|1 person marked this as a favorite.|
The thing is morality changes over time. What is considered wrong or right can change over the years so at this time because over time what is good has changed hands so many times that no we cannot find a nation that is "good" right now due to our standards, but years ago imsure u could pick a few countries at a time that would be considered "good" by the morality of that time.
I would agree that certain things are deemed evil or bad in one place or time and not bad or even good or valued at other places and times - marijuana, gay marriage and other such issues show that society can change over time its views. However, I do think there are some baselines of morality that do seem to have stood the test of time and have been independently arrived at in different societies. For instance 2,500 years ago in India the Buddha taught that there are ten courses of wholesome conduct (and I am pretty sure these predated him):
1. Not to Kill
2. Not to Steal (or specifically "take what is not given")
3. Not to engage in sexual misconduct (usually explained as involving minors, incest, violence, deceit, unfaithfulness, etc.. - but yes, here there is room for debate about several matters)
4. Not to lie
5. Not to use abusive speech
6. Not to use speech to divide people against one another
7. Not to speak irresponsibly (yes, this is rather vague)
8. Not to give in to greed
9. Not to give in to hatred
10. Not to give in to delusion (also a matter of interpretation I guess)
So, yeah, there are areas there that are debatable but even in those I think most people would agree that irresponsible speech, delusion, and sexual misconduct (at the very least rape and incest and such) are not things we want to see done.
It also comes down to the Golden Rule that has also been independently spoken of in different cultures at different times.
So I am wary of the argument that morality is totally relative. I do think there are baselines even though peripheral issues are arguable and changeable.