Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Cayden Cailean

TriOmegaZero's page

Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Modules Subscriber. FullStarFullStarFullStarFullStarFullStar RPG Venture-Lieutenant, Arizona—Mesa. 28,547 posts (37,367 including aliases). 13 reviews. 1 list. 1 wishlist. 20 Pathfinder Society characters. 40 aliases.


1 to 50 of 6,622 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>
Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Modules Subscriber

I know, I want to live in that world too.

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Modules Subscriber

I see a FAQ! Yay!

Grand Lodge

6 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Modules Subscriber

Don't have to, it's self-evident.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Witch Doctor wrote:
...they were referred to as "easy mode class".

Still are.

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Modules Subscriber
Mark Seifter wrote:
Does sound awesome though!

Shackled City:
He ran ahead of the party to turn a corner and find himself standing next to the kitty and a fire giant. While the rest of the party was rushing to catch up over the next couple rounds, he Stunning Fist'd the outsider with his first attack, then continued to flurry on the giant. When the giant hit him with a Large greatsword, he threw in a disarm check before dropping the sword behind him. The poor fire giant had no choice to try and overrun to get his weapon, provoking a critical hit that knocked him backwards.

So the monk kept the rakshasa from casting, tanked the fire giant, took away his sword, and nearly succeeded in keeping him from his sword until the rest of the party got there to back him up.

Grand Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Modules Subscriber
Liz Courts wrote:
I WILL HAVE ORDER! ORDER I SAY. :D

I'd like to order the Unchained PDF, but it isn't available yet!

Grand Lodge

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Modules Subscriber

Suddenly, Todd finds his account deleted...

Shadow Lodge

5 people marked this as a favorite.
Gorbacz wrote:
So, does a Paladin violate the code when he or she drinks decaf?

Was the calf properly sacrificed?

Grand Lodge

3 people marked this as a favorite.

This unit welcomes our new community overlords.

Grand Lodge ***** RPG Venture-Lieutenant, Arizona—Mesa aka TriOmegaZero

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Mulgar wrote:
A GM that can't handle 6 players isn't much of a GM. Period end of sentence.....

Good thing we're talking about GMs that don't WANT to handle that many players then.

Shadow Lodge

5 people marked this as a favorite.

FFVI 4 LYFE

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Modules Subscriber
Tacticslion wrote:
wakedown wrote:
I suspect it will be mostly compatible, in the same way 3.0 adventures can be run with 3.5,
Heck, I've found 3.0 adventures to be mostly* compatible with PF...

Yeah, next time I run Shackled City, I doubt I will even update anything.

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Modules Subscriber
bugleyman wrote:
...he can't be real for you, and at the same time not real for me?

Ooo, quantum theology!

Shadow Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.

I don't claim to be original, just genuine.

Grand Lodge

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Modules Subscriber

I needed a Colossal centipede for a game. I found this.

I then needed a Gargantuan ooze, and repurposed it for that as well. My players were like "we have to fight the centipede?!" to which I responded "no, you're fighting the thing EATING the centipede".

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Modules Subscriber
bugleyman wrote:
There is no strong empirical case for the existence of God (which frankly, most of the theists I respect freely acknowledge).

Pretty much. I choose to believe in a god. I don't believe there is any evidence of such a thing in our world, however. (Which is incidentally why I ignore organized religions and holy books.)

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Modules Subscriber
Jaelithe wrote:
If you're straining not to take offense when the opposition is so even-toned and restrained, even in the face of such responses as have crept into the thread, well ... I honestly don't know what to tell you, other than ... uh ... "Nice job, so far"?

Naturally, the opposed responses align more with my worldview, so it's less stressful to give them a pass.

They're still being jerks of course, but they don't break my equilibrium as much.

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Modules Subscriber
thejeff wrote:

Honestly, Jaelithe's posts are very opposed to my viewpoint, but I haven't been offended by any of them.

I'm embarrassed by some of the ones on "my side" though.

Oh, I agree. I don't really think Jaelithe is saying anything wrong, it's just my lens coloring it.

Grand Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Modules Subscriber
Jaelithe wrote:
And once again the strain of measured and respectful dialogue begins to weigh on certain participants.

Indeed. I'm trying to take your posts as neutrally as possible, but they just sound so opposed to my viewpoint that it's hard to not take offense.

Grand Lodge

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Modules Subscriber
Nathanael Love wrote:
You attacked the position "I can't play Pathfinder anymore if Pathfinder 2.0 comes out".

Attacked it? It was MY position. Hell, it STILL IS.

Let me remind you what I was replying to.

You wrote:
Why would I buy PF 2.0?

I answered your question. That is not a straw man.

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Modules Subscriber
Gauss wrote:
Out of curiosity, why was the Bard/Oracle untouchable?

I can think of two reasons.

Shadow Lodge

3 people marked this as a favorite.
JonathonWilder wrote:
Yet no other class has all three good saves!

So?

Grand Lodge

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Modules Subscriber

A successful trip attempt makes the target fall prone. I know of no rules that prevent this when the target is mounted.

Grand Lodge

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Modules Subscriber

Since most religious myths are also really good stories, I don't have a problem including gods in my games anymore than I do including other literary favorites like the Jabberwock or dryads and whatnot.

Shadow Lodge

4 people marked this as a favorite.
BigP4nda wrote:

...first the rogue, then the monk, now the fighter...

What is wrong with these people...

Nothing.

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Modules Subscriber

Aw man, we lost Ra? Curse you Timitius!

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Modules Subscriber
Buri Reborn wrote:
I don't get the idea you can't play the old system just because new ones come out.

Me either.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Nathanael Love wrote:

That's a pretty obvious straw man argument there.

Could you point out exactly where I attacked a position you do not hold?

I will point out that I am pretty sure I am unable to play 3.5 now, due to lack of players.

Nathanael Love wrote:
Yeah, I'll still have my books, but the 300-500+ dollars a year I spend on Pathfinder won't be making their way to Paizo anymore, I will find some other outlet for that spending.

Yeah, I still have my 3.5 books, but my money doesn't make its way to WotC anymore, as I have found Paizo as an outlet for that spending.

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Modules Subscriber
GreyWolfLord wrote:
TOZ wrote:
Because you can't play PF if everyone else is playing PF 2.0.
I see no reason I couldn't continue playing PF 1e if a 2e came out.
TOZ wrote:
...if...

Shadow Lodge

6 people marked this as a favorite.
Nathanael Love wrote:
I didn't buy 4th edition D&D because I didn't want a new edition. I didn't buy 5e because I didn't want a new edition. Why would I buy PF 2.0?

Because you can't play PF if everyone else is playing PF 2.0.

Grand Lodge

8 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Modules Subscriber

The entirety of my 3.5 collection has seen zero use since Pathfinder released. I pray the same never happens to my Pathfinder books.

Grand Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Modules Subscriber

If the doomsayers continue to prophesy long enough, eventually they will be right.

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Modules Subscriber
Zenogu wrote:
People actually prep Read Magic? I almost threw it in as a candidate in another thread titled "List of Useless spells."

It speeds up the 'what are these scrolls we found' situation.

Grand Lodge ***** RPG Venture-Lieutenant, Arizona—Mesa aka TriOmegaZero

1 person marked this as a favorite.

The following Pathfinders have been admitted to the ranks of the Seekers after re-securing the Hao Jin Tapestry and the wayward Venture Captain in charge of its care.

Dorian "Pyro" Warden Human Alchemist12
Silver Crusader Kevror Half-elf Wild Shadow Ranger10/Lantern Bearer2
Elfira Lava Flames Ingot Red Apple Gnome Fire Domain Druid12
Charlie Henderson Gnome Urban Barbarian2/Arcane Striker Bard3/Dragon Disciple7

Each has received a letter sealed with the mark of the Decemvirate and will be returning to action next week...

Grand Lodge

7 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Modules Subscriber

Wierdness is part of the package.

Shadow Lodge *****

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Shifty wrote:
Now I know how the Shadow Lodgers felt.

I'll buy you a drink next time I see ya.

Grand Lodge ***** RPG Venture-Lieutenant, Arizona—Mesa aka TriOmegaZero

2 people marked this as a favorite.
John Compton wrote:
To clarify this point further, it requires the recovery of an object that is actually an artifact-level magic item (i.e. A minor artifact or major artifact); just recovering a flashy magic item MacGuffin is not sufficient.

Are the Sky Key components artifact-level magic items?

Grand Lodge

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Modules Subscriber

Huzzah!

Grand Lodge ***** RPG Venture-Lieutenant, Arizona—Mesa aka TriOmegaZero

4 people marked this as a favorite.
thorin001 wrote:

Yes I am, but that is metagaming of the worst sort on the part of the GM.

I encourage such metagaming if it will make a good game.

Grand Lodge

5 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Modules Subscriber
Avadriel wrote:
So the FAQ was written with the expectation it would not apply to unchained rogues, but had wording that unfortunately failed to exempt them, this means to me at least, until they change the FAQ, unchained rogues are affected by a unintended nerf due to a minor communication error.

And anyone who comes to my table expecting the Unchained Rogue to be denied sneak attack against targets with concealment is going to be bludgeoned with the CRB.

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Modules Subscriber
pres man wrote:
TOZ wrote:
It was an area effect.
Munchkin.

Oh hey pres man, found any good PF rules to port back?

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Modules Subscriber
Kudaku wrote:
The first review is probably just around the corner.

Actually, there are already reviews posted.

Grand Lodge

4 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Modules Subscriber

This print run needs to sell out fast so I can pick up a second printing copy.

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Modules Subscriber
Treppa wrote:
My favorite thing about Denver is being able to leave doors and windows open and not have bugs fly in.

I knew I chose poorly. :(

Shadow Lodge

5 people marked this as a favorite.

It was an area effect.

Grand Lodge

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Modules Subscriber

We so need to hang out, dude.

Shadow Lodge

6 people marked this as a favorite.

...

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Modules Subscriber
alexd1976 wrote:
Of course those names can't be used, but the idea behind the classes: unlimited use abilities that deal decent-large amounts of damage. I mean, the DA had a BREATH weapon.

And Paizo has said that they are not going to repackage 3.5 content when they can write their own. Hence why there are no Witchaloks, Dragonbreath Masters, or Pactsealers in the official rules.

1 to 50 of 6,622 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2015 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.