|
|
|
Recent posts by
Shade:
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James,
Here are a few great 3.x ones from Dragon and Dungeon that didn't make into the books (as well as some great ones you created pre-3e).
Draknor (Dungeon #24)
Blackroot Marauder, Murdakus, and Dirtwraith (Dragon #270)
Kurge, Rotripper (Dragon Annual #5)
N'gatispawn (Dragon #305)
Firetounge Frog, Orthlys, Demon-Infused Elemental (Dragon #285)
Grimorian, Raknakle, Skerath, Skittermaw (Dragon #274)
Bonetree, Ragewing, Razortail, Treeleg Strangler (Dragon #280)
...and of course, Kaiju! (Dragon #289)
And didn't you create the ulitharid, which I believe first appeared in Dungeon #24 as well?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over at the Creature Catalog, we've been converting a bunch of prehistoric beasties lately, and we've found some real gems outside the common dinosaurs.
For instance the gorgonopsians would fit nicely into most D&D campaigns. If you have any doubt, check out a few scenes from the wonderful BBC show, Primeval:
Clip One
Clip Two
The thylacoleonidae are essentially "dire marsupials" from Australia, that are supposedly tougher pound-for-pound than a smilodon.
Shonisaurus, Therizinosaurus, and some of the labrynthodonts (like Mastodonsaurus) would also make worthy adversaries.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'd like to see a seamless progression from the first 20 levels. I always found it jarring how the ELH suggested that it should be a "world-shaking" event when the 21st level milestone is hit.
I'd like to see epic feats be truly epic, not just another +1 in a chain or a slightly-better metamagic feat.
I've played and DMed epic level campaigns.
What worked great:
-Melee/Ranged Combat: Despite common gripes I've seen, our group found little problem with iterative attacks and higher modifiers.
-Monsters: Monsters scale up nicely, particularly if you bend the rules a bit and scale up spell resistance and caster level for SLAs.
-Skills: Many skill checks seemed to scale nicely, while some of the epic applications of skills were fun. A few checks became a bit too automatic (like Concentration and Tumble), but that happened long before epic levels.
-Epic Prestige Classes: Some of these were quite worthwhile and played well with others, like the arcane lord and soulreaver. Others...not so much.
What worked absolutely horribly:
-Epic Spellcasting...yuk!
-Epic Magic Items...the huge void between the "just slightly better than regular" items and the ones that cost millions of gold pieces was troubling. And artifacts became less interesting, yet all the more coveted solely for their indestructible nature (who wants to lose an item worth over a million gps?)
-Having to reign in "save or die" effects so every combat didn't become a game of rock/paper/scissors.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Erik Mona wrote:
I have considered putting together an atrociously huge monster book by combining two or three books (and errata) into a giant alphabetized titan limited edition for gamers with more money than sense.
I lack both, but would still covet it. :)
As for preferences:
*Drop the PC races
*Drop the advanced versions of same thing
*More real-world animals, vermin, and dinosaurs
*Needs more yeti
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kirth Gersen wrote:
How about this:
* Take 3.5 system. Roll together skills with synergy bonuses, as proposed in the Pathfinder system. Synergy bonuses go the way of the dodo.
* Allow retroactive Int bonuses, so you don't have to back-subtract. Geron is dead-on with that suggestion; it'll save a lot of difficulty when statting NPC wizards.
* Ignore class vs. cross-class skills.
* Then all you need to do is pick 'em and max 'em out.
I like this. Alot.
I really like the skills system, as both a player and a DM. However, as a DM, I already simplify my life by simply figuring out how many skill points per level/HD ranks the creature/NPC gets, then figuring out the max ranks, and assign max ranks to the chosen skills. If I need other skills, I simply shave off a few points here or there and assign them to the extra skills. The biggest slowdown is figuring out those skills that are class skills at some levels and non-class skills at other levels (such as by multiclassing or adding prestige classes). Kirth's method would solve this problem nicely.
I'm a big fan of synergy bonuses, but agree that by combining most synergistic skills, they are no longer necessary.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Erik Mona wrote:
The suggestion of marrying some of these stories to game statistics is an intriguing one. How many people would be interested in something like this?
Count me in.
Giants in the Earth and Novel Approach were two of my all-time favorite Dragon series.
I've already used several of the China Mieville monsters from Dragon in my campaign.
After reading Jack Vance's Dying Earth a few months back, I started statting up some of the creatures within.
So yeah, I'd eat that up. :)
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm...my last post disappeared.
I just finished the book last night, and "Hellsgarde" was definitely my favorite. Great atmosphere, nice ending. :)
"Jirel Meets Magic" was probably my second favorite, and I "Black God's Kiss" was great as well. "Quest for the Starstone" was fun, but it felt a bit disconnected from the rest. I'll agree with the others who felt that "Black God's Shadow" felt a bit too much like rehash.
I found it very refreshing that Ms. Moore's writing style barely felt dated, despite being from a much earlier era. She was definitely ahead of her time.
Erik, thanks for bringing these great stories back. I'll add a review to the products section as well. I'm off to gather up the ISBN numbers for "Elak of Atlantis" and "City of the Beast" and see if my local Barnes & Noble will stock them. To date, the only Planet Stories book I've found there is "The Anubis Murders".
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Snorter wrote:
Shade wrote:
waltero wrote:
Has anybody tried out the new edition of Talisman?
Yep. It's alot of fun.
Do you know if any of the rules have been changed?
I've got a first edition copy from the early '80s.
Second edition was just a new box.
Third edition had cool 3D miniatures, but gameplay seemed the same.
If the rules are unchanged, I'll just crack out the old box.
I (unfortunately) never had the opportunity to play the 1st or 2nd editions of the game. The 4th ed is supposed to be an update of those, disregarding the 3rd.
I'd check out BoardGameGeek for a better comparison.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James Jacobs wrote:
I've seen Cloverfield twice so far. Between it, The Host, The Mist, and The Last Winter, the last 12 months have pretty much been the best 12 months for monster movies that I can ever remember. More, please!
I watched the Host for the first time the night before I watched Cloverfield. Monstergasm. :)
If you liked the movie, check out the viral marketing stuff. The following site sums it up nicely:
http://cloverfieldclues.blogspot.com
It almost plays like a prequel.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I entered a promotional code in my shopping cart, and it shows that it was entered. However, the price does not reflect the 10% discount.
I proceeded to the select payment screen and it still does not show the discount.
Is there any way to clear a promotional code and re-enter it?
I tried emptying my shopping cart and re-entering everything, but it retained the promo code.
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|