|Paizo Pathfinder® Paizo Games|
|About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ|
"What other changes do you think we'll see for the monk in the book" presupposes "what parts of the monk are/are not in need of changing"
Good Idea wrote:
I totally want to see a full BAB monk!
Bad Idea wrote:
The monk is total failsauce and needs full BAB to even begin to approach relevance in Pathfinder. Also wizards are still better fighters.
GM Bold Strider wrote:
There is no valid rules argument for limiting Pageant of the Peacock against monsters.
Actually, since "By gracefully weaving your body through subtle forms and postures you can convince others of your breeding, eloquence, and refinement." is listed under the effect, you can argue that the ability to use a Bluff check in place of an Int-based check is limited to checks involving convincing others, which identifying monsters weaknesses does not fall under.
What if they replace the irreplaceable Grand Lodge and Silver Crusade? A.K.A Welcome to the Wayfinder Faction, Now Go Home!
Andrew Christian wrote:
Aww shucks, I'm out of luck because all I wanted was 2 more. :)
Don't let them in, don't let them see:
Ciretose apparently got too vociferous in the ACG play test for the Warpriest I think, and was banned. He sent me a farewell email letting me know what happened. I ran a PFS game for him back in December and that was the last I heard from him.
- Toz because, well, Toz.
Quite often the best reason ever.
Also, shout out to our GLORIOUS FORUM OVERLORDS especially the one that gives cookies.
Missing the forest because of the trees.
Can we expect these new races to be banned in the future? Should we warn new players to only use content from the core books, just to be safe?
Yes. If they are only buying the books to get access to content for PFS, and not to enjoy the book as a Pathfinder supplement, you should warn them to only play core rulebook options in order to avoid disappointment and useless books in their library.
Edit: Knew I should have included a '/whatever' at the end.
Kyle Baird wrote:
One could, theoretically, create an aasimar or tiefling now, get to 1, 2, or 3 xp and after August 14th, rebuild for free into an ACG class without changing the race. Correct?
Edit: I was not there TL, but my wife did stay in the Art of Animation hotel. Sorry you missed her!
The bottom line is that if even 30 or 40% of the people dislike something, there's nothing to be gained by putting it in the campaign.
Nothing except the enjoyment of the 60 or 70% of the people that like it.
Ogrork the Mighty wrote:
This isn't about the Uber-Trapfinder feeling awesome in his field. It's about making traps relevant to the game again.
This is a problem everyone faces, regardless of whether the trap finder has Disable Device twinked out to +30 or is just a paladin or barbarian with the HP to eat the trap and keep going.
Ok fine I get it, I'm wrong I guess.
You're not wrong...
I suggest considering your tone and how you would feel being addressed in the manner that you have addressed these players. Is it conductive to your goal of encouraging roleplay? Are there better ways to get your message across?
Your most recent post here is a sarcastic admission of error that in no way concedes anything and is only meant to ridicule and insult anyone who disagrees with you. Can you see how that will only array people against your position rather than persuade them to it?