Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Zalsus

Talonhawke's page

RPG Superstar 2013 Star Voter. Pathfinder Society Member. 4,116 posts (4,199 including aliases). No reviews. 2 lists. 1 wishlist. 6 aliases.


1 to 50 of 213 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | next > last >>

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Problem is nothing stops a really good item from going to use by the caster as well. If it's really something they want to do they can hit those prereqs as well.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

So we are back to all barbarians being raging angry people.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Dammit I'm gonna miss bleach. Length hasn't be an issue for me but I also am a reading addict. My issue really is the weekly wait for my 4 small hits then back to waiting.


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Jaime Sommers wrote:
Talonhawke wrote:
As I am 30 and out of the house it isn't a problem for me, however my youngest brother is wanting to get into pathfinder and my father is extremely conservative religiously.
Excuse me but... how young is your youngest brother?

17 years old. In other news after talking with my father about my experiences with the game and a discussion about clerics and religion with our pastor who it turns out has a son that plays he is going to let my brother play provided that it doesn't interfere with his school work and he doesn't start acting weird as he put it.

Thank you all for the advice.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

As I am 30 and out of the house it isn't a problem for me, however my youngest brother is wanting to get into pathfinder and my father is extremely conservative religiously. Can anyone possibly point me in the right direction of some articles I can show him or anything really along those lines so we can at least get a dialogue going?

P.S. Sorry if this is in the wrong section.


4 people marked this as a favorite.

Please of Magnificent Many-Eyed King do not bring attention to these fools. There lack of these things makes it easier to sneak up and destroy your foes and bring new souls upon which to feast.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

So if I take RH Tengu and long nose form how large of a beak do I have now?


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Lights incense at the altar of the rules team and begins summoning ritual.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Maybe your just really good at using your massive Orc ass in combat.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

This to me would be like learning that you supposed to negotiate with a Rakshsa for the release of hostages at level 1-3 and coming back the next session ready to bless a crossbow bolt and let the true strike casting wizard shoot it because you found out it was an instant kill ( or at least used to be ) during the down time.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Once again lack of info on why is the issue. In the Viking example it's evident why humans only. However lets say a guy shows up with a short bearded human with a high con, a Scottish accent, worse alcoholism than the cast of Jersey Shore, and a big axe. Will you be frustrated because he is a dwarf rip-off? ( and yes I know that guy fits in great with Vikings)


2 people marked this as a favorite.

The thing is the GM is only at fault if there is a complete refusal of discussion. If I say that I'm running Dragonlance you can't be a halfling but if what your wanting is a small race who are good at sneaking that's an option. If you wanted to play a warforged your outta luck as well but maybe you just wanted the constructy flavor (mmnm wood, metal, and oil) so we might ask the resident tinker gnome if he minds you playing a gnomish invention of a close friend who he is helping test. But if I just say no without at least learning what your seeking then who am I helping.

On the flip side if it's a game set in the godless years and you demand to play a cleric or you won't play there isn't much I can do to help. Same thing if you show up with a 3pp moogle race that you have to play, and by Reorx's beard you mean a moogle not a kender then am I the problem?


9 people marked this as a favorite.

What I've picked up from the thread is that there is no problem with any of the hypothetical characters, all the hypothetical players seem to be unyielding douches. Because if we decide to play a game of political intrigue and you bring Sir Smash and Burn, then the player not the dwarf fighter is the problem. If no elves exist in your world then 90% of the time bringing an elf is bad form. But if we are playing a campaign where it just might work (exploring a new continent, interplanetary travel, or the like) then asking isn't out of the question. Heck asking for something and listing your main reason/s why should never be considered bad. However only having that one idea and refusing to budge is bad for the player to do, just like adamantly refusing to at least talk to the player as a GM isn't going to help anything


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Alrighty after reading this thread it's clear what I'm doing wrong as a GM. I watched too many Saturday morning cartoons as a child. Coupled with too much comic books. It causes me to instead of blanket barring of things based in concept to wrap my head around a way to fit the square peg in the round hole. Sure a bit of cutting might happen, but whether it's to the peg or hole remains to be seen.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

My point was that they were all twisted evil lil bastartds. Then it was revealed that not all were changed over. Simply because no elves have been seen for 40000 yrs doesn't mean that there aren't some out their somewhere, if it can fit the narritive. It's funny how there were no oracles or alchemist ( as in the classes with the abilities they bring) in my home setting until hmm I like the rules for this sure lets use it, same with the Bo9S classes nothing out there was even close to what they did but that didn't stop me from working them into my games.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Bruunwald wrote:
I think most players and GM are long-since used to the notion that drawing your arrow out is actually part of the bow attack itself.

Drawing that arrow is still a free action by the rules.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I have to agree with Snorter here but on both sides neither the DM or player should be done with their creative works until talking to the other.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Ciretose don't forget about QuickDraw shields.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

BBT flurry is not twf anymore. Flurry is now simply extra attacks at certain levels. Thus rulings affecting TWF and THW dont affect flurrying with a THW.

Also how come everytime the devs rule in a way you dont like you start firing off outlandish off the cuff reasons why this new ruling is completly ruining the game.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Malachi using the actual rules show me one thing that will break. You and both know that your above list is worse scare tactics than political talk radio. You still can't seem to understand the word can't. All the FAQ has to say is that without EWP you cannot wield a bastard sword in one hand. It's called a rules exception.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
DrDeth wrote:

We need to just get over the term "action". Again, like I said, PF is not meant to be read legalistically like 3.5. It is to be played under RAI aka Common Sense. So, it makes no difference whether "no action" is a "action" or not.

The RAI is very clear. You can do NOTHING except transfer hp to your eidolon while Held but make your save. You can not delay.

Fixed it for you.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Sean K Reynolds wrote:
Kristopher Miller 644 wrote:
I have a clarification question regarding the flambard; am I correct in the following interpretation of its function?

{A character with only martial weapon proficiency can only wield it two handed and does not gain the bonus to sunder.}

Correct.

{A character with Bastard Sword Proficiency but not Flambard Proficiency can wield it one handed and does not gain a bonus to sunder.}

Correct.

{A character with Flambard Proficiency but not Bastard Sword Proficiency can only wield it two handed, but does gain the bonus to sunder.}

Correct.

{A character with both Flambard and Bastard Sword Proficiency can wield it one handed and gains the bonus to sunder.}

Correct.

{Also, shame on Paizo for publishing that bats are rodents in one of their products.}

Reminds me of writing the 3E PH and trying to explain what weasel-like animals were for the purpose of a familiar's "speak with animals of its kind" ability. "We can't say 'speak with mustelidae,' most people don't know what that means without looking it up...."

It's actually to your advantage to treat bats as rodents, otherwise bat familiars can only talk with bats, while rat familiars can talk with rats, mice, squirrels, porcupines, beavers, chipmunks, guinea pigs, and voles. And yes, I know the familiar rules treat them as different types of animals.

here is the link if you like


1 person marked this as a favorite.

They are proficient with those that state it such as the temple sword. Otherwise no luck.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Clicked the button but as you already know I'm firmly in the rules language camp. One-handed weapon is a rules term it does not mean the same thing as a weapon wielded in one hand. So when you use a weapon as a one-handed weapon you use the rules for one handed weapons. When you are simply wielding it in one hand then use the rules appropriate to what type of weapon it is.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

All ha the almost never wrong lord Wraithstrike


2 people marked this as a favorite.

BBEG A enemy figure who has some how managed to rise to some form of power within his tribe, religion, or other group despite the fact he usually dies to Adventurers within 18 secs of actually confronting them due to his egotistical need to confront them at odds of at least 4 to 1.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Wait you mean my GM lied and my barbarian doesn't lose his class features if his Int is higher than 7 or if I wear more than a lion cloth?? Am I also allowed to talk in complete sentences or is actually banned?

In all seriousness always crazy mouth foaming barbarians are as bad as always evil orcs right Mikaze?


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Thomas Long 175 wrote:
ciretose wrote:


Here is why this won't work.

1. Schrodinger's Wizard magically appears at 12th level. He didn't have to to go through the awkward phases of wizard life picking up all those feats and pre-magic item min/max scores, often dying in the process, he appeared fully formed. And he always has the exact right spell at the exact right time, and plenty of time before and after to buff. Hence, he is undefeated.

2. Assuming anything is begging for the goal posts to be moves.

3. Some people on here seem married to beliefs to the point of religious fervor.

I'm not even reading the posts, how right am I?

Wizard hasn't been brought up in a few pages I don't think. :P

3 is correct.

Edit: I'm sorry i misspoke. The word wizard was used 3 times in the past 3 pages before you came in.

Speaking of Religion can I speak to you about the wonders of his Magnificance Lord Wraithstrike.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

33. If you don't like your salsa burning hot warn me .... I mean the person making it so I don't throw in a handful of super hot peppers.

I was so glad we had plenty of milk that day.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I usually try to have a contingency plan ready for running away. The best I've seen however went to our party monk a tetori who had grab and rhino's charge. He really liked to charge and burn ki to grapple spellcasters. He had ready to charge the next person who cast a spell believing the enemy wizard would cast shortly after his turn the wizard died on the next turn from the paladin followed by every one but the monk and sorcerer failing a save against a contingent wail of the banshee. The wizard goes to cast teleport the monk looks up " what about my readied action".


1 person marked this as a favorite.
3.5 Loyalist wrote:
Talonhawke wrote:
3.5 Loyalist wrote:
Rynjin wrote:
EldonG wrote:


Nonsense.

If it's actually a scenario set in Golarion...(where there is NO AMAZON)...

But there is the Mwangi Expanse and the jungles in that area.

Very analogous to the Amazon, is it not?

EldonG wrote:
I approach a ranger.

Where? Generally they're already out in the wilds somewhere, not just hanging around town swigging beer with nothing better to do.

The Mwangi expanse is more deepest darkest Africa, which merges into Egyptian culture if you head north and east, and Moroccan if you head north and west, just like our world.
Yep just like our world plus DINOSAURS. That is all.
Don't be like that. C'mon, you know they copy paste real world geography and cultures heavily (with some changes of course). The Arabs are always south and east of what could be considered Europe, Asians are in the East or so far West, and so on.

I was meaning that you were right except that Mwangi is better because of dinosaurs.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Detect Magic wrote:

I am similarly against gay marriage, but not because I think gay people shouldn't be allowed to marry. I'm against telling churches that they have perform marriage ceremonies for folks that they don't believe should be getting married. Besides, if a church wants to deny a gay couple the opportunity to marry, why would you want to be a member of that church? Even if I was religious (I'm not), I'd find it hard to associate with (or support) a church which doesn't view all people as equal under God.

That said, I believe marriage should be a religious ceremony and nothing more. It shouldn't grant any legal benefits. The fact that it does seems to me to be a violation of the separation of church and state.

All "marital rights" and legal benefits provided by marriage should be provided instead by a civil union. Thus, two people can join, legally, and be recognized by the state, whilst having no association with the church (or any other place of worship). If they'd like a religious marriage as well, they should be free to have one, but would obviously have to find a pro-gay congregation. Now, that's probably a problem for some people depending upon where they live. Pro-gay churches are out there--but they're not abundant in all places.

Sadly, as I don't expect this to happen, I'm in support of gay marriage, because I think all people, regardless of sexuality, are entitled to the same human rights (including the right to "marry" whomever they wish).

This highlights how I feel as well on the issue though said far more eloquently than I could even begin to. Bravo!


1 person marked this as a favorite.

If the limits are arbitrary or misinformed then yes I might ditch. If the limits are defined or make sense then I'll rehash my concept.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I'm sorry 3.5 not meaning to poke fun but when I read "must be this high in diplomacy" all I could think was "do you smoke it, freebase it, or does it come in drinkable form"


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Paul Watson wrote:


And now you know, even if you didn't really want to.

And knowing is half the battle!


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Been following this for awhile now and honestly I'm with Kirth. I've had to modify classes/ races but very few times have I ever had such an issue that something was banned( one example of banned is the Truenamer and that was a group agreement). On the other end I've had GMs ban classes at their whim or bad rules reading. Two GMs I've had banned monks completely one because they had read the rules horribly wrong ( they thought a monk could flurry with all of his limbs as in at 1st level 2x hands feet and head for 10 attacks). The other banned it because quivering palm was overpowered and broken. Even after being shown that an equal level wizard could install kill so much better and more efficiently he still thought it was a game ruining ability.

So I had to pass on my favorite class every time they ran ( which for years those were the only DND to be played) and go for something else. All because of very uninformed gms who didnt want to even try to listen to any reason.


3 people marked this as a favorite.
organized wrote:
I'll take some good old fashioned Jack Chick over Robertson any day. Some one in my neighborhood used to give out his little graphic novels every Halloween.

I remember those from church camp that's where I learned DND was about summoning the devil. And rock and roll albums were blessed with animal and virgin sacrifice by the Church of Satan. Yeah fast forward 10 years and I started playing best friend at the time was the preachers kid. He wouldn't play without making sure it was cool with his dad so i let his dad borrow my books. Two weeks later his dad's only things to say where "I don't see a big deal with this." And "Are halflings anything like hobbits?"


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Also on the subject of things being "exceptions " look to the Titan Mauler it was supposed to be an exception. But to do something different than the rules you have to have rules that allow it. The Titan Mauler didn't have rules to let you actually do what it was supposed to do so it doesn't let you do it.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

More wood for the flames here is the 3.5 paladin of freedom's code reprinted.

Code of Conduct
A paladin of freedom must be of chaotic good alignment and loses all class abilities if he ever willingly commits an evil act. Additionally, a paladin of freedom's code requires that he respect individual liberty, help those in need (provided they do not use the help for lawful or evil ends), and punish those who threaten or curtail personal liberty.

Associates
While he may adventure with characters of any good or neutral alignment, a paladin of freedom will never knowingly associate with evil characters (except on some sort of undercover mission), nor will he continue an association with someone who consistently offends his moral code. A paladin of freedom may accept only henchmen, followers, or cohorts who are chaotic good.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Sean K Reynolds wrote:
MrSin wrote:
Huh, that sounds like something that should be in core to me.

Well, Ultimate Campaign is a book in our core line...

But anyway, if "that should be in the core book" was the deciding factor, the Core Rulebook would be about 1,200 pages...

Would that be enough to qualify it as a two-handed weapon?


4 people marked this as a favorite.

Yes every attack that is from stealth or flanking will grant sneak attack dice to the damage.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

@ Lord Fyre I have to agree on the fact that women also want these things to a degree.

On of my wife's first request when I got skyrim on my pc was better looking female models and more feminine looking armor.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Just when I thought I had all the books I needed till ultimate campaign.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
shallowsoul wrote:
Lord Foul II wrote:
Gunslingers have a problem of yes they are powerful, but they are expensive, espically at low levels.
Being expensive is part of what balances the class. How far are you going to get having eight arms with a gun in each hand but only enough money to buy ammo for one?

Cost should have been the balancing factor. But no people still freaked so now we have a full BaB class whose signature weapon has slower reload than a crossbow, the same range as a thrown weapon, and not the ability to critically fail but a better chance at a crit fail than it has of critting. All for what 10-40 ( or as I call it get eaten range) for touch attacks that we can expand x times a day with our limited grit points.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

FAQs for the glorious and all powerful Lord Wraithstrike the Shrouded One.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Bill lets ignore the mom and baby.

It will cause a healer to decide to let a loved one die.
It will cause a pacifist to decide to break his peace and attack someone.
It will cause a priest chanting a ritual to close a hole to hell to decide that attacking the taunter is more important than keeping an invasion of balors from reaching the material.

It takes away the ability of the character to use reasoning and thought in their actions and simply attack in some way instead of doing something that might be much more important to them.

And even if we allow the "throw a rock" loophole it still waste a standard action and still can cause someone to act out of character.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Sadly the flaw is a lack of masterwork unarmed strike.

Star Voter 2013

1 person marked this as a favorite.

My actual attitude is more of show me my mistakes so that I won't be making them again.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

The sever better have mystic tiers to handle the upcoming traffic


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I would just like to throw in maybe a FAQ tag to make searching for those blogs easier to find. Especially on my iPhone.

1 to 50 of 213 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | next > last >>

©2002–2014 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.