Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Member of Church of Razmir

TOZ's page

8,905 posts. Alias of TriOmegaZero.


RSS

1 to 50 of 8,905 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>
Shadow Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.

For science.

Shadow Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
John Napier 698 wrote:
That piece of violence may be ( highly ) unsuitable for a twelve year old.

And Archer isn't? :P

Shadow Lodge

Of course, the only reason fantasy worlds have so many of those is so murderhobos have something to kill, so...

It's like a bloody chicken vs egg problem.

Shadow Lodge

Who, who, and who?

Shadow Lodge *****

Baval wrote:
Im not familiar with PFS rules, but does it not have random encounters?

Correct. Scenarios have specified encounters, and GMs are not allowed to add extra ones just to murder PCs. Or even not to murder PCs. No extra encounters, that's all.

Shadow Lodge *****

4 people marked this as a favorite.

Oh, this child is precious.

Shadow Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Torbyne wrote:
i dont see us as in 2.0 yet though because i secretly want there to be a 2.0 and i want it to change a lot of things, not just scatter some options to work around issues.

How much benefit will doing that bring? Enough to outweigh the costs? This is a system made for people who refused such changes before, and Paizo has quite a few $50 hardcovers of the CRB that would be rendered unmarketable in such a case.

Shadow Lodge

swoosh wrote:
Claxon wrote:


Look at the above quoted FAQ. You are incorrect.
The one that says PDT hasn't decided yet?

Good luck getting that to fly at table.

Shadow Lodge

21 people marked this as a favorite.

We're already well into 2.0, they just didn't reboot the product lines to do it.

Shadow Lodge

Dolgarth wrote:
@TOZ: Many thanks for your recommendation! Did I really make that good an impression in one scenario?

Eh, maybe I'm easily impressed by any attempt to characterize during play, since it doesn't happen that often. :P

Shadow Lodge

You weren't around for the playtest then. :P

Shadow Lodge

So honest appraisals of the system are attacks?

Just kidding, we've known that since the beta.

Shadow Lodge

Azten wrote:
That includes invisibility.

Again, YMMV.

Shadow Lodge

Azten wrote:
What gets really weird is when someone invisible casts a spell.

YMMV, this point is still unconfirmed by the PDT.

Shadow Lodge

I suppose I better try this out now that I'm starting PbPs... :)

Shadow Lodge

Say hello to my ifrit twins. 16 primary after racials.

Shadow Lodge

7 people marked this as a favorite.
ElyasRavenwood wrote:
What is a spell manifestation?

A poor idea.

Shadow Lodge

4 people marked this as a favorite.

Seen it, believe it, dice are funny that way.

Shadow Lodge

3 people marked this as a favorite.

To pass the time as we slowly decay.

Shadow Lodge *****

1 person marked this as a favorite.

It's a branch family.

Shadow Lodge *****

3 people marked this as a favorite.

A huge thank you to Andrew Christian for taking over my table of #6-13 Of Kirin and Kraken at SkalCon so I could go enjoy a zany Out of Retirement scenario with author Clinton Boomer.

Shadow Lodge

GM Evil wrote:
Honestly the only reason I'm even interested in a title at all is because the local gaming shop wants me to have some sort of "title" in order for me to run games in their store.

Tell them you're a Venture Sergeant until you get approved.

Shadow Lodge *****

I am intrigued by your ideas and would like to register for your newsletter. :) (And have already registered for your Warhorn.)

Shadow Lodge

Dr Styx wrote:
It just shows that the Effect of Acid Splash can be more than one creature.

That's not how that works. Not at all.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

:D

Shadow Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.

The best kind of correct!

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Yes, I would like to Blood Under Absalom please.

Shadow Lodge

3 people marked this as a favorite.
BigNorseWolf wrote:
TOZ wrote:
*lays in wait of a new faq*
you can't ready an action out of comba ow ow ow ow ow

yeah but i can stab you out of combat, see?

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

*lays in wait of a new faq*

Shadow Lodge

9 people marked this as a favorite.
master_marshmallow wrote:
Enough, you're making the exact same case over and over again.

I had to laugh.

Shadow Lodge

Okay, thanks for clearing that up. I agree.

Shadow Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Link2000 wrote:
Edit: I also use my imagination while playing this game.

So do the rest of us. I'm not sure why you wanted to point this out.

Shadow Lodge

Link2000 wrote:
What I am trying say is that a Ray is not a "Target" based spell.

No one is disputing that. What is in dispute is if swarms are immune to just Targeted spells or spells with targets.

Shadow Lodge

Did I miss the citation of that?

Shadow Lodge

Val'bryn2 wrote:
...so your test actually eradicates one of the weapons we all know affect swarms.

How do we know that?

Shadow Lodge *****

4 people marked this as a favorite.

*needs to hurry up and TPK his parties so he can report on time*

Shadow Lodge

I'm pretty sure we're just all ornery cusses.

Shadow Lodge

3 people marked this as a favorite.

Understood. Happens to us all.

Shadow Lodge

5 people marked this as a favorite.
graywulfe wrote:
I would say I am sorry that me expressing my opinion bothers you but that would be disingenuous.

No one is bothered by your opinion.

Shadow Lodge

By that standard it's essential even with only one enemy. You have to track AoOs and reach and maneuvering distance and the like the same for a single enemy, especially with a party of multiple characters.

I still don't find the argument to hold any water, of course.

Shadow Lodge *****

Brendan Molloy wrote:
What different resources?

Choice of feats, equipment, stats. You get to take advantage of better combinations than the ones chosen for the pregens.

Shadow Lodge

Saiyagamitar wrote:
does anyone else think that reflex saves against AoE stuff doesn't make sense?

Very little in this game makes sense.

Shadow Lodge

4 people marked this as a favorite.

RAW. Nuff said.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

*facepalm*

Shadow Lodge

I've been trying to get mine to come in out of the rain for ages now.

Shadow Lodge

Oh, that's good. First time I built her, I looked at her saves and couldn't figure out what I had done. I had forgot about the domain power. :)

Shadow Lodge

4 people marked this as a favorite.

It's striking.

Shadow Lodge

3 people marked this as a favorite.
captain yesterday wrote:

My mom passed away early this morning.

I'll post something nice about her later.

Sorry CY. Seems a good time to bring this oldie out.

Shadow Lodge

Inventory Tracking Sheet
Level 1-4 Chronicles
Level 5 Chronicles

Naturally, I will be slow tracking the first two chronicles.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Whelp, I want to burn the forums down again. :/

1 to 50 of 8,905 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2016 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.