Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | My Wishlists | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
About Paizo   Messageboards   News   Paizo Blog   Help/FAQ  
Search
Links
Shop
Recent Reviews

Way of the Samurai (PFRPG) PDF
***** by Endzeitgeist

Scions of Evil (PFRPG) PDF
***** by Endzeitgeist

Book of Friends and Foes: Assassins in the River Nations (PFRPG) PDF
***( )( ) by Endzeitgeist

Power Word Spells: Lore of the First Language (PFRPG) PDF
***** by Endzeitgeist

Wicked Fantasy—Humans: The Reign of Men (PFRPG) PDF
***( )( ) by Endzeitgeist

   RSS Posts    RSS Reviews    RSS Wishlists
Witchfire

Skara Brae's page

16 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists.



I have two copies of the Pathfinder RPG beta print version sitting in my cart right now, and the system is telling me my shipping will be $25 because it's going USPS priority (and I can't choose another option). Is this an accurate estimate?

If so, do you offer shipping through another courier, even by individual arrangement? (I've had another online store send my stuff thru UPS even though they don't normally, because I wanted the ability to track the package.) $25 seems a bit high for a non-trackable package, especially given the cost of the product. I'm only in Canada guys, not some Siberian wasteland. :P


Does a rogue with the Minor Magic talent qualify for the Arcane Strike feat? Why or why not?


I, and my group, attempted to play 4e. We gave it a good honest go, and heck I even approached it with an unhealthy dose of denial. However the writing is on the wall, 4e is simply unplayable. And more to the point no one likes it. My wife finds the pathfinder PDF, and suggests a one shot to try it out. The group was very enthusiastic, I played COD4, one player even saying he was impressed by it. (coming from him that is high praise indeed) Later that night I looked through it, and honestly, it's one of the best things I've seen in a long time. And better yet, becuase of its backward compatibility, if a player is missing something from 3e, I can, as a DM, just plan bring it back. So long story short, I'm converting my 4e Kalamar game into a 3p Kalamar game.

This thread actually has a point, and it is even related to the title. Despite 4e being unplayable, there are some small things that I do like about it. The biggest one being action points. I really like how the simplified version of action points work. The way 4e does it, players use their action point every second encounter, but i was wondering if perhaps a system of action points similar to 4e could be used. In that they are renewable resource which grant an extra standard action, once per encounter. But they aren't plentiful enough so that they are used every encounter, but aren't scarce enough that players will actually use them instead of hoarding them until it looks like the angle of death is looking them up in the phone book.

Other things about 4e I like are; healing surges, the simplified encounter building system, and well...thats about it actually...



©2002–2012 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online,PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.