|Paizo Pathfinder® Paizo Games|
|About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ|
Surrender monkeys was 20th century. Not revolutionary time.Just sayin'
The trouble with adjudicating charm and illusion spells; and how Ultimate Intrigue solves all of that
That is actually my way of thought too : this is a pretty efficient way to curb down the power, without limiting creative options in the choice of classes.
And ban all stat boosting items, too.
I'm with you, but I already tried to contact them, and this is so annoying.
I am due to start a Razor Coast campaign sometime next year. Should I just tell my players "sorry dudes your character sheeets are ******" every time there's a new update ?
The great point of hero lab is precisely that it is open to everything Paizo, and then more.
And I am already spending way too much time on RPG/software forums, so no I can't find some to go to Lonewolf's.
Well, sorry for the rant anyways.
That is great.
However, once again, ALL third party files that are not sold from the lonewolf webstore have disapeared.
This happens about every new update and is frankly growing irritating. If some more permanent solution could be found to avoid this, that would be great.
Mana Chicken wrote:
I am all in favour of more realism, and more rules to limit magic, but there's such a thing as pushing it too far ...
The problem with 15 minutes adventure day is bad adventure design, and powermunching players exploiting it.
Want to avoid that ?
Write the adventure with victory conditions for the villain which means the PCs need to act now, or lose.
It can be :
Would it be logical IRL for the party to rest and nothing happens after their 15 minutes ? No ? Then don't have it in game.
Also, if the party stays immobile to rest, then they become targets to be ambushed. Stay out also of the boring and predictable three encounters a day. Send as many encounters as needed to make them squeal ... if that is logical with the situation.
I remember absolutely hating the delve format.
It made things much more complicated for me, and sometimes it was really irritating. I had the impression of reading the same text several times over as different sections were referencing the same thing, but not in the same way, leading to confusion.
Plus, as I recall, it made certain monster actions mandatory, as "the goblin will always charge you".
Better is the foe of Good as they say.
The Raven Black wrote:
I haven't showed me my OD&D "white box" yet ? :)
I also have the Fiend Folio authographed by Gary himself.
James Jacobs wrote:
Somehow, I am somewhat sad to read this.
I understand that you want a gaming atmosphere as friendly as possible, everybody is welcome for Golarion, and I deeply respect this.
The part of me that is sad though, is that I have the feeling that all of you are self-censoring yourselves because of this, in fear that someone might get offended. I don't mind adult and edgy themes, done right.
Please keep up the good work, and dare show evil for what it is. A good villain for an AP, is a villain you want DEAD, DEAD, DEAD !!!
All the best.
I had a very similar approach.
I had to tell players : "NO, your character cannot start with knowledge of Thassilonian", and no, no one can teach it to you, as no one speaks it.
That was in hope of getting them motivated to talk to Brother Quink, or whatever his name. it did not work though, they kept ignoring him for the whole campaign.
I also applied huge limitations on rolls pertaining to ancient history, and geography of the old kingdoms, until they found the library. then I lifted it all.
Actually, that did not change much, but I felt it was better.