|Paizo Pathfinder® Paizo Games|
|About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ|
Diego Valdez wrote:
Great! Thanks for the confirmation.
Not to sound too paranoid, but I just want to make sure this order is pending only because it is still waiting its turn in the queue and not because it got hung up somewhere. I've had that happen before with pre-orders in the mix.
As I was able to download the Mummy's Mask subscription item, but not anything else.. it seems fragmented.
Antony Walls wrote:
The Faction Guide was published before the Inner Sea World Guide.
Factions have not seen much expansion since Gnomes of Golarion contained the Wonderworker faction in parallel.
Inner Sea Combat, Inner Sea Magic, and Occult Mysteries expanded a series of "Faction-lite" organizations covering smaller groups. I expect Inner Sea Intrigue to add a few more.
With all of that, I think it unlikely that there will be a big book of more Factions.
A couple of years ago, there was a kickstarter for miniatures. The organizer ignored the advice that he was walking into legal troubles, and that he should talk to a lawyer. The end result was, as I recall, a court order to destroy all of the miniatures manufactured. The sculptor had to re-sculpt all of the miniatures because they were too plainly based on copyright art belonging to Wizards of the Coast. Even though he changed the names... "filing off the serial numbers".
Really... talk to a lawyer.
It depends on what you're doing and how you're distributing it.
There is a Community Use Policy (CUP) that defines what non-profit things you can do with Paizo's Intellectual Property (IP). Golarion, Akiton, Castrovel, the specific details of those, and more, are Paizo's IP.
If you want to publish to sell, then you need to negotiate a license with them.
If it doesn't fall under what you're allowed to do under the CUP, then you need to be talking to a lawyer about negotiating a license, basically.
"Filing off the serial numbers" is something people talk about, but the more obvious it is as an attempt to do that, the more likely the current laws will require that Paizo takes action to stop you.
So, really, the more serious you are, the more you need to talk to a lawyer.
One part of the Shattered Star AP takes place in Kaer Maga, and provides some background on the place and its ties to Karzoug.
Really, the whole Shattered Star AP has a bunch of things you can mine if you want to enhance RotRL in some ways.. or to use as hints and foreshadowing dropped into RotRL if you plan to run Shattered Star later.
Steve Geddes wrote:
Consensus among non-Paizo people in the other discussions was that the 3.5-era APs have a stronger "claim" to a position in any such lineup, due to being pre-Pathfinder. That may not be accurate, of course.. it is just us trying to read the tea-leaves and make sense of the patterns. :)
The kingdom rules being updated in Ultimate Campaign mitigates the need to update Kingmaker itself... a revised version would likely point the buyer to the PRD for the free updated rules, just as the Rise of the Runelords directs the reader to the PRD for the updated rules for Haunts.
While Kingmaker *is* popular and out-of-print (because it is so popular), and those are two criteria in its favor, being already up-to-date for Pathfinder rules makes it less of a candidate. Also, being designed as a Sandbox campaign whose timeline can extend YEARS, that somewhat divorces it from the setting continuity and weakens its case.
If I had to rank them, I would put Kingmaker at the top of the list *after* the 3.5-era APs... mpstly because it is out of print and so popular. Paizo could as easily decide to do another sandbox AP, though.
Of course, there is no guarantee that all of the 3.5-era APs would be updated (so Second Darkness and Legacy of Fire may never be done), but Curse of the Crimson Throne seems to have more of a "lock" on being the next one, if/when that ever happens.
I will take a stab with a few possibilities:
1) A cryptozoology-based bestiary.
2) A Sorshen-based Runelords follow-up of some kind.
3) A Nocticula-based special AP on her rise from Demon Lord to benevolent goddess of the night.
4) An Atlas of Golarion with an improved "global" map showing all continents in more-or-less equivalent quality to the current map of the Inner Sea region, and light Gazetteer-level entries for the undeveloped continents. (Nobody said he was working alone :) )
I think Absalom is one of Erik Mona's pet projects, so that seems unlikely to me.
This has been discussed a number of times elsewhere.
The main candidate seems to be Curse of the Crimson Throne... it is popular, the parts are unavailable, and it is pre-Pathfinder RPG rules (3.5).
Second Darkness is also a viable candidate. It NEEDS the attention more, but that also makes it less likely to be done, as it would be much more work. It needs to be re-structured and sections re-written, really. It touches on some key points of Golarion lore (Earthfall, the origins of the Drow) which would usually make it a cinch to be updated.. but the poor sales attest to its problems, and the work required to fix them (giving the impression that 'all Golarion elves are jerks' is one of them). That James Jacobs has said he would like to take a crack at fixing it is a positive sign, but having a potential sponsor for the project isn't enough to tip the scales unless other elements line up.
Legacy of Fire is a lukewarm candidate. It is pre-Pathfinder RPG like CotCT and SD, but it is not popular like CotCT and does not have the important lore connections of SD.
Other APs are already Pathfinder RPG, which immediately makes them less in need of updating, so less viable candidates.
You will note that the paragraph about Second Darkness is larger than the others.. which I think is a testament to its "iffy" position. CotCT is clearly the leading candidate as it meets the three main criteria discussed.. lack of availability of the printed copies, being pre-Pathfinder rules, and being popular. Legacy of Fire and Second Darkness meet only one, but SD has more lore elements and setting themes that need to be addressed, I think.
Urath DM wrote:
I must correct myself.
The definitions of the body slots in Ultimate Equipment clearly calls out the Body and Chest slots as being for articles of clothing.. so that seems to settle the question for me.
Thanks all for your responses.
The armor bonus not stacking, and getting only the better, is understood... if it applies.
Neither is it a questions of body slots, as clothing is not assigned to a slot (as far as I can tell).
What I am concerned about is a situation like the PCs need to travel in extreme cold conditions.
Do they need to choose between wearing armor (which provides an armor bonus, but no protection against the exposure to cold weather), or wearing a Cold Weather Outfit (which provides a +5 circumstance bonus to Fort saves against exposure to cold weather, but no armor bonus).
Based on the description and illustration, it seems likely that suits of clothing ( "X Outfit", "Cleric's Vestments", "Monk's Robes", etc.) are not intended to be worn with armor.
However, I can find no direct statement one way or the other (although I notice the Tabard mentioned it is typically worn over armor), so I ask the question. :)
As I understand it...
The Brothers of the Seven saw to it that the house was boarded up a few days before (probably when they were sure Aldern had become a ghast and gone back to Foxglove Manor to harvest the marked souls in the Sandpoint area.
Justice Ironbriar sent the two Faceless Stalkers to the house. They are there to lay low and kill the PCs if the PCs come to investigate.
In addition to what has been said here, "Bastards of Golarion" pretty much uses Nualia as the model for the "Celebrity" background.. including artwork that looks pretty much like her.
While the book has large portions dedicated to Half-Elves and Half-Orcs, there is a lot that is usable for other part-human races.
This is the sort of thing that the Kingmaker AP did ... exploration and missions from NPCs.
The exploration rules are updated in Ultimate Campaign (available on the PRD here).
An ongoing mission for the PCs to locate new sources of rare wood for the lumber operations would be ideal.
Missions from their mentors could include things like fetching plants for spell components, fetching plants for medicinal use, fetching plants or animals for cooking ingredients, and finding lost children.
The module "Fangwood Keep" has a gazetteer of the southern forest.. you could use that for ideas, and maybe send the PCs there to help with the defenses.
Kingdom Events, even if you are not using the Kingdom rules (also updated in Ultimate Campaign), could be used to generate missions.. take care of a rabble-rousing NPC, help find lost loggers, remove a marauding owlbear, and so on.
Don't forget that several new books have come out since "Crypt of the Everflame" was released.. so there are many more base classes who could have mentors there.. and maybe some of them don't like each other? Perhaps they put their proteges up to things like racing in the forest?
Also, the older module "Conquest of Bloodsworn Vale" can make for a nice break from the episodic missions assigned by mentors. It would take a little work to update from 3.5 to Pathfinder, but it isn't that difficult.
The HeroLab community is very active in producing files.
The issue, as Rednal said, is complexity. Adding a new deity, domain, even spell, is not hard. Coding adjustments to apply the effects of a new spell, new condition, etc... that's harder.
The editor supports additive material.. meaning things that go with the flow of the established rules and are similar to other, existing things. It does not support variant rules. That requires someone who has built up significant familiarity with the code base to go into the XML and do things by hand.
I would love to see HeroLab support for the Ultimate Rulership, Ultimate Battle, Ultimate War, line... but because they change rules (such as Edicts, and splitting an army's OV into melee and ranged values) are not additive; they are variants and alternatives. So it will be a while before the community has those.
One thought mentioned on the LoneWolf boards is that, while the Ultimate Rulership, etc., line seems too small for each to have its own HeroLab support project, maybe if the line grows to include enough content, a project to do a bundled HeroLab support set could work.
Jason Nelson wrote:
Being someone who really liked Birthright back in its day, I can say that having kingdom-scale organizations who do not depend on controlling hexes for their resources, and which can interact with kingdoms (of various sizes) would be ideal.
The characters of my players were spent after clearing the upper level. This was actually their second attempt at the place.
Unfortunately, they had let a goblin escape, and he made his way downstairs to get the longshanks down there (including a Tsuto who had escaped the Glassworks). They hid in a rope trick to rest up.
In my case, Nualia abandoned Thistletop to go to the Mosswood and try to recruit more goblins. Convincing the chief to split the tribe and send some of the troublemakers to Thistletop to occupy the preferred lair seemed like a good plan to her. She left her hounds as guards, and headed out.
Orik, Tsuto, Bruthazmus, and Lyrie were sent to ambush the party when they headed back to Thistletop... a faster-moving set of goblin spies kept watch for the PCs coming back. THat led to Orik and Lyrie being captured, and turned over to Magnimar for judgment.
I'd like the see the Ultimate series dip a bit more into the Downtime rules.. new rooms, teams, buildings, and organizations seem like an area ripe for expansion.
The Hell's Rebels AP gave the Rebellion organization a means to be active ... ways for organizations to interact (attack and defend) would be interesting. This may be more fertile ground after Ultimate Intrigue ships and we see what is in it... if noble houses are not presented in some product similar to Guilds and Schools in Inner Sea Combat and Inner Sea Magic, perhaps that's another area to look at.
There are also a few others:
If I remember correctly, there was a list of suggested names for one of the monster races... orcs or hobgoblins, I think... that was altered because some of the names were actual names in Turkish.
So the name thing is intended not to include *any* actual real-world names, is my understanding.
The Shattered Star map folio has a poster-sized version of the (beautiful) in-world map of Varisia used in the Varisia player companion, as well as poster-sized maps of Magnimar and Kaer Maga.
You may want to look over the Adventure Finder and set it to show all adventures in Varisia.
FWIW, in his "Monster Focus" series self-published through Minotaur Games, Jason Bulmahn included tables of a few knowledge check results for the creature in each book. This is certainly not an official thing for Pathfinder overall, but it does offer some insight into what at least one of the Designers considers appropriate.
Ghouls, for example, seems to use the "it is common" modifier as the base entry is for DC 6 ...
DC 6 tells us that the creature is a ghoul, ghouls are undead, they retain some intelligence, they are ravenous, and there is a more powerful version called a ghast.
DC 11 tells us that ghouls can paralyze by touch, but elves are immune, and that this immunity does not include the touch of a ghast.
DC 16 tells us that the ghoul's bite carries a disease that rots flesh and dulls reflexes. Those who die from it become ghouls.
DC 22 is for ghasts only, and tells us they have stench that sickens those who get too close.
Randy Von gunten wrote:
My group is just starting part 5 runeforge and was curious what kind of bonus/penalties to expect based on sin points. How would these modifiers be determine.
The points are explained in the Appendix of the adventure in Anniversary edition.
The idea is that, from the beginning of the campaign onward, the actions of the characters could earn them "sin" or "virtue" points. Being greedy (hiding treasure from the others), being gluttonous (drinking more than others at the bars and taverns), and so on should be noted, each significant action earning 1 point.
Whichever sin/virtue pair the character has the most points in determines which bonuses and penalties apply.
As written, the goblins are concerned with the upper floor..
Rise of the Runelords:
Ripnugget holes up in the Throne Room and waits for the PCs, for example.
That being said...
A lot depends on how long your players take to deal with Nualia and Lyrie, and how much they continue to explore that level, how much patience you want to let Ripnugget have, and how the goblins interact with the non-goblin allies (Orik, Lyrie).
As written, it doesn't seem like the goblins get along too well with the non-goblins, so it doesn't seem like the goblins will go running to them for aid. The goblin warriors would likely be unwilling to interrupt Bruthazmus while he's with the chief's harem.
Bruthazmus or Orik could hear the sounds of the fight with Lyrie, but that is unlikely. There's a lot of distance and there are many barriers between that room and where Orik and Bruthazmus are.
If Lyrie did not sent Skivver to fetch help, then Orik would still be brooding in his room and Bruthazmus enjoying the attentions of the harem.
So, until Ripnugget actually sends some warriors to get Orik and Bruthazmus, not much is likely to change. He won't wait forever, and while he may be more canny than most goblins, he probably doesn't have too much more patience than the others.
Also, once he knows that the intruders have gone below, he will then likely send warriors to see if Orik, Lyrie, and Bruthazmis have dealt with them. Ripnugget is dedicated to the plan, after all, so he doesn't want to see it fail, and he does want to see Nualia protected. Goblins think in terms of outnumbering their opponents, after all, so he would want to make sure that the intruders are taken down.
Another factor is how much healing the PCs did for Shadowmist before moving on. If the horse is still in poor shape, Ripnugget may kill him, as was the original plan.
In the worst case, the PCs could end up being caught between Nualia, Lyrie, and Yeth Hound on one side, and Orik, Bruthazmus, Ripnugget, and the rest of the goblins on the other side. The other Yeth Hounds may join in as well.. in which case, it fight becomes a CR10 like that noted for the case where the PCs time things badly and arrive while everyone is gathered for a religious ceremony in the Shrine.
Ed Reppert wrote:
I never said it made real-world sense.. but in terms of game mechanics, to keep a trait as less valuable than a Feat, it does.
Furthermore, it is my understanding that Heirloom Weapon grants proficiency with the *one* weapon inherited through the family, not all weapons of that type (so your ancestral longsword, not all longswords).
Go to the LoneWolf site HERE and go to the Forums... then the Pathfinder forum.
The Soulbolt is from Dreamscarred Press' psionics?
If so, it is not maintained by LoneWolf themselves.... it is a community-managed product. so you will need to use the bug report mechanism for community content.
Overall, the staff and community on the LoneWolf forums are very helpful, and can give you better answers for HeroLab content.
Fallyrion Dunegrién wrote:
CotCT was my first AP and it is still one of my favorite. Loved to see a compiled version (and a better image for Laori, cause the ones on the books are horrible).
The upcoming release of Ultimate Intrigue, with the Vigilante class (tailor-made for a certain NPC in Curse of the Crimson Throne) might help.
One thing which I am considering doing is to adapt the Caravan rules from the Jade Regent Players' Guide for general use in any Varisian area.
These are rules for operating a Varisian Caravan, and managing it as it travels.
There are some issues with the Caravan Combat rules, so you may want to look at the Jade Regent forums for advice there.
I would think you would not mix the Faction Guide with the Fame and Reputation rules too much. The Faction Guide is Golarion-specific, while the Fame and Reputation rules are world-neutral.
If they were to be used together, I'd probably treat the Fame and Reputation as an additional Faction the PC can earn Prestige with. In the Faction Guide, the intent is for the PC to be able to earn 3-5 Prestige each level. If the PC is a member of more than one Faction, it is not per-Faction that I know of, so the PC needs to divide his/her attention between them. I'd treat the Fame and Reputation the same way.
The other way to look at it is, the Factions are continent-spanning or world-spanning operations, while Fame and Reputation are local (thus the growing area over which your Reputation is known). If your game is more local than continent-spanning, the Fame and Reputation setup may make more sense than Faction membership. This is especially so, I think, if your focus is going to stay in small towns (since the Factions incur a 5 PP additional cost for using Prestige in smaller settlements).
My case will not be here until next week, but in the meantime, a dungeon dressing item that occurs to me is the Ebon Acolytus (from the Bestiaries of the Curse of the Crimson Throne AP) ... an animated altar that can serve as dressing or a creature.
Also, now that we have Allevrah the Elf General, I'd like to see her other form done as well. :)
I use it in my games.
I've always liked political nuances to my games, so I like having groups for the PCs to join.
Note that Inner Sea Magic, Inner Sea Combat, and Occult Mysteries introduce organizations that use a scaled-down version of the Fame and Prestige systems from the Faction Guide. These are things like Guilds, Schools, and secret societies.
I have read it that way in the past, myself.The fact that it can be read in more than one way (we have 3 mentioned in this thread) supports my statement that it is ambiguous. :)
The animal can take passive advantage of beneficial circumstances without the tricks, such as benefiting from Flanking bonuses when they occur naturally (no other position for the animal to attack from except one that includes flanking, or a PC moves into flanking position with the animal, as examples).
For the animal companion to create those conditions, that's when the trick is required. The Flank trick teaches the animal to enter, and to try to remain in, a flanking position with the master or an ally. That's a more active role than simply benefiting from conditions others create.
As for AoOs, the wording in the Flank trick is unclear. "It always takes attacks of opportunity." can be read as "it does not ignore any provoked attack of opportunity" (remember, when an AoO is provoked, a creature can usually choose whether or not act on it -- perhaps waiting for a better case). So it may not mean "cannot take AoOs without this trick", but as it says, "will always take AoOs".
Finally, for maneuvers, some of them are part of the animal's attacks (dogs and wolves gain a free Trip attack on successful Bite attacks, for example). These would not require teaching the animal a trick to use.. but if you want the animal to use others (like Bull Rush, Dirty Trick, Drag, Reposition, Disarm, or Sunder), then it needs to be taught to do that.
The tricks limit what the PC can order the animal to do. The list is not exhaustive, and additional tricks can be created for additional behaviors.
Ultimate Campaign includes a sidebar on the topic of intelligent animals.. animal companions with their intelligence raised to be 3 or higher.. which opens the possibility for more independent action by them (with an example given).
There is 8-page section on companions, including animal companions as well as others, that discusses issues of control. In the end, they are NPCs under the GM's control, though they can be guided with the Animal Handling skill.
It is also worth noting that the Move Action requirement does not apply to animal companions unless you are "pushing" the animal... Druids, and any class whose Animal Companion is based on the Druid progression, gain the "Link" feature for their companions at 1st level, allowing them to control their companion as a free action or to push it as a move action.
This is not a new thing, really. Most of the tricks mentioned are defined in the Core Rulebook under the Handle Animal skill, along with the "General Purpose" training (essentially a bundle of Tricks to serve a specific purpose). What the Animal Archive did was to make clear that things like active Flanking are not considered part of normal behavior for the animals, and must be learned as tricks.
Some people disagree, and cite the pack tactics used by wolves as an example of natural use of flanking. For game purposes, though, the rule is you need the trick to do the behavior in the trick.
There was also a Blog post March 11, 2013, that reviewed this in the PFS context.
EDIT: Aaaand ninja'd serveral times over. I need to write shorter posts and do less lookup while writing them.
Haunts can be damaged by positive energy, so a Channel Positive Energy or two can possibly deal sufficient damage to neutralize a haunt. This is temporary, and the haunt will return. When the haunt description talks about destroying a haunt, that's what needs to be done so the haunt will NOT return. Destroying the haunt is not necessary to get past it, usually.
Do you have access to the GameMastery Guide? The rules for Haunts can be found HERE on the PRD
In addition, Occult Adventures added some explanations/expansions to Haunts as optional rules HERE.
These may help to make your Haunts more manageable. They're not unstoppable, but it can be tough depending on who notices it.
The cover art for the Inner Sea Primer is a view of Thistletop as the iconic characters Ezren and Merisiel fighting goblins near the rope bridge.
The only issues I see are:
1) the head is rotated too much.. the interior level 2 is "slightly" slanted, not rotated on its side as this image suggests
2) the fact that it is a head/face should be less clear. The features of the face are supposed to be more weathers, so you only get the impression that they are there when the lighting is "just so".
A response in the thread [url="http://paizo.com/threads/rzs2t7bu?Additional-swift-actions"Additional Swift Actions[/url] asserts that you can take a Swift Action before Readying another Swift Action.
This seems to violate the limit of one Swift Action per turn, but...
the wording of the "Initiative Consequences of ..." sections in both the Delay and Ready rules seem to contain artifacts of the earlier, more structured initiative uses with a specific end-of-round that was used for status effects and other bookkeeping adjustments.
PRD Quotes of Delay and Ready:
Pathfinder Reference Document wrote:
In both cases, the text addresses delaying or not having your readied action triggered until your next turn comes around in the initiative. But they also include text referring to taking your actions in the "next round"... which cannot happen with cyclical initiative... the round for each character is until your initiative comes up again.
I believe this is the basis of the assertion that you can take a Swift action, then ready another Swift action.. because it implies "your turn" has ended and you can get in two Swift actions this way.
Should this wording be clarified?
The Cavalier's mount is an Animal Companion. It does not use the Horse entry from the Bestiary at all. It uses the "Horse" entry on p.54 of the Core Rulebook for its basics, and the table linked by CampinCarl9127 (p. 52) for advancement. The Cavalier's level is treated as the Druid level on that table to determine the stats.