the AP started to get and extra bump to our prime stat and a random stat bump...which brought us to around 20-22 pt buy.

We have a gang of 5 players, all who are experienced and 2 who are VERY experienced.

My 5 players are CRUSHING RotRL and they are 1 level behind in XP (due to their being 5). And I rate how they are doing that as:

1. Very Cooperative Players. (They play as well as a freaking SWAT team)
2. 5 of them.
3. 25 point buy

Points 2 and 3 are interchangeable...as we have just played with 4 when one was out a couple of times.

25 point buy is a bump in power, plain and simple, to say otherwise just seems odd. You can create a good character with NO dump stats, or a AWESOME focused character with a dump or two...

WRT to Summoners in general. Same response as said before in other threads:

If the pet is crushing the martial classes, then make sure the build is legal. This has been the source of a lot of angst.

An experienced player who likes building things...is going to ROCK with this class, but is still not on par with the Wizard. (A close 2nd or 3rd maybe, but unless the game is NOT based upon the 15 min adventuring day...the Summoner runs out of spells fast)


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber
Erik Mona wrote:

The current plan is to release huges in formats other than as part of big sets.

Expect to see Encounter Packs and products like them in the months to come.

Totally freakin wicked.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

Oooo...something to look forward too!


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

I'm considering a subscription starting with Shattered Star...but has there been any mention on what the set will be after Shattered Star?


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber
Cpt.Caine wrote:
Peet wrote:

Now I'm curious... What would you rate the difference between a 15 point party, a 20 point party, and a 25 point party in terms of CR per encounter? Is a +5 point buy big enough to justify a +1 to CR? What about a +10 buy?

Peet

Ok, I'll say it again: the point level used has no impact on balance.

Raising the APL is all about what the players can handle, and how well/bad the DM is able to challenge the players. A group of good players will require a higher APL regardless if they used a 15 or 25pt buy. A group with a couple (few) of bad players will require a lower APL.

A weak DM will need to use a higher APL regardless of the point buy level. A good DM will not have to increase the APL, and may even need to lower it.

Having a stat at +6, with a couple of others at +4, will not change encounter balance when compared to having one stat at +4 with the others at +2.

The only issue with point buy is whether players can play MAD classes with a 25 point buy or are "forced" to play SAD toons using 15 points.

All other things being equal, which group is more powerful? A party of 15pt buys or 25 pt buys?

I'm not trying to be confrontational, but just throwing out the Weak DM vs Good DM comments, please realize that super tailoring AP's for some DM's is not an option. We have full time jobs, kids, and other stuff to do.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

Great, another subscription I will need to sign up for...I'll go ask my boss for a raise.

<shakes fist at James>


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

Unless the the easier target is not as much of a threat as the invisible wizard summoning MORE adversaries OR (using Greater Invisibility)spamming you with attack spells.

And invisibility is only a 2nd level spell, its NOT a perfect defense. That's why there is an ever so small chance you can pick up on cues to where invis-o-man is. Greater Invisibility, while a 4th level spell, only allows the user to stay invisible while attacking and does not improve the quality of the defense (same stealth bonus/perception penalty).

Perception is the most used skill for a reason. And really, should a 10 level monk with 18 Wis with a 17 Perception score be totally shut down by a 2nd level spell?

With a good roll and exercising caution a 3rd wizard still has a chance of evading the monk with a mere 2nd level spell.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber
Grick wrote:
MPCampbell wrote:
Does Pathfinder have a feat/ability like 3.5's practiced spellcaster which allows a multi-classed character to add levels to their spell effects?

There's a trait that might help. Not legal in PFS.

Now I have to ask...why is it not legal in PFS?


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

Yes, thank you!


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

Per the Inner Sea Bestiary they are 16 RP, but I am not coming up with that many spent.

Humanoid/Constructed: 2 (Love this by the way)
Standard Ability Array: 0
Exceptional Senses (DV LLV and +2 Per):4
Emotionless: -1
Nanite Surge: +3
Linguist: +1

I'm coming up with a total of 9. What am I missing?


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

A standard action means only one attack.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

Dotting, oh gods yes dotting.

My concern is that I hate death from massive damage rules.

I suggest Touch of Death drops you to -1 (maybe -9) HP if you fail.

You aint dead, but damn close.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

dotted for future updates


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

That sounds like an odd criteria.

It's a base class, at some point a mini seems to make sense.

Maybe they need to feature one in an AP?


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber
1 person marked this as a favorite.

Party is confronted by a guy in plate mail, 20 well armed and armored thugs and an obvious wizard.

Plate mail Guy: 'Surrender now and we might only take your stuff!'

Player (leader of the group): 'Eat Hammer metal head!' (throws a throwing hammer that he has had for several levels, but never used) Roll: Nat 20!

Much huzzahs in or group!

DM Response
Plate mail guy with bruised head and ego: 'Aracansta, (talking to the wizard while pointing at our leader) THAT one!'


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

:) actually I was being too snarky for my own good.

I'm basically asking for Paizo to have WizKids make some gunslinger minis for Pathfinder.

Currently have started Skull & Shackles, and we have a human female gunslinger...

Does anyone know of any plans to add these to a set in the future?


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

Male, female, long and short guns.

That is all :)


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

Yeck...oh well.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

How are these calculated?

D10's + Con, yes, but if you use static rolls, is it 8 + Con?


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

dotted


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

Yep, AC is correct. Summoners are great, and in the hands of an experienced player can really mess your bad guys up with their pet. So, as the DM, you will need to use different tactics. Target the Summoner, battlefield control/ranged touch attacks on the pet, etc.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

Alzheimer's.

:(


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

Thread Necro....sorry sorry

I'm playing synth...and while I'm looking forward to the higher levels, I still would not want to solo against a competent fighter build (NPC). I see the synth as a great 2nd wave melee, to come at the enemy sideways after the party's main gun has gotten their attention and wrecking their day. This allows the buffage and when I take the baddie's attention away from the fighter (or barbie), he gets a second wind (healing, self buffing, repositioning, whatever). Wolf tactics!


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

The synthesist also gains access to the eidolon’s special abilities and the eidolon’s evolutions...

So, does that include Evasion at 2nd level???


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

Okay, I'm going for a weird build, and it is what I am set on, but need some advice on how not to blow the concept.

Background: We are starting Skull & Shackles.

Our DM is gonna be changing up the start, we already have a ship and we each are taking 1 of 6 roles that each award a +2 to an ability score.
We also get to start with 3 times max starting wealth.

I got the Captain, which gets me a +2 to Charisma.

We are starting with a 15 point buy.

I plan on playing a Gunslinger (Mysterious Stranger) at 1st level, then Summoner for the rest. I am toying with Synthesist, but really love a separate eidolon.

Fellow Party Members:
Human Bucaneer
Half Orc Barbarian
Slyph Rogue
Something Inquisitor

Any suggestions?


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber
Mathwei ap Niall wrote:
Winterwalker wrote:

If those Devils were all within 30' of each other, failed to resist the spells with their SR22, then failed a will save with a +8 will bonus, and became entangled, or worse failed the follow up fort save with a +14 to the roll...and get nauseated

...ya they deserve to die.

Don't forget the spellcraft check they each get to make to identify the spell as it's being cast to know it's an illusion. (dc 20 and they each have a +12 to spellcraft so... 8 or better on the dice).

I don't see a problem with the spell.

Does this mean they get the +4 to the save?


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber
AnnoyingOrange wrote:
gnomersy wrote:
It has spell resistance, a save that negates, and a partial even if you fail. And it's 5th level, all in all it's not terrible but it's not the best spell around either.

Adding to that :

"A failed saving throw indicates that a character fails to notice something is amiss. a character faced with proof that an illusion isn't real needs no saving throw. If any viewer successfully disbelieves an illusion and communicates this fact to others, each such viewer gains a saving throw with a +4 bonus."

What constitutes proof lies with the GM, but allies communicating is easily done when multiple intelligent creatures are targeted, in the example a single succesful save or failed SR check would allow one of the devils to communicate this and grant his allies a new save with a +4 bonus.

If your party ever gets targeted I am sure one or more will succeed their save and allow them to communicate this, it seems not close to as bad as you think. Confusion is more troublesome in my opinion.

Okay...I missed that...we all did I guess!


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

Yeah, I get that the spell DOES have to get past that hurdle...otherwise it gets shut down fast, but when it works...it's devastating.

My group is seeing a well built illusionist doing his shtick with this spell very well. We got the drop on a bunch of Barbed Devils mounted on Hellcats...and he took out over half of them (6 or so) cause they blew their saves (he is spell focused in illusion I believe).

I don't fault the player obviously, we are all reading the spell, and he is doing nothing incorrectly...just a few of us are looking at some epic fights getting done VERY quickly.

But, I agree in the end...the spell can fail on that first save.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Battles Case, GameMastery Maps Subscriber

Well, it seems a bit contradictory in its description...

The spell seems to fool the targets into thinking it is trapped in a Web spell (with spiders!) so, one would think that teleporting out would get their brain to reboot,but it does not, but a freedom of movement does?

Web has rules to get out, so why not make the the target have to mentally escape the grapple (they 'think' they escaped)to give them a chance?

Or is it that the spell has 2 saves that gives it balance? WILL to be trapped, and FORT to not be nauseated.

1 to 50 of 112 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>



©2002–2013 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.