Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Member of Church of Razmir

TOZ's page

7,808 posts. Alias of TriOmegaZero.


RSS

1 to 50 of 7,808 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>
Shadow Lodge

Forgive them. They must be British, which means they need all the compassion we can offer.

Shadow Lodge

Left out in the cold again. :P

Shadow Lodge

5 people marked this as a favorite.
Liz Courts wrote:
I really, really, really hope so, but that largely depends on how many fires I have to put out.

*puts away the matches*

Shadow Lodge

Azten wrote:
As long as it's Sacred Tattoo that gets the nerd bat.

Nah, they'll remove Luck bonuses from the game instead.

Shadow Lodge

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Imbicatus wrote:
It's not a question of the +1 bonus, it's a question of the resource cost. A half-orc can get a +1 bonus to all reflex, fortitude, and will saves from all sources for the cost of a trait. A human can get a +1 bonus to all reflex, fortitude, and will saves from all sources for the cost of three feats.

I think the real problem is that Orc Ferocity is utter garbage compared to Sacred Tattoo.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
alexd1976 wrote:
It get's eye-rolls and groans from multiple people when this shows up at our table... again... and again.

Sounds like a local problem rather than a system problem.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Taku Ooka Nin wrote:

You can ban after someone takes something. If it is the first time you've encountered it, then it is fully within your rights as the GM to do so.

You just say, "Ok, that is broken and I don't want it in my game, so I'm not going to have it in my game. Rebuild the character or bring a different character in, you're allowed a free rebuild (Class, Race and Talents) with WBL up to the wealth you've accrued thus far.

You're happy, the player gets to try something new so he is happy.

Disclaimer: Use judiciously, repeat uses may erode good-will and social cohesion.

Shadow Lodge

But why isn't it here already?

Shadow Lodge

Matthew Downie wrote:

Under Golarion rules, there is something about the unnatural forces of undeath that drives almost all undead beings, even mindless ones, to become Evil.

Exactly what this force is isn't clear...

I call it "Author Intent".

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Charon's Little Helper wrote:
If they didn't - then they're not a lich. If you still say they are a lich without said ritual, you've changed the definition of what a lich is, so any discussion of it is pointless.

Guess you can stop discussing it then.

Shadow Lodge

Charon's Little Helper wrote:
You CANNOT have a neutral lich.

The hell I can't!

Shadow Lodge *****

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I wish I could take that seriously.

Shadow Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Davor wrote:

I'm still shocked this is a conversation. "I didn't know any better" is NEVER a valid excuse. Why does the paladin get one for killing an innocent creature? Because he was stupid?

/flips table

*sets the table back up* How rude.

Shadow Lodge *****

Mostly because we completely botched collecting anything to have leverage against him. But also because of how it was written.

Shadow Lodge *****

I agree with the last two posts.

Shadow Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Death is not the only failure condition.

Shadow Lodge *****

thorin001 wrote:
Casting a spell with the Evil descriptor is not an Evil act

This is what I agree with.

Shadow Lodge *****

Nefreet wrote:
You cannot in any good conscience (ha! I made a funny) claim that casting Infernal Healing is not an evil act.

Damn right I can.

Shadow Lodge *****

BigNorseWolf wrote:
Isn't the first instinct of every paladin upon detecting evil to ready smite?

I used to think that. Then my paladin shattered an evil mirror, and it only made things worse.

More importantly, you just cast the spell and know exactly why you are detecting evil.

Shadow Lodge *****

BigNorseWolf wrote:
I mean is there a surer sign from the gods that you shouldn't have done something than suddenly getting the urge to smite yourself?

Why would you have that urge? Not that it would even work. You detect as, you don't become a valid target.

Shadow Lodge *****

Jessex wrote:
What spells can Lawful and Good divine casters not cast? Evil and chaotic ones.

That only applies to Clerics and Druids. Those classes with the aligned spells restriction.

The Paladin should probably have that restriction as well, but does not. Nor does the Ranger or Oracle.

Shadow Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.

I love it when a plan comes together.

Shadow Lodge *****

Are you volunteering, friend? ;)

Shadow Lodge *****

The Fox wrote:
Do we really need to make up new ways to get into arguments before the game even starts?

You think this is a 'new' way?

Shadow Lodge

6 people marked this as a favorite.

So let it begin anew...

Shadow Lodge

Rogue Eidolon wrote:
Who's that Mark Seifter guy anyway?

I hear he's a real jerk.

Shadow Lodge

Y'know, that's fair.

Shadow Lodge

4 people marked this as a favorite.
bugleyman wrote:
One day.

But this day is NOT THAT DAY.

Shadow Lodge

What the hell?

Shadow Lodge

Meanwhile I'm just over here watching Overlord.

Shadow Lodge

But...money. ;)

Shadow Lodge

6 people marked this as a favorite.
Neo2151 wrote:
If that's true, why are you playing PF right now instead of 3.5?

Because they can use their 3.5 books with PF?

Shadow Lodge

If you eat dragon, you will become dragon. Science fact.

Shadow Lodge *****

1 person marked this as a favorite.

If you think the lodge is gone, you're quite mistaken.

Shadow Lodge *****

BigNorseWolf wrote:
If you let the players use any interpretation that they've come up with

Lying about my position does you no favors.

Shadow Lodge *****

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Well, when one of us is actually guilty of bad behavior, maybe that will come in handy.

Shadow Lodge *****

As you did by claiming that we were 'encouraging people to interpret'.

BigNorseWolf wrote:
Knock it off, both of you.

Also, has this ever worked for you?

Shadow Lodge *****

6 people marked this as a favorite.
BigNorseWolf wrote:
This just encourages people to "interpret"

I honestly don't care to spend my gamedays arguing and harassing players into the One True Way to play the game. As long as the table is fun, I have accomplished my goal.

Shadow Lodge

3 people marked this as a favorite.

Ashiel's theme.

Shadow Lodge

It was even in the first Dungeon AP. :)

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
DM_Blake wrote:
That is a long post. I thought I was the only one who did that...

You obviously don't know TL.

Shadow Lodge

The Pale King wrote:
Just when you thought Oracles were becoming a bit more balanced....

What idiot thought that?

Shadow Lodge

I wear a hat. No one ever looks at the hat.

Shadow Lodge

4 people marked this as a favorite.

If you think GenCon only takes up one week of time, you are sorely mistaken.

Shadow Lodge *****

I resemble that remark.

Shadow Lodge *****

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Michael Thompson wrote:
Back to the OP a bit. I'd recommend not running Serpent's Rise in your area if you are planning to run Siege of Serpents at a local con/game day soon. There are massive spoilers for the Siege of Serpents in Serpent's Rise.

Conversely, there are also massive spoilers for Serpent's Rise in Siege of Serpents. :)

claudekennilol wrote:
I don't see what's so special about either of them that they can only be run by 4-5 star gms.

The fact that only 4 or 5 star GMs can run them is what makes them a special.

Shadow Lodge

Ah, another thread about general etiquette when arguing rules has devolved into a specific rules argument.

Shadow Lodge

Why is he consulting the Tome of Horrors?

Shadow Lodge

4 people marked this as a favorite.
Richard Moore wrote:
The spam is irritating and unfortunate, but I will echo the captcha hate. It's one of the worst anti-spam measures ever designed, IMO.

It causes a lot of problems.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

^^^ He's right you know.

1 to 50 of 7,808 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2015 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.