Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Member of Church of Razmir

TOZ's page

6,679 posts. Alias of TriOmegaZero.


RSS

1 to 50 of 6,679 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>
Shadow Lodge *****

GM Bold Strider wrote:
There is no valid rules argument for limiting Pageant of the Peacock against monsters.

Actually, since "By gracefully weaving your body through subtle forms and postures you can convince others of your breeding, eloquence, and refinement." is listed under the effect, you can argue that the ability to use a Bluff check in place of an Int-based check is limited to checks involving convincing others, which identifying monsters weaknesses does not fall under.

Shadow Lodge

Ed Reppert wrote:
So tell me again why you play?

I don't play this game because it's good, I play it because it's popular.

Shadow Lodge *****

1 person marked this as a favorite.
PrinceRaven wrote:
But the Wizard making a mockery of most challenges is ok because why?

I don't think he said it was okay.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I can see this will be as debated a secret as whatever happened to Aroden.

Shadow Lodge *****

Whoops, wrong box old chap.

Shadow Lodge *****

Kolossal Ego wrote:
You're part of the island now. There is no *my* or *I*. ONE OF US! ONE OF US!

I wondered where that new voice was coming from. We were all a little surprised at the new tenant.

Shadow Lodge *****

It's my thread, I'll troll if I want to.

Shadow Lodge *****

I don't know, I've slept since then. Which debate was it? There have been so many...

Shadow Lodge

3 people marked this as a favorite.

That Gruumash is pretty awesome, I hear.

Shadow Lodge *****

Truly, this is an inspired idea that should come to pass.

Shadow Lodge

15 people marked this as a favorite.

You've had some of Lilith's cookies.

Shadow Lodge *****

Remember that running away is always an option.

Shadow Lodge *****

Now I'm jealous.

Shadow Lodge

They come out of their back, right? Like blade wings? That would be so metal.

Shadow Lodge *****

Magic, I presume. :)

Shadow Lodge *****

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Well, I did want to let people know with enough time in advance for just such reasons. ;)

Shadow Lodge *****

Andrew Christian wrote:

And if you want to use RAW as an argument, I'd say that 3 is the upper limit, because 3 is the number used.

He says, and I quote, "another native outsider or three."

In context, I agree that the language is being ambiguous and just giving an example.

But if we need a hard number, I'd say its already in the blog.

Aww shucks, I'm out of luck because all I wanted was 2 more. :)

Shadow Lodge

4 people marked this as a favorite.

I enjoy grandiloquent discourse.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Don't let them in, don't let them see:
Ciretose apparently got too vociferous in the ACG play test for the Warpriest I think, and was banned. He sent me a farewell email letting me know what happened. I ran a PFS game for him back in December and that was the last I heard from him.

Nicos wrote:
- Toz because, well, Toz.

Quite often the best reason ever.

Also, shout out to our GLORIOUS FORUM OVERLORDS especially the one that gives cookies.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Hey, where did the OP go?

Shadow Lodge

Don't explain the joke.

Shadow Lodge *****

4 people marked this as a favorite.
Baxcel wrote:

Let's see going down the list... I always play the lower levels there some of the funniest ones I've been in

Never changed my chr sence its my mistake if I've done something wrong...

There's no point in lieing about a roll.. The rolls are there in front of everyone an the entire game is rolls why lie?

Missing the forest because of the trees.

Shadow Lodge *****

Abyssian wrote:
TOZ, when did you pick up that fifth star?

Oh, you know. Here and there.

Shadow Lodge *****

BNW gets it.

Shadow Lodge *****

David Bowles wrote:
Don't forget druids.

Druids are Core, they can't do that!

Shadow Lodge *****

2 people marked this as a favorite.
HowlingWolf wrote:
Can we expect these new races to be banned in the future? Should we warn new players to only use content from the core books, just to be safe?

Yes. If they are only buying the books to get access to content for PFS, and not to enjoy the book as a Pathfinder supplement, you should warn them to only play core rulebook options in order to avoid disappointment and useless books in their library.

Shadow Lodge *****

New Options.

Shadow Lodge *****

Majuba wrote:
If only I could do more than wound... :)

There's always PaizoCon. ;)

Shadow Lodge *****

The Fox wrote:
So "1 XP" does mean "1 XP of player credit" after all!

That IS the easiest way to avoid any such argument, and makes me glad I played my lawbringer barbarian this morning in First Steps.

Shadow Lodge *****

Fromper wrote:
Until then, it's all just pointless speculation.

To you.

Shadow Lodge

rknop wrote:
Hydra's Fang Incident

Maniacal laugh, maniacal laugh...

Shadow Lodge *****

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Redneck GM wrote:
From a mechanics stand point the power level of the player base will be way cut back.

They're banning gunslingers and summoners too?

Shadow Lodge *****

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Which doesn't contradict what I said. :P

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Gninjas are not overpowered and anyone that says so has no system mastery or knowledge of game design and balancing.

Shadow Lodge *****

andreww wrote:
Online roll20 game as well so not even a GM fudge option.

/gmroll

Shadow Lodge *****

1 person marked this as a favorite.

You kind of have to have a different filter for the sites I frequent.

Shadow Lodge *****

1 person marked this as a favorite.
BigNorseWolf wrote:
You've got a month, and the Pathfinder society online collective ought to have a "Tiefling Aasimar confirmation crazy congo line" set up soon if it doesn't already.

Oh, it already does.

Shadow Lodge *****

Edit: Knew I should have included a '/whatever' at the end.

Kyle Baird wrote:
One could, theoretically, create an aasimar or tiefling now, get to 1, 2, or 3 xp and after August 14th, rebuild for free into an ACG class without changing the race. Correct?
TriOmegaZero wrote:
Kyle Baird wrote:
TriOmegaZero wrote:
What do boon-only races have to do with people feeling upset that they missed their chance at non-boon options?
It's a good thing they still have a month to play a 2 hour game of We Be Goblins to get that 1 xp for their character.

Yes, we were speaking of the time after that. Or at least I was. Try to keep up, Baird. :P

Personally, I'm using First Steps because We Be Goblins only grants 1 PP. ;)

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Ah, well as long as we're just throwing out unvalidated opinions then.

Shadow Lodge

That...doesn't refute his statement.

Shadow Lodge

5 people marked this as a favorite.

Edit: I was not there TL, but my wife did stay in the Art of Animation hotel. Sorry you missed her!

Demoyn wrote:
The bottom line is that if even 30 or 40% of the people dislike something, there's nothing to be gained by putting it in the campaign.

Nothing except the enjoyment of the 60 or 70% of the people that like it.

Shadow Lodge

GypsyMischief wrote:
I never thought traps were all that relevant to the game anyway, standalone they're horribly boring.

It very much depends on the style of the campaign. Urban intrigue doesn't always have room for them, while dungeon delves are more suited to including traps.

Shadow Lodge

Ogrork the Mighty wrote:
This isn't about the Uber-Trapfinder feeling awesome in his field. It's about making traps relevant to the game again.

This is a problem everyone faces, regardless of whether the trap finder has Disable Device twinked out to +30 or is just a paladin or barbarian with the HP to eat the trap and keep going.

Shadow Lodge

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Jaçinto wrote:
Ok fine I get it, I'm wrong I guess.

You're not wrong...

I suggest considering your tone and how you would feel being addressed in the manner that you have addressed these players. Is it conductive to your goal of encouraging roleplay? Are there better ways to get your message across?

Your most recent post here is a sarcastic admission of error that in no way concedes anything and is only meant to ridicule and insult anyone who disagrees with you. Can you see how that will only array people against your position rather than persuade them to it?

Shadow Lodge

4 people marked this as a favorite.

Kittens of Golarion

Shadow Lodge

ElyasRavenwood wrote:

So I'm just curious, why the desire for an "official ruling?"

Thanks

Because some people won't shut up about their interpretation until they get one.

Shadow Lodge

I'm just as sarcastic in person as I am here.

Thankfully people don't say obviously stupid things in person as much as they do online.

Shadow Lodge

Yeah, I was having the same problem looking on the PRD.

Shadow Lodge

Hama wrote:
You do know that core trumps supplement? Every. Time.

Hmm, where do I find that rule?

Shadow Lodge

That's what my Life Oracle uses, and it has been quite enjoyable.

1 to 50 of 6,679 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2014 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.