Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Rast

Todd Stewart's page

Contributor. Goblin Squad Member. Pathfinder Society Member. 1,899 posts (2,039 including aliases). No reviews. No lists. 1 wishlist. 2 Pathfinder Society characters. 6 aliases.


RSS

1 to 50 of 1,899 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>
Contributor

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Sissyl wrote:
I do not understand that study. How do the manage to connect the genital nerves to provide a sense of touch here? I am not saying it is impossible, mind you...

They don't actually have to reconnect anything, and what they transplant in doesn't start out with any nerves it seems.

As they explain in the full paper, by seeding the matrix with both epithelial and smooth muscle cells, upon transplantation the tissue underwent vascularization and innervation, aka blood vessels from the surrounding tissue infiltrated, expanded, and integrated into the transplant, and likewise nerves from the surrounding tissue did so as well.

Contributor

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Ambrosia Slaad wrote:
And reviewed here and RPGNow (in comments), and hopefully soon at the d20pfsrd store!

Thank you so much for the review!

Since the proteans IMO were created without the option or the intent to harken back as much to non-OGL critters as for instance the daemons have some shared thematic ground with the 'loths, the proteans are quite near and dear to me, potentially more so than the daemons (heresy I know!). And since I adore tieflings (blame DiTerlizzi and Planescape), the lack of a protean touched race was a glaring hole IMO.

Of course the same glaring hole has been there for a long time, even with respect to slaadi in 3.x (chaonds and neraphim were never really explicit on the topic and were never developed further). Why should fiends get all the fun in interbreeding with mortals? Why shouldn't the plane of unbound creation and raw, random chance be able to imprint and alter mortal offspring? Why shouldn't the best outsiders get to create a race of best-planetouched? :D

Contributor

Ambrosia Slaad wrote:
Myrryr wrote:

So, it always bugged me there was no support for the chaotic outsiders as there is for the good and evil ones...

The Ouroborn are located here.

Interesting. Have you by any chance seen the new Xaolings from Rogue Genius? I definitely recommend it.

Proteans are awesome :D

Contributor

3 people marked this as a favorite.

Of particular interest to trans* individuals: Tissue-engineered autologous vaginal organs in patients: a pilot cohort study. was a paper published in Lancet just recently.

Big big big awesome implications, and I say this as someone who has worked in tissue engineering (livers) and with some of the techniques pioneered by the Wake Forest Institute of Regenerative Medicine's. Though this particular study wasn't specifically aimed for producing organs for implantation for MtF patients, it's a logical extension of the technique, and the same basic techniques are likewise applicable with some more work to FtM patients.

And as it's using autologous cells (cells from the patient's own body) to grow the organs, there's no issue with immune rejection as in conventional transplantation.

:D

Contributor

Congrats to everyone that made it in!

Contributor

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Ilja wrote:
Hmmm. Maybe i can ask here, if people are interested in discussing it. Please tell me if this is a stupid question... But how do you guys feel about how to include trans* people in RPG world creation?

Like TanithT said, in backstory. For most characters (depending on setting specific, cultural elements) it'll be as up front (or not) as any cis/het character. Unless you're heavily interacting with an NPC it might not come up, or might not be relevant in a lot of interaction.

Here's one example from my home game. The PCs are in the planar city of Galisemni, and one of the NPCs that they've interacted with rather heavily is a protean-blooded tiefling named Il'setsya. It never actually came up in conversation directly during the course of the game, but Tanith asked me after the game, "Is Il'setsya trans*?"

The answer was a solid yes, but as it literally never came up in conversation in game I asked why Tanith thought so, and it came down to a few very subtle statements about her past in-game and Tanith's assertion that "I know you really well". The guess was correct and the character is in fact trans, though it likely won't be openly discussed in game or necessarily something the other players and PCs are aware of. But it's there, and by interaction regarding some elements of her experiences in the past (specifically her past as a starving, male-bodied street urchin and her interaction with a giant campaign bugaboo/macguffin called the Lethe Wall).

Will it ever come up in game? I can't say for certain, but it does provide more depth and emotional character for this character in specific.

Contributor

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Most of my experience with the practical application of Said's work has been to see it used as a bludgeoning tool to silence or discredit scholars who criticize any culture that they aren't members of by birth, and doubly so if they're discussing religion.

For instance I've seen criticism of female genital mutilation in the middle east and east Africa hit by charges of 'you can't criticize this, you're being an imperialist eurocentric/racist/sexist orientalist' etc.

Worse even if the scholar is an actual orientalist by academic focus (see for instance the work of the German scholar Christoph Luxenberg, who regardless of if his theories are historically accurate wholly or even only partially, has been hit by an avalanche of dismissive, disdainful charges of "orientalism" as well as a bevy death threats).

Contributor

Haladir wrote:
GreyWolfLord wrote:
However, homosexuality is still against the rules as per the New Testament as well.

Speaking as a Christian myself, this point is very much debatable.

Just to keep in mind: Nowhere in the New Testament does Jesus ever say one word at all about same-sex relationships.

Nowhere.

Not. One. Word.

** spoiler omitted **

Brief discussion on this topic elsewhere.

Thank you for stating this (I agree wholeheartedly).

And since it was mentioned earlier, it's worth noting with regards to 1 Timothy's positions on women, that the scholarly consensus is that Paul didn't write it, but that it's a 2nd century forgery written in Paul's name. It contradicts Paul's own previous statements regarding the active and equal role of women in the early Church as well as details from other sources.

But I should avoid getting into a scholarly discussion here.

Contributor

Mystic_Snowfang wrote:

Your own gender, are you male or female?

Your sexuality?

Characters you've had.

Their sexes, ages, sexualities, attractivness level and what sort of attractive they are? Tomboyish girls, manly men, pretty boys, super lovely curvaicious ladies.

Male bodied (MtF trans* but I'm not currently transitioning)

Hetero (if you go by birth gender / if I transitioned it'd be homosexual)

Recent PCs and arguably DMPCs:

Nisha Starweather - female tiefling, heterosexual, 14 Cha, athletic. Obnoxiously random, almost perpetually happy.
http://blackmyst.deviantart.com/art/OC-commission-8-410790842

Aranath Glenshadow- male elven druid, heterosexual, 16 Cha, athletic (the only male PC I've had in nearly a decade) - he did technically get turned into a female song dragon briefly, and eventually turned into a shadow dragon and ended up in love with an older female shadow dragon that took him under her wing.

Astrid'azilindria'noxamilla - female half-faerie dragon wizard/sorcerer, 19 Cha, bisexual, short, hyper feminine girly girl
http://blackmyst.deviantart.com/art/OC-commission-13-443559502

Il'setsya - female protean blooded tiefling sorcerer/rogue, 18 Cha, homosexual, average to athletic build, flighty, hyper-random. Probably the most transparently self-insert character I've had in terms of personality in-game

Contributor

1 person marked this as a favorite.

This was a very fun project to work on, just saying >:)

Contributor

3 people marked this as a favorite.

You're doing an awesome job Tim, just saying :)

Contributor

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Mikaze wrote:

sees product name

thinks "This sounds like a Todd Stewart product"

clicks product

:)

adds to cart

*happy grin*

Contributor

7 people marked this as a favorite.
Dragonchess Player wrote:
Not to get too in-depth into developmental psychology, but people are generally (more or less) bi-sexual;

Umm, no offense, but I would have to seriously dispute that assertion with pretty much every modern study on the prevalence of various sexual orientations, and with our current understanding of the origins of sexual orientation hard-wiring in the brain.

It appears to be entirely of biological origin, with social factors having little to no influence whatsoever in your sexual orientation.

Contributor

Drejk wrote:
Todd Stewart wrote:

I'm female in most of my dreams.

Understandably I have reason for this, but I'm always happier for the experience once I wake up, even if I'm back in a male body.

Interesting. Do you know if it is common part of dreams of other transfolk or if you are just lucky in that regard?

I honestly can't say for certain, though for folks that I've spoken with, my dreaming patterns in that regard seem relatively normal.

Contributor

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I'm female in most of my dreams.

Understandably I have reason for this, but I'm always happier for the experience once I wake up, even if I'm back in a male body.

Contributor

I <3 Lamashtu so very much.

Damn that's an amazing piece.

Contributor

1 person marked this as a favorite.

So Owen shared This yesterday, and you know, it's quite appropriate to post here in this thread.

Hopefully the link works. If not, I blame the protean Chorus of Internet Addresses of Unnaturally High Vapor Pressure.

Contributor

3 people marked this as a favorite.

If you think that you would enjoy the job, by all means apply for it. College degree or no college degree. The education spread for folks who have worked full-time as RPG designers and developers is pretty wild: everything from no college degree, to creative writing/English degrees, to Chemistry, etc.

Paizo will decide if your design chops are up to snuff, but for you, the only metric that matters is if you could see yourself doing it and if you would enjoy it.

Contributor

I would totally love to play either an imentesh protean bard, or an imentesh transmuter.

Contributor

Adam Daigle wrote:

Cosmologies—which are infinite—are too big to really fully “get” as far as mortal minds go.

I mean, look at our real world universe, rather what we know of it now. Look at how many billions of billions of galaxies, each having billions of stars and worlds... and that’s just what we have been able to see.

That’s just the Material Plane, which is surrounded by equally infinite Elemental Planes, which is surrounded by also infinite Ethereal and Astral.

Beyond that is another spread of infinities—the Outer Planes.

Most of these other planes are even bigger than the Material Plane, so omnipotent beings and their outsider minions have plenty of space to hang out.

This.

The Maelstrom is as far as anyone can tell, infinite, and new planes have solidified out of its chaos as time has gone on. There's plenty of real estate to go around even just on the non-infinite but mind-bogglingly large other planes of the outer sphere, even before you get into the Maelstrom and Abyss.

Plus since gods aren't restricted to dwelling within a plane that strictly matches their alignment, it's actually more open to expansion IMO to some other cosmologies.

Contributor

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Crystal Frasier wrote:

"Hermaphrodite" is not a good term to apply to people. Hermaphrodite is for talking about snails and flatworms. For humans (and tieflings), the world you want is "intersex".

This case isn't quite the same however. Hear me out if you would.

Proteans have also been described as being completely gender-morphic, shifting between male, female, agender, hermaphroditic and anything in-between at whimsy, because they can, and because orange acorn cantata, etc. When I used that word to describe them at times, it's in reference to the biological term which isn't appropriate for humans, because that state doesn't actually exist in humans. But it does in snails, proteans, and some other outsiders and others.

Tieflings however aren't precisely human. They've got some other blood floating in their veins that isn't of mortal origin. So why should mortal biology reign supreme? While it's frowned upon to use the word to refer to intersexed humans, given that tieflings have outsider blood involved, and the use of the term with respect to them refers to actual hermaphroditism, I would think it sufficiently transcends biology and isn't an intersex condition, but what we see in snails. Human intersex individuals may have been labeled hermaphrodite in the past due to ignorance of their state and confusion with non-human biology and mythological personages, but tieflings in this case and some others aren't the same thing. Of course you could also have an intersex tiefling, and that would be perfectly cool as well.

Contributor

Jonathon Vining wrote:


See, I used to view Rahadoum like Zach W. Being kind of an atheist myself, I figured, "Hey, these guys just wanna be fantasy atheists. That's cool." But then you come along with an amazing viewpoint that changes how I see it all. This is why Mikaze is my favourite person. Well, top three. I'm having trouble picking between M here, Todd Stewart, and China Mieville.

Wait, what??! *boggle*

How and why am I on your favorite person list?

And this is officially the first time in my life I've been named in the same breath as China Mieville. Be still my black beating heart! :D

Contributor

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Generic Villain wrote:


On a side note, there is a non-evil lich way back in the The Great Beyond (book of planes). However, I also recall reading something from the author (Todd Stewart) saying that he statted up the lich before knowing about the "all undead are evil in Golarion" rule. Or something like that. This was years ago.

Xegarius Malikar was his name.

The default is for most every undead creature to be evil, for a variety of reasons. James has explained the reason and rationale behind that default elsewhere.

Does this preclude their being incredibly rare exceptions for one of them to start off as non-evil? Does it preclude an originally evil lich from eventually becoming something other than evil?

If Malikar is revisited at some point in the future in print, perhaps we'll find out what his circumstances are for why he isn't evil. Or it's possible that he'll be turned evil. Time will tell :)

But just like with risen fiends, exceptions to the rule in Golarion should be really really really really freaky rare, with a deep, epic story to explain it all.

Contributor

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Timitius wrote:


Weal or Woe: only 4. Could use a couple more, ON THEME. Lower level ones (lvl 3-5) would be nice.\

I just snuck into your inbox and hid another Weal or Woe there. It may or may not have explosive runes prepared. It also may or may not be a hungry naunet protean I scribbled the text in magic marker on. I make no promises.

:D

Contributor

5 people marked this as a favorite.
Andrew R wrote:
So if this is so offensive to some, have there been any complaints about the witch class from those that are religious witches (wiccans)?

*shrug* Which I find somewhat odd, because the term existed well prior to Wicca being created in the early/mid 20th century - they just adopted the term for themselves. Now if the witch class referenced anything specific from wiccan theology and its various branches, then it might be something to be sensitive about perhaps. But as the word vastly predates wicca, I don't see it as much of a problem personally.

Contributor

That's a really awesome Bloodline :D

Contributor

9 people marked this as a favorite.
GM DarkLightHitomi wrote:


There is not a physical brain difference that is causing this.

There are no personality traits that have gender. The only gender difference that applies to the mind is sexual orientation. Everything else about the mind is gender neutral.

However, we are also made to mostly, but not entirely, conform to a culture, and it is common for a culture to identify certain traits with certain genders even when such traits have no biological basis.

In particular to this thread, some individuals find themselves with personality traits that the culture tells them is not for their gender. It is natural (though not always correct) to believe that the majority (whom we call "everyone") must be correct, so natural that it can be hard to feel otherwise even when one understands this intellectually, thus people see themselves in a meesed up light. They have desires and tastes that are biologically normal but are culturally wrong, and when it comes to psychology, the culture usually wins. This result in people who feel like they are wrong because their self view conflicts with the culture, and the subconcious reinforces this through the confirmation bias (which means that your subconcious will always try to prove you correct rather then admit to being wrong. The subconcious hates being wrong more then even cognitive dissonence.)

You're perfectly welcome to your opinion, but that's completely and utterly wrong as far as modern biology is concerned.

While we're still teasing down the specifics, there very much is a biological basis for internal gender identity and gender dysphoria. The idea that "culture" is behind gender dysphoria is rather insulting and dismissive of trans* persons.

Contributor

1 person marked this as a favorite.
thejeff wrote:


I'll give the rebuttal that I and others used earlier, but I'm not going to get drawn further back into this:
I don't think the OP looked at the gnoll or the gorilla and thought: Those remind me of black people. He looked at the map, saw the pattern that suggested Garund was an African analogue (which it blatantly is) and saw that the sub-Saharan analogue as represented by gnolls and gorillas and that black people were conspicuously absent.

That's not racism. That's drawing an obvious inference.

Having freelanced on parts of 'Heart of the Jungle', I can only ask how exactly you could miss the many pages discussing the multiple human ethnic groups in the area, a number of whom take inspiration from snapshots in time and space of several different real world cultures?

Contributor

DM_aka_Dudemeister wrote:

My issue is that the Girdle of Opposite Gender is referred to as a "cursed" item. Transformation from one gender to the other is referred to as a curse, and for some people that's not a bug it's a feature.

I think the Girdle of Opposite Gender should just be a magic item. One that's relatively easy to make (Alter Self as a prerequisite). No mentions of curses.

Paizo staff has touched on this before. For most people it would be a curse to have that transformation, while for transgendered persons it could be a blessing. As such it seems likely that it'll go from being "cursed" to just a magic item at some point in the future. Probably for the best.

Contributor

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Rynjin wrote:


Also, why do people keep adding a * after the prefix trans?

It's a spectrum with different people choosing to transition and others not, and it has various shades of self-identity therein. The * is just an attempt to be more inclusive I think, but I don't think anyone is going to object or be offended if you don't use that.

Contributor

4 people marked this as a favorite.

Also, there's a big difference IMO between trying to genuinely be sensitive to things that hurt and offend people, and trying to be offended on behalf of other people in a sort of egotistical condescending tumblr pissing contest.

Be cool to everyone, try to be sensitive to others.

Contributor

10 people marked this as a favorite.

Ambrosia Slaad is saying things in an incredibly effective, informative, and in terms of a response to certain posts in this thread, possibly a much kinder way than my first response would have been.

But a few brief comments on my part to some things in this thread that have been said:

Having your brain's physical structure not correlate with the rest of your body is not fun. I know this on a personal level, though I can't claim to speak for every trans* person out there. It took me years to even come to the point of being able to recognize and admit that status.

It's a daily discordance, a nagging, gnawing dyphoria that is never easy, even if you try to ignore it, or bury it, or try to rationalize it as anything else. For some people the level of dysphoria brings despair, and as TanithT said, for far too many trans* persons, it ends in suicide if they can't for many varied reasons transition if that would be their choice. It's a very real thing, and how each person decides to handle it is their own decision, be it hormones, surgical transition, or none of the above.

But please have some sympathy for people and not treat it as a joke, or an affectation, or a mental illness, or something that people "get over", or a phase, or a way to get attention, etc.

Also, for the record, I'm not offended by the Girdle of Opposite Gender. Just on account of it transforming your body without your consent or prior awareness that's enough there to earn it cursed item status. Paizo's designers have commented on its status wrt trans* individuals, its status as a cursed item due to legacy game lore, and Paizo of all people out there have been amazingly tactful, sensitive, and embracing of trans* people as customers, players, and with giving them in-game representation. I cannot thank them enough. :)

Contributor

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Ambrosia Slaad wrote:

If a transgendered person wishes to seek gender confirmation surgery, they do so to alleviate the body/mind incongruity that is too disruptive to ignore. They aren't confused, or mentally ill, or "suffering a culturally-induced identity crisis"... they are attempting to alleviate the disruption and incongruity with the best option available to them (since we don't have real sex-changing magic on Earth). Their bodies and identities are sovereign to themselves and themselves alone.

This.

Every bit of this.

Contributor

Drejk wrote:
Todd Stewart wrote:
Rysky wrote:
Mikaze wrote:
|dvh| wrote:
Except nobody's actually having on-page sex in Paizo products.
|dvh| is right. I've looked.
Well there is that Lamashtu orgy in Land of Pharaohs...

Hey, I was absolutely certain that not only would Lamashtu's Flower get cut in development, but I'd probably get an email politely advising me to avoid writing about Lamashtan blood orgies in the future.

And then it stayed in. And then it was illustrated. :D

Bad Todd! Bad!

So, when are you writing something about daemons, kytons and rakshasa?

I'd love to talk about what I'm writing, but alas I can't till any particular product is announced, authors listed, and released. I neither admit nor deny I'm working on any particular project at the moment.

But if you want specific things and think I'd be good for them, badger Paizo by sending them emails, or forum posts, or pizza with requests scrawled on the box. ;)

Contributor

Ambrosia Slaad wrote:
Todd Stewart wrote:

...Respect the setting constraints as they are are you'll be fine (and yes, this is coming from the person who played a half-faerie dragon PC).

But you'll take my CN tieflings from my cold dead hands. >:)

You've done much more than just play a half-faerie dragon; you made it a PC race. ;)

(And hey, it's on sale right now for 30% off for the next 44 hours at the d20pfsrd store and for another week at DTRPG.)

That I did. That was a really fun project as well.

Apparently it's either horrific and grimdark, or completely off the wall whimsical when I write.

Contributor

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Mikaze wrote:

more ssc and Egyptian-flavored gender-ambiguous lillend orgies next time plz?

You could use your getting-stuff-past-the-radar powers for good!

;)

Mixed gender lillend mating balls it is. I can promise nothing however. :)

Contributor

James Jacobs wrote:

5a) Yes, absolutely, and they are not fond of it.

6) Not everyhthing powerful lives forever. It can die, but it hasn't yet. Rest assured, if it DOES... something WOULD happen. What that might be isn't yet revealed.

7) Alderpash doesn't know everything... but there's more than one way to be a "prisoner."

Congrats James, you've just doomed the PCs in my home campaign to run afoul of the Oliphant or run across Jandelay in some capacity, given that the campaign is based out of Galisemni and there's a crazy heavy protean influence just about everywhere they look.

Now my brain is fixated on what exactly Jandelay is, how it relates to various protean lords, any relation to Galisemni, and lots of home-campaign-specific backstory thereof. I love the Maelstrom and I'm eating this up here. :D

Contributor

Despite the fact that I've run almost exclusively planar campaigns since 2001, the majority of the PCs in those campaigns have been more conventional than not. At most one template really.

But the thing is, it's so much a bizarre coterie of races represented by the PCs (or not) in my experience, its that my players' selection of characters have always fit the tone and atmosphere of the setting.

If you're in Sigil or Galisemni, sure you'll see lots of tieflings, aasimar, and other planetouched alongside normal humans, more monstrous races, and some full blown outsiders. If you're playing in a less exotic setting, it rather behooves your players to pick less exotic PCs I think. As long as people keep that self-imposed notion of be in line with the setting when you pick PC concepts, you'll avoid many issues. Don't pick a half-celestial qlippoth blooded tiefling rogue/wizard/3 different PrCs if you're playing in virtually any place on the material plane (or heck if ever anywhere else as well). Respect the setting constraints as they are are you'll be fine (and yes, this is coming from the person who played a half-faerie dragon PC).

But you'll take my CN tieflings from my cold dead hands. >:)

Contributor

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Trust me when I say that it's full of sweet, sweet depraved awesome.

Boomer, Logue, and me. You could probably find those three names listed in ancient, suppressed apocalyptic apocrypha. :D

Contributor

5 people marked this as a favorite.
Rysky wrote:
Mikaze wrote:
|dvh| wrote:
Except nobody's actually having on-page sex in Paizo products.
|dvh| is right. I've looked.
Well there is that Lamashtu orgy in Land of Pharaohs...

Hey, I was absolutely certain that not only would Lamashtu's Flower get cut in development, but I'd probably get an email politely advising me to avoid writing about Lamashtan blood orgies in the future.

And then it stayed in. And then it was illustrated. :D

Contributor

5 people marked this as a favorite.
memorax wrote:
The Great and Powerful Trixie wrote:
TanithT wrote:


Complainer: You are being rude and abusive! I WANT MY PONY AND I WANT IT NOW!
Say what now?
Agreed and seconded. They maybe a handful if even that who are very demanding. If not most are anything but. Apparently you can't ask Paizo anything as it's being rude and abusive.

You took my comment 180 degrees from what I intended.

I'm actually in agreement with TanithT's comment making light of some recent complaints with hyperbole. The response by an alt of mine was just being ironic, since TanithT asked for a pony in the hyperbole, and the alt was a My Little Pony character.

Contributor

Freehold DM wrote:
I'm a bit out of the loop. What's an ace?

Slang for someone who self-identifies their sexual orientation as asexuality.

Contributor

thejeff wrote:
Generic Villain wrote:
thejeff wrote:


More states will follow and we'll see a Supreme Court decision within a decade.
A decade? I would have guessed that as well this time last year, but the way thing's are going, we'll being seeing a SCOTUS decision in a year or two, tops. That's assuming they even bother taking such a case after it makes it to the circuit court, as it apparently will in Texas.

"Within". I'd love it to be sooner, though I'd also love one more democratic appointed Justice just to be sure.

They could also rule on narrow grounds again to avoid a final decision.

I actually suspect it would be a very lopsided decision in favor of equal rights by the current court, with some bizarre bedfellows that don't normally make sense with the conventional wisdom of Conservative majority/Liberal minority.

Contributor

thejeff wrote:


Sadly that "far right social wing of the Republican party" has far more control over the Republican party than their numbers might suggest. It's really hard to argue they're increasingly marginalized when they're driving policy in so many states and blocking progress on the federal level.
The economic right/libertarian (not centrist) wing of the party may not care about the social issues, but they cater to them for primary votes.

The Dems may not be as reliable on LGBT rights as we'd like and the sea change may be affecting moderate Republican voters, but suggesting there's little difference between the two on LGBT issues is just not realistic.

Too often on a national level, the Dems absolutely take LGBT votes for granted without doing much of anything after an election is over IMO versus larger voting blocks that they can't ignore.

I'm always in a bind when it comes to elections because I refuse to vote for religious conservatives but I also refuse to vote for folks on the economic far left. Moderates in both parties sadly tend to vanish because of the way that primaries are run in this country which tends to greatly amplify the voting power of the far left and far right in both the Dem and Repub camps. Sigh.

Contributor

Generic Villain wrote:
Judy Bauer wrote:


I get what you mean—but pragmatically, wanting it to pass for a downstream political goal is throwing thousands of people under the bus for political points. It's our lives you're gambling with! Please keep that in mind before you regret too much that queer folks (and people perceived as queer) kept their right to, e.g., buy groceries, or call the loss of that right "excellent."

I'm absolutely okay with throwing a few thousand people under the buss if it means maintaining the Senate in 2014-2016. The good that Obama could do in his last 2 years with Senate backing far outweighs the minimal harm that would befall the people of Arizona for the few months before that law was struck down as unconstitutional. A missed opportunity to raise utter hell and dominate the headlines.

So I don't seem hypocritical (just ruthless), I'm openly gay and would welcome this law in my state.

You're welcome to whatever political beliefs you wish, but I can't help but be absolutely aghast at that sort of willingness to cause real harm to people in the name of supporting a specific political party.

I would argue that the country as a whole is seeing a sea change in terms of LGBT rights which pleases me to no end, and that it's no longer such a clear cut Liberal/Conservative issue.

A large chunk of normally Democrat-supporting voters approved of Prop 8 in California, and I would argue that it's only an increasingly marginalized (by their own party) the far right social wing of the Republican party that is against LGBT equal rights, rather than the amalgamation of the economic right/libertarian/centrist wing of that party.

I'm not personally willing to cause real harm to real people just to score political points for one party or the other.

Contributor

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Vivianne Laflamme wrote:
TanithT wrote:
Vivianne Laflamme wrote:
Okay... Then don't participate in the conversation if you think it's overly specialized and useless.
You are in the LGBT thread, on a gaming forum. It seems that you want to have a conversation that is very heavily focused in the language and viewpoints of a specialized field that other folks here have said is inaccessible to them.

Sometimes there are conversations in this widely ranging thread about topics I know nothing about or about things I find uninteresting/overly specialized. And that's okay! There are many conversations I'm not interested in, but that of course doesn't mean everyone else is uninterested in them. My solution is simple: I don't jump into those conversations.

Also, there is irony in someone who's used specialized medical jargon telling others to avoid jargon.

There's jargon and then there's jargon. On the one hand you can have highly specialized terms in science that are quite specific and between those with a background in those fields, it clarifies discussion. But at the very same time for something like chemistry or medicine that are grounded in the quantifiable, whatever theories that exist in those fields which use highly specific jargon, it's possible to describe them to someone outside those fields using much simpler language.

There's also that second type of jargon, that if I may paraphrase the words of the much underrated philosopher Calvin, in his monograph 'The Dynamics of Interbeing and Monological Imperatives in Dick and Jane: A study in Psychic Transrelational Gender Modes' describes as being used to "inflate weak ideas, obscure poor reasoning, and inhibit clarity."

Another exploration of the difference might be found in the publication of Alan Sokal's brilliant "Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity" in the postmodern cultural studies journal 'Social Text'. [An intentionally nonsensical paper submitted just to see if his academic standing and the incomprehensibility of the text would make it seem intellectual enough for the editors to just publish it, which to their embarrassment, they did].

I'll admit a bias against certain schools of thought and their attempts to define the world through terminology of their own invention that at no point derives from experimentation. If something cannot be tested for confirmation or falsifiability, it isn't proper science, and unfortunately I see it as misguided at best to try to define human gender identity or sexual orientation via these.

Contributor

Annabel wrote:

Scientific Realism I think I explained this, but this particular phrase has a deep and complex meaning which certainly goes beyond the needs of this register. But because I am sensing some confusion about my particular position regarding science, I didn't place this in spoiler tags.

Suffice it to say, someone (me, specifically) can be a scientific arealist (or some people call "anti-realist") while still holding that science creates useful knowledge. In fact, I am willing to go so far to say that disciplined scientific knowledge has the capacity to generate very good things. I look at my own personal contributions to scientific knowledge proudly. Not being a scientific realist doesn't make me anti-science.

However for the benefit of those without a background in philosophy, you might wish to actually provide a definition of Scientific Realism. You don't seem to have provided one above.

Contributor

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Annabel wrote:
And what are these racially specific drugs?

When you get into pharmacokinetics, you can and will see some radically different metabolic profiles across different racial groups. Among what we broadly classify as races, you have populations that have population level SNPs for various P450 enzymes in the liver just as an example, that can radically affect the dosage and safety profile of specific drugs. If you under or overexpress Cytochrome P450 3A4 for instance, that has major ramifications for a patient, and it's often useful to consider racial population demographics of certain P450s when giving certain drugs to people in those populations.

Ideally we could sequence a specific patient for this information, but we're not quite there yet (almost at a commercially viable level for that!), so going by "racial" population genetics can be useful.

Contributor

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Jim Groves wrote:
Set wrote:
Nanatsusaya wrote:
Great Beyond <- We know a fair amount about great metropolises of the Great Beyond like Dis, but what about Axis? What should PCs encounter along the way if they journey to the Boneyard to petition Pharasma for something?

Axis deserves it's own book, eventually, as a planar metropolis along the lines of the City of Brass or Dis, but expanded beyond all of the above in the sense that it's not really just a big city on some other plane, but more like a plane unto itself that is just one big honkin' city.

More like the Plane of Gears, in the Midgard setting, it's not just a big city, it's a world/setting unto itself, that is covered with streets and buildings.

I would like see this book, plus have some more detailed rules about planar adventures. There are some but I think they're pretty threadbare.

Even if it's not feasible to do a book on each of the planes, I think it would awesome at some point in the future to see a hardcover book on planar adventures. Advice on ways to handle the planes in a campaign, dealing with various outsiders beyond combat, etc.

In that sort of book you could present multiple examples of locations to set as the focus of such a campaign: Axis, the City of Brass, Galisemni, and Shadow Absalom being the locations that first come to mind for me.

Such a book is up at the top of my list of 'Paizo Dream Products'. :)

Contributor

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Chaderick the Penguin wrote:

I would also posit that there is a precedent for Asmodeus transcending typical devilhood. Since the 2E "Guide to Hell" supplement, Asmodeus was a deity. I'm pretty sure he retained that status in 4E, though I'm a bit fuzzy where he fell in the 3E years. The canon was all Greyhawk (the big deifying promotion there went to Vecna), and I don't have my copy of the 3.5 "Fiendish Codex II" handy...

Off the top of my head:

2e Planescape didn't define Asmodeus except as a big, incredibly powerful mystery for the most part that manipulated the other Lords of the 9 like chess pieces.

2e's 'Guide to Hell' presented him as a gigantic serpent that ate disbelief, didn't need worship, had the power of a greater deity, and was partially responsible for the creation of the multiverse along with Jazirian the coatl deity. This concept was never picked up in subsequent books except for the idea that he had a true form different from the avatar in Nessus, and that he fell from somewhere else.

3e MotP mentions the 2e GtH as a rumor, but largely sticks with the Planescape line and leaves mystery in place for DMs to flesh out as they choose.

3e BoVD largely does the same as the 3e MotP.

3e Fiendish Codex II presents a twist on previous material and defines Asmodeus as originally being a LN entity that fell to LE, with his followers becoming the first devils/baatezu (though it mentions that Baator/The Hells were already there when they fell, which fits in nicely with the 2e and Fiendish Codex I yugoloth creation mythos that had them and their own creators seeding the Abyss and Baator with the first Obyriths and Ancient Baatorians).

4e Asmodeus isn't the same entity as the 1e/2e/3e Asmodeus because 4e uses a completely different cosmology and different in-game history. I don't recall the specifics of his power level, but I think Asmo became a deity. 4e Asmo and his followers were originally angels that killed their patron deity.

1 to 50 of 1,899 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2014 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.