|1 person marked this as a favorite.|
That's a personal discipline - that has nothing to do with adhering to rules or society.His men are expendable, and he only has loyalty to himself and making money. And he will murder or lie at every moment to do so. Having a personal credo, oath or methodology doesn't = Lawful.
Having a code of honor strongly correlates with Lawful even if it is not the entirety of the definition. Or at least a code that is consistent with what is considered by society to be "honorable" behavior. My recollection is that Angel Eyes does NOT in fact ever lie. Though I will admit that I have not seen the film for quite some time so I will have to concede that you may in fact have a point. I was under the impression for example that Angel Eyes was in fact a union officer from previous viewing... while further investigation seems to suggest otherwise. Considering one's underlings to be expendable is a classic evil trait, not so much a lawful nor chaotic one. Many overtly LE overlords are portrayed in this manner.
As far as Tuco - he's just mercenary.As soon as he realized Blonde had the secret - he went from torturing him (which was revenge for what Blondie did to him earlier) to taking care of him and partnering up with him.
Tuco is the perfect CN - destructive or not. He isn't evil or malicious, not like Angel Eyes, and that's...
This, however, is flat out wrong. Tuco is not a villain, neither wholly unsympathetic...HOWEVER being partially sympathetic does not make a character neutral. You do not get to ignore the deeds he commits off screen. His particulars include murder and rape, according to the judge in one scene. On screen, Tuco cavalierly commits blatant armed robbery (of a gun, no less) and attempts murder. He takes what he wants and exhibits little remorse when his own confederates are killed. These are not traits in keeping with neutrality.