Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Mammon Cultist

Sissyl's page

8,322 posts (9,299 including aliases). No reviews. No lists. No wishlists. 8 aliases.


RSS

1 to 50 of 8,322 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

Grappling is not doing permanent harm. It shouldn't be difficult to grapple a rogue. Once you pin him, take his stuff. All of it. Then help the naked-but-for-underwear rogue up. "Just a little fun between friends, right? Ha ha." Give his stuff back. Make no demands and do not refer to this again. Then if the GM tells you that ANYTHING OF YOURS is missing, for any reason, you wait until the next non-dangerous situation and do it again. This time, when it is unattended, smash enough to cost him twice as much as the value he took from you. Then give him back the rest, help him up, and say "Ha ha." Make sure you do this especially if you OOC know that something of yours was stolen by someone else. The integrity of your equipment list is HIS job. Eventually he will understand.

If the GM doesn't allow you to grapple him, ask why. After all, you're not killing or hurting anyone. The answer will tell you what to do.


mechaPoet wrote:

Friendly reminder that homophobia, Christianity, and mental illness don't usually have any causal relation.

Advocating for violence against homosexuality as a Christian cause (and the characterization of homosexuality as a form of violence) is neither new nor related to being "crazy." If anything, this is a (currently more extreme) reflection of the dominant view in the west since, let's say, Dante Alighieri.

To me, being a loonie is about having completely absurd views than any sort of mental health issues. I take mental illness very seriously, but there are honest opinions that make you go "bluh... Ummm... Guh...." when you hear them, and having some word for those people is useful. I also think you are wrong about Dante. It is probably a few thousand years older than him, and certainly did not start as a christian concept. Leviticus is just FULL of sweetness, sunshine and joy toward other people.


Charm person on the nearest cop would work wonders.


And I do that at work, all the time. It is just tiring, and I don't want to spend my free time doing it too.


No. But if I was going to try not to swear, I would have to think about what I said every single sentence. That is what you don't get: It is part of someone's language, and changing that takes effort, even the parts where you don't swear.


Durngrun Stonebreaker wrote:
I'm not asking anybody to change (unless you're around my kids which none of you are), I just don't get the "woe is me, walking on eggshells" aspect of it. Do you really swear so constantly that it is unimaginable to turn it off for an afternoon?

Unimaginable? No. It simply means I have to consciously think about what I say EVERY. SINGLE. SENTENCE. It takes energy. It means I won't be able to relax. You wouldn't have that problem, but everyone else is not you, and you don't get priority because you don't like to hear it. As long as your only solution to the conflict of interest is "that is no problem, just don't swear, it doesn't even take effort to do it", I am not going to see any reason to adapt to your wishes. If you were ready to ask me politely, taking care not to tell me in front of others, ignore the ones that do get through, and acknowledge that it takes a sincere effort for me, we'd have a better position to get to an agreement.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

My point was that it's not one side's job to adapt to what the other side wants in this conflict of interest. It is completely irrelevant that you think it's easy for the other side to change, the only part of it you CAN change is YOUR part of it. You don't get a free pass because you consider swearing an ugly, uncouth, barbaric, stupid, moronic, uncomfortable, uncivilized, blasphemous or otherwise disagreeable behaviour. Just like swearing, it is your choice not to see it as the above or not, and if you do, you put the entire onus of change on the swearer. As TL says, if you want to be around that person, it's not a good method.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Sea serpent, since there are tons of things in Inferno that is far higher on the CR.

Get changed into an aasimar or a tiefling here in the real world, with very obvious racial characteristics, and all the attention this would entail?


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Nor is not even having opened the bible uncommon for the real loonies.


I don't condem those that don't like foul language, I just don't see it as some unbearable burden to ignore it if someone is swearing. Especially if that someone is someone you consider a friend.


Social liberals? Hardly. They sound far more like our left block (social democrats, left party and environment party).


Seriously? I have a hard time seeing them lose in any but a complete surprise attack. They only need to get some loot to get started, then all bets are off. They have charm magic, buffs, oodles of hit points, unbelievable combat training, and now they will have armored vehicles and full combat gear. It is a scary thought.


Wikipedia has a pretty thorough page about the seven virtues. Chastity is the idea of beneficial purity of body and mind. For example, it is what lets you shake off someone berating you unfairly.


If I had been an American, I would likely have identified as a libertarian since liberal in America is nothing of the sort. I wholeheartedly support this decision. I don't understand your venom here.


You COULD reverse the tests and see if the heroes would act in accordance with the seven virtues instead. So you'd get chastity, temperance, charity, diligence, patience, kindness and humility instead.


Preacher had a neat view of swearing. Preacher had a neat view of a lot of things, really. =)


You get both a cohort AND followers.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Indeed. It's part of being human. You'll never get along with everyone. And, even though written text can help you get closer to someone, it never matches actually meeting them. If more people truly understood this, many things would be easier.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

If I am expected not to use profanities so that I do not annoy others, they will have to inform me of it (which in itself would go a long way toward convincing me not to associate with them more than absolutely necessary), and they would also need to respect any preferences I have, such as not listening to anything dealing with a person's religion, faith or spiritual feelings without putting them up for criticism or debate. I am a kind person, but I have a job that requires great care in how I express myself (not just regarding profanities). It takes its toll, and I absolutely don't want to spend my free time watching my tongue as well. Doing so wrings me out. When someone comments on it, I will be extremely clear that I WILL not adapt to their preferences. Some have given up on me because of that - I consider that a good measurement of their interest in spending time with me.


Take stuff from the rogue when he's sleeping. If stealing is the only allowed PvP, use it.


...the carnage was unbelievable... unbelievable... yes... very unbelievable...

The next poster has a suggestion to cover up the crime scene.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Bring back THAC0!!!


Sure. It is kind of yellow, but here ya go.

*tips a front loader of yellow snow over TFF*

Enjoy!


Oh, and how often do you use water elementals?


Goddity knows this because it bought five hundred economy-size jars of ointment against rash-ly#5, to use against its severe foot rash.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I checked out the languages needed to talk to the various summoned creatures. Turns out, it was pretty simple: You need the elemental languages (of course), celestial to talk to a large variety of creatures not including the celestials who all have true speech, abyssal to talk to the greater demons who do not speak common. Infernal gives you only the hell hounds, and sylvan gives you only the blink dogs. So, for six languages, you can talk to almost all the creatures. This was done before the Summon Neutral/Evil Monster feats and the rings of summoning affinity, so there's that, but it's still interesting how few languages you need.


181. When the barmaid asks what they would like to drink, the barbarian rises, draws his greatsword and cleaves her down the middle in one fluid motion.


3 people marked this as a favorite.

*chases after FHDM with a pitchfork and a torch*


Good thing you do, that way you select for people who don't use swear words, instead of some other useless stuff you could have been selecting for. =)


To be honest, I remember the rules lawyering discussions as even worse than the ones I've been through recently. Not only that, the "Why don't we get enough magical stuffz?", "should we really fight such creatures at our levels?" and discussions related to WBL and CR, were also worse back then. I'm old enough to call myself a grognard proudly, but really, things were worse in the bad old days.


Sooo, KC, are we good to resume the drinking milk meme now? =)


"THE" of Poog's name is a noble title he chose himself. Goblins, go figure.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

It also alienates people who could have been your allies.


You could make the Neutral deity abhor strongly aligned magic, if you want to build on that mechanism. The clerics would ban summoning non-neutral creatures in any way, and be quite suspicious of any aligned spell. Add in a few historical events where proponents of these types of magic have been dangerous to the world, to magic, and to the deity's church, and you have a perfect explanation for their mistrust and bans.


While it's true that you can change your active skills more than the set ones in D2, the differences were not that big between the different ones available. In D2, you could build very different characters through your skill choices. *shrugs*

The new loot system sounds good. I do think, however, that there is too much single-class loot around in D3.


Having played D3 single-player a bit, I would say this: The graphics are far better than D2, of course. They bloody well should be. The story has its ups and downs, but that has always been true. The bosses are... well, losers. The gameplay is decent, but never reaches the level of D2. The characters are okay, but lack the complete customization of D2. The random rewards are not where they should be, I felt. All in all, it feels like a glitzed-up sequel that Doesn't Quite Get It, but is sort of competently done, if that makes sense.

You do not, though, HAVE to play with others, use the auction houses (if they have them at all nowadays), or delve into the MMO:ness, if you don't want to.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

*asks questions*


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Ashtathlon wrote:
Sitting at a table, sharing it with the players that created them...meeting your creators like that....such a disappointment.

I wouldn't mind meeting SOME of my characters... others would be in the "nuke the site from orbit" category.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Or... you could try Die, Vecna, die!


Come now, core 3.5 isn't all that bad. Once upon a time that was all there was to play...


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Or why not heart, scalp, other hand, other eye, molar and foot? *whistles innocently*


Grim and gritty is a style, yes. It is also not what the Realms ever aimed for. Still, I guess it IS eminently possible to play it that way, focusing on the bad guys. Certainly, different novels and short stories have painted it as such.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Just saying that in a setting which includes CR 54 dragons, CR 40 liches, chosen of evil gods, and so on, it's not going to be pretty unless someone is around to hold off the heat, at least until the heroes can get to it. It is a question of having high level threats in the setting at all. If PCs being level 15 is as far as the setting goes, there shouldn't be CR 30s, fine, but FR always aimed higher than that.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Well, option C is always there for the taking. A powerful NPC isn't going to explain what they are up to to anyone who asks. And as for B-team, it's easy to deal with: First, realize that a level 2 adventurer group isn't going to be the world-shaking A-team. A threat they can reasonably fight isn't going to threaten the entire world. Second, even a relatively powerless group can become the focus of the action if they are the ones present and communication is difficult.

The alternative is a world without ANYONE else fighting against evil with a chance of success, without allies that could affect anything, without anyone able to reward the players, without any good magic items the players did not craft, without any safe places the PCs may rest and relax... isn't that kind of boring?


2 people marked this as a favorite.

"Super NPCs need to die in a fire.", usually said about the Forgotten Realms.

Consider the believability of the world. It is a setting that has countless massively powerful villains, simply because they are needed to provide a challenge to higher level players. Without good counterparts, is there even one sensible reason the powerful villains would not have taken over completely ages ago? Not that I can see.

Further, such NPCs are a subset of a greater type of good individual, one that includes good creatures in total, from blink dogs to metallic dragons and solars. Some of these are also extremely powerful, should they also die in a fire, to leave the PCs as literally the only people in the setting with a CR above 3 that have a good alignment?

As a final point, nobody seems to complain in this way about the good deities. Still, they are the literally most powerful good NPCs around in any setting. Should they too die in a fire, because the PCs might end up in some sort of contact with them?

Yes, I understand that it's a particular style of wankery for GMs to focus only on their favourite super NPC. Perhaps the FR setting is too suited to this. That doesn't change the fact that powerful good NPCs are not in and of themselves a problem. It's about how they are played.


Meh. You just spelled it wrong, GT. It was always lucubration.


Ssyvan wrote:

One thing I don't think anyone has mentioned, if you do decide the summons must be summoned on the ground you could also say that they can't use their talon attack on while walking (considering this is the advice forum).

Also, since they're going to attack to the best of their ability, and if they summoned on the ground next to a goblin. They'd likely take flight (remember you control them), which would provoke an attack of opportunity. I'd tell your player that before springing that on them. At the very least that'll get you a round where the eagle can't full attack.

I'm fairly certain if they fail their hover check they have to continue movement, which means they'll likely be provoking AoOs and only getting 1 attack.

Lastly don't forget about Fighting Defensively and Total Defense, the former granting them an AC 18, and the latter granting an AC 20. That's going to make it rather difficult for the Eagle to hit.

Saying an eagle can't use its talons when on the ground would be a pretty sharp departure from the rules, IMHO. It would raise a ton of odd questions: How can an octopus swim at all if it uses all its tentacles for attacking? How many does it need to move? Etc...


3 people marked this as a favorite.

Madoka is so so worth it.


225. Nonexistent stuff like Alien 3.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Well, there is another episode that qualifies. We played a group of seriously dysfunctional superheroes in a Mutants and Masterminds game. Part of the concept was that the story we told was a comics story.

One day, we had taken a few hits including humiliation, a breached homebase, and so on, from a woman named Nightmare. She had dream powers, and a completely amazing regeneration. You can probably guess where this is headed.

Once we finally track her down, we slaughter her zombie minions like dry leaves, then turn to her. We found pretty quickly that she was completely unkillable. This did not prevent us from trying our darndest, though. She was repeatedly torn into tiny gobbets, massacred, burnt, splattered across the walls... but she regenerated even from these dire fates. So we started getting extreme. Among the highlights was my character (a big strong tank) lifting the two-ton lid of a stone coffin to smash down on her every time she started trying to regenerate, splattering her blood and body all over the floor, us, ceiling...

It ended when we finally realized we couldn't kill her. So we put her in a massive safe torn out of a wall for the purpose, squeezed it together to keep her body from regenerating more than a little, flew across the world, and dumped the safe in the Marianer trench.

After this episode, with every comics panel filled with rivers of blood, the comic book got a new, far more restrained cartoonist. Everyone followed this.

1 to 50 of 8,322 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2015 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.