Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Mammon Cultist

Sissyl's page

10,621 posts (11,921 including aliases). No reviews. No lists. No wishlists. 11 aliases.


1 to 50 of 2,613 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I liked Chiang's The story of your life, even though second person. Then again, it is written as a letter to someone, so it works.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Adventurer means someone without a place in society. Someone who takes risks FAR beyond what sane people would be comfortable with. Worse, they NEED TO, because getting strange and extremely dangerous missions is the only way they can have a decent income. And of course, these missions are not necessarily matched to their capabilities. So they have very high rates of attrition.

In short, not something you do if you want a good life expectancy.

And thus: There needs to be a reason why the person chooses to be an adventurer that is more important to him/her than a good life expectancy. That is what makes them interesting.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Miss Taekwondo? That is one hell of a name. ...Sorry.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

And the point is... if you have done something like that... then you accept it. You turn yourself in. You suffer, and you know why you suffer. AND YOU DON'T EVEN TRY TO RATIONALIZE IT. Or else you do, claiming that "I did the morally right thing, the people on the other track were more in number blah blah blah blah blah blah blah greater good blah blah blah blah every good person would do the same blah blah blah blah!!!!" (monologuing is a time honoured tradition with people like you) and you're evil. Congratulations.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

"For the greater good" is one of the absolutely most characteristic catchphrases of the Lawful Evil alignment. "Can't make an omelet without breaking some eggs" is another. Concepts like "net loss of life" is bread and butter to Lawful Evil. And when you question such a character, they will bring up stupid black and white situations like the tram problem.

See, Lawful is all about the group before the individual. And more specifically, the vaguely defined, not personally known group of, say, an organization, a city, or a country. Or a race.

And Evil, because these are the people who consider killing a way to improve the situation, even killing innocents. Not in self-defense, not even of declared enemies, but innocents. As soon as that becomes okay to you, you have that little E on your character sheet.

But it takes a while to get there. Sometimes, rarely, there is no way out that you can see. You may have to do awful things to save people. And you will be doing an evil act if you do. But as has repeatedly been stated, a single act does not force an alignment change. But once you start rationalizing it (the hallmark of Evil), spouting nonsense like "I did it for the greater good", you're done.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

I have a lesser and a greater rod. I try to use the lesser one for empowering my quickened fireball. Does it work? No. It would be a level 7 spell since that is most disadvantageous to me.

Now I try my greater rod instead. Does that work? No. Since the greater rod can't handle a level 3 spell, that is more disadvantageous to me.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Gauss: I am well aware of that. That is why I wrote what I wrote.

Note that since incorporeal creatures are no longer on another plane, they sort of have to "be in contact with the ground". This is even more clear since they need some part of their bodies outside it.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Yeah, webinar is awful.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Ok, we need some really bad words to be associated with. How about "superfluous"? "taxation"? Or even "proctitis"?


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Dazing Spell is good. =)


13 people marked this as FAQ candidate. 1 person marked this as a favorite.

The recent FAQ

FAQ wrote:

Metamagic: At what spell level does the spell count for concentration DCs, magus spell recall, or a pearl of power?

The spell counts as the level of the spell slot necessary to cast it.

For example, an empowered burning hands uses a 3rd-level spell slot, counts as a 3rd-level spell for making concentration checks, counts as a 3rd-level spell for a magus's spell recall or a pearl of power.

In general, use the (normal, lower) spell level or the (higher) spell slot level, whichever is more of a disadvantage for the caster. The advantages of the metamagic feat are spelled out in the Benefits section of the feat, and the increased spell slot level is a disadvantage.

Heighten Spell is really the only metamagic feat that makes using a higher-level spell slot an advantage instead of a disadvantage.

is unclear. There is an interpretation that it changes everything about metamagic according to what you write in the FAQ. Which would mean that metamagic rods operated off the new slot level of the spell with metamagic applied. As an example, a fireball (level 3) modified by the Quicken Spell feat (+4 levels) would require a greater rod of metamagic, empower, to empower, instead of a lesser rod as before. Is this what you intended? Or does the FAQ only apply to questions of concentration DCs, pearls of power, and the magus spell recall ability?

Second, the text in the FAQ starting with "The advantages of the..." to the end is unclear as to its purpose. Why was it included?

Third, if you intend for this FAQ to change the rules regarding metamagic feats that thoroughly, would not an errata be a better place to do it?


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Blindsight can't see ethereal creatures, and incorporeal creatures are sort of undefined as to if they can be seen with blindsight. "either ineffective or partially effective" is not exactly obvious. Tremorsense should not work, but by RAW, you could make a case for it. It lets you see "anything that is in contact with the ground", which an incorporeal undead could be said to be.


4 people marked this as a favorite.
Skyrim Rampage Cap'n Yesterday wrote:
Got my Storm Atronach! I'll take her out for some devastation later. :-)

How... romantic. =)


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Agreed. Jean hasn't been too many times through the death-door.

First Jean died in the shuttle. That should have been enough, but:

Madelyne Pryor was a clone who went on to die in Inferno. She was clearly her own character, though.

Rachel Summers, Jean and Scott's daughter, returned as one of the last survivors of Days of Future Past. She then claimed her mother's powers - which never seemed to be as impressive as they were with Jean. Still, Jean was another interesting character.

Scott grieved for Jean, and various stories referenced Jean and the Phoenix force, most notably the one where Mastermind convinced the X-men through an illusion that Madelyne was phoenix as well.

Jean then returned, and the retrofit was that the phoenix force had saved her by putting her in a cocoon under central park, IIRC. When that was done fixing her radiation damage, she came back.

...and was then killed by a massive stroke due to a parting shot from Magneto.

...but Jean's consciousness still remained as a facet of the phoenix force, and did manipulate things in certain ways afterward.

Madelyne also returned in some way, but I didn't read that.

All in all, since the phoenix means rebirth, should this be horrible?

Yes. The retrofit of "coccon under central park" was horrible. The rest is decently done.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Sharoth wrote:
Sucker Punch was bad. The uncut version was pretty damn good. It is amazing what a few extra minutes will do for a movie. Case in point was Terminator 2. I loved the movie, but I had only seen the theater version. I went to Blockbuster and rented it to watch with my ex- and I picked up the extended version. The extra 20 or so minutes made the movie even better.

Spoiler:
The director's cut contains two extra scenes (maybe more, I just saw those two scenes on the net). Of the two, one is a show number which was glamorous but probably not necessary, the other is an absolutely central scene for the entire movie. Meeting the High Roller is where the heroine finally understands her own sexuality. During the entire film up to that point, others have forced her into acting for their pleasure. With him, she finally accepts her desire and acts on it. The mood goes from dread to triumph, the real emotional payoff of the entire movie. It explains so much of the other scenes that it's ridiculous. Given the thematics and symbols of the movie, I would speculate that what actually happens is that she meets him and finds him a decent person - which is corroborated by him shutting the asylum down. And of course, the moron censorship people see only sex=bad and CUT IT. It's a massive offense of the whole principle of censorship that leaves the movie mutilated.

1 person marked this as a favorite.

According to me, amateur philosopher:

To seek something is not in itself a bad thing. It is the methods you use to get it that may make it bad. Nor is wanting something (anything, really) a bad thing, for the same reason. Other people, gods and whatever have jack all to do with what you want and what your goals are. If you break some eggs to get there, though, this changes.

That is the simple answer. The more complex answer is:

What you want and think does not only affect what you do. It also affects what you want and how you think. As has been stated, human instinct is brutal, harsh, wicked and sometimes monstrous. Some things you can think and seek will make it more difficult for you. So, even if an external morality/judgement/faith has no bearing on this, your future self and the situations you are brewing for it may. I am not saying you should not commit thoughtcrime, merely that you ought to be careful about the goals you set up and the thoughts you think because it can come back to hurt you.

It behooves us all to be a tiny bit careful.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

See, Suckerpunch is one of the most intricate movies I have seen in a long time. It goes quickly, you need to be on your toes, things are not as simple as they may seem, symbolism abounds, and the themes explored are very much worthwhile ones. Goes to show how differently people understand it, and appreciate it. I loved it.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

"Sir, this facility is a nuclear missile facility. You are not allowed in here. Indeed, you're not even supposed to know about it. You can't imagine the trouble you're in now."
"But, but... Snorlax?"


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Things happen because things that happen earlier? No, sorry, that is CAUSAL Friday.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

But that has not yet overwhelmed itself with hugely powerful charms. :-)


3 people marked this as a favorite.

Go Exalted. 2nd edition has a charm that allows you to attack every enemy within a mile radius with your sword. Nuff said.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

1. Seriously, man? A thousand sloths in my yard?
2. Let's see, we have thirty wrecked patrol cars, fourteen casualties, more than a hundred wounded civilians, at least sixty lawsuits for police brutality, a demolished quarter in central Manhattan, and a dead giraffe. For a shoplifter?
3. What did you do to me? Please tell me that is yoghurt...

And now, the answers:
1. They misunderestimated me.
2. Most of our imports come from overseas.
3. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice... ummm... can't be fooled again.


5 people marked this as a favorite.

When starting teaching, you need to immediately beat up the biggest guy there. Or maybe that was prison.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Well, depends if the corporate types are being restless. Then you might have to show them some new tech to make them worship you like a god. Say, a fax, or a ballpoint pen.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

*jumps into a bucket of used cleaning water*

*smokes, but clambers out of it not burning*

*looks at Rysky and probably tries to stand up straight*

Matt Damon!

*looks around and runs out of the next room*


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Communism is a religion. It has the same appeal to "goodness" (obedience), the same transcendent Vision (the Classless society), the same unbridled dogmatism and fragmentation, the same disdain for outsiders, the same moralism and suppression of sexuality, and the very same violent aggression toward competitors (other religions) just as soon as they become the dominant part in a society.

Communism being atheist is very old by now, and still just as useless.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Fire stations, apparently.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Still claim that would be Lord of Light. But, sounds fantastic.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

No no no, that would be the Pink love hulk and the Purple depression hulk.

"Purple depression hulk is saddest of all..."


3 people marked this as a favorite.

No, 48%.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

The portrait MD uses actually depicts his foot. Things got pretty screwy when he melted.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

...Molten Dragon.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Well, let's just say that 48% are likely going to be okay with it, plus whatever portion of the leave voters who have been disillusioned by failed promises. It's still not going to be an easy thing to do.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
prosfilaes wrote:
Sissyl wrote:
Two points are not a line. They are two points. If you have a line through them, then you know what that line looks like, yes, but there is nothing at all that says there is one in the first place.
Euclid does, in Postulate One of his elements.

Really? You're seriously arguing this? Heh.

Okay. We have two points. You can, as you say, draw a line through them. Then you can claim that whatever the two points measured you can now predict just by looking at that line.

But all you really have is two points. The claim that the line now corresponds to anything at all is merely your conjecture. You can extrapolate that line and say "Hey, in 20XX, Paizo will for certain publish another collected edition of an AP. Just look at the line!" Considering that they have specifically stated that we shouldn't read anything into the fact that they now publish that second collected edition, i.e. that the line you speak of has no relevance whatsoever, you'd be making a claim out of the blue, wouldn't you?


1 person marked this as a favorite.

If one was to go visit the congress, would the road be blocked by a lump of snorlaxes?


4 people marked this as a favorite.

The young queen was sold by her family, who had mistreated her horribly, to marry the aging despot of Korvosa.

Spoiler:
But the castle holds many secrets, and in the deep vault, she found him. He had been mighty, a powerful lord, and now he was imprisoned. She sensed the danger from his first word to her... But he set her soul on fire. It would be the deepest treachery to acknowledge her feelings. And yet, he is the first who has ever loved her. Theirs is a love that will shake the pillars of heaven.

Curse of the Crimson Throne is a romantic adventure path, following the growth of a young girl into a woman.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Poog is... Well, how do I put this? He is a... Squirrel who was bitten by a radioactive cucumber.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

*swims around in DTSM's trash compactor*

*is hungries*


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Why would it be a good idea, if you have several toilets, to close all but one and set it as nongendered? I mean, if you have several, I would think there would be just as many nongendered... And where is the harm then?


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Original synthesist summoner with a Kali eidolon, though?


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Berinor wrote:
Sissyl wrote:
This is also the reason most dedicated atheists consider organized religion to be dangerous.

I wish you would say many instead of most. Atheists are about as far from being a monolithic group as you can get. Certainly the most vocal ones do. I certainly agree it can used in a dangerous way (from undermining education to sheltering/legitimizing abusers to terrorism), but it can be used in a positive way, too (building community, sharing values, encouraging charity and compassion).

I believe religion wields an outsized influence but is a tool, not inherently good or bad.

A central part of my point is that atheists as a rule don't think it's a bad thing that people believe something. Generally, atheists are very much for freedom of thought and so on. That is not the sticking point. The bad thing is organized religion, specifically the way it affects people who do not agree with religious morality laws and so on. See, there is no option to opt out when the religious people make laws for the whole society, with christian lobbying groups with outlandish influence pushing such laws, christian politicians approving them, and christian policemen and lawmen enforcing them.

And if christianity is a tool, then it behooves us all to think about what it's a tool for doing. Statistically, it is very clear that countries with little poverty are less religious. Is it out of the question that major religious organizations draw the conclusion from that?

Aranna wrote:
It is. I had no idea atheists viewed Christianity as this monolithic entity trying to oppress them. The ones I know are quite content to live and let life as long as you don't try to ram your ideas down our throats. The truth is we are a very fractured bunch without a single voice.

I don't think it's a question of you even trying to do so. It just happens, as a consequence of your view that since religious feelings are good, and your ethics are good, then laws and policies that enforce it are great. What you miss is merely that they are great FOR YOU. Everyone else has to adapt, which feels pretty much like getting YOUR ideas rammed down our throats. And sure, there are many christian churches... but there are also both huge organizations like the RCC, and a tendency for christian groups to act the same way in major issues, whether due to dogma, tradition, a desire for consensus, or whatever. The divisions only run so deep with regards to political actions.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Ireland got new blasphemy laws not so long ago. California had Prop 8. Texas got harsh abortion laws. Bush shut down stem cell research. A serious number of countries have life from conception in their constitution, and the number is growing. Russia is actively persecuting homosexuals, largely run through their churches, as I understand it. Intelligent design, propriety censorship in school materials. And so on. Toothless? Not very. You are the 800 lbs gorilla in the room. You sit where you like. Everyone else adapts. Two billion christians means that it was ages since you were the underdogs.


3 people marked this as a favorite.

Believe what you will, that is not the issue. You guys make laws, create policy, and so on. And so, we are subjected to your evaluation of every single new concept. We can't decide on our own values regarding reproduction, research, education, etc etc etc without having to run it past you guys. If you really hate something, such as abortion, we get subjected to your thoughts about it at our most vulnerable times. If we want the legal aspects of marrying, and our prospective is someone of our own sex, rest assured that you guys will weigh in. If we want freedom of expression, you are there talking to the elected politicians about blasphemy laws. And so on.

We are forced to adapt to and relate to your values, despite not sharing them. We are forced to go against our conscience, our values, and what we feel is important in life, because you feel that your values are the only healthy ones in existence and everyone would be happy if only those values were strictly enforced. Note that this is exactly the argument for protecting religious people from blasphemy and making laws against insulting someone's religious feelings.

This is also the reason most dedicated atheists consider organized religion to be dangerous.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Everything Operationdromedary has ever said is morose and generally pointless. *sigh*


1 person marked this as a favorite.

To chop down your first tree in Minecraft, everyone knows you use a flower.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I don't think they listen to hip hop.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Heh. The internet is here to stay. They wanted to get rid of it, they would have had to do it early nineties. Now? Heh. That is, however, not saying what the shape of it will be. Let us all be thankful it is still in somewhat decent shape.

Making a living making let's play movies, well, it always comes down to the same things: Charisma, a unique perspective, entertaining banter, comprehensive knowledge and understanding of your product, and a way to make money from it. Right now, however, it IS possible. Who knows in a few years.


5 people marked this as a favorite.

Where else would you feel it, baron?


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Aranna wrote:

Tacticslion said it best.

Thank you. Your my hero. I hate it when atheists throw bricks at me just because I am Religious.

Disregarding the misunderstandings inherent in the "belief in science is still belief", there is no need to throw bricks. We atheists get our share of bricks too, I am sure you are aware. But to answer your concern: As an atheist, I understand that my existence ends with death. And I am okay with that.

1 to 50 of 2,613 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2016 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.