Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Sheriff Belor Hemolock

Sauce987654321's page

697 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists.


RSS

1 to 50 of 697 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Really, Greater Teleport can allow you travel to other planets if you have some idea of where you are going. Interplanetary Teleport just does that much better.


I agree that you don't need to be higher than 6th level. You can still make powerful characters with only 6 levels.

I think the trolls in this movie resemble ogres in pathfinder. They fight and look like them, and I don't think they could regenerate any body part (including head) that's severed.

The stone giants are just best represented by colossal earth elementals in pathfinder. Judging by the hit dice and the pattern of their CR increase per size category, the stone giants would be about CR 15


Zhangar wrote:

In comparison, Sarenrae accidentally tore open Golarion all the way to the mantle with a single sword strike over at Gormuz.

Some fun with math -- the continental crust is about 25 miles thick, give or take a few miles for elevation. Stone has 15 HP per inch. So the crust is approximately 1,584,000 inches.

Meaning that Sarenrae potentially struck the entire city of Gormuz for about 23,760,000 damage with a single melee attack.

(Though it's more likely she "merely" struck for 2 to 3 million damage instead, since she was expecting to just crater the city, not punch through to the mantle. But Rovagug had been weakening the region, and thus greatly reducing the amount of "smite" needed to bust it all the way open.)

Now, with that number in mind for Sarenrae's basic melee attack, remember that she needed the back up of about a dozen beings just as powerful as she was just to subdue Rovagug long enough to imprison him.

Here's the thing with this; I think it's a bad idea to attempt to recreate an effect like that through damage, alone. As an example, a Great Red Wyrm's "Melt Stone" ability with its breath weapon allows it to melt stone in a 60-ft radius. It could target the ground and melt that deep in to solid stone, and it wasn't because it just inflicted 10,800 damage with its breath weapon. This shows me that creating a creator that large was simply an application of her melee attack.

Anyway, the GM is pretty much always in control of a Great Red Wyrm. This being the case, the dragon can cast wish for its greater effect, choosing to exponentially increase the radius of its next use of melt stone, GM approves, now said dragon proceeds to melt an entire mountain. It's all perfectly RAW, as well. A GM doesn't necessarily need a deity to do some serious destruction.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Since ending worlds is in discussion, that's something that's said Behemoths do in their description.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I just assumed that since the max power level of a demon lord/archdevil/empyreal lord is 30, a pathfinder deity would be CR31+. I already consider creatures/PCs that are about CR 18+ to already be godlike. When there are creatures that are relatively invulnerable to most physical/energy attacks, that can fly, change weather, resurrect others, teleport, lift giant objects, able to regenerate from dust, and live forever, I think it's pretty easy to use them as a stand-in for a deity. Especially creatures with miracle/wish, as the power level of these spells is only limited by the GM, because if the GM wanted to those spells can literally do anything, according to RAW.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Tacticslion wrote:

Perhaps!

Firearms, seige engines, and tanks are a fair starting baseline in that case, and those are... pretty potent. (Also hardness/energy damage halving of metals compared to their effects in a given universe against weaponry.)

Nonetheless, those are just guesses and baselines - until actual Starfinder rules come out, we're left just as ad hocing things from our own guess works and particular need preferences. :)

Jeez, what kind of tank is that. That thing is like more than 3 times the size of an Abrams tank.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Tacticslion wrote:
I just assumed they were using the numbers from Star Wars d20 in their calculations.

maybe, but things always get rebalanced when converted into pathfinder.


Imbicatus wrote:
Sauce987654321 wrote:
Imbicatus wrote:
DeathMvp wrote:

I have GM'ed a home game that was the D20 Starwars with the pathfinder class brough in from a back water world. It was alot of playing with it to work but may and my group had fun with it. Magic was intresting to play with to work with space ships but we got it to work.

The best was when a Collosal Gold Dragon did battle with a Star destroyer.

Unless Lasers did fire damage, the star destroyer would have completely destroyed the dragon. Even then, ion cannons and missile launchers should have chewed it to pieces. A colossal dragon would only be the size of a Corellian corvette. We all saw how well that went in the opening scene of A New Hope.
it probably wouldn't be at all harmed if it chooses to use its magic to protect itself from those attacks. It's a 9th level caster that has access to tons of anti-tech spells, it's not like it's just big monster.

What magic though? Wall of Force and it's like will be breached quickly, as will stone skin. Anti-tech field will stop projectiles and lasers, but not explosions.

It could avoid the ship with no problem, but if It just tried to buff up and attack it, it's got at best a 50% chance of winning, especially when you include the ships shields and tractor beams to immobilize it.

I don't know why wall of force is going to go down quickly, if used. I don't think we should assume that its weapons are going to instantly do astronomical amounts of damage like we've never seen, because it probably would be balanced like everything else in this game. If anything, it's weapons, like its lasers, could function like a colossal laser pistol/rifle, which is like 8d6 or so damage.

The anti tech field does have an effect against explosives. It's so they don't hit the dragon directly and instead force a saving throw to half the damage.

It doesn't need stone skin. It has its own DR.

I honestly don't think the tractor beams might be all that effective. Vehicles always had low saves and CMD, while the dragon's is going to very high. Again, I'm not going to assume it's weapon is going to just dominate the dragon like it's nothing.


Imbicatus wrote:
DeathMvp wrote:

I have GM'ed a home game that was the D20 Starwars with the pathfinder class brough in from a back water world. It was alot of playing with it to work but may and my group had fun with it. Magic was intresting to play with to work with space ships but we got it to work.

The best was when a Collosal Gold Dragon did battle with a Star destroyer.

Unless Lasers did fire damage, the star destroyer would have completely destroyed the dragon. Even then, ion cannons and missile launchers should have chewed it to pieces. A colossal dragon would only be the size of a Corellian corvette. We all saw how well that went in the opening scene of A New Hope.

it probably wouldn't be at all harmed if it chooses to use its magic to protect itself from those attacks. It's a 9th level caster that has access to tons of anti-tech spells, it's not like it's just big monster.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Avoron wrote:
Veilgn wrote:

Just transfwr tarrasque to the sun.

Let see what happends.

Yes, let's.

The tarrasque is immune to fire, but it's certainly not immune to pressure. In Pathfinder, water does approximately 1d6 points of pressure damage per 100 feet (2.95 atmospheres of pressure) per minute, for an average of about 0.119 damage per atmosphere per round. If we assumes this increases proportionally for absurd pressures from inside a star (seems as good a guess as any), and we assume that Golarion's sun has similar central pressures to our own (around 250 billion atmospheres, apparently), we can calculate the amount of damage the tarrasque will be taking: 250 billion x 0.119 = 29.75 billion damage every round. In other words, every round spent inside the sun translates to about 140 years of regeneration. The tarrasque, meanwhile, must go into hibernation for the lack of breathable air. This makes it immune to any effect that could determine its location, and it has no means of regaining consciousness or escaping the sun on its own.

Sweet dreams!

If we go by those rules, the Tarrasque has about 200 rounds (20 minutes) before it starts to be threatened by the pressure. The fortitude save starts at 15 +1 for each minute each save. It has no where to go, though, so either way it works fine.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

There's always a giant template Hydra for a CR5 gargantuan :D

If you want to be a little creative. There are templates like the mutant template in bestiary 5.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Malwing wrote:
You know the only reason why RAW seeing the sun doesn't work is because nobody bothered to make size rules past colossal size. I was having similar problems just now because I've been trying to find out exactly how big the Tarrasque is to solidify some house rules. Personally I think once it's past double 64-128ft then the monster should have some environmental rules so that you can interact with it as if it were not a creature sometimes (climb it like in Shadow of the Colossus.)

The Tarrasque can swallow a Brachiosaurus whole (gargantuan size) if that helps you judge its size.

Shadow of the Colossus has almost nothing that reaches 100' in height, so climbing something like that is probably best left as a feat rather than a monster's quality.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Since the Balrog is being brought up, and while I disagree that it shares the same power as the Balor, this would be a good stand in for it (at least the film version).


For me, I have players play in a specific setting of my preferences only as I won't be able to play that same exact setting in someone else's game. My goal is to get them to like it for similar reasons as I do while we all have a blast.


I know this doesn't add to anything, but the statblock for the level 16 "CR 14" King is the sorriest and most pathetic "CR 14" I've ever seen, haha. It's really more like CR 6 or 7 at best.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
GreyWolfLord wrote:
Kahel Stormbender wrote:
GreyWolfLord wrote:

Don't discount technology. In Pathfinder a rifle bullet does 1d8 more or less damage.

In real life...that bullet kills you dead no matter WHAT "level" you are. I suppose you could compare it to a death spell, but even more deadly in the hands of an expert shooter.

To be fair, a normal person would have 1d6+con in hit points. And people do regularly survive being shot. But that 1d8 damage CAN kill a normal person. Adventurers wouldn't be considered normal.

But how long would that level 13 wizard last under the fire from a chaingun or m16 assault rifle? Or dozens of assault rifles? Or hundreds of assault rifles? Would a sniper bullet to the head be considered a ranged cdg that doesn't require the target to be helpless?

It doesn't matter HOW MANY HP you have, 1 bullet will kill you.

an elephant in PF has 11d8...one bullet can kill an elephant.

A Whale has 15d8, a bullet (or even one harpoon [which is actually better in whaling...bullets have to some special modifications in the whale's case) properly done can kill them.

Apparantly, we have harpoonest and sharpshooters that can hit at least an AC of 28 or better...

Sometimes FAR more consistently than someone with a 20 BAB even, (meaning they won't miss on a natural 1, they miss less than 1% of the time).

That would put their BAB somewhere in the range of 30 or 40, maybe even 50...(even if we say they do miss 5% of the time somehow)...meaning these snipers and others could be over 30th or 40th level!

And we have many of them.

Our weapons aren't the wimpy PF weapons...the Gun and all the types of ammunition are like Death Spells.

Anyone can have the ability to buy the appropriate death spell, and with enough training, actually use it effectively.

We haven't even gotten into the REALLY decent military weapons yet, and heck, not even close to the heavy weapons a tank might carry (and the armor to prevent it from being destroyed by the same), or the super weapons...

Yes, one bullet can kill any of these creatures in real life and in game. If a creature is in a helpless condition or even treated as such (like standing there and allowing for an opportunity to get shot in the head, though it's a GM's call) is most likely to die from a coup de grace from a high critical multiplying weapon like a gun.

Same with the harpoon example. If a creature is bound and helpless, you can auto hit with any weapon. It doesn't matter if they have 1,000 AC, they still get hit, critted, and forced to save or die. And like with any animal, they pretty much have no special defenses like many magical beasts do, so they are in a pretty bad position.


Imbicatus wrote:
Besides, it's not like King Kong was just a Megaprimatus. He was a Giant, Advanced, Megaprimatus.

King Kong isn't colossal, IMO he isn't even gargantuan.


Lol idk. Neothelid with half dragon template for a giant psychic dragon.


Well this has been fun to read. Now I'm just wondering when Game of Thrones characters start being compared to high level fighters.


LazarX wrote:

You can't swallow whole something several size categories larger than yourself. You have to be at least 3 sizes larger than your meal.

And if your character is that freaking large, you're way out of scale for anything we'd discuss.

You only need to be 1 higher to swallow, but it's no good since colossal is the highest size category.


thejeff wrote:
Sauce987654321 wrote:
Aelryinth wrote:
Sauce987654321 wrote:
Aelryinth wrote:

PHysical abilities are overpriced in PF and mental abilities are underpriced.

If you use Marvel Thor, whose base Str lifting is about 100 Tons, that's Str 65 or so.

Since the PF scale is x4 per ten points, someone like Spiderman, who can lift and throw a car a short distance with a 15 ton rating, is about Str 52 or so.

Reasonably, the max most melees can hope for at the end of a career is the 32-33 range, which is about a ton.

Strength on that level can just be covered by mythic rules. A barbarian with 20 STR + 4 rage bonus with Mule Back Cords and Display of Strength can reach 52 as well. That's just being first level, too. It's really no big deal.

but we're not talking Mythic Rules, we're talking normal rules.

And we're talking those Strength scores, not just lift-and-carry. Throw a spell of Giant form on the first level guy and he can lift and carry tons, too. Not quite the point I'm trying to make, here.

Spiderman can jump a ten story building. he can effectively run 100 mph+. He can see bullets and dodge them. He essentially has perfect hand-eye coordination and balance, as well as exceptional recuperation abilities and stamina when fighting.

Yeah, but if your talking about people that can do that sort of thing those are the rules they would fall into. So Spider-Man would likely have 32 strength plus the mythic ability. They wouldn't just give him a whopping 52. Just like jumping very high, covered by a mythic ability, as they wouldn't give him +400 on acrobatics.

As for hand eye coordination and seeing bullets, monks can catch bullets at like level 2. As for running fast, there's a feat that allows you to have 50% concealment while running. IDK how fast that translates to, but being nearly invisible while running sounds pretty fast.

Except there's no indication that Spider-man has special strength for lifting things. He punches things really hard too. Every game...

Just about any martial has the ability to hit way harder than their strength normally allows because of modifiers and feats.


kyrt-ryder wrote:

You're missing the point Sauce.

The Mythic rules were a mistake. They kind of sort of bring martials up to roughly where they should be in the normal rules [barring a few outlier abilities that don't belong, and a few generic 'mythic crushes nonmythic just because' rules] but then they take casters up to 11.

I agree those rules should be normal for martial characters, but since it's not the case the mythic rules is where many of those Marvel characters would fall into. I was just bringing that up since that's how the game in its current state would handle it.


Aelryinth wrote:
Sauce987654321 wrote:
Aelryinth wrote:

PHysical abilities are overpriced in PF and mental abilities are underpriced.

If you use Marvel Thor, whose base Str lifting is about 100 Tons, that's Str 65 or so.

Since the PF scale is x4 per ten points, someone like Spiderman, who can lift and throw a car a short distance with a 15 ton rating, is about Str 52 or so.

Reasonably, the max most melees can hope for at the end of a career is the 32-33 range, which is about a ton.

Strength on that level can just be covered by mythic rules. A barbarian with 20 STR + 4 rage bonus with Mule Back Cords and Display of Strength can reach 52 as well. That's just being first level, too. It's really no big deal.

but we're not talking Mythic Rules, we're talking normal rules.

And we're talking those Strength scores, not just lift-and-carry. Throw a spell of Giant form on the first level guy and he can lift and carry tons, too. Not quite the point I'm trying to make, here.

Spiderman can jump a ten story building. he can effectively run 100 mph+. He can see bullets and dodge them. He essentially has perfect hand-eye coordination and balance, as well as exceptional recuperation abilities and stamina when fighting.

All of which are incredibly high priced in the game itself.

==Aelryinth

Yeah, but if your talking about people that can do that sort of thing those are the rules they would fall into. So Spider-Man would likely have 32 strength plus the mythic ability. They wouldn't just give him a whopping 52. Just like jumping very high, covered by a mythic ability, as they wouldn't give him +400 on acrobatics.

As for hand eye coordination and seeing bullets, monks can catch bullets at like level 2. As for running fast, there's a feat that allows you to have 50% concealment while running. IDK how fast that translates to, but being nearly invisible while running sounds pretty fast.


Rhedyn wrote:
Sauce987654321 wrote:
Rhedyn wrote:
Sauce987654321 wrote:
Rhedyn wrote:
Usane Bolt can run 200ft per round. Making his move action either 50ft or 40ft. Being 6 times faster than him is still well within the realm of possible.
Honestly, he'd probably have a 30 speed, as well with probably the run feat. If cats and leopards have a speed of 30, then I don't see a reason why he shouldn't, too.
His speed per move action is 40ft with the run feet.
Speed is usually abstracted, hence my cat and leopard example. That being the case, I'd have his speed at 30 with the run feat.
Not according to the math. Usane bolt would have to be a level 3 commoner in PF with fleet, fleet, and run.

Yes, but in game where things are abstracted and not absolute that might not be the case. Leopards can run 35+ mph, but still have 30 speed and high dex. Another example is the lightning stance feat, where you run so fast that you have 50% concealment. Even with concealment from running, you still have 30 land speed, but you still have to meet a 17 dex requirement. So it would seem speed can be represented through dexterity, too, because speed is another abstraction.


Rhedyn wrote:
Sauce987654321 wrote:
Rhedyn wrote:
Usane Bolt can run 200ft per round. Making his move action either 50ft or 40ft. Being 6 times faster than him is still well within the realm of possible.
Honestly, he'd probably have a 30 speed, as well with probably the run feat. If cats and leopards have a speed of 30, then I don't see a reason why he shouldn't, too.
His speed per move action is 40ft with the run feet.

Speed is usually abstracted, hence my cat and leopard example. That being the case, I'd have his speed at 30 with the run feat.


Rhedyn wrote:
Usane Bolt can run 200ft per round. Making his move action either 50ft or 40ft. Being 6 times faster than him is still well within the realm of possible.

Honestly, he'd probably have a 30 speed, as well with probably the run feat. If cats and leopards have a speed of 30, then I don't see a reason why he shouldn't, too.


Aelryinth wrote:

PHysical abilities are overpriced in PF and mental abilities are underpriced.

If you use Marvel Thor, whose base Str lifting is about 100 Tons, that's Str 65 or so.

Since the PF scale is x4 per ten points, someone like Spiderman, who can lift and throw a car a short distance with a 15 ton rating, is about Str 52 or so.

Reasonably, the max most melees can hope for at the end of a career is the 32-33 range, which is about a ton.

Strength on that level can just be covered by mythic rules. A barbarian with 20 STR + 4 rage bonus with Mule Back Cords and Display of Strength can reach 52 as well. That's just being first level, too. It's really no big deal.


It's interesting how martial characters always have their super human status questioned in every thread like this one. I've even read in another big thread how navy seals are similar to higher level martials because of how skilled and deadly they are in combat. I thought it was pretty funny, actually.


Mysterious Stranger wrote:

The DC represents the chance to break free while in combat in a single round. You can keep trying until you succeed. While you normally can’t take 20 on an ability check, I would allow this. Since taking twenty is basically a way to speed up the game instead of making the character actually keep rolling until they get a twenty it amounts to the same thing.

So that means that any character with a STR score of 20 will eventually get out of a net. The trap requires a STR score of 22.

yes you can take 20s on an ability check.


Claxon wrote:
alexd1976 wrote:
Adagna wrote:
Claxon wrote:

If a person has chosen to make themselves helpless, then sure they are helpless.

But no, almost no one would choose that except for some weird confluence of events. Certainly, someone being "held hostage" is not going to choose to make themselves helpless to their attacker.

The act of not struggling is their choice to make them self helpless. If someone puts a gun to your head and says "nobody move or I shoot", and you as a hostage don't move... you have chosen to be helpless. If you slam your head backwards in a headbutt or reach up to disarm or squirm to turn and face the attacker... then you have chosen to not be helpless.

If you as a hostage comply with the "don't move or I shoot" command then you are choosing to make yourself helpless.

So yes, quite a few people who are intimidated/timid/value their life will make them self helpless and see what happens rather then risk grave bodily injury.

Interesting point of view, but it doesn't have to be limp passive resistance OR full out attacking your grappler.

Choosing not to be helpless does not obligate you to attack.

You simply make a choice to not become helpless, no more, no less.

It doesn't force actions, visible or otherwise.

Agreed.

Also, in the game where provided you don't make yourself helpless you have a substantially better chance of actually surviving an encounter like this then you do if you made yourself helpless.

This is a game not real life, provided you have enough HP things don't risk killing you in a single hit.

At level 1, a barbarian vs a gunslinger, the barbarian should have no fear of ever being killed by a single shot because he has 12+ con hit points and a musket will only do 1d12.

The game isn't designed to simulate real life, things are not meant to instantly kill here. The problem is you want the game to be like real life, where a gunshot to the head almost guarantees death. But the rules don't support such a...

a shot to the head could also be a crit, so that'd be 4d12. The problem isn't that the game can't do realism; the problem is that people try to shoehorn everything into a realistic setting. So you end up with all of these house rules that deal with lava, falling, explosives, and guns so they can easily kill off even high level characters, when really the situation should be replaced with first level NPCs with single digit health.


I don't think allowing yourself to be helpless is or should be explicitly stated in the rules. It's right up there with denying your own dexterity to your AC or having to go to the bathroom, because having those rules written in the game really does nothing for the game and only serves to take more pages up. That being the case, it's just another GM thing.

As far as how the GM can handle it, the GM can always have the weapon deal max damage. I think it's unnecessary, because guns usually are x4 crit and your coup de gracing the target.


AwesomenessDog wrote:
Sauce987654321 wrote:
AwesomenessDog wrote:
As far as other peoples comments go, that's perfectly fine if you want to make guns matrix style in your games but base PF was built around martials having more realism than fantasy (with exception to SU and SP abilities) so it would target FF normally and then you could rule it back to Touch, you're the GM after all. However at the same time, I would argue that the armor in your fantasy setting would also be special and would stop said matrix bullets so to me it sounds like full AC would apply, but once again, up to you.
In any case it would not target flatfooted at all, because you're not only dealing with armored humanoid encounters. Dexterity also can mean that the target is fast moving, such as cats, insects, and birds, for example.

The lack of accuracy in the weapons and the fact that not every hit is a direct hit (and even when they are, they don't just punch through plating) is why it "wouldn't" target touch. You can't dodge a bullet in real life so once you aim your super inaccurate gun, its just up to the luck of the dice or in real life the chance the bullet flies towards the target and doesn't veer off, it isn't about the person reacting to it. Dodging the aim of a gun doesn't really work either just in that its equally hard to dodge a bows aim in real life since all I have to do is twitch my aim a couple degrees for every 3-5ft you displace yourself, and its not like it gets better if you get closer since I can fire it and then you wont react in time, especially against a bullet.

Animals have very thick skin and fur, there are weapons from the modern day that cant get past a bear's greasy fur (9mms, more often then not, will also not puncture a human skull on the first hit). Your argument that animal hides wont stop or hinder a bullet from a early firearm is not based on fact and certainly doesn't apply when we would have things like dragon hides thrown into the mix. AC isn't stop an attacks success, its making it less likely:...

What? I was saying that it shouldn't target flatfooted is all I was saying. I do agree that firearms shouldn't target touch, but that's not what I meant. My example of animals was a reason why it shouldn't target flatfooted.


AwesomenessDog wrote:
As far as other peoples comments go, that's perfectly fine if you want to make guns matrix style in your games but base PF was built around martials having more realism than fantasy (with exception to SU and SP abilities) so it would target FF normally and then you could rule it back to Touch, you're the GM after all. However at the same time, I would argue that the armor in your fantasy setting would also be special and would stop said matrix bullets so to me it sounds like full AC would apply, but once again, up to you.

In any case it would not target flatfooted at all, because you're not only dealing with armored humanoid encounters. Dexterity also can mean that the target is fast moving, such as cats, insects, and birds, for example.


alexd1976 wrote:
Sauce987654321 wrote:
I'm glad firearms don't target flatfooted. I don't see anything wrong with someone dodging your bullets matrix style. This is a fantasy game after all.

I love that you can actually deflect them with a feat too.

It rarely comes up, and is totally awesome on the rare occasions it does. :D

Don't forget that you can catch them, too.

What I really like is that in the firearms rules it calls out those feats specifically and says that they work on bullets, just to make sure nobody says otherwise.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I'm glad firearms don't target flatfooted. I don't see anything wrong with someone dodging your bullets matrix style. This is a fantasy game after all.


chbgraphicarts wrote:
Entryhazard wrote:
The oozaru form shouldn't have a a Dex penalty. When Vegeta transformed he still was insanely fast and maybe even more than in humanoid form

Dexterity =/= Speed.

You can be slow as a glacier and extremely dextrous; conversely, you can be fast as lightning and still be a clumsy f@@!.

Well not as far as the actual base speed mechanic, but dex does seem to be an abstraction for being "fast." I figured this when I noticed cats and leopards have high dex but still have a land speed of 30. Another example would be when running a chase, because you use mainly dex based skills to determine the outcome while speed only gives you bonuses.

But I do agree that Great Apes should have a dex penalty, because everything that grows larger in pathfinder has dex penalties. I don't think Vegeta should be an exception.


I didn't mind how the hp system worked when I accepted the fact that mid level characters are pretty much super human, and high level to 20th level characters have more in common with gods rather than real life people.


Artemis Moonstar wrote:

Speaking of Kaiju... I always wanted to do a Kaiju campaign. Culminating in an OMFGEPIC Showdown of Ultimate Destiny between all the Kaiju that have rules so far, some Behemoths, Colossi, and of course, the Spawn of Rovagug.

Basically, I want to take my PCs against Colossal sized opponents regularly, with truly epic Shadow of the Colossus styled climbing of the huge creatures kind of gameplay.

I remember in 3.5 there was a feat that allows you to climb giant enemies. I forgot it, though.

You can always use a giant template on gargantuan creatures to make lower CR colossal enemies, like a roc, t-rex, sea serpent etc.


I don't see much of a resemblance between drogon and a young red dragon. Drogon can't speak common, doesn't have magic, and doesn't even have as many limbs. In pathfinder terms, it'd be a drake.


Anguish wrote:
Wiggz wrote:
the overpowered mess the current Mythic rules

Just wanted to poke my head in a second since this is presented as fact. Seems to me the whole point of Mythic is to be "overpowered". You play legendary characters with exceptional abilities. As a long-term player and long-term DM, I've frankly been finding my current player campaign through WotR the most fun I've ever had. Are we stomping bad-guy face? Yes. Are we supposed to? Yes.

So while I support you in the spirit of your post, the way you've put it kind of intimates (or bluntly states) that the Mythic rules are somehow... wrong.

If 2 mythic tiers equals +1 CR then yes it's not supposed to be overpowered. A CR increase from a source should have its power level in line with any other source.


DM Under The Bridge wrote:
Doomed Hero wrote:
DM Under The Bridge wrote:


Nope, Loras was besting level 2 fighters (and cavaliers) and experienced professionals higher than lowly level 2. Best in the land with a lance, but can't be above level 6, even if he has been beating others around that level consistently? I find this a very strange position to take.

Its not that he can't be. Its that he doesn't need to be.

XP is arbitrary and doesn't translate. It cannot be used as a metric or explanation of ability for anything not designed inside the system

You have to look at the actual described actions of the characters and then translate those into mechanical terms.

The reason Loras is probably below 6th level is because he doesn't need to be any higher to do the things he is described as doing. Its that simple.

Now you are trying to say he is "probably below 6th level"? What, so he isn't even up to two attacks? A renowned swordsman and very respected knight due to his expertise in the tourneys and he can't even fight two people at once because you assign him as below sixth level.

Bronn & Oberyn are capable of taking down multiple opponents at once, as is Jorah (when he gets going, sometimes it seems he prefers being knocked about it seems), as is Brienne who minces through rapists, soldiers and knights. Two at once was easy for Barristan, in the books and in the show (he got absolutely swarmed in the show and that was his downfall). Of course Barristan has the accomplishment of blitzing a castle, which couldn't be done with only one attack per round against numerous attacks, but if you want to believe 5 is the limit that is your wrong take on it.

You do realize that cleave and greater cleave/cleaving finish allows you to attack multiple targets at once, right? Did you also know that if you use the lunge feat in conjunction with greater cleave it allows you to potentially strike down over a dozen targets with a single standard action?


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I won't speak for everyone as for what the reason is behind placing GoT at level 6 and under, but I'll share my reason.

They are impressive in the context of their setting, but you don't need double digit levels to be impressive. These are people who are good at beating other humans and such, but pathfinder is not just a game that has a few dragons and only humanoids with some animals as possible encounters.

Making someone level 12 (CR 11) means they are a challenge for a 40' tall elder earth elemental or a building sized dinosaur that can swallow a brachiosaurus whole and tank missile launchers (t-rex with the giant and invincible templates, also a CR 11 creature). Am I supposed to expect Syrio to challenge any of these creatures I mentioned? Putting these characters at a lower level isn't intended to disrespect them or anything, it's to properly put them at the correct CR in comparison to everything else the game has to offer.

That whole Thoros ressurection thing. When Beric lost to Sandor and then was immediately healed afterwards, that looks like cure light wounds to me than anything. Cure light wounds can heal mortally wounded people, too. Let's not get it twisted though, I'm just acknowledging the fact that you don't need high end magic to represent what happened; I'm not trying to put down the character or anything. Coincidently, not only is a 1st level warpriest able to heal the mortally wounded, but they also have an ability to make someone's weapon deal fire damage, too.


Wouldn't putting the mountain at level 8 (CR 7) be equivalent to fighting a remorhaz (a giant worm-like creature capable of swallowing a rhino) or 3 minotaurs? I never got the impression that mountain was this good.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Maverick898 wrote:

I agree. i use the warcraft rpg to gelp my conversions aswell. according to the "manual of monsters" The lich king is a CR 50.

but then again this is the way im doing it, and its easier for me to covert this way.

arthas would probably be around a cr 23 - 25.

kil jaden as a demon lord around a 28

and sargaras is a titan. a god
in the end its all for fun.

Titans that exist in this game are from CR21 - 22, but they could easily be stand-ins for gods. That whole thing about gods can't be statted is really for Golarion gods, not necessarily for all gods in any setting or universe.


Had I known this thread would have died shortly after I posted in it I would have waited later.


gustavo iglesias wrote:
A 20th lvl fighter can grapple a whale.

Even that's selling a 20th level fighter short. A 20th level fighter with some focus in grappling can grapple a creature that can swallow whales.


Dud Muffin wrote:

I love your breakdown. Since this is all speculative, I'd like to point out a potential (albeit, small) flaw in your logic. Jason takes out assorted, hired guns/toughs and trained security personnel throughout the films. More often than not, he makes this appear pretty easy.

Why wouldn't we assume that these people are a few steps above a lowly commoner. Like the chump journalist that eats it in the 3rd movie for example, as we see how poorly he fairs against the same odds as Jason. If that were the case, Jason seems to effortlessly dupe and/or b!@ch slap mobs of these guys. That would ostensibly give them at least a level or two in fighter or a similar martial class, since there has to be some delineation between a trained fighter and a commoner.

The fact Jason is able to wreck droves of these types of 'characters', I would say is pretty strong evidence that he is of higher level than just 5.

Again, I feel your analysis is pretty spot-on, just playing Devil's Advocate!

I think a couple of brawler levels would work fine, maybe give him hero points on top of that.

I agree with you that the people he fights don't need to be commoners. I think a level of warrior would work. A warrior with combat related feats is a big difference from a commoner with non-combat feats.

I don't think it's a good idea to give him anymore than 3 levels. Making him level 6+ starts to put his power level in the same range as large sized drakes and 16-ft. tall elementals.


Indagare wrote:
Any suggestions on this? Is there some better way to create a world by spell or should I just leave that to deities?

If you're the GM, you can simply use the Wish spell to do that. The Wish spell's section on creating greater than the listed effects is only subject to GM discretion, so there would be nothing stopping something like a Pleroma Aeon or a Fomorian Titan from creating an entire world from nothing.

You might not like this method, but it's still technically 100% rules legal.

They don't call it the "mightiest spell" for nothing.


JJ Jordan wrote:
Sauce987654321 wrote:


I don't see why it's an unfair comparison when the situation can be perfectly replicated in Pathfinder with a Warpriest and probably other classes at 1st level.

You can convert it however you want, but it doesn't fit perfectly whether you think about this mechanically or through the narrative alone. There may be a difference between the TV series and the books, and I am going off of the books.

Cure light wounds does not bring back fallen allies. It will stabilize a dying ally but it does not resurrect a dead ally.

Beric Dondarrion was lanced through the chest by the Mountain. Instant death. A charging critical hit by the strongest man on horseback. Just thinking about the narrative, cure light wounds is not saving that guy. He is dead.

Mechanically? Okay, it's unlikely but possible he could be saved by cure light wounds if the Mountain "rolled" minimum damage, and it wasn't a critical hit at all but George RR Martin is just really brutal with his combat descriptions.

Then Dondarrion is hung and stabbed through the eye. The dude is dead. Not dying. Dead. The level 1 warpriest is not powerful enough to solve this problem other than by building a funeral pyre. Someone with access to level 5 divine spells can do something about that.

The magic level in the world is increasing quickly. We started out with, at best, cantrips and level 1 spells and are now in the level 3-5 spell range. A minor character casts the equivalent of "remove disease" on one of the Greyjoys. So that's a level 5 cleric right there. I don't even wanna' get started on the skinchangers and greenseers in the series.

Whether they were impaled in the chest by a lance or stabbed in the eye and then hung, it still deals hitpoint damage and it still allows someone with the cure spell to bring them back.

Visually, for the most part, the dying condition and dead condition aren't going to appear much different. The dying condition is sort of similar to the dead condition, as in they can't do anything but lay there. It's not like they've established that Thoros' healing ability can only bring back someone in the dying condition. To him and anyone else, the person in the dying condition is pretty much dead, in other words he's not coming back. Point is, when they are "dead" in their setting probably means dying condition mechanically in pathfinder.

it's hard to be instantly killed in pathfinder, whether it's getting an axe to the neck or being blown away by a grenade launcher. They still have a chance to be cured. A person in the dying condition without help is as good as dead anyway, even if they stabilize, which the game even points out. This is why Cure Light Wounds, even a 1st level spell, is invaluable in their setting.

Remove disease doesn't mean 5th level cleric either. The restoration subdomain allows for it to be a 2nd level spell. Assuming hero points are allowed so they can be used to cast a spell one level higher, which brings us right back to level 1. Which again makes sense, seeing that they can't do everything or probably anything else that a 5th level cleric can do.

Okay, I'm not saying that everything in GoT has to be 1st level. They could have another level or two, but my point that it, at least to me, is easy to convert with even with 1st level characters.


Combat Monster wrote:

I'm a big fan of converting superheroes into the system without creating special rules. It's always fun to see the varied ways different people work these heroes.

I'm looking forward to seeing a bunch more conversions and hopefully less naysayers saying it's wrongbadfun.

It's not that people think it's badwrongfun, but a lot of people somehow got it in their head that it's impossible to convert characters or anything from a source other than pathfinder. I've even seen people post that it's impossible to convert characters as simple as the ones from Game of Thrones without house rules.

1 to 50 of 697 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2016 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.