Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Kyra

Skeld's page

Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber. Pathfinder Society Member. 3,176 posts. 6 reviews. No lists. No wishlists. 1 Pathfinder Society character.


1 to 50 of 476 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>
Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

4e is dead and gone. Can we get back to talking about Pathfinder?

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

The game has a basic set of rules. Some of the rules are less flexible than other rules. Other options (especially feats, spells, and class abilities) let you break or bend the rules.

The less flexible a rule is, the more likely an option that breaks it will be referred to as "cheese."

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

If Paizo releases a Pathfinder 2e, it will be as backward compatible to PF1e as PF was to D&D3.5 when PF was released. Anyone expecting an entirely new, or wildly different, game is going to be sorely disappointed because Paizo isn't going to release a game that will invalidate their entire back-catalog.

The entire idea of PFRPG was predicated on the fact that people didn't want a completely new game. As bets go, it was a huge winner.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

4 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Rogar Valertis wrote:
...

This book doesn't contain a rewrite of the Fighter. If that's what you're looking for, then this isn't the book for you.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

5 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

I think it would be helpful to add "Was this review helpful?"-type functionality to product reviews. This could be as simple as adding the current "like" functionality to reviews, or something more complex where reviews could be sorted according to how many customers found the reviews helpful.

This type of functionality would help weed out bad reviews while promoting ones that are actually helpful.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Rogar Valertis wrote:
Skeld wrote:
Rogar Valertis wrote:

Of all classes in need of "unchaining" they left the fighter out???

XD

The Fighter can greatly benefit from some of the optional rules, especially Stamina and Combat Tricks. It doesn't take a full rewrite of the Fighter to get that improvement.

-Skeld

I don't want to derail the thread but... really? The summoner needed unchaining more than the fighter? Or even the monk (same class who got all those nifty style feats with UC?)?

They added new mechanics benefitting the fighter more than others. Nice. But from what I'm hearing not really the overhaul the class needed. Besides the main problem with the fighter is the class seems so bland. Every other class can do what the fighter can. Yes you get more feats, but that's really all there is to it: more feats. Nothing is unique about the fighter, and adding new mechanics that everyone can use does not solve the problem at all.

If you can address a problem with a class without making any changes to the class, that's a winner in my opinion because you don't invalidate every statblock for that class that's been previously printed across hundreds of products. The Stamina/Combat Trick rules do exactly that, especially if you follow their recommendation of making Stamina/Combat Tricks a Fighter-only option.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Rogar Valertis wrote:

Of all classes in need of "unchaining" they left the fighter out???

XD

The Fighter can greatly benefit from some of the optional rules, especially Stamina and Combat Tricks. It doesn't take a full rewrite of the Fighter to get that improvement.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Callum Finlayson wrote:

So...

** spoiler omitted **

Spoiler:
Force ghost?
Grand Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

So much awesome.

Grand Lodge

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Monks are to classes what katanas are to weapons.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber
knightnday wrote:
Dragon78 wrote:
There is a heck a lot more stuff worth it in this book other then a single class:)

Agreed. A two star review based off a few pages is akin to giving the book a poor score because you didn't like the cover or a few pieces of art.

One can be concerned or even upset about some of the changes, but giving the book as a whole a poor review over one area is misleading. For those who haven't seen the book and are just getting bits and pieces in the thread, wait until you have it in your hands or it goes up in the PRD/SRD/Archives before discounting the whole.

Right. The Monk class revision is 6 pages. That review is effectively a review of 6 pages out of a 256-page book.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

5 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Based solely on the discussion, you'd guess this book was 80% Monk, 10% variant multicalssing, and 10% who cares because Monk.

There is a lot of stuff in here. A lot of really good stuff.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Honestly, this is why I keep a flamethrower in my Jeep. Well, this and spiders.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

You could try The Dragon's Demand. It starts at level 1, ends at 7, and has a good background setting that new players can delve into. It also features several classic foes, plus some unusual ones.

Welcome to the community. Don't hesitate to ask when you have questions.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

I prefer the "the problem doesn't exist until it happens at my table, then I'll make a quick ruling for that session and take more time after the session if I feel like it needs to be revised" approach.

Also, I don't generally worry about RAW, or RAI, or developers opinions, etc. If it works for me and my players, that's all that matters.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

I remember Mike from my early days on the boards. RIP.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Here's an excerpt from the Anathema Archive description in the RotRL-AE

Anathem Archive, RotRL-AE, Page#420 wrote:
When using the anathema archive to cast spells, the user can either simply open it (in which case it randomly opens to one of the new Thassilonian spells presented earlier in this chapter) or the user can attempt to force the anathema archive to open to a specific spell from that list or to any arcane spell she knows how to cast. Doing so requires a Spellcraft check (DC = 20 + double spell level)—failure indicates the archive opens to a random spell from this chapter’s seven earlier options.

"That list" refers to the list of campaign-specific Thassilonian spells provided in Appendix 7 of the AE. The parenthetical has been removed from some sources, such as d20pfsrd.com. If you read the description on page#420 of the AE, it's much more clear that it's referring to the Thassilonian spells.

If the user fails the check to open to a specific spell that the user knows (which I take to mean a specific spell from their spellbook or spells known list), then it opens to a random spell taken from the list of Thassilonian spells.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Man, talk about confusing. Good thing I don't take the rules too seriously! ;)

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

I looked over my PDF last night and from what I saw I'd like to say that this is a really good book for beginners. There is a bunch of very helpful information in here. Experienced players probably won't get much out of it, but there were a couple nuggets that I came across in my casual flip-through.

The book is kinda repetitive in places. Also, players that like to optimize will find some of the advice (especially feat selection) hard to swallow. That's just a reflection of Paizo's particular philosophy on character design, but I wouldn't be surprised if some players take exception.

Again, very good book for beginners.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber
DM Sothal wrote:

So, lets talk specific rules in the strategy guide: page 128 "Understanding your square", the threatened areas:

I didn't know you'd get AoO's for someone/thing leaving those dark grey squares that you actually don't threaten...

Oversight?

No, it's intentional because without that AoO, you could approach a character wielding a reach weapon completely unopposed so long as you approach from the corner. It's literally a rule to fix a corner case.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

I'm not sure about named NPCs (off the top of my head), but spellcasting services like that should be available in Magnimar and Korvosa, or any other settlement that is considered a "Large City" of 10,000 or more souls.

That's the general rule anyhow; specifics of eh campaign setting and your GM may dictate otherwise. I'd feel pretty comfortable looking in either of those places (maybe Riddleport and Kaer Maga as well).

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

I hope we see Grioths from The Dragon's Demand in this one.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

4 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber
wraithstrike wrote:
Skeld wrote:

what with all the Rules forum warble garble

-Skeld

What does this mean?

Contentious rules threads devolve into two or three sides talking past each other with no hope of any meaningful resolution, coupled with the near-constant hand-wringing, kvetching, and insatiable hunger for FAQs fueled mostly by PFS's "thou shalt RAW" backbone, causes the Rules forum to periodically devolve into a caustic environment. Many of those threads become so filled with noise that they're nearly useless.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

5 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

My game is fine, but I have trouble recognizing these boards anymore, what with all the Rules forum warble garble and the countless "my GM is mean" butthurt threads.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Mark Hoover wrote:
Is there an issue with handing out XP for those of you who don't? What if it was handed out between sessions?

I find XP to be constraining. With XP, encounter math determines the pace of the game, while I prefer that the story determines the pace of the game. It lacks flexibility and I want to be flexible because that just fits my style better.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Fencer_guy wrote:
If you base your XP on the AP or when its story-appropriate when would you do this? After the adventure? Before (so XP from last session) Or maybe something dramatic like a level increase right before the big boss battle?

I have my players level their characters when they hit the level point I've designated. Sometimes, this is at the end of the session and sometimes, the middle. If I think there is a good chance they'll level somewhere in the middle of the session, I give them a heads up so they can be prepared ahead of time.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Fencer_guy wrote:

Since it seems like people don't use XP all the much what do you do when you have a player who does almost nothing. They are like murder hobo or something close to that. Then you have the player who does extra things like draws a pics or has a deep background for the character.

Do you have rewards for that? What are they?

I had one GM who would reward with Universe Questions. You could ask the universe any question or favor and you get it with no questions ask and no GM trickery.

It was also hard to get them and you really couldn't bank them to use them later.

If I were inclined to give out extra rewards (which I'm not), I think I would give out something like a Hero Point as a prize.

If i had a player that was a lazy "murderhobo" (which I don't), and talking to them didn't work, I'd be inclined to not invite that player back for subsequent campaigns. It's usually not worthwhile to play with someone that either uninterested in the game OR has a much different playstyle.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

I stopped using XP years ago. Now I just level when it's appropriate to the story.

That said, I don't like the idea of awarding different amounts of XP to different characters. I prefer that all characters receive he same XP and stay in sync, XP-wise, to avoid level disparities within the group. When a player can't make it to a session, their PC is still participates, run by another player or the GM.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Skeld wrote:
I may have missed something, but did OP say they were done? I reread I'm operating under the assumption that a TPK in chapter one leaves the group with a high degree of recovery/replayability.

I left out a critical word. Gah!

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

"If you don't like [my behavior] you're free to leave."

"If you won't stop your behavior, get out."

Are two sides to the same antisocial coin. Po-tay-to / po-tah-to.

I don't advocate either form.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Errant Mercenary wrote:
Interesting to read that about APs. I personally found more daunting having to come up with a campaign setting, a score of NPCs (mildy interesting at least), enemy NPCs, an interesting story line, stat up NPC humaoids that took class levels, etc, rather than have all of this printed and omit/included what you (don't)like. Perhaps because the comparison I did wasn't with short modules and one off sessions, in which case, yeah I agree with you.

Sorry, I wasn't clear in my post: I think it's a better idea to start with shorter, less complex published adventures than to start with a full AP. LazarX had some good suggestions. I'd also recommend something like Crypt of the Everflame, which is geared to 1st-level beginning players/GMs.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

4 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber
alexd1976 wrote:
a)Prewritten adventures are a crutch for experienced groups, I literally never use them.

I'm an experienced GM (a very experienced GM) and I disagree with this one. Homebrewing can be great when you have the time to dedicate to it. Prewritten adventures are very useful because much of the up-front work is already done and it allows me to take that time and focus on other stuff. It's especially true here, where the prewritten adventures Paizo publishes have so much additional material available that other GMs have posted.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber
LazarX wrote:
Skeld wrote:
Bill Dunn wrote:
The point is - what polite society calls profanity is part of the vernacular in some parts of society. People who think it's easy to change the way others speak have probably never tried it themselves.

I don't know about that. When I was younger (before I got married and had kids, which is to say before I turned 30), I could and would cuss a blue-streak at the drop of a hat. In fact, I still can, but I choose not to.

It wasn't hard to make that change. I just had to be cognizant of the words coming out of my mouth. Unlike behaviors that a physiological or addictive component (like smoking or drinking), swearing is one of those behaviors you can change by choosing to change it.

-Skeld

I would say that the biggest reason I don't swear that often is because my father did so nearly constantly. I despised him so much, that I avoided doing anything he did, which is probably why I don't smoke, and drink about 2 beers every three months.

Funny story. I have some friends that swear very liberally in front of their kids. When their daughter (my goddaughter) started kindergarten, they got a call the first week after she dropped a few f-bombs during show and tell. Hilarity ensued.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber
memorax wrote:
Personally I agree that people can change certain behaviors like swearing. But they have to be willing to change. If not good luck. It's way too easy to say "well I did it so can you". Another person might turn around and say "good for you I'm not and if you don't like it your free to leave". The problem to day is that everyone assumes that people will act and behave like themselves. Which is usually not the case.

That's true; you won't change unless you're willing.

Doesn't the attitude of "if you don't like [my behavior] you're free to leave" seem kinda anti-social?

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Sacredless wrote:
Skeld wrote:
Said another way, if you think a class needs more skill points, give more skill points to that class. Moving the bonus skill point binding from Int to Con messes with everyone, even the classes you think don't need more skill points.
It's optional. Either constitution or intelligence. Up to the individual player.

Ok, that addresses the second part of my comment, but not the first. Why not just bump 2+Int classes to 4+Int (or whatever you feel is appropriate)?

Sacredless wrote:

So, to summarize;

A) I want more players with moderate skill points AND survivability in addition to players with high skill points AND fragility. To create roles around the different acquisitions of skill points.
B) I want players to not feel punished for dumping intelligence.
C) I want players to feel like they earned their skill points, as opposed to me just giving it to them. Create the illusion of agency.

A) I don't think this will accomplish you goal. I think you'll end up with moderate skill points + survivability and high skill points + survivability. Wizard players will see this as a way of getting higher skill points and higher HP.

B) Remove the skill point penalty for dumping Int. Done.
3) This already happens; players "earn" skill points by investing in Int.

This feels like a solution looking for a problem.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Bill Dunn wrote:
The point is - what polite society calls profanity is part of the vernacular in some parts of society. People who think it's easy to change the way others speak have probably never tried it themselves.

I don't know about that. When I was younger (before I got married and had kids, which is to say before I turned 30), I could and would cuss a blue-streak at the drop of a hat. In fact, I still can, but I choose not to.

It wasn't hard to make that change. I just had to be cognizant of the words coming out of my mouth. Unlike behaviors that a physiological or addictive component (like smoking or drinking), swearing is one of those behaviors you can change by choosing to change it.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

My thoughts on this:

Since you're a player, you shouldn't go behind the GM reading the AP, even if it's just to check to see if he's running the AP "by the book." Many GMs consider that cheating and you might inadvertently read something spoilery.

The AP is designed for a four-PC party. Since you only have three players, you're already behind the curve. Also, two of your three are level 2, which is lower than the recommended level (3rd) for this part of Thistletop. Those two things along will give you problems. Your party composition is also problematic (in the sense that it'll make fights harder).

I wouldn't be too hard on your GM though. This looks more like a lack of experience than anything nefarious.

I also disagree with Errant Mercenary. APs are complex, can take years to run to completion, and require a lot of preparation, insight, and (often) customization. New GMs are much better off running shorter adventures until the get comfortable in the GM chair.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Bill Dunn wrote:
Durngrun Stonebreaker wrote:
I just don't see how it takes so much effort not to swear.
Maybe you should try an experiment. Have a friend quietly observe you for a few sessions, jotting down expressions you use frequently. Then spend the rest of the campaign not using them under threat of being kicked out.

I don't know... If swearing is such a deeply ingrained behavior that you simply cannot control yourself, then it will probably cause problems in other areas of your social interactions.

-Skeld

Edit: what I mean by the above is that swearing can be situationally dependent; there are times it's more socially acceptable than other times and that's dictated not only by the setting but by the audience as well. Swearing in the wrong setting and/or audience can leave others with the impression that the swearer lacks self-control. Whether or not it's ok for others to make those types of judgements is another topic.

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

If the purpose of this is to give me lee classes more skill points, then just give them more skill points.

Said another way, if you think a class needs more skill points, give more skill points to that class. Moving the bonus skill point binding from Int to Con messes with everyone, even the classes you think don't need more skill points.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

A good GM:
Doesn't forget that the players are the heroes.
Provides an exciting and challenging adventure with an engaging story.
Knows what his players like in a game, but also knows what he likes in a game.
Knows when to foil the heroes and when to let them be rockstars.
Accepts feedback, positive and negative, and adjusts his game as necessary.
Keeps the game moving forward.
Knows the whole point of gaming is to have fun.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Kobold Cleaver wrote:

I was wondering why this thread died when we reference it so often.

Then I remembered.

It got really boring.

Yeah, but for a few days, it was a really awesome thread. Especially the thing in the OP about drinking the milk even though they asked him not to. What a freak show. Lol.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber
BigDTBone wrote:
Signing your forum posts.

Funny. I almost posted that myself.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

12 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Complaint threads that can be summarized as "this adventure/product is not custom designed for my group, therefore it's a terrible product."

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

14 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

"I'm a better game designer than the game designers and here's one of my terrible ideas as proof of my superior skills" threads.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

12 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

"Help me wreck my GM's/Group's game because I don't like something they did/said" threads.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Katina Mathieson wrote:
Skeld wrote:

So we're doubling up in APs in April.

-Skeld

Because of the port strike issue, we will have to push Adventure Path #92 back to April. While there will likely be a double-month at some point, we are unsure if it will be April, if it will be further down the line.

We'll be sure to let you know as soon as we have more information!

Just like the old days. ;)

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

I grew up on Old School Gaming and I still prefer that style of gaming, in the sense of less reliance on "a rule for every situation" and more flexibility on the part of the GM to resolve actions quickly within the context of the game as it exists at that moment.

I still rather enjoy Pathfinder and I don't miss THAC0 one single bit.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

^ So much awesome!

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber
captain yesterday wrote:
I got a spoiler for you skeld** spoiler omitted **:-)

Damn you, Captain.

Lol.

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

We need more information.

In the absence of details, something is definitely off (things that could be easily explained). Your point-buy is on the money, your number of players is not unusual, but your mortality rate is high (especially if you're in the earlier parts of the AP).

I appluad your initiative by looking for some non-spoilery explanations from the community, but it would be really, really, helpful if you would point your GM to this thread so we can talk to him about the details of your group and get into potentially spoilery territory.

-Skeld

1 to 50 of 476 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2015 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.