|
|
|
Recent posts by
Tessius:
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xabulba wrote:
Robert Little wrote:
Xabulba wrote:
I want a bigger inventory!
Two things - buy all the backpacks. Most vendors in each of the cities have a single backpack that will add 10 slots to your inventory.
Second, is get the Warden's Keep DLC ($7 or free with Collector's Edition). Once you complete it, you have a lock box that you can store crap in.
No vendors I have met have had a backpack for sale. I also have the Wardens Keep but that dosn't do any good when I'm pilliging during a quest. I would have to go back all the way I came just to unload stuff and then go all the back to were I was, it too much of a pain in the A@@.
The quartermaster in Ostagar had one but dont know how I'd have enough to afford it then. The dwarf merchant in your camp also sells one.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can I Call My Guy Drizzt? wrote:
Mikhaila Burnett wrote:
Question 1: The dot after subjects on messageboards. What is it? How does it behave the way it does?
Hypothesis: The dot is added when you comment/create a thread, and vanishes after so many posts pass without you commenting it.
Question 2: How does one get labeled a 'superscriber'?
Hypothesis: Subscribe to EVERYTHING that has a subscription associated with it.
Am I even close?
I wonder if the dot disappearing from some threads you've posted in has anything to do with multiple aliases? I just noticed it started doing this today after I made a new one.
Might be something Gary's set up after a certain amount of time w/o posting. Or it could be the "...of Forums are way too long" threads are eating them to survive. BTW dont feed the "forums are way too long" threads after midnight...
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mikhaila Burnett wrote:
Question 1: The dot after subjects on messageboards. What is it? How does it behave the way it does?
Hypothesis: The dot is added when you comment/create a thread, and vanishes after so many posts pass without you commenting it.
Question 2: How does one get labeled a 'superscriber'?
Hypothesis: Subscribe to EVERYTHING that has a subscription associated with it.
Am I even close?
1. The dot is put next to threads you post in.
2. The superscriber tag is applied when you subscribe to all the subscriptions in a product line.
ok now I need to find what I'm missing in the PFRPG line to not have it...
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sara Marie wrote:
Thanks! Cosmo is showing me around the systems so I can fix things for you guys. (If your curious as to what it looks like, think of a Rube Goldberg machine).
As for the person I am replacing... if I understand the office rumors correctly, goblins have kidnapped her. I'm sure we'll be forming a rescue party sometime in the near future, but no doubt, her time spent away will have molded her into something far too great for mere customer service.
...They stuck Alison in some kind of editor crysalis-cocoon?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hopeless wrote:
Still wondering how long before I get cut off, but anyone know why Eli didn't just have those on the ship try and reach them?
I mean they did have the people to try after all?
Is it worth spoilering this bit?
Think the ships dialing system locked out the other 3 addresses. One of the away team hacked a work-around on their remote to go to one of the other addresses. And I did notice that Rush totally blamed Sgt. Greer for shooting that guy.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
jscott991 wrote:
Fair enough. :) I was trying to think of a homicidal, chaotic figure and he came to mind.
The nominal alignment means less than the presentation.
<off topic> BTW some of the best stuff in Batman: Arkham Asylum is all the Mark Hamill/Joker bits. Even the random stuff over the PA system </off topic>
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kaelas Rilyntlar wrote:
Tom Baumbach wrote:
Kaelas Rilyntlar wrote:
The Blood Elves are light-skinned, evil, demon-worshipping elves.
Driven, power hungry? Yeah. Evil? Nah, not by D&D standards.
Communing with evil outsiders isn't evil? So I guess a paladin then that consorted with a pit fiend, would be ok?
Wow, no more evil than all the gnomes and humans on the alliance who are Warlocks...
The blood elves started out as high elves. A magically advanced race who unfortunately became addicted to magic over time. When the Scourge invaded their homeland and destroyed the font of their power and wiped out most of them, the survivors went into withdrawal. They started exploring other avenues one of which was binding demons. This was exacerbated by a corrupt leader. Since then, they've cast out this prince and have sided with the angelic Naaru in an effort to get back on track. If you look at it, there's plenty of gray on both sides of the Alliance/Horde thing.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Radle 81 wrote:
I just noticed that Mr. Mona has not posted since Sept. 8th. Everything OK? Is he away?
I'm not stalking, honest! :)
I usually like to click on the various Paizo staffers profiles and then view all their recent posts so I don't miss anything cool or interesting. Usually, James, Jason, Lisa, Erik, Sean etc are the main ones I check and I just happened to notice that Erik hasn't posted in a while ...
Just curious, I guess ... :)
He might be at Gen-Con Oz...
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew Morris wrote:
Ixancoatl wrote:
Jabsco wrote:
I know more about these rules then any of you
I was going to comment on the debate goin on on this thread, but I'm still reeling from this comment. Really? Seriously?
Based on grammar, I'm guessing he's ESL, and doesn't realize how condencending he sounds.
edit:Earlier, he said "I'm Willing to bet the lot of you are new to this game"...Matt, by ESL I think you mean English as Second Language? I dont recognize the abbreviation but from the context that's what I guess.--corrected the quote.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well however they got there, House Thrune are the current leaders of Cheliax and have the support of the government, the armed forces, the Hellknights and more or less the nobility. I'd have to read it when I get home but the impression I got from the companion on Cheliax and Part 1 of CoT is that it's very rare for devils to just walk about town, even Egorian. Also, Cheliax has not forbid other religions as I recall, not even Iomedae. As for high level do-gooders, there aren't many. Golarion is just now stabilizing after the onset of the Age of Lost Omens and the early impression was that Player Characters are the new movers and shakers. And if there are High Level do-gooders like in the Forgotten Realms, just look to Elminster's sidebar on basically this topic from the 3rd ed FRCS.
Edit: Here's an interesting idea. What if as part of his helping jail Rovagug, Asmodeus made an agreement with the other Deities. If he ever could get an entire culture/nation to openly worship him, the other deities would not interfere...y'know just so I help you lockup this angry nihilstic god? I mean c'mon *grin* who would ever be stupid enough to openly pledge their and their country's fealty to me? :)
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sean Mahoney wrote:
Jabsco wrote:
They are unnamed so they do stack
It's a little tougher to adjudicate than that.
The sword sage ability reads that the Wis to AC is only applicable while wearing light armor, while the monk can only use it while unarmored.
However, the unarmed sword sage variant isn't actually a real thing but is instead lightly suggested in the "adaptation" section of the class. The adaptation specifically only says to give the ss the unarmed progression of the monk and remove the light armor proficiency, it doesn't say that the ability changes from while wearing light armor to not wearing armor (though such a call would make sense since the ss no longer has proficiency with light armor... it just isn't what it says).
Finally the way stacking works also would argue a bit against these stacking. In the Rules Compendium under stacking it indicates that unnamed bonuses stack unless they come from the same source. It could certainly be argued that these are indeed the same source (a class ability that gives Wis to AC when unarmored) and so overlap instead of stack.
It really comes down to a DM call because of all that... there isn't a crystal clear RAW ruling on this one. Well, I guess by RAW the ability doesn't change over and so you either have Wis to AC in light armor or unarmored but not both.
Sean Mahoney
At work so don't have books with me...I remember that a similar question came up with Duelist and Bladesingers Int Bonus to AC. I'm thinking that it was in Sage Advice, but the answer was since they're both based on the same stat they dont stack.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aaron Bitman wrote:
Saint_Meerkat wrote:
Wait, here's an eye...
And here's a hand...
And a head.
Wanted: Trustworthy surgeon good with a saw.
April Fools' PFS Scenario: Aroden's Head...
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crmanriq wrote:
Improved Natural Armor, Improved Natural Attack are both listed as possible feats for animal companions.
There is no rules text for either of these feats.
Should we assume the same text as 3.5?
My guess is that they're in the Bestiary.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kirth Gersen wrote:
Kirth Gersen, about halfway up the page wrote:
First U.S. death from swine flu was right here in Houston: Derek and Silverhair and I need to break out the masks pretty soon, I guess.
pres man wrote:
First U.S. death has happened because of this virus. A young child in Texas.
Um, yeah, that's what I've been saying. And provided a link.
Yes, a little child that came from Mexico in the last couple weeks. Read it on an article on yahoo but can't find the link atm.
edit: found it
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090429/ap_on_he_me/med_swine_flu
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tensor wrote:
Wow!
So, what do we know?
** spoiler omitted **
If so, :)
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|