Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Member of Church of Razmir

TOZ's page

7,739 posts. Alias of TriOmegaZero.


RSS

1 to 50 of 7,739 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>
Shadow Lodge *****

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I'll have what he's having.

Shadow Lodge

Rysky wrote:
Though yes, can we be a little bit more civil please in our disagreements?

I'm trying, I promise.

Shadow Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
magnuskn wrote:
forger03 wrote:
Divine Protetion was a decidedly fun and enjoyable power feat that worked great according to all those I know. Now it's... a feat I don't think anyone I know would ever bother taking. Including myself.

Hahahaha. Hah. No.

Worst designed feat ever. The people who were responsible for the original release should have worn hubcaps of shame until they fixed this. The fix may be a bit overzealous, but this feat should never have been published in the first place.

Hahahahahano. At least it actually DID something.

Shadow Lodge

Weird, I see it happen all the time.

Shadow Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Julie Iaccarino wrote:
I ate too many tacos.

I don't understand.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Cort is my hero.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
DM_Blake wrote:
Is Paizo sending a clear message that they're in such a hurry to rush a new book to market and make the quick buck that playtesting and rule balance is now pushed off to post-release, or ignored all together?

Tell me what you think the answer is when Occult Adventures is out for perusal.

Shadow Lodge *****

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Assume until further clarification that Slashing Grace can be used with all light weapons.

Shadow Lodge

claudekennilol wrote:
Good thing my magus has fencing grace instead and that'll never be errata'd since it's in a Player Companion.

We could start up a FAQ about it...

Shadow Lodge

10 people marked this as a favorite.

Man, so this is what it's like when Blizzard releases a WoW patch.

Shadow Lodge *****

Wait, there's a second printing of the ACG?

Shadow Lodge

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Gorbacz wrote:
I've always syspected you of being a closet magical tea party cops and robbers gygaxianist. ;)

That's some hovercraft full of eels level of word salad.

Shadow Lodge

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Larkspire wrote:
knowing the rules is crucial...

Meh. I don't find that to be so.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
HWalsh wrote:
TOZ wrote:
HWalsh wrote:

I find the argument of:

"The problem is the game. If it doesn't work the way I run it, because I have a style that I like, then the game is broken."

To be very... Illogical.

Then why do you posit that the game is not broken based on your own style of running it?
Because the way I run it creates scenarios that mimic the way adventures are presented in the source material.

It's not broken because you can fix it then?

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
HWalsh wrote:

I find the argument of:

"The problem is the game. If it doesn't work the way I run it, because I have a style that I like, then the game is broken."

To be very... Illogical.

Then why do you posit that the game is not broken based on your own style of running it?

Shadow Lodge

This will only end in tears.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Quote:
Respect. Do we have any!?

I know I don't.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Dare we dream it?

Shadow Lodge

That's not my name...

Shadow Lodge

Yes, I will put on clothes in the morning. For tonight, NAKIE!

Shadow Lodge

7 people marked this as a favorite.
Quote:
There are creatures in the world that even giants fear.

We call them PCs.

Shadow Lodge

But is it that difficult to type it all out? :P

Shadow Lodge *****

pauljathome wrote:
Steven Schopmeyer wrote:
Gamerskum wrote:
So when do we stop roleplaying in order to get the mission done?
When an alternate interpretation of your character leads to better table harmony than another.
Within reason.

I'm sorry but I see no need to add this qualifier as there are NO situations when being without reason is the right answer.

Shadow Lodge *****

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Jessex wrote:
TOZ wrote:
Jessex wrote:
And how precisely will you ever stop being a jerk if there are no consequences for being such an enormous jerk to the people you game with?
Who here has advocated for there to be no consequences?
You and everyone on your side of this debate.

You assume far too much.

MY consequences come outside the game, between the PLAYERS who have the problem.

Shadow Lodge *****

Jessex wrote:
And how precisely will you ever stop being a jerk if there are no consequences for being such an enormous jerk to the people you game with?

Who here has advocated for there to be no consequences?

Shadow Lodge *****

1 person marked this as a favorite.
thejeff wrote:
Without that, do you still think it's PvP?

Sure, if I have to justify why I didn't charge the player for a raise dead.

Shadow Lodge *****

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Seran Blackros wrote:
TOZ wrote:
Seran Blackros wrote:
I am fairly certain that is not legal in PFS

Only if the death was caused by legal circumstances. I consider the inquisitor's actions PVP and thus illegal.

Naturally, you are welcome to rule differently at your table.

I will. I am just curious, how do you define PvP?

S.

Much like pornography, when I see it.

Shadow Lodge *****

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Seran Blackros wrote:
I am fairly certain that is not legal in PFS

Only if the death was caused by legal circumstances. I consider the inquisitor's actions PVP and thus illegal.

Naturally, you are welcome to rule differently at your table.

Shadow Lodge *****

Akari Sayuri "Tiger Lily" wrote:
Rocks fall, everyone dies? :)

Eh, in the OP's example, I would probably tell the necromancers player that his character was raised at no cost.

Shadow Lodge *****

Jessex wrote:
I did. How does never work for you?

At your table? Perfectly.

At mine? Not so much.

Shadow Lodge *****

Jessex wrote:
At what point do you get to stop forcing other people to do stuff so your piece of paper can still get used?

You have a brain. Use it to figure each situation out.

Shadow Lodge *****

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Socalwarhammer wrote:
I disagreed- sometimes s%$@ happens and its only a game. What do you all think?

The inquisitor not healing the necromancer is basically coming to another persons house to play cards, and during the game breaks his chair over the table. Then he leaves.

In PFS, your fellow player doesn't get to just roll a new character. The GM doesn't get to build the necromancer back up from the setback of a raise dead. Intentionally letting your party member die is forcing them to expend resources or removing their character from play.

It's only a game. Don't break other people's toys.

Shadow Lodge

All of them.

Shadow Lodge

Krensky wrote:
North Star isn't fantasy...

WTF difference does that make? Is he not an anime fighter that people can take for reference in their games?

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I really want my Invulnerable Rager to rock such a necklace once he hits 12th level.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Letric wrote:
Have you ever played MERP? Middle Earth Role Playing Game?

Why would I have done a silly thing like that?

Shadow Lodge

6 people marked this as a favorite.

Well, that escalated quickly.

Shadow Lodge

4 people marked this as a favorite.

Off-Topic is that way guys.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Simon Legrande wrote:
DungeonmasterCal wrote:
*weeps for the derailed thread*
Buck up little camper. We'll beat this thread... together.

Can we just Diplomacy our way past it instead?

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Terquem wrote:
...oh I give up.

That makes me the victor!

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Nah, f&~~ that. I have enough to do without babysitting players too.

Shadow Lodge

4 people marked this as a favorite.
Headfirst wrote:
Here's a piece of advice that's going to sound counter-intuitive, foolish, or perhaps even offensive to some of you: Stop trying to win.

Stop telling people what to do.

Shadow Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Rynjin wrote:
Well, you know, unless you don't have the tools to do the thing you're trying to do.

Then you harden up and accept the results, and let the GM deal with it if he doesn't like it.

Seranov wrote:
Obviously the solution is to move time and space around you with sheer willpower and scientific might.

I prefer rediscovering teleportation through sheer determination to punch someone in the face.

Shadow Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Wizards!!!! wrote:
I was wondering what you guys think is the hardest monster/BBEG to defeat in pathfinder

The GM.

Shadow Lodge

Kirth Gersen wrote:
Saldiven wrote:
I'd also be perfectly content to make a gentleman's agreement that neither side would do so.
So much of the unbalanced, rickety structure of the game demands gentlemen's agreements that I suppose adding one more is no big deal for some tables. For me, and a lot of the people I've gamed with in the last 10-15 years, that's getting to be really old -- the list of things you can't do "because, well, that's just not done" is getting to be as long as the rulebook itself. At some point you start looking for good house rules that will close more than one loophole at once, if only to make your own life easier. We were hoping Pathfinder would do that with 3.5. But it didn't, so we started writing our own.

So instead of a list of agreements as long as the rulebook, you decided to write house rules as long as the rulebook. :)

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Lou Diamond wrote:

Now everyone can be happily married to a partner of their choosing.

Enjoy it and celebrate it with your friends and family.

I hope we can.

Shadow Lodge *****

4 people marked this as a favorite.
Drogon wrote:
Must....resist...

Think about baseball.

Shadow Lodge *****

Tell me something I don't know.

Shadow Lodge *****

Victor:
You realize the adventure specifically says you have to kill that creature to escape, right?

Shadow Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.

All topics are now marriage equality topics!

1 to 50 of 7,739 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2015 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.