Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Member of Church of Razmir

TOZ's page

6,483 posts. Alias of TriOmegaZero.


RSS

1 to 50 of 6,483 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>
Shadow Lodge

I would just ignore it, like I ignore alignment.

Shadow Lodge

Man, I love my VO's Barbarian but my Life Oracle uses a lot of resources on him...

Shadow Lodge

Gorbacz wrote:
Sure, there's sexual dimorphism. But if you put it in game and say that Women are -2 STR, the next thing that happens is "I think women should actually be -2 INT too, because how many female CEOs and politicians are there?" and what follows is pure madness, destruction, deaths and permabans.

Bah. We all know Int isn't the relevant stat when talking about politicians.

Shadow Lodge ****

Chernobyl wrote:
I'd average the 6-7 and 1-2 gold and use that value

That would be incorrect.

Shadow Lodge

5 people marked this as a favorite.

They already get that, but the material component is a weapon.

Shadow Lodge

Lincoln Hills wrote:
You had wits?! Luxury!

Some players still lack them!

Shadow Lodge

No.

Shadow Lodge

Jaelithe wrote:
Kazaan wrote:
Pride is a classic sin in one specific Earth religion.
Two spring to mind: Christianity and Islam.

I thought they were the same religion, just with different prophets.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Kthulhu wrote:
Well, when it becomes obvious that the developers don't really give a damn about balance, you take what you can get.

You've been taking it for decades then. :D

Shadow Lodge

Hama wrote:
How can I advise him without it sounding pretentious?

You shut up and let him learn the hard way.

Shadow Lodge ****

Chris Mortika wrote:
Roll dice. Tell stories. Meet new friends. Explore. Report. Cooperate.

And I certainly do.

Shadow Lodge

Sometimes they just get what they get.

Shadow Lodge

Blerg, should not have giant cup of soda before bed.

Shadow Lodge

true_shinken wrote:
Am I being too nice?

Yes. You must destroy all their equipment and crush their souls.

Shadow Lodge

RDM42 wrote:
In which case why is he not just playing a different class with UMD instead of a wizard without spells that uses wands?

An interesting question, no? Maybe you should try it and find us an answer.

Shadow Lodge

born_of_fire wrote:
Rynjin wrote:
If it is indeed meant to "inform, not restrict" as EVERYONE who's defended alignment so far has said, then it SHOULDN'T RESTRICT.
The paladin is proof that alignment is intended to restrict.

No, the paladin code does that, not alignment.

Shadow Lodge

Arachnofiend wrote:
This is just a matter of opinion. I like mine better though

Naturally.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

So....what, alignment is Rovagug?

Shadow Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.

ANYTHING but THAT.

Shadow Lodge

14 people marked this as a favorite.

I'm putting you in the yellowdingo file now.

Shadow Lodge

I'm off every day.

Shadow Lodge

Agreed, Daniel.

Shadow Lodge

Spook205 wrote:
By this logic if a police officer disguises themselves for a sting operation, the criminals do criminal activities and get killed during the process, then the police officer is morally culpable. Which is bogus.

Who is talking about morality? I'm talking about alignment.

Aranna wrote:
TOZ it isn't even an evil act to kill the vile villains.

You know better than to believe you'll get me to agree with you on this. Doing evil to evil is still evil.

Shadow Lodge

Aranna wrote:
According to TOZ yes that paladin is evil.

See previous link. Also note that you've moved your goalposts from 'doing evil' to 'being evil'.

Shadow Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Zhayne wrote:
And if you don't need roleplaying guidelines, because you actually roleplay, then it's useless.

To you.

Shadow Lodge

LIES.

Shadow Lodge

Wait, the Inquisitor is ranged?

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

My bank wouldn't tell me why they couldn't send my withdrawal to my printer.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Oh yeah, that old thing. I bet we could get people talking about how they wouldn't allow it because it's 3.5, never mind that Paizo published it themselves. :)

Shadow Lodge

4 people marked this as a favorite.
Firstbourne wrote:
Has anyone heard...

lol

Shadow Lodge

agnelcow wrote:
EDIT: Or, y'know, what TOZ said.

Wo-PAH!

Shadow Lodge

Lamontius wrote:
spike spike spike spike spike spike

SPIKE DIES

wait wrong show

Shadow Lodge

I rarely find that my casters need the same spell over and over. With my spontaneous casters I end up casting the same spells over and over because I have nothing better to do. And in most events I end the adventure with spell slots still unexpended from not needing them all, prepared or spontaneously.

Shadow Lodge

Ditto.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
scrmwrtr42 wrote:
I'm not familiar with YellowDingo...

That much was obvious by the fact that you think he needs defending.

Shadow Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Quote:
What can a Wizard do that a Sorcerer can't?

Who the f#$$ cares?

Shadow Lodge

I fail to see how anything related to beef jerky could be useless.

Shadow Lodge

I just thought my revulsion at the picture was me wondering what horrible STD they had contracted.

Shadow Lodge

3 people marked this as a favorite.

HE LIVES!

Shadow Lodge

DSXMachina wrote:
Celestial Healer wrote:
I agree with blitzing to extend the post count.

That's a shocking concept, blitzing to bloat the post count.

:P

Oh you poor naive thing.

Post count is ALL.

Shadow Lodge ****

That's friggin' hilarious.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

They certainly don't mean he's one of the esteemed leaders...

Shadow Lodge

What's Citizen Kane?

Shadow Lodge

No, that would be Cleric. :)

Shadow Lodge ****

*ahem*

Shadow Lodge

Charlie Bell wrote:
"Make a Spellcraft check and I'll tell you." :p

"The laws of magic auto succeed."

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
born_of_fire wrote:
So clarify your argument or go away already.

I wasn't making an argument, I was answering a question. And I'll go away when you stop replying.

Shadow Lodge

born_of_fire wrote:
Why does everyone assume that one lucky bugged who ends up with a 42 point buy when he rolls is cheating?

Cause it ain't just one bugger.

Shadow Lodge ****

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Nefreet wrote:
Obviously we think differently, so what would you call that?

"You holding an erroneous opinion."

Shadow Lodge ****

Jiggy wrote:

Can you be considered to increase "paperwork" by just increasing the paper? By just increasing the work? Do you have to increase both the paper and the work in order to increase the paperwork?

These are the types of questions I ponder as I lie awake at night...

The world may never know.

1 to 50 of 6,483 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2014 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.