Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Lion Blade

Tacticslion's page

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber. 13,130 posts (15,712 including aliases). 4 reviews. 4 lists. 1 wishlist. 37 aliases.


RSS

1 to 50 of 13,130 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Look. Spirits, haunts, undead, dead, etc.

Here's the deal: I know you're kinda, you know, dead.

And, sure, that sucks.

But, and bear with me, there's no need for all this endless reams of drama. I mean: come-ooonnnn.

Fake chopping heads off? Really? Rrrrrrrrrreeeeeeaaaaaallllllyyyyy?

We get it. You're dead. I felt worse for you before you started whining like a sixteen year old who got dumped by their "forever" girlfriend they got together with a month ago because senior strong pants invited her to ice cream. Get yourself together, man. Or woman. Or whatever. It doesn't matter.

Here. Let me play you a song.

There.

Now get over it, and help me raise you from the dead instead of being all mysterious and jerky about it.

Dangit. >:I


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Do you have a favorite side-character in the 'Zelda series? Whether it be the humble Old Man, or I AM ERROR, or Tingle or Epona or Beedle or Aryll - do you have someone from a specific game, or the whole series who you just love? Why?


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Until (and unless) you really need it and it's really helpful.

(It varies by insurance and situation. In many cases, you're right, tgtg.)


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Tacticslion wrote:

Also, yes: step one of making a better wife is cursing her so she can't defend against you very well, and so she believe the lies she tells you. I didn't say that this plan wasn't evil...

And/or I recognized the unfortunate implications later...

In my defense, you can always just let the curse go later. The point is only so that she doesn't, you know, drown you all/murder you all while you try to bring her to universal harmony and enlightenment-cum-eternal harmony with the universe. 'Cause that's a real possibility, otherwise.

Also, I'm presupposing some really old 3.X rules are still in circulation regarding an extraneous use of the Bluff skill, re: Malak and the penalty v. Sense Motive. That, uh... that might not hold true, though, so... uh... maybe nevermind that one? Maybe that could be re-done as being "more vulnerable to charisma-based checks" or something? I dunno - work with your GM! As I said! :D


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Also, yes: step one of making a better wife is cursing her so she can't defend against you very well, and so she believe the lies she tells you. I didn't say that this plan wasn't evil...
And/or I recognized the unfortunate implications later...


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Thanks!

She is suuuuuuuuuuuper busy these days. Teaching is about two full time jobs.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Freehold DM wrote:
Tacticslion wrote:
Is the Almighty Johnsons ever not an emotional roller-coaster?
No.

ALT response: "so just like the poetry then"


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Tacticslion wrote:
Tacticslion wrote:
Is the Almighty Johnsons ever not an emotional roller-coaster?
Freehold DM wrote:
No.

Poop.

EDIT: It's going to be a long couple of seasons. :/

I mean, awesome, obviously, but long - each episode is, like, forty-five minutes, commercial free! :D


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Tacticslion wrote:
Is the Almighty Johnsons ever not an emotional roller-coaster?
Freehold DM wrote:
No.

Poop.

EDIT: It's going to be a long couple of seasons. :/


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
captain yesterday wrote:
I've never heard of it. :-)

New Zealand series all about the Norse gods in modern day New Zealand (as of, like, '11-'13) but... they don't really know or understand everything about it at all as they don't incarnate until age 21. Kind of like perpetual reincarnation (sort of).

It's... quite good, so far, but it's got its ups and downs. I recommend it. There are definitely cultural differences, but it's a really solid show nonetheless.

EDIT: It's like a soap opera, but with better television show sensibilities and about Norse gods.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

JJJJJJWWWWWUUUUUUFFFFFF. I'm gonna go with, "No." then. :I

EDIT: Oh, come the Frigg on^. *gets re-dressed*

^ Gets re-clothed.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Is the Almighty Johnsons ever not an emotional roller-coaster?


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

I'd probably end up something like I mentioned this here.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Tacticslion wrote:
revisiting
James Jacobs wrote:
still part of the setting; they're designed for use with Pathfinder, not 3.5, so there's not much of a reason to "revisit" them.

Okay, so this is something I've been mulling over. Obviously the term I've been using in my head (and now on the forums with you) is different from the one used at Paizo. Would you clarify how it's used in Paizo's terminology?

(I'm pretty certain from the context of this post I get it, but I can be silly enough that I like to see it spelled out sometimes, as a point of learning, just to be sure I'm not being super-dumb.)

Sorry for being unclear, there.

Thanks!


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

It's all the tame to me...

... he says, four days later. He's a fast one, that TL. Aaaaallllways swift on the uptake, and quick with the snappy dialogue and witty rejoinders, that one. Eeeeeyup. Eeyup.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Thanks! Yeah, sorry: all of that was about the plane, not the the creature. Apologies for being unclear! Thanks!


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

(I'll keep it in mind!)


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
captain yesterday wrote:
You should watch Bob's Burgers next. :-)

Probably going with The Almighty Johnsons. Thanks, though!


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

EDITED into a new post: for easier digestion/replies! Yay!

1) Related to the above post, do you mind briefly describing the ecology (as you understand it) of the shadow as it applies to Golarion? I've really read as much as I can of it, and I'm more confuddled than ever, as most of it's contradictory - probably on purpose, but still.

It often seems in some places that it's an abandoned wasteland, while in others it's quite settled - that, in itself, wouldn't be a problem, it just kind of seems to imply that these are the same places (i.e. where cities in the material are reflected in the shadow).

2a) Am I just misreading the intent, or is it intentionally vague, or is there something else going on there?

2b) Example: How do creatures like the shae get on with their business in life and growing human harems and such, with creatures like the kyton's implied to have so much power over such great reaches of the place? What about the d'ziriak?

3) How do the d'ziriak, shae, dark folk, niholoi, and fetchlings view each other and relate to each other (on Golarion)? (Generally, I suspect they all hate the kytons; except, maybe, for those few crazy folk who worship ZK and/or his kytons, or those, who, like some of the citizens of Nidal, were forced to be raised under the yolk of them and know nothing better.)

Thanks again!


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

EDIT: for great justice readability/ease of use

Nihiloi were a creature kind that made a quasi-prominent (-ish) appearance in Council of Thieves (in that they showed up in one of the AP entries as a major encounter and statted up in the back of the book, were implied to be kind of important, and just kind of were never mentioned again)... and were never mentioned again, from what I can tell.

Is Paizo ever planning on revisiting them?
- 1) If so, what (if anything) do you think (or know about) the basic concept of such a thing, if you can or don't mind sharing?
- 2) If not, I'd be curious: why not? (I actually found them really cool, over-all, as a thing. I can understand there are plenty of possible reasons - I'd just be curious for Paizo's.)

Thanks!


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Welp: that's it. I've finished Archer on Netflix.

Season 7 doesn't appear - it is unlikely to do so any time soon, I suspect. To that end, I think I'll remove Archer from my watch list.

It was fun - I liked some of it, and, I must say, I think that Season 6 is the best of them. Archer himself has become a much better person than he has been in any of the previous seasons. Seeing him mature into a more reasonable individual over-all has been a bit of a relief.

Frustrated about his and Lana's tendencies at blowing up at each other, but not too surprised. Over-all: I'm glad they finally achieved the romance they did. And here's hoping that little Abbijean has a good life! Good luck!


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

I DEMAND (respectfully, when you have time, please) A LINK TO YOUR JOURNAL OF SAID CAMPAIGN (if updated, and, if not, no rush or pressure)!

EDIT: AND I DO SO WITH CLOTHES ON! *re-dresses*


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Awesome!


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Vidmaster7 wrote:
I...I... need to just favorite the last 2 pages all together

Yyyyyeeeessssss... let the love and magnanimosity and kindness and generous spirit flow through you~! :D


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Huh.

I was hoping to do something like the OP myself, but work hard to hide it, in order to minimize my screen time.

The loose character idea was: yeah, it sucks, but it makes sense; but my brethren are in the wrong here, and if I can prove my worth, I can eventually be open, even if many never accept me. But not today.

Oh well. Guess no GM's gonna let that fly now. :/

(Concept loosely based on an organization of lawful good government assassins - not the class - who were an agency of five strange mutant creatures I was running who kept their true nature secret at all times by heavy investment in disguise. I'd have to consider it carefully, and it'd be something I'd have to consider how to handle to avoid inconveniencing anyone else, but it seems... unlikely, given the vehemence, here. Makes sense, one supposes.)

((First two purchases are always a ring of sustenance and hat of disguise - though the 'hat is only for those creatures that need it. Anything with a continuous keep watch effect is next, and now I'm the perfect guard...*))

* No wonder everyone finds me creepy, I'm covered head to toe in feature-obscuring stuff, and I stay awake all night staring out at everything! I find me creepy, and I'm a lawful good guy and playing me XD!!**

** Well, okay, not anymore...


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Hah! The succubus hates it! The proof is in the pudding! Truly it's hallowed touch is too much for her corrupted flesh!

slipsoutofthreadquickly


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Quote:
Air Combat Maneuvers and Dogfighting History

Well, I've not really found too much use to Combat Maneuvers whenever my dogs've been in the air, in the history of my games, it's really always been a matter o-

Oh. Oh, I see. Oh. Please, continue.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Ooh! Ooh! More like a pun purification!

A Punification, as it were!

After all, it is a kind of Punishment! :D


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Maelstrom Tapewyrm wrote:
Talonhawke wrote:
Tacticslion wrote:
Whatever was in the fridge.
Since that's past tense do we assume you don't know what you ate or just don't care?
Maybe it was "C. TL tried to eat whatever was in the fridge, but he lost"? Now it has assumed his appearance and begun posting on the Internet.

Er, no. No, definitely not that last one. Definitely not. I have no idea where you got such a weird idea. Nope. Not a single clue. And this is certainly not a suspiciously copious and excessive denial, that's for sure.

>.>

Nope.

Not. At. All.

*Whistles in a definitely inconspicuous manner and wanders away.*

(It's a combination of both of what Talonhawke suggested, actually. ^-^)


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Whatever was in the fridge.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

I don't like evil people doing evil things.

I'm already morally conflicted by Archer - I find it unlikely that I would enjoy people being much worse.

As an example: I love Bruce Willis as an actor - almost every film. Couldn't stand The Jackle.

It's not about being criminal, it's about doing evil things (and being unpleasant people - the Archer cast manage to skirt a fine line, here, of avoiding being too unpleasant, though it comes very, very close sometimes, and does veer into the category of, "I really am uncomfortable, here.")

Anyway: I don't really have plans to watch it.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
thegreenteagamer wrote:
Man, if you think the characters on Archer are morally ambiguous, you would absolutely, vehemently hate Always Sunny. They're all straight up evil.

A good reason for me to not to watch that show! : D


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Nice!

I loved the Secret of NIMH, growing up: it was one of my favorites, but terrifying, too!

Watership Down is a powerful story, but, to me, the hares were never the most interesting of the Red Wall people and cultures, though I totally understand why they're yours! I just loved the ideas of the otters, moles, mice, badgers, and even wildcats. I was less interested in the "vermin" (rats, weasels, and so on), hares, and some others. I found the squirrels and a few others just kind of okay.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Aaaaaand she's Archer's. That both does and does not surprise me.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

I find Archer: Vice to be a simultaneous combination of better and worse than the previous seasons.

I think that it's more humorous in many ways - it's got better jokes in many ways. The meta-commentary is pretty solid, and the references to previous seasons are pretty funny.

There is genuine character growth and clever call-backs and interesting things like that.

On the other hand... they start off by trying to become drug dealers. That sets me up as extremely uncomfortable and makes me unlike all of them as a direct result.

That leaves me very conflicted as a result.

It makes it both the most mature and immature of the seasons at the same time. It's... weird. Very intelligently made, very well-written, and very clever. Certainly not as Miami drug-fueled-bad-guys as it seemed at the beginning, but not really good, either.

Of course, Archer leaves me conflicted in the same way, too.

Go figure.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
captain yesterday wrote:
There's the sheriff and deputy in Gravity Falls, but that's not a movie, though they totally should make a Gravity Falls movie.

Hilariously appropriate topic to be naked.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

I've got to say. I'm sorry that Kazzak (the dog) hasn't come back again after that one episode. He was awesome.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

I was. >:I


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Eric doesn't work as gay:
thegreenteagamer wrote:

Differences? Like way too much singing, and the fact the Prince is clearly gay or asexual. Either way he is not into women.

Look at the "kiss the girl" song. Beautiful atmosphere, chorus singing romantic music, girl leans in for the kiss the first time...freeze frame and look at the face he makes as he pulls back. That's a face of disgust!

Now look at Ariel. You have a girl who looks like that trying to kiss you and you pull back and make a face? Gay or asexual. Mood be damned, a girl who looks like that should get an enthusiastic response even if you're outside a paper mill and being serenaded by the Chipmonks covering Bjork! Even the witch has to hypnotize him.

Also, did that dumb b%@!+ forget how to write? She signed a contract! She couldn't write "I'm the one who rescued you. I'm a mermaid who traded her voice to get legs. Kiss me and I get my voice back,"? I'm sure a palace had paper and ink. Or...There was sand everywhere and she had a finger.

thegreenteagamer wrote:
It was responding to TL's summary of TLM, but they ARE remarkably similar...

Humorous... but it fails for the simple fact that it confuses two different potentially similar expressions - disgust for confusion.

Fact is, the boy is extremely conflicted.

On the one hand, he has <DREAM WOMAN>: beautiful voice, saved his life, and he vowed to find and wed her.

On the other hand, he has <REAL WOMAN>: beautiful body, rambunctious but kind and friendly, intelligent and (most importantly) present.

The dream is crashing pretty hard with the reality; he made a vow - a rash, hasty vow, to be sure, but a vow nonetheless that he honorably and honestly wishes to honor... but that conflicts with his feelings for Ariel. His enthusiasm for the one conflicts with his newfound enthusiasm for the other.

That said, not writing her name was a rather... large plot-hole, yeah. I'm just going to go with the idea that they use two different language systems that were both anglicized for the audience (i.e. they both look like English to us, but gibberish to each other). Could have been quickly explained, but... ah, well.

EDIT:

EDIT spoiler:

thegreenteagamer wrote:
Any excuse to point out Disney set the precident for a gay prince over 25 years ago. Yes they get married and have a kid, but so did Tobias and Lindsey Fünke. Doesn't make Tobias anything close to straight. It was political. Eric saved his new best platonic friend and killed the sea witch, so Triton gave him his daughter and agreed to peace and trade between kingdoms. Nothing romantic about that.

This entirely ignores how enthusiastic he was when he woke up on the beach after she saved his life. He was thrilled - over the moon! Not, relieved, "Oh, good, I'm alive, thank, you!" but, "I HAVE HAD A REVELATION! THAT WAS DIVINE! OH, WOW, HOW AWESOME! SHE WAS GORGEOUS! AND THAT VOICE!" That was romantic attachment in addition to gratitude.

I've actually been trying to think up a precedent of homosexuality - something that can be cleanly interpreted as such - without some heavy-handed forced after-the-fact "I choose to ignore everything to re-interpret the work in this different and obviously not-as-intended-emotional context" way... and I'm coming up blank.

Mmmmmmmmmaybe in The Black Cauldron? It's been long enough that I no longer remember that film - it could be. Also possible in something like Peter Pan - after all, Peter did go the whole Thimble route as a kiss, and was very asexual about everything, but that's more innocent and asexual than anything else. The Sword and the Stone - Merlin seems to imply that Arthur will understand one day why the squirrel is attracted to him, but Arthur sure isn't interested today (unlike Mowgli in the Jungle Book)! Basil and Rattigan may have something like that in The Great Mouse Detective... but none of these are really "Prince" tales. Maybe Emperor's New Groove? That might fit? Not sure.

For actual homosexuality within Disney works, off the top of my head:
- Hugo [gargoyle] from Hunchback (rather definitive)
- Oaken [sales guy] from Frozen (dubious, to me, but broadly accepted)
- Hermes [god] from Hercules (pretty heavily implied)

As an aside, there are a few popular theories that don't really hold well, under scrutiny:

- Scar from Lion King could not be gay (or rather, he had to be either bisexual or heterosexual, or at least capable of heterosexual reproductive acts meaning that it's impossible to cleanly lable him as such despite some stereotypical coding), as, in LKII, those lionesses who were his and his actual son were a central part of the plot
- Merida seemed entirely uninterested in any romance at all. She does briefly take interest in two boys: the middle boy (Young Macintosh; the dark-haired, fairly well-muscled, classically good-looking one) until he throws a temper tantrum; similarly, she seems impressed (or perhaps just shocked) by the super-muscled guy she thought was Wee Dingwall (his name was Conan, Wee Dingwall was behind him); it's impossible to say if this would have kept up
- Elphaba* Elsa could certainly be, but it's highly unclear, and, I suspect, at least for the first film and short, she was definitively asexual simply because she was afraid of personal contact of all kinds; whether that is her "natural" tendencies (which, hopefully, will thaw out with time) or not, is unclear; she subconsciously developed a male-personality snowman (Olaf)... but he was a creation of both her and Anna's childhood playtime; she developed an asexual(?) personality snow-monster for defense; she developed a very feminine "showy" dress... but immediately pushed away anyone who got too near to her (though she never changed back). Effectively, we're left with not enough information to tell.

* Elphaba was definitively not homosexual. She was, in fact, heterosexual in both musical and book, though she had a powerful asexual friendship with a female friend.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
captain yesterday wrote:
Wait a minute, I'm at least 45% sure that's not the plot of The Abyss.

Oh, so you've seen the theatrical version!


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

How long it lingers on scenes (we're often talking, like, seconds, each) and a few extra scenes looking at stuff happening.

Mmmmmmmmmaaaayyyybe with, like, a few extra lines of dialogue.

It's actually a pretty important thing.

It makes an enormous difference in how a thing flows, however. Those few extra seconds allow precious processing time to make something feel a little more like, "Yeah, okay, I've processed this scene/these characters/this moment." or that extra scene (usually only a few seconds long) lets you go, "Oh, well, if that's going on, it totally makes sense that these guys'd say/do/think <thing>." and that dialogue can make everything make more sense (which is probably obvious).


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
gran rey de los mono wrote:
I could be completely wrong, of course. I'm unfamiliar with Les Mis, other than the name Jean ValJean and that it's set in France. I think during the revolution.

Oh, no, you're totally correct.

It's this song, by the way (near the beginning of the film) - or at least bits of it.

Fair warning - that's the film version.

Absolutely phenomenal as a film version... but only kind of okay as a sound track (except as a reminder of how awesome the film was), 'cause these people aren't super-singers, just excellent actors who do pretty okay at singing while acting.

EDIT: By the way, it's a powerful story. I recommend it. Some of it is depressing, some of it is uplifting, and some of it is just kind of, "Huh."-ing. Worth experiencing. The music is incredible all-around, despite what I noted above. See, in-context? That music is an incredibly powerful tool for telling an amazing story.

One song, I Dreamed a Dream has done some amazing things.

- Susan Boyle's first appearance (one of my favorite moment's is when the commentators forget to comment when the camera goes to them to do so the second time; also the way Simon kind of falls in love with her voice later on)
- Anne Hathaway did an amazing scene in a single take; this is not that scene (you should see the film), but this is the song

Or, here's a medley
- Covers the whole story! (Well, not really - there's so much it leaves out, it really doesn't cover it at all*!)

* It's kind of like saying, "The Little Mermaid is a film adaptation by Disney of an old story; it involves a Mermaid who falls in love with a Prince. They go through trials, but they may or may not get together in the end. There's a fish, bird, a crab, a dog, some boats, a shark, a bunch of other merfolk and humans, and octopus-folk witch, a minister, an old guy, and a chef (he's memorable!). The end." - all the important details that make the story the story are left out.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Oh! Okay, that at least limits it somewhat. Thank you!

My mind went so many ludicrous places simultaneously it was... headache-inducing.

EDIT: I mean, they were all great musical places, but having so many conflicting-but-awesome musical styles demanding "READ ME THIS WAY" at the same time was... oof. Also, I just missed the title. Duh to me. Thanks!


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Tune, sweet-merciful-FaWtL, TUNE?!?


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
The Green Tea Gamer wrote:

New DBZ Abridged!

Seriously, among like the three best things to happen to me on a semi-regular basis.

...does that speak more of DBZA's awesomeness, or just how depressing my life is?

A little of column A, a little of column B. Gonna focus on the awesomeness instead.

Not depressing. Just fun.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Rift of Repose: while I imagine it's generally made of some sort of hard Abyssal rock, at this point, in your mind (as, to my knowledge there's nothing official on the subject), what would happen if someone got to the rift and successfully knocked out the walls containing the fossilized remnants?

Understanding that each campaign is different, I'm curious what your opinion is - that is, how you'd tend to handle it.

Do you think it'd:
1) reform, barring some sort of quest/specific action to alter it?
2) be gone forever? (that one memory was it)
3) something else I've not thought of?

Thanks!


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

James: who would win, Mhar or Rovagug? What about Azathoth or Rovagug?

Thanks!


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
captain yesterday wrote:

Finished with Batman vs Superman, Pea Bear and I thought it was a great movie, I can kinda see where some of the criticism comes from, but it's way better than everyone (not here) led me to believe.

Lex Luthor was way over the top though.

Were you watching the "big" version on the DVD? I've been led to understand that it's much superior to the theatrical release by those who've seen both for some reason.

(Apparently, despite the DVD being longer and less edited, the theatrical version feels longer and less well edited - I'm guessing the latter was over-edited and that ended up making it feel more disjointed than ideal.)


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Oh!

That's... season five!

So it is. Hadn't noticed.

Netflix is helpful in that it informs you, but if you don't pay attentntio-

... hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh'okay, well that's a different opening, now.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Not much: just tired.

Child vomit + exhaustion (late night + all day with two children, both of which are simultaneously active and demanding) + lack of ability to do anything that I actually want to do (including lack of internet over the weekend [see next entry]) + multiple-hour-cum-multiple-attempt-internet-repair (just in time to do very little posting) + quite a few other similar things.

Just a moment of grump.

1 to 50 of 13,130 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2016 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.