|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
Re: Summoner's Eidolon = OP?
Post,
by
Austin Morgan
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
|
"Really, a Fighter's not better than a Summoner, and a Summoner's not better than a Fighter. We're comparing Apples to Oranges here, and that's even true for Fighter vs. Eidolon." |
|
|
2.
|
|
Re: Did you make it to the promised land safe Yoda?
Post,
by
yoda8myhead
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
|
"Maybe I should drive over to the Paizo offices to see if he's there. I know which window is his and wouldn't even need to go inside." |
|
|
3.
|
|
Re: Should a christian play Pathfinder?
Post,
by
roccojr
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
|
"Pathfinder doesn't promote devil worship any more than Monopoly promotes tossing families out of their homes to build hotels." |
|
|
4.
|
|
Re: >>Ask *James Jacobs* ALL your Questions Here!<<
Post,
by
James Jacobs
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
|
Studpuffin wrote:
Cats or dogs?
Cats.
Cats bury their feces. Dogs eat it.
Cats all the way. |
|
|
5.
|
|
Re: >>Ask *James Jacobs* ALL your Questions Here!<<
Post,
by
James Jacobs
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
|
Post it again! Of course, if I skipped it because it wasn't worthy, that'll just get you a DOUBLE sad. The internet is FULL OF RISKS. |
|
|
6.
|
|
Re: Going to be a dad!
Post,
by
CourtFool
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
|
"Children do not come with instructions manuals and the 'right' way to raise them changes pretty much every year. So just love them and you will do the best you can." |
|
|
7.
|
|
Re: >>Ask *James Jacobs* ALL your Questions Here!<<
Post,
by
James Jacobs
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
|
First of all, the way this question is phrased, there's NO WAY I can answer it without a legion of rulesmongers picking it apart like a swarm of starving jackals picking apart the seven-day dead sun-baked carcass of an elephant. |
|
|
8.
|
|
Re: Gag Items
Post,
by
Clinton Boomer
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
|
These monkeys are CRAZY monkeys, however, and no amount of training, yelling or stomping of feet will get these monkeys to stop it with their crazy monkey shenanigans. |
|
|
9.
|
|
Re: GM Help: Help me before I kill off my unlikable evil PCs!
Post,
by
Mikaze
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
|
If a game is actively becoming anti-fun for a player, that player shouldn't be beholden to stay in the game. And GM's are players too. |
|
|
10.
|
|
Re: Wondrous Item auto-reject advice #14: Item is something we can't advertise due to mature or offensive content
Post,
by
Mynameisjake
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
|
Sex is okay. Violence is okay. Sexual violence is right out.
1 in 6 women will experience a sexual assault at least once in their lifetimes. Many will suffer multiple assaults. 1 in 30 men will be raped.
Paizo has made it clear that using threats of violence against children is both trite, overdone, and inappropriate. The same should be extended to the very real victims of sexual assault. Especially considering the majority of victims never come forward, and the vast majority never receive justice (only 3% of accused rapists ever spend jail time).
I would never, ever risk putting a victim of such abuse through the horror of reliving such an event, no matter how "realistic" I wanted my "world" to be. And, no, you probably don't know if someone at your table has been victimized by sexual violence. Males, especially, don't report it or even confide in their closest friends.
Add to that the fact that the perpetrators are depicted as thinly disguised regional stereotypes, and, yeah, deeply offended. |
|
|
11.
|
|
Re: Over the word count, seriously?
Post,
by
Mark Moreland
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
|
If I stop reading an entry before I even finish the name, it's usually because I assumed the last words in the title were "of epic autorejection +4." |
|
|
12.
|
|
Why we don't reprint.
Thread (80 posts),
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.
|
|
Re: I Don't Like the Game Master Guide
Post,
by
CourtFool
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
|
Looking for yes-men to rally against the fan bois on the fan bois' home turf is doomed to failure. I will support your freedom to state your opinion. Beyond that, you are on your own. |
|
|
14.
|
|
Re: >>Ask *James Jacobs* ALL your Questions Here!<<
Post,
by
James Jacobs
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
|
If we do a swimsuit edition of our iconics, we wouldn't limit the art to the girls. |
|
|
15.
|
|
Re: The apocalypse has come! (or "How to successfully drag my wife into Pathfinder RPG")
Post,
by
DeathQuaker
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
|
"My personal tip for any person: don't make blanket statements about what women players tend to like or not. Women really run the gamut--I should say, PLAYERS run the gamut of what they like to do. And with all due respect, 2 people you know does not constitute an adequate sample. (Personally, my favorite enemies are non gendered demons. I doubt this has much to do with my gender.) And telling an unsatisfied woman, "But I did it because I thought you ladies LIKE this stuff" usually results in Very Bad Things regardless of the particular situation it refers to. " |
|
|
16.
|
|
Re: If there is one, email contact for developers?
Post,
by
Larry Lichman
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
|
After all, there really is no wrong way of playing Pathfinder. |
|
|
17.
|
|
Re: An official response is needed
Post,
by
Sean K Reynolds
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
|
This is an official response.
The rules are clear.
I appreciate your enthusiasm, but expecting someone on staff to give an "official" answer to your rules questions (1) is an unreasonable demand on our time needed to get books finished, and (2) sets a bad precedent that takes power away from the GM because "unless someone at Paizo says it, it's not the rule" becomes the rule. |
|
|
18.
|
|
The website is down
Thread (308 posts),
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
|
Paizo forum for when website breaks |
|
|
19.
|
|
Re: Pathfinder Battles: Heroes & Monsters Brick
Post,
by
Anguish
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
|
The point is that the wallet's emotional impact again hasn't anything to do with the proper price of the product. |
|
|
20.
|
|
Re: Threadcrapping report option
Post,
by
Ambrosia Slaad
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
|
We are all adults here; we should aspire to act like it. We shouldn't expect the mods to clean up our comments; they have far more important things to do then continuously fight fires on the messageboards. If you can't reply in a civil and rational manner, then its time for a break from the thread. And if it dawns on you that the person you're GRARing with is completely entrenched and not going to listen to your opinion, then it's perfectly reasonable to walk away and not waste your energy on them. That doesn't mean you've lost; it means you've figured out you're wasting your time trying to slay a windmill. |
|
|
21.
|
|
Re: [Intelligence Check] Bringing Back the Sexy!
Post,
by
Erato
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
|
Most male gamers (and perhaps even most people in general), and thereby most RPG material, seem to have severe difficulties comprehending that women have a sexuality which goes beyond a need for men to like them. |