|6 people marked this as a favorite.|
Mike, I would respectfully request that you reverse this ruling to an official stance of "no official ruling." I believe it would be better for the campaign if GMs and players were encouraged to cooperate, and at the same time for the players to have the responsibility for being able to present to the GM a sufficient snapshot of how their character's numbers work. I think silence on this better serves the community by reinforcing the notion that "Sometimes Mike can make the rule of not making a rule", and this PARTICULAR issue is one where not making a rule is better, because the position currently taken is at some dissonance to the Additional Resources electronic sourcing rule and the secondary request for a rule is one which i DESPERATELY do not want to see - an "official standard for what a character sheet must constitute".
Because we avoided requiring a specific form and format of the purchased item log, I believe we similarly should avoid forcing a specific form and format of the character sheet.
In my specific case as a GM, I vastly prefer NOT having an 'official' character sheet with a gamer's scraggly glyphs inscribed and erased and re-inscribed all over it. Whether that's a HL snapshot on a tablet, a HL instance on a laptop, HL in dropbox imported to my device, a printout, hieroglyphs, whatever - as long as there's something that gets us to a reverse-engineerable stat block I don't care.
(Hmm, that's a thought: all GMs should be familiar with stat block format.... and it's more consistent than the HL default sheet vs. PFS version of the PFRPG sheet... but I'd still rather not have an official medium, form and format discussion)
Hell, the last character I ran was written out on two 3x5 cards (0xp level one character in Wounded Wisp on a day I wasn't expecting to play and did NOT want to play a pregen...)... in something that closely resembled an exploded statblock format.