Tallifer's page

If anyone is interested in playing the Fourth Edition of Dungeons & Dragons, we are playing about every two or three weeks on Skype. it is hard to get a face-to-face group sitting around a table in Korea, so this works very well.

The main group meets in Toronto but we here in Korea can play with them via Skype. This means playing at two o'clock on Sunday morning, but considering how hard it is to get a Fourth Edition game together, it is well worth it. (Besides I would rather spend these sunny days outside rather than cooped up around a table.)

We are going to begin a Fourth Edition game next week (fingers crossed). Post here if you are interested.

When the Playtest Rules for the Fifth Edition are made public, we will play them as well.

Actually we are currently all English teachers or professors in Korea. However in 2010 I played the Fourth edition with a couple of soldiers and others in Taegu.

We have a Facebook group for roleplayers in South Korea called "D&D in Busan." There are currently 20 members.

These days there are two Pathfinder tabletop games plus one Labyrinth Lord Google+ Hangout game.

New players and dungeon masters are always welcome.

Reply here and we can get you connected to our group.

Am I the only person who completely disagrees with the DM?

HOW are the actions of the party "evil"? These characters are Lawful Good/Good, not Lawful Stupid/Stupid Good. Why would they try to save the children if they didn't believe they had a chance/thought something EVEN WORSE was going to happen if they played along? The LE wizard sounds pretty dangerous.

But "evil"? These people weren't out to maliciously obliterate those kids, nor did they do it on a whim from their perspective. If you didn't give them an apparent out, you've only got yourself to blame if the party takes a drastic third option.

Commando Dude, I hope you are indeed the only person here who thinks that deliberately targetting the bridge full of children with area-effect spells does not equate deliberately killing the children.

They could at least have sniped at the enemies with individual missiles and spells. Their foes might have started killing the children, and that should have stopped the fight. But if the children did die at the hands of the evil enemies, then at least the party would be less directly guilty. Besides there must have been spells available that would hinder the enemies.

I am contemplating building a paladin with a longbow (composite when rich enough). The idea of a hobbit excited me until I realized that in Pathfinder a small character uses smaller dice for damage. Is it still worthwhile? (Plus fewer skills and one less feat, but the racial bonuses seem a good balance for that.)

Someone mentioned Deadly Aim, but without the bonus feat, it will take a long time to get that. (After all Point Blank and Precise Shot should probably come first.)

EDIT: Doh. I see now that Deadly Aim has no prerequisite other than Dexterity. Time to try this out!

Are there any Halfling feats or items which counter act this size disadvantage?

jreyst where exactly are you getting the idea about a paladin fighting fairly, not take advantage of weaknesses, or meeting in melee whenever they can?

Not harping on you, I just like reading sources for peoples ideas :)

I know I've read of several noble, honor bound samurai who favored the longbow. It doesn't really seem like such a taboo idea as you present in literature.

I myself like the idea of the paladin with a bow, but I can help you out on the literary background to the idea that a knight (of which a paladin is the paragon) would not use a bow.

In the Iliad, the epic poem about the Trojan war, Prince Paris is repeatedly mocked and scorned for using a bow rather than engaging in melee. Achilles, Hector and the other great heroes always waded into the thick of things with spear and sword and shield, but Paris plinked away at people with his bow.

Later, the term paladin was first coined to refer to the twelve knightly companions of Charlemagne, of whom Roland was the chiefest. Throughout the entire corpus of Carolingian legends and Arthuriana, I have yet to read of a knightly hero using a bow, except to hunt. I am sure it does occur, but the focus of the poets is always the cleaving and hewing of swords and axes and the thrusting and shivering of spears.

I would suggest therefore that such a code against missile weapons is purely a cultural tradition, and so would apply differently to characters from different backgrounds. Furthermore said chivalry did not apply to the vilest of enemies. In D&D terms, a paladin of Good should have no compunction about how he defeats an orc, a witch, an anti-paladin or his henchmen.

I am a purist. I often like to take rules and systems to their extremes. Therefore if I play with random rolls I want nothing other than 3d6 in order, no rerolls, no choice. Or full point buy, nothing random, nothing restrained. Either give me the oldest of D&D or the newest of Pathfinder or Fourth.

I think a paladin should behave like Sir Galahad, the Parfait Knight. Ironically I read about him in the 1970s long before I ever heard about D&D, and I found his Mary Sue perfection, intolerant attitude and lily white purity just as annoying as many players find the stereotypical paladin. But as much as I disliked him, I would never want an Arthurian epic without Galahad or a D&D world without priggish and shining paladins.

Our party was sent to negotiate with a village of orcs. We tried to parley from a position of strength, but soon found ourselves in a fight surrounded by the entire fighting force of the village.

At first we tried to focus on their chieftain, hoping that his death would route the others. He however was so tough that by the time he fell, his followers were enraged by his death and encouraged by his great display of orcish prowess against a party of adventurers. Much orcish blood flowed as they attempted to annihilate the small party of invaders. Fortunately they had only one shaman to harass us with spells.

Finally we somehow managed to retreat back up the road without any deaths. Later we came back with a squadron of Goliaths to clear the road, but the orcs had wisely moved camp far away.

I appreciate that you do not want your character to get all the time and that she is an agile jungle girl, but at some point there has to be a point in wearing heavy armour and carrying a shield. Fourth Edition which I love initially made the mistake of overvaluing dexterity and intelligence, which mistake they rectified with masterwork heavy armour. The main tactic for an unarmoured warrior should be to avoid face-to-face combat whenever possible: backstab, ambush and shoot them from a distance or allow the Fighter to grab their attention and then come in from a flank.

Here is my first draft of a 15 point Human Cleric of a Nature goddess (for the longbow). The campaign will probably begin with a sea voyage.

S13 D10 C12 I10 W17 Ch13 HP9
No minuses since I need some skills and I do not want to fall off the ship with low dexterity.

Feats: Channel Smite, Guided Hand
Domains: Good, Feather

Composite Longbow, Hide since we are on a ship.

Orisons for the day: Light, Detect Magic,Create Water
Prayers for the day: Protection versus Evil (Good domain), Divine Favour, Shield of Faith (maybe Air Bubble, but a one minute duration might not enough time to save a drowning man).

Thank you ever so much for creating this thread.

I will be trying out Pathfinder for the first time in January, and I am feeling overwhelmed by the prospect of learning a whole new system. This should at least allow me to create a functional character who is useful to my new group.

.
.
.
.
I have been playtesting a campaign for two player-characters, because I want to begin the campaign as soon as possible and not wait until I get at least four players.

So I am ready to run any time I can find some roleplayers in Pusan.

I have now finally acquired the 4th edition Players' Guide for Eberron. (It takes much time to get stuff here in Korea.) I would like to explore and play in such a world, but its weltanschauung is too alien for me to embrace as a dungeon master.

Still looking ...

In truth I am willing to play almost anything. It just happens that I have the books for the 4th edition of Dungeosn and Dragons.

By the way, if you are desparate for roleplaying in Taegu or another city near Pusan, just take the train to Haeundae: it is cheap to travel in Korea. I realize that it takes almost three hours to get to Haeundae from Taegu, but is not a good game worth it while we are in exile?

I realize that foreign teachers, soldiers or others in Korea might not have their gaming stuff with them, so I ordered a pound o' dice from Chessex: there shoudl be enough for everyone.

We are also located a block from two supermarkets and of course there are convenience stores. And Starbucks and Baskin Robbins around the corner. And this being Korea, ordering pizza or fried chicken to the school is easy and cheap.

On Sundays, the school where I teach during the week is empty. We can have a large room to ourselves with a computer, an overhead beam projector, many tables (which can be joined)and comfy chairs wheeled in from the office.

We are looking for roleplayers in Pusan, South Korea.

I am willing to try running 4th edition Dungeons and Dragons. I have almost all of the books or pdfs for 4th edition.

I also have a great location for gaming on Sundays at my English school.