|1 person marked this as a favorite.|
He's deluding himself.
Casting IH is making an evil choice. He's a hypocrite. He can continue to think he's making good choices, but where it really matters, i.e. wanting healing, he stoops to using Evil because it's better and more convenient.
He could say whatever he wanted...his actions would speak for him, and soon enough he'd start popping the paladin's detect-o-meter, which has been a kind of 'oh s+&&' moment for some people when it happens. Of course there's the one guy who tried to make it seem like I was singling him out personally, but he's the same guy who thought he could stay CG while using Evil magic to good ends. I warned him, he learned otherwise. And since I don't allow Evil PC's when I GM, he had a choice of taking drastic action to reclaim his destiny, or becoming an NPC. I ended up with his character sheet, and he started someone new.
What happened to the new NPC after that was interesting, but that's a separate story.
This would fall under tolerating a lesser Evil to fight a greater Evil. It's still Evil, in the end. Your example is different because the character is going into it with eyes open.
he's Evil with a Code. that doesn't mean he's not Evil, nor does it mean he can't have noble qualities. But he is indeed making his choices and choosing to be Damned rather then making other choices. it IS his choice.
I'm really starting to see why so many gamers are fundamentally uncomfortable with the idea of objective alignment.
Thanks for your thoughts.