|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
From what I understood, Weaver had sued his neighbor over a property sale or somesuch. That neighbor then began sending threatening letters to local, state, and federal officials, while signing Weavers name. He came to FBI attention when he contacted them to let them know that any letters that they recieved werent from him. IIRC, of course, I could be way off. Kirth Gersen wrote: Thanks for the recommendation -- this sounds really good. Just saw the Randy Quaid re-enactment of the Siege at Ruby Ridge and have mixed feelings about the whole scenario. I mean, yeah, the guy was no good... but at the same time, is it totally unreasonable to expect the "investigators" to refrain from acting as a hunter-killer extermination squad? Just finished: Overall pretty good book. Id say it was about 45% anecdotes involving law enforcement breaking the law in order to enforce the law, 45% post 9-11 abuses, 5% a breaking down the Constitution in plain English, and 5% Eminent Domain abuses. Regarding Ruby Ridge: Its pretty amazing how much of the accusations against Randy Weaver were complete fabrications. (note: the book doesnt go into this, just the specific lawless actions of the officers during the siege.) You know the name of that movie, as it sounds like something I would watch? So who was unlawfully restraining Elian? Thats what you are missing. As far as the 11th circuit court of appeals, your link backs my version up. -No date cited- protective rights given to Lazaro
As an example, If you are suing someone over possession of a tv, even if you know that you are going to win, you do not have the right to break into someones house and take the tv before the court says you win. Interesting little factoid about the search warrant: The INS waited until 7 pm on Good Friday, after the regular (presumably less INS-friendly) judge left, so they could get a rubber stamped warrant from a magistrate who was unfamiliar with the case and was notoriously pro government in his rulings. The weapons thing was completely fabricated (a hallmark of Reno's tenure). The INS agent who signed the affadavit presented to the magistrate made ZERO mention of any weapons or threats of violence, just that Elian was to be arrested because he was an illegal alien (never mind that the precedent was for the INS to not arrest Cubans unless they committed a crime, consistent with the Cuban Adjustment Act of 1966) and that he was being (serious air quotes here)"unlawfully restrained". ZERO mention of violence or weapons. However also omitted was that Aaron Podhurst, a lawyer from Miami (and coincidently, a long time friend of Reno) was mediating negotions between Lazaro, Juan Miguel, and the Government, even as the affadavit was filed! If Reno would have waited till then, she would have been in the clear, but she didnt. There was no reason, whatsoever, to use tear gas, guns, and violence. (What exactly did the NBC camera man do again to deserve the assault?)Yet they did, the message for Lazaro Gonzales was the same message that Reno had for the Branch Davidians: "We are going to show them that we control (the compound) and they are impotent." Moorluck wrote:
Your ideas intrigue me and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter. copied from another thread: Comrade Anklebiter wrote:
I sincerely wish to apologize. Not so much for the libertarians taking over your thread (youre popular with us plutocrats!), but for declaring this a "fake politroll" thread. I should have been more specific, but in my quitting-smoking rage-fueled haze, I wasnt. Only the part where I was declaring myself to be your self appointed campaign manager was meant to be the politrolly part. If I actually offended you, I apoligise many times. Thank you for you consideration,
Regarding Ruby Ridge, the only blame given to Janet Reno was the cover-up part. (IIRC, she wasnt even AG when the siege happened.) When your superior gives you an illegal order (shoot any armed adult male) and you ignore that order to perform an even more illegal order (shoot unarmed woman holding babies) you deserve to be punished. The Reno office made sure that neither supervisor or shooter were punished. Regarding Elian, I dont know where you get your information, but from what I can tell, you have it backwards. The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals enjoined the Federal Government from moving Elian outside the jurisdiction of US courts. When Reno ordered Elians removal from his great-uncles home, it was in direct violation of the courts order, aka kidnapping.
Then you've never read any of his books I think the Judge's biggest targets are A) John Ashcroft and B) Janet Reno. Edit- I highly recommend his book "Constitutional Chaos". The entire first half is about police abuses and Janet Reno's mishaps (Waco/Her Child abuse crusades while AG in Florida/Ruby Ridge cover-up/ Elian Gonzales), while the second half is dealing solely with the legal abuses of the war on terror during the Bush presidency. (so far, about 3/4 of the way through it.) In no particular order: Against Me!
Obviously it depends on my mood which is my favorite at the time. Honorable mentions
The Mad Badger wrote:
Only if we win the election. So I suggest you start working on slogans. Here are 2 to get you started: "Tired of voting for the lesser of 2 evils? This year vote goblin, the greater evil! ------message paid for by the Friends of the WPABGTDG Association." or (on a button that features me doing a pouty-face)
Edit- thought of some more "Voting is for ninnies! Now get out and vote for me!"
Plus, I have a personal mission to mention Tom Wopat as many times as possible. All the "I'm Gonna Get You, Sucka" talk had me in a silly mood. Kirth Gersen wrote:
I am disappointed that you would so openly shun the Worker's Party for the Advancement of Both Goblinkind and TheWhiteknife's Desire for Graft. (WPABGTDG for short) It may be true that Obama=Dubya=Romney, BUT Doodlebug Anklebiter > Tom Wopat > A three legged bobcat > cotton, the fabric of our lives. I hope this clears things up for you. Matthew Morris wrote:
Hahhahahaha I had to buy my girlfriend this. Its a piece of crap. Of course we werent using it for its intended purpose. I live in Hello Kitty Hell. The Mad Badger,
And a friendly reminder to keep at least 15' between yourself, Comrade Anklebiter, and any cabinets. Also, if you see our leader grabbing a shovel, for gods sake, man, run. Comrade, I cant believe I used Czar as a formal title. That sucks on my part. Another good report coming from the federal courts It's a little premature (its only a preliminary injunction), but I'm happy about this. Unfortunately, now we get to sit back and watch the DOJ spend a bunch of taxpayer money fighting it. meatrace wrote:
If you were here right now, I'd throw something at you. 8p I agree with theJeff, tho. We definitely do need a (sane) opposition party (or 2 or 3!). I am conservative, in the sense that I believe in actually conserving things like money or civil liberties. There is very very little that is conservative about most of today's elected republican party. ciretose wrote:
This, I agree with. Dont get me wrong, I think there are a few more pressing matters....ie assassinations, wars, and indefinite detentions and such. IMO, if the Republican party wants to keep pressing neocon after neocon as their nominees, they deserve to lose every election they run for. Someone in some thread mentioned the difference between actual conservatives and the tripe that the republican party has been putting out over the last 3-4 decades. I, for one, would like to see a return to actual conservatism. Those biscuits at Red Lobster
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
