Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Member of Church of Razmir

TOZ's page

8,991 posts. Alias of TriOmegaZero.


RSS

1 to 50 of 8,991 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>
Shadow Lodge

Kaouse wrote:
I really don't know why you're being so antagonistic to my suggestion.

The metaphysical knows when you're trying to cheese out some rules lawyering and turns off the spigot.

Depending on the game, I'd allow it.

Shadow Lodge

You had new players writing up rules? I've never seen that.

Shadow Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Komoda wrote:
Most people will think I am crazy...

If I didn't before, I certainly do now.

But that's okay, most of us are.

Shadow Lodge

Komoda wrote:
Not at all. But that is what is says, which no one has said otherwise yet. And it is why I advocate removing that line altogether.

Then start a new thread for that, as it has nothing to do with what the actual DC is.

Shadow Lodge

Komoda wrote:
Unless you are involved in a jumping competition, "the result equals distance traveled in the jump..." is a useless rule.

It wouldn't be the first...

Shadow Lodge

I'm bad, and that's good. I will never be good, and that's not bad. There is no one I'd rather be than me.

Shadow Lodge

Holy s&$&, you and I agree on something!

Shadow Lodge *****

2 people marked this as a favorite.

They attach to the string and you launch them forward to stab your melee foe.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Nefreet wrote:
Matthew Downie wrote:
Shall we continue this debate forever?
I'd prefer we didn't. You obviously think otherwise.

I think you and I are destined to do this forever.

Shadow Lodge

Kajehase wrote:
Wouldn't a rancor require a deal with Lucas Film, though?

Nope! Although a rancor in a political discussion would certainly liven things up.

Shadow Lodge

5 people marked this as a favorite.

Only if it is a musket that shoots axes.

Shadow Lodge

Cyrad wrote:
Strange to be mad at someone for roleplaying the flavor of a spell in a roleplaying game.

Indeed, quite strange to have a problem with the player for a characters decision.

Shadow Lodge

*raises hand...four times*

Shadow Lodge

I'll get to work on finally unchaining my rogue then.

Shadow Lodge

I also have a bard...but she has my GM credit for Eyes. I'm not sure if that is a problem, since she isn't getting credit.

Shadow Lodge

4 people marked this as a favorite.
Jader7777 wrote:
People at the table have gotten mad at me refusing an offer of infernal healing. It's really awkward too.

And stupid.

Shadow Lodge

6 people marked this as a favorite.

Bless you, Anon, for the joy you bring to the Freehold.

Shadow Lodge

*sighs*

Shadow Lodge *****

1 person marked this as a favorite.
BigNorseWolf wrote:
How do you resolve Schrodinger's ninja ?

Communal Resist Energy.

Shadow Lodge

Oh dear, it looks like I'm gearing up for Reaping What We Sow with all tengu...

Shadow Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.

I looked into Kingdom Death.

That may have been a mistake.

Shadow Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.

One of my buggiest complaints with the rules.

"So all the underlying system issues are still there, but here's a bunch of extra knobs and whistles to play with!"

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I too am confused.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Ain't nothing fake about Trinam.

Shadow Lodge

Oh hey, I remember this thread!

Shadow Lodge

As a godless heathen, it doesn't bother me in the slightest.

Shadow Lodge

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Rednal wrote:
@TOZ: I think "infinite" might be a bit of an exaggeration. XD Most religions feel that a deity (or deities) 'act', which tends to weight things towards success. We want to avoid the Bandwagon Fallacy, of course - being the largest religion in the world doesn't make you correct, but on the whole, things are probably weighted in the direction of the larger religions. Isn't trying to use logic with unknowables fun? 8D

It's a wonderful thought experiment, I've just found that Pascal was far too limited in his argument for it to carry weight. When I say infinite, I refer to the fact that any afterlife you can imagine is a possibly alternative, as every single religion or belief could be wrong. Thus, any other possibility may be the correct one. Any kind of prize can be behind door number one, and if you have to guess what it is before you open it to win, you're almost certainly going to lose. A larger consensus is just more people being wrong together, not more evidence they are right.

Shadow Lodge

3 people marked this as a favorite.

Pretty sure there's nothing. If I find out otherwise, I imagine I'll be pounding on the intangible barrier yelling at everyone about it.

Shadow Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Trinam's alive? DIIIIIIIIIVE!

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Darksol the Painbringer wrote:

So, Paizo thinks having Dexterity to Damage is a Mythic-only benefit.

Gotcha.

I guess that means the Unchained Rogue has Mythic Rules. Almost no table is gonna use it now...

This is the poorest use of logic I've seen all year. Bravo.

Shadow Lodge *****

3 people marked this as a favorite.

But we won't.

Shadow Lodge

I celebrate in the only way I know how - playing Pathfinder!

Shadow Lodge *****

Wait, give up what?

Shadow Lodge

4 people marked this as a favorite.

Oh, I can hear you. Understanding is completely different. :)

Shadow Lodge *****

Terminalmancer wrote:
We'll have to agree to disagree.

Oh, I already knew that was the case.

Shadow Lodge *****

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Terminalmancer wrote:
It's just an unavoidable effect of the number of players in PFS.

I fundamentally disagree. Instilling a community value of trusting your GM or VO when they answer the question will go a long way to stopping it. The question will be asked and answered without ever reaching the campaign staff.

The campaign coordinator should not be treated as 'mom' when 'dad' gives you an answer you don't like.

Shadow Lodge *****

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I think the campaign is only becoming obsessed with corner cases because the players keep asking about them. Accepting a GMs ruling on something and moving on will go a long way to reducing the minutia codification.

Shadow Lodge

5 people marked this as a favorite.
Hmm wrote:

Charm person. I keep failing my will save.

Hmm

And that's how I ended up married.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Freehold DM wrote:
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Linkified.

Shadow Lodge

4 people marked this as a favorite.

Nope, it's right here, smartass.

I also have it on my phone.

Shadow Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Apple gifted me with a beats headset when I bought my laptop.

They're heavy pieces of garbage.

Shadow Lodge *****

I gotta be better about that last one, and coax some roleplay out at the end.

Shadow Lodge

We are all just cogs in the system. :)

Shadow Lodge

5 people marked this as a favorite.
Zelda Marie Lupescu wrote:
Why is it "unnecessarily stupid" to have characters equal?

It's not, but point buy doesn't make characters equal. They get an equal amount of resources, but they don't end up equal thanks to the rest of the system.

Shadow Lodge

5 people marked this as a favorite.

The Roll of TOZ (Let 'em fall, maaaaaaannnnnnnnn!):

captain yesterday: 1d21 ⇒ 6
DJEternalDarkness: 1d21 ⇒ 10
Freehold DM: 1d21 ⇒ 20
Misterhabs: 1d21 ⇒ 5
N.Jolly: 1d21 ⇒ 5
Rednal: 1d21 ⇒ 13
Uncle Teddy: 1d21 ⇒ 17
Whack-a-Rogue: 1d21 ⇒ 4
Zesdead: 1d21 ⇒ 17

Freehold DM wins the dice off, coming oh so close to that perfect number. Freehold, buddy, you've got up to $15 to spend on any 3rd party PDF. Merry Christmas!

Shadow Lodge

4 people marked this as a favorite.

Final List of TOZ:
captain yesterday
DJEternalDarkness
Freehold DM
Misterhabs
N.Jolly
Rednal
Uncle Teddy
Whack-a-Rogue
Zesdead

Roll off will happen tomorrow morning, to give everyone time to speak up or forever miss The Gift of TOZ.

Shadow Lodge

3 people marked this as a favorite.

Alright gang, check my work here. I have compiled...The List of TOZ. Let's read it off, maaaaaaaaannnn.

The List of TOZ:
captain yesterday
DJEternalDarkness
Freehold DM
grimdog73
Jaxom Dragonheart
master4sword
Misterhabs
N.Jolly
Rednal
Uncle Teddy
Walt Flanagan
Whack-a-Rogue
Zesdead
ShadeKyubi

If you didn't win a gift so far, and you're not on the list, shout out with your rolls so I can put you on. If you're on the list and DID receive a gift, let me know so I can take you off. Once all the final winners are wrapped up, we'll see who gets The Gift of TOZ. (At this moment, it appears that grimdog73, Rednal, and ShadeKyubi do not have rolls that add up to that sublime number. Hopefully the last roll will fix that!)

Shadow Lodge

I have nothing but time. :)

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Who was that masked woman?!

Shadow Lodge *****

Ya done good, Pirate.

1 to 50 of 8,991 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2016 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.