Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | My Wishlists | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
About Paizo   Messageboards   News   Paizo Blog   Help/FAQ  
Search
Links
Shop
Recent Reviews

Way of the Samurai (PFRPG) PDF
***** by Endzeitgeist

Scions of Evil (PFRPG) PDF
***** by Endzeitgeist

Book of Friends and Foes: Assassins in the River Nations (PFRPG) PDF
***( )( ) by Endzeitgeist

Power Word Spells: Lore of the First Language (PFRPG) PDF
***** by Endzeitgeist

Wicked Fantasy—Humans: The Reign of Men (PFRPG) PDF
***( )( ) by Endzeitgeist

   RSS Posts    RSS Reviews    RSS Wishlists
Marzena

Sobelia's page

40 posts. 1 review. No lists. No wishlists.


Search Posts
Search Sobelia's posts:
RSS Recent Posts

Does anyone else out there think it would be a good idea for WOTC or Paizo to create DM packs of miniatures- say a bag o' kobolds with 20 mixed poses, or the same for goblins and the other most commonly used races? I know I'd buy


I have bought several of these boosters (3), and have gotten no repeats.


Of all the lunacy-

So I GM a group of five players (currently 4th level with one 5th level-we had a near TPK early on)-we’re running through the ROTRL campaign, and just finished the Burnt Offerings module. One of my players read ahead and has been “cheating”- always too prepared for every situation. So I set it up that there have been some killings in Sandpoint- and it looked like it was the Sandpoint Devil. Everything that the PCs have heard is that it’s unstoppable, no one ever returns, and nothing survives after seeing it. Well, what do they do but decide to hunt it down. They climbed up the Devil’s Platter and searched until they found the Pit. About this time the SPD shows up- lets loose with its scream which chases two of the PCs off, then it lays down a fog and starts blasting with its breath weapon.
The remainder of the party keeps fighting, until they realize they are going to be handily slaughtered. The cleric flies off and finds the other PCs, and the whole party retreats to where? No other place than The Pit itself- den of the SPD. So I suspect I have a TPK on my hands. But hey, the townsfolk all warned them, and they had a chance to flee. What would you guys do? We finish with the PIT encounter this Weds night.


JPSTOD wrote:

It is not that difficult to use.

An added plus, all the User Artwork from the Dundjinni Forums can be used in it also.

Now that is a goodie I did not know. I have been trying to find freebie art out there to add on to the program. Thanks for the heads up!


Does anyone know when this is going to hit the Paizo shelves? I know it's available for download from the Profantasy site already...


I've heard and read a lot of complaints about CC3 being difficult to learn. I've just really started trying to use it and it really is not the bad. The key is to follow the examples. If you are used to programs like Photoshop and GIMP, then you'll be familiar with the layers and sheets that CC3 uses. The most challenging aspect of the program is learning the CAD based functions. Again, if you follow the examples and use the video demo available on the Profantasy site, you'll get the hang of the program rather quickly. Altogether, I really like the program. The user community provides fantastic insight and the company has great support. I recommend it to every GM that is trying to map his world!


At present I am running ROTRL- we just finished Burnt Offerings, and it has become known to me that one of my players is reading ahead- and is sending stat blocks of the enemies to the rest of my players. The rest of the group has asked him to stop, which is good- but in the meantime- I am throwing red herrings left and right into Skinsaw Murders to trip him up- I've changed a few things here and there that are key. Ultimately, my goal is to have him walk into a fight prepared for one thing, but be faced with entirely another.


Adventure: Burnt Offerings
PC: Allum Thief 1/ wiz 2, Daruk Barbarian 2, Talus, Ranger 1

Catalyst: Gogmurt and the goblin refugees

The party decided to immediately track and attack the goblins in their hideout at Thistletop after the raid. After trying to burn the goblins out unsuccessfully, they then proceeded with a frontal assault. Mind you, the smoke from their fire alerted the whole compound.

In the entry room at the thistletop lair- where the hole is- the PCs faced off with Gogmurt whose hit and run tactics left Daruk filleted and on fire. Gogmurt's animal companion, with help from a goblin dog, took out Talus the ranger, and Gogmurt critted the rogue with his flaming sword. (using the Crit Hit deck- was tres ugly). Gogmurt then turned his attentions to the cleric, Nim, and dropped him to 0, but Shalelu was with them and managed to drag him out of the way, heal him, and the rwo escaped. Almost a complete TPK, and a vicious fight.The goblin refugees were apparently only meant as extra XP as the players had no trouble dropping them...


Will this include an electronic version as well? I run my games online and missed out on the electronic version of ROTRL 1 & 2 , and the maps in electronic form would be awesome...


Patrick Walsh wrote:
alex wrote:

I _think_ this is the final version of my submission.

Non-rapier of Wooing

Alex.

Blink-blink.

There is much I could say, but I'm going to summarize:

This is a joke item no matter what your intent was. That was why it did not make.

Indeed. I had a player whose bard would have loved this, but I would NEVER allow this into a game.


I really, really like this item. It has good flavor and good mechanics. I could see this applied in numerous scenarios, both against the PCs or on the PCs' behalf.

Picture the bard entering an evil queen's harem dancing away for her.


This is one item I would keep as far away from the Expedition to Ravenloft adventure as possible-it seems like it would destroy the real challenge of a high level vampire like Strahd.


Patrick Walsh wrote:
Sobelia wrote:
Patrick Walsh wrote:
Sobelia wrote:

here's mine: I think it was boring, mainly... although I could see the Shoanti using this all the time.

Bracers of Focused Anger, Greater

<snip>

I initially didn't have the images of the favored foe on the bracers, just the briars that were interwoven with the leather. For the player characters, I waned to have a way fro them to tell to which foe the bracers were keyed.

Also, I tried to aim this at the non outdoorsy classes to offer them more combat ability. It could be abused by a barbarian- at first level raging 3 times without penalty,giving them a total of four rages, which is why i dropped the favored foe bonus to +2 from my intial +4

I like the designated favored foe being included in the description. as said elsewhere, it should creep the PCs out.

To avoid the potential barbarian abuse, add text that says it does not add to the number of rages a character already has. This would mean if you have none, you get one, but if you already have one or more (or have another item that adds more), you just get the favored foe bonus.

That somewhat defeats what I had in mind for the bracers, with them being favored by barbarian tribes. The cost would make it such that only a tribal "champion" could afford them. However, what if I added something like "If the wearer already has the rage ability, using the bracers increases the duration of the post rage fatigue suffered by the character." ?


Patrick Walsh wrote:
Sobelia wrote:

here's mine: I think it was boring, mainly... although I could see the Shoanti using this all the time.

Bracers of Focused Anger, Greater

Not boring, but "barbarian in a box". The description needs some strightening out as it reads like the bracers are woven with something else rather than the images on the bracers are interwoven together. Additionally, it is unclear if just the strands of briars irritate and incite or if both the briars and the images of other races irritate and incite. Clarification on this point would be useful.

I initially didn't have the images of the favored foe on the bracers, just the briars that were interwoven with the leather. For the player characters, I waned to have a way fro them to tell to which foe the bracers were keyed.

Also, I tried to aim this at the non outdoorsy classes to offer them more combat ability. It could be abused by a barbarian- at first level raging 3 times without penalty,giving them a total of four rages, which is why i dropped the favored foe bonus to +2 from my intial +4


Chris Mortika wrote:
Sobelia wrote:

here's mine: I think it was boring, mainly... although I could see the Shoanti using this all the time.

Bracers of Focused Anger, Greater
These tanned leather bracers are interwoven with images of different races and strands of briars that irritate the skin and incite anger.

Good day, Sobelia. Rather than discuss this in terms of the Superstar competition, I thought I'd respond as a DM or player, looking to include the item into my campaign.

Sobelia wrote:
The wearer of these bracers gains two uses of Rage per day per the spell; each Rage lasts 7 rounds. The wearer is also under the constant effect of a +2 enhancement bonus to attack and damage rolls against the favored foe of the bracers. ...

I don't have my SRD handy; does this stack with the Ranger's favored foes, or with the "bane" property of weapons? If it did stack with both, I think it might provide a way to massively large bonuses.

Thank you for submitting this for our perusal.

-- I appreciate the feedback Chris- as with all magic items, you have to look at the type of bonus- those of the same kind do not stack. As the Ranger's favored foe bonus is an unnamed bonus, it would indeed stack. In rgards to Bane- it would not stack since the bonus is an enhancement bonus. You would take whichever bonus is higher.


here's mine: I think it was boring, mainly... although I could see the Shoanti using this all the time.

Bracers of Focused Anger, Greater
These tanned leather bracers are interwoven with images of different races and strands of briars that irritate the skin and incite anger. The wearer of these bracers gains two uses of Rage per day per the spell; each Rage lasts 7 rounds. The wearer is also under the constant effect of a +2 enhancement bonus to attack and damage rolls against the favored foe of the bracers. These bracers usually keyed with orcs, goblins, or aberrations as their favored foe. The effects of Rage and the +2 to attack and damage rolls stack.
Moderate Enchantment; CL 6th; Craft Wondrous Item, Rage, Heroism; Price 20,400 gp.


I really like this one. As I play a rogue most of the time, I will definitely hope for this in my next game. The only concern I have is that the creator must be a rogue, which means you have to multi-class to make this item.


The only concern I have about it is that it is directly related to the Shape Spell ability of an Archmage. This item does have limitations, but with it being so similar, I could see a lot of room for abuse at lower levels.


Post attempting to bring conversation back around to orignal topic of conversation, but failing miserably by using several unrelated anecdotes. Waits expactantly for reply and flaming.


Good point, Damnitall22. We'll see how the coming week proceeds.


So just this week, a new guy at my office starts chatting with me, and mentions he was into reenactments, and making his own weapons, so I asked about roleplaying games- then he starts going on about DND and how he played, and then he says- I sareached a point in my Christian life where I relaized a lot of this was real, and I quit playing. DND teaches a lot about real witch craft, you know..." He then went on about how the game separates you from God and leads to sin.

*shakes head* I'm a Christian- and I don't feel that the game affects me. Some of the stuff is based on real cults. For example Pazuzu- an Assyrian demon- ok, so it makes me unconfortable- so I leave it completely out of my games.

Anyway, it's frustrating living in a small town where finding gamers is next to impossible. (Haven't played in about 2 years.) Also- there's a lot of narrow minded people 'round here in America's bible belt.

Anyone else have suggestions on positive ways to deal with the pending "conversion conversation?"

-Sobe


I must weigh in here- I've run some pretty dark games in my time- where the players all played evil characters and it was my job as the DM to combat them. I have seen the depravity that lurks within the average joe and it can be disturbing. HMM is disturbing to an extent, but if you look at it from a biological standpoint: ogres consider themselves to be higher on the food chain than the lesser races, therefore the rangers become "sport" and food.

In response to an earlier comment about simians and eating something you could conceivably converse with, please consider many of the foods used throughout the world, notably monkeys in areas where they are plentiful.

Now, at first blush, the ogres' actions seem a bit much, but if you take into context that this is a fantasy game and the PCs are combating evil, it does not hurt for the evil to be REALLY evil. Once you've defeated it, you know, incontrovertably, that you have done something right and worthwhile. I applaud Nic for keeping us on our toes. Sin is a multi hued thing- sometimes it is shallow and hard to see, and other times its blatant.

The ogres, IMHO, represent greed and gluttony and lust. In their lust they violate everything, in their greed they take and slaughter, and in their gluttony they overindulge in eating their prisoners.

A horrifying thing to see, but oh-so-satisfying to remove from the world.

I am looking forward to the rest of the ROTRL campaign. Look hard- the sins are everywhere!


I'm absolutely in! There's nothign like having a good hard cover book on your shelf. One thought for the guys from Paizo- include a searchable PDF with the purchase of the book- for those of us that use laptops and those awesome ROTR pdfs, we could cut down the number of books we need to carry to say... three.


Woohoo! Tis done! *reaches for a brew*
Now to design me a country! Good luck everyone!


Congratulations Mr. Schwartz!

Mike, you had mentioned we losers might could get a look at what you guys had as the requirements for the outline portion of the open call; could we get a look at it?


Jason Bulmahn wrote:
Sobelia wrote:

After you guys are done with determining who writes W3, would it be possible for you to post the outline guidelines for the rst of us losers? We're all hoping to learn as much as possible about what publishers like you are looking to see.

Post again after the winner is selected and I will see what I can do.

Jason Bulmahn
GameMastery Brand Manager

Will do. Many thanks!


Mothman wrote:

You beat me by about an hour Ashavan!

Yes, good luck to all, and who ever gets it, this is going to be great!

Mike,

After you guys are done with determining who writes W3, would it be possible for you to post the outline guidelines for the rst of us losers? We're all hoping to learn as much as possible about what publishers like you are looking to see.

By the way, I purchased both Burnt Offerings and Conquest of Bloodsworn Vale after submitting my query. I must admit I underestimated Pathfinder when you guys announced it. The adventure is quite imaginative and detailed beyond belief. I honestly cannot wait to see how W3 turns out!


I picked up a subscription to Dragon three or more years ago, and I have been thoroughly impressed with the timeliness, the quality of the articles, and the overall production quality, including the editing. I have picked up several more Paizo products since the demise of Dragon, and the editing is fantastic,unlike recent WotC products such as Undermountain- the words on the tabs for the first section are misspelled, and spelling errors are common throughout every product they have.

I am impressed with Paizo and its people, and though I will buy 4.0 in an effort to support my local game shop and our gaming community in general, I will continue to support Paizo in whatever flavor of system they choose to pursue.


Dreamweaver wrote:
Sobelia wrote:
Which leaves lots of development room for monsters...
Yeah but how close can you get to an existing IP monster before you are 'plagiarizing', I guess is the best word. I had several ideas for monsters but then I start looking and there is one in MMIII that is pretty close to my idea.

I guess it boils down to knowing what's there in print, and figuring out how to prevent plagiarizing. I remember an epsiode of Angel in which Cordelia states "There's a monster for everything!"

And there is! Just figure out what you need it to do!


Dragonmann wrote:
Sobelia wrote:
Mike, in regards to WoTC IP- Since the SRD is not necessarily complete, how do we figure out what's their IP? I know beholders, illithids and the like, but what about the other stuff, especially non MM1 stuff?

EVERYTHING from WotC books not in the SRD is their IP.

Which leaves lots of development room for monsters...


Mike, in regards to WoTC IP- Since the SRD is not necessarily complete, how do we figure out what's their IP? I know beholders, illithids and the like, but what about the other stuff, especially non MM1 stuff?


Whimsy Chris wrote:
clockworkjoe wrote:
I honestly think my submission had all the prerequisite qualifications. I had unique locations, a memorable villain and plenty of action. I would truly appreciate a critique that would mention why my submission did not pass.
My guess is that there were a lot of good submissions that had the all prerequisites, but they could only pick 12. In fact, just reading some of the other submission, many of them are adventures I would gladly run. I'm sure it just came down to picking their favorites.

I suspect that there were quite a number of queries that could have made it, and at that point, I bet Mike and Jason and the gang had to use grammar and punctuation to narrow it down. I suspect that's what got me.


Fatespinner wrote:
Cosmo wrote:
Sean, Minister of KtSP wrote:
Okay, I have done my best to act casual during all this, but the guys (love 'em to death) are really trying to make us all explode. I'm sure of it.
What do mean by "trying"?
*explodes*

*mops up the mess*

Glad I laid off the coffee...


Jason Buhlman wrote:
No, he's just so darn good-looking and clever.

ARRGH!

Nice alias....- funny how aliases don't show up on a treo. Didn't catch it till I was back in the office...


Jason Buhlman wrote:

Sebastian,

I only just realized what you did here. Impersonating editors on these boards is a serious offense. You are banned for life.

As a side note, we have decided to skip over the second round and announce that Craig Shackleton, known as Rambling Scribe on these boards, will be awarded the contract for Flight of the Red Raven.

Wow. Rambling Scribe must have included routing codes, account number and pin to his bank account in the body of his text. It would have been nice for 10 people to at least have a shot to expound upon 800 words with their outlines. I'm sure it was a fantastic query, but still, the rules changed. Oh well.


Kelvar Silvermace wrote:
Lilith wrote:
Mike McArtor wrote:
The meeting has begun.

Elan, cue dramatic music!

"Dun dun dunnnnnn!"

Yeah. They should make their announcement like this.

I guess we are all a bit like over caffeinated prairie dogs by now, aren't we?


Fatespinner wrote:
So this is kind of a silly question but, if the winner of this contest is already a GameMastery subscriber, will they be given two copies of their own adventure and get charged for one of them or will the copy that comes with their subscription just be given gratis and they'll only receive the one copy?

or if not already a subscriber, can they receive a subscription?


A good answer, to be sure! October the 15th, then. Good luck to everyone!


According to the rules, for player B to get to opponent X, he can freely pass his ally to get to the opponent, at which point the opponent gets an AOO. If the AOO hits, the grapple fails. In the case of the failure of the grapple, the DM must adjudicate whether Player A or Player B is displaced back to Player B's starting position, since you cannot end your movement in the same square as another creature that is not at least three size categories larger than your character.



©2002–2012 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online,PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.