Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Warforged

Rune's page

Pathfinder Society Member. 557 posts (2,346 including aliases). No reviews. No lists. No wishlists. 16 aliases.


RSS

1 to 50 of 557 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

2 people marked this as a favorite.

The Townsfolk idea is also interesting (specially considering the many Leadership-like feats), but I'd suggest adding some development ideas to the NPCs. Things like: Keira is an herbalist and apothecary. She is also the wife to Hank the Lumberjack, and her husband's company is missing. Hank may be found and rescued (a DM may put him anywhere in the adventure), or maybe they find just the body and bring back his wedding ring. Keira might ask a cleric PC to perform a funeral, and pay by providing local herblore to the PCs (a +2 circumstance bonus on Knowledge (nature) and Survival checks to identify and procure plants in the local region). Later she might name her child after a PC, or even find solace in his/her arms.

Please pretty please make sure to include at least one extremely excited local boy/girl that idolizes the PCs and offers to accompany the as a hireling-sans-payment or apprentice. Make him/her try to emulate the PCs' habits (if the rogue is brooding, the apprentice knits a cowl off his/her extra shirts for extra broodening).


2 people marked this as a favorite.

The Deadly Delves looks really promising. I think something along the lines of the latest modules - three short adventures that have tenuous connection (so that they may be ran separately or together) is preferable than a full-on adventure. I think you need a really interesting hook for these sidelines, but the overall structure should be short - a couple of encounters, some exploration/investigation/diplomacy and back to the track. The Witcher 3 has a lot of these really amazing, surprising sidequests that are mechanically simple but often leave you "whoah, THAT happened!".


2 people marked this as a favorite.

I'm also really excited by the idea of this AP; ever since I first read the Pathfinder Chronicles Campaign Setting I kept the idea of a Nirmathas guerilla-style game and this promises to deliver exactly that.

Those all look really good, Dale, but I have one small suggestion about the bounty hunters:

Since solo encounters pretty much suck, I'd recommend making a small number of bounty hunting antagonist parties. Maybe one that's level 3, one level 7, 10, etc. Make them have compelling backstories that play off each other, and at least one member that might be redeemed/recruited after the battle (a down-on-his-luck mercenary that just took the wrong job, a person in a domineering relationship with another party member that is actually freed by the PCs, etc).

A couple suggestions: Low-level - A rival adventuring party (their patron gave them the false information that the PCs are bloodthirsty murderers and demon cultists), Mid-level - Highly trained bounty hunters working for the Lumber Consortium, High-level - A party of Red Mantis assassins (including warpriest, sohei monk, ranger and slayer).


So a couple months ago I had way too much time in my hands, so I did this.

I took the River Kingdoms map, rotated slightly to match the angle of the Kingmaker maps, adjusted a 12-mile hex according to the map's scale and voilá. Sure it isn't perfect or exact, but ended up good enough for my purposes.

According to my count, Pitax ended up with 68 hexes (discounting the 4 unclaimed hexes of the Thousand Voices and Sarain, which IMC it lost to Mivon). I included 4 cities during the war events: Pitax itself, Mormouth, Littletown and Rushlight (which I figured was a smallish permanent town that boomed during the festival).


1 person marked this as a favorite.
James Jacobs wrote:
No contest. Candyman.

Watched it as a kid. Still remember vividly a lot of the scenes.

Have you seen the 2015 movie Visions with Gillian Jacobs? How did you find it?


James Jacobs wrote:
3) Two way tie: I would revisit book 2 to address concerns of misogyny (at the very least make it clear that what elements ARE in there that are misogynistic are intentional and reflections of bad guys in the adventure the PCs need to defeat) and I would rebuild the sewer exploration portion of the 1st adventure to be a standard map exploration with actual set encounters instead of a needlessly complex "Build Your Own Sewer" rule section that sacrifices interesting encounters in favor of dungeon design theory crafting.

I'm DMing this very adventure and would like to avoid making the female player awkward so I have to ask: What are the misogynistic elements that should be downplayed or addressed?

edit: Edited for clarity


We're at the Fortress of Stone Giants, the players have just started exploring Jorgenfist.

Shalelu Andosana: Revealed as the mother of the half-elf ranger of the group, she accompanied the party until the end of Hook Mountain Massacre when she made peace with the leader of the Black Arrows. Returned to Sandpoint to reinforce its security in the wake of the giant attacks. (Left town years later due to the events of the Jade Regent AP)

Small digression:
In my game Shalelu was the mentor (also secret mother) of Cathryn, the group's female half-elf ranger. She and Bruthazmus were nemesis, having had a long grudge punctuated by violent instances of arrow-shooting and trap-setting. When she noticed the bugbear scouting nearer Sandpoint she sent her apprentice to the town and moved to settle their grudge once and for all but got captured due to the help from Nualia.

She was later rescued by the PCs, who stealthily invaded Thistletop during a black mass held by Nualia and provided a lot of intelligence on the villains. Due to Orik's strangely timid but gentle treatment of her, she pointed out he might be useful.

Orik Vancaskerkin: Since the PCs had invaded Thistletop stealthily before and liberated some prisoners, the dungeon went on high alert. Most of the upper denizens guarded the throne room with the goblin chieftain and that resulted in a huge fight. The party was increasingly impressed with Orik's skill in battle (his nigh-untouchable AC and respectable damage) and at the end of the battle all enemies were defeated but Orik was still standing behind his shield and the party offered him a chance to surrender. He told his story and promised to help the party with information but asked them to please not kill Lyrie (which is the only reason she's alive). Ended up fighting alongside the party when promised a full share of treasure and turned practically into a fourth PC (since we lost one player). Everyone keeps trying to turn him off Lyrie.

Lyrie: Survived Thistletop after Orik asked the party to spare her. Wrapped Orik around her finger, using his affection to convince him to pay for her arcane research and lavish lifestyle in Magnimar. She is probably due to receive some bad news and be left with a couple thousand gold pieces in debt if the PCs convince Orik to leave her.

Erylium: Long battle, ended when an [/i]enlarged person[/i]ed paladin smote evil to gain huge bonuses to grapple. Grappled with no hope of escaping and surrounded by an enraged party, Erylium died squashed.

Nualia: Sadly, was killed. Would love to work on a redemption arc for her, but the party was way too pissed off about the lives lost as her burnt offerings.

Kaven Windstrike: Only survived the revelation of his treachery due to PC insistence and pragmatism (the Black Arrows were severely understaffed). The other Black Arrows all survived too despite me changing the last part of the adventure from a dungeon delve to an attack on the fort which the PCs had to lead, prepare for and survive.

Black Magga: Actually almost killed by the party! Who knew a greatsword evil-smithing power-attacking paladin dealt so much damage? She actually had to run for her life.


So my players have just finished book 5 and got Briar which has organically changed from a bastard sword to an Aldori dueling sword (the weapon favored by the queen). At the very end of the session they let me know they'll be using the legend lore spell on it as soon as possible. As a last disclaimer, I mean to fast forward 10 years from the defeat of Irovetti to the beginning of the blooms so the rulers will actually be coming out of retirement to face this last threat for their kingdom.

Question is: How much information should the spell give them? Any suggestions on how to convey that information as a "legend" instead of "this happened, followed by this"? Maybe frame it into a sort of a children's story or fairy tale (which it incidentally is)?


Axial wrote:
Does she literally start the game as an inquisitor without class features?

The GM narrated a small prologue before the protest at Aria park and I believe she indeed lost her spells but regained them by joining with the faith of Milani (Shelyn references in her backstory were actually Milani ones, which I didn't know).


Ckorik wrote:
Wizards can do this with a trait - and aren't limited on what they can summon with it.

Mind sharing that one? Looks neat.


Well, on my 3.5 game, the cleric slowly turned from a buffer fighting cleric to a pure caster around level 10. It wasn't a once-in-a-lifetime experience, just the slow realization that while fights need to be won and damage needs to be dealt, there are people focused on doing that and there are many other problems that can be solved by a single spell - which you have it and the others don't.

Hold person has been used as a very simple save or lose at low levels. Blade barrier saved a paralyzed barbarian from cannibalism at the hands of a PC-classed ghoul. The banishing effect of Holy Word, while commonly overlooked, can be really powerful against outsiders - a couple hours ago in our Wrath of the Righteous game, a holy word single-handedly took care of half-dozen mythical salamanders before they even acted - a CR 16 encounter.


Also this:

SRD wrote:
Swashbuckler levels are considered fighter levels for the purpose of meeting combat feat prerequisites.

It means that Weapon Specialization, Greater Weapon Focus and Greater Weapon Specialization are on the table and specially Penetrating Strike.

But either Power Attack or Piranha Strike is necessary, though. I myself Precise Strike very often or intentionally provoke attacks of opportunity to Parry/Riposte (generally to also eat away at opponents' opportunity attacks to allow the cleric or wizard to cast his spell/retreat safely).

Variant Multiclassing is also good for that - my Wrath of the Righteous swashbuckler is VMC into Paladin, using Smite Evil for the big fights (always evil, frequently evil outsider). Cavalier would also work.


It's been a while since I've not seen a full caster without Craft Wondrous Item. In one game, the witch makes wands, potions and rings while the cleric makes wondrous and weapons/armor. In other, both the Wizard and Oracle make wondrous items.

One thing I see almost every session is the crafter upgrading one piece of gear - raising the fighter's ring of protection +1 to +2 (or cloak, belt, armor, etc). The crafter's downtime days are heavily disputed between the other group members - we generally tip as well.

Answering the OP, I've seen mostly those "necessary" items being crafted and upgraded, like the "big six". For some reason the wizards in my groups never use their Scribe Scroll properly (last session the wizard had to use a limited wish to replicate a true strike spell to manage hitting an important touch spell).


LuniasM wrote:
Skald - The most metal class of all time, bar none. I rebuilt a villain in Kingmaker as this class and the fight was infinitely more interesting. I enjoy this class even if they don't have too much variety in builds.

Glad to see I was not the only one. Mine had the party crying OP during the two sessions they took to kill him (I made that dungeon a running fight through multiple rooms).


Wow, the announcement for Ironfang Invasion blew my mind! Ever since I read the campaign setting for the first time I envisioned a long guerrilla campaign between Nirmathas and Molthune and you guys sure are delivering it! The fact you are developing it is just the cherry on top!

Can you say anything about the AP? Even broad strokes? Are the PCs from Nirmathas, Molthune or anywhere else?


So who's playing it on the PS4? I'd love to get a fun crew running :)


This is just beautiful man... For some reason it took me 3 days to find out about the VLOOKUP function so I had to make a lot of horrible if-nests to calculate Rank-derived bonuses. Yours is simply elegant. Congrats :)


Damn I feel bad I hadn't seen this before! I ended up making my own version. Will try to modify it to include your week-by-week tracking, though. That's just gold.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

After DMing a very long Kingmaker campaign, I learned to appreciate excel sheets to handle most of the heavy load involved in Kingdom Building. So when I got to the Rebellion part of Hell's Rebels I thought I would help out my DM and hash out a functioning automated sheet to cut down on his work. A few sleepless nights of banging my head on the keyboard in frustration resulted on this and, seeing as I used a LOT of material produced by awesome people at these forums, I'd love to share it with you:

Rune's Automated Rebellion Sheet.

If there are any problems/miscalculations/bugs, please let me know (by posting on this thread or direct messaging me). A few notes about the sheet:

  • Open it in Excel for better formatting. I have not tried it in any other medium (it looks awful on Dropbox). It uses the fonts SeriaRegular, Source Sans Pro and Newcomen Bold (for the title).
  • It is locked to protect the formulas; any entry fields are unlocked and can be edited. These include: # of Supporters (which is used to calculate Rank), Population, Notoriety, Membership, Treasury, "OTHER" category of bonuses to Loyalty/Secrecy/Security (both the number and the name, so you can indicate the source of the bonus), Allies (and Boons), Number of Safe Houses, Officers (and their bonuses).
  • My DM said we can have multiple people in Officer positions, but only one provides the bonus. So only the first Officer adds his/her bonus to the relevant stat (the Recruiter is an exception).
  • You choose the teams from a drop-down menu; the team listing is on the second tab. You can enter custom (or bonus) teams by replacing the placeholder Bonus Teams.
  • The checkbox for the possible Rebellion actions needs to be manually checked positive or negative (I'll work on that if I get the time - if you know the solution lemme know).
  • As I'm not sure how Allies and their Boons work I'll wait for the adventure to progress before I try to implement their bonuses to the sheet - they'll need to be added manually.
  • Please beware of spoilers - I'm playing this game and we literally just started using the Rebellion rules.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

We're only two sessions into the campaign but I really like our line-up (even if we could use another player):

Magnus Corvus Augustus, human brawler (shield champion): Former paladin of Aroden gone to fight in the Everwar, he was trapped in a stasis field in a Thassilonic ruin around Fort Korvosa. Finally freed after 300 hundred years only to find his god dead and his nation corrupted. Found his hometown Kintargo as one of the last places in Cheliax not doomed by diabolism and works to keep it that way. Seeing as he's bound to and simultaneously abhorred by the idea of fighting his "fellow Chelish countrymen", he's vowed to never lift a blade to take a Chelish life. The shield, adorned with the winged eye of Aroden, he kept, using it as a symbol of protection for his fellows and lofty ideals of the greater good for mankind.

Zataria, tiefling ex-Asmodean inquisitor: Taken from squalor by a Asmodean priest, raised to believe her existence was cursed and service to the Dark Prince was her only path available. She infiltrated the cult of Shelyn to destroy them from the inside but found unconditional love and acceptance. Withholding information from the Inquisition she allowed the shelynites to survive, but lost her divine powers in the process. After the Night of Ashes and an enormous guilt-trip at seeing the Thrashing Badger burned to the ground, she found a single red rose in the ruins. With burning purpose in her eyes and the divine backing of Shelyn, she started herself on the path of redemption. Knows she got red on her ledger and seeks to fight against her previous superiors in order to clean it.

Adonatius Tanessen, human bard (arcane duelist): Blacksmith, bon vivant, public orator and free spirit, Adonatius was a public nuissance to his family before Barzillai, and when he vocally questioned their wisdom in allying with the dictator, they publicly shunned him to distance themselves. Wants to see a free Kintargo and reunite with his friend, the bard Shensen.

Egeria, middle-aged human witch: A member of a big family of humble means, Egeria cared for her elders, their children and her chicken coop. Battling bouts of depression due to the many losses of her life (and the declining political and economic status of the city), she was contemplating suicide while observing the black herons fish in the river. One of them sat by her side, and convinced her that a better future was possible and it would provide her with the means to bring it to life. Shen-shen, the black heron, then proceeded to teach her spells of healing and subduing those who would threaten her family. Egeria today fights to make the city a better place for the lower strata of the society, providing a valuable point of view from the streets.


There's always New Stetven in Brevoy. The entire kingdom is Game of Thrones-like with noble houses scheming against each other.


Hey JJ have you heard the "Lore" podcast? Each episode is about a "true life scary story". I'm completely hooked on it and thought it should be right up your alley.


MeanMutton wrote:
After I wrap up my current campaign (end of this year, most likely) I'd like to use either E6 or DD5 for my next one. Not sure which yet.

Sorry, but a google search did not return information about DD5. How is it different from E6?


12 people marked this as a favorite.

Do not steal from the party. It is not cool and always leads to bad feelings all over.


James Jacobs wrote:

10 Cloverfield Lane is a great movie in that regard; the heroine does face some harrowing scenes, but she is VERY much the heroine of the movie and is never once played as a victim. She's smart, resourceful, quick-witted, and admirable; one of the best leads in a horror movie for a woman in a long time, in fact. The danger she faces is real, but the fact that she faces it head on makes her all the more awesome of a character.

There's no actual sexual violence in the movie (but the implied threat of it does provide one of the ongoing building dread elements of the movie).

Thanks JJ. I myself have returned to the horror genre following your many indications here on the boards and so that's a double thank you.


Hey James, Cloverfield Lane just premiered in my town and I'm thinking about taking my girlfriend to see it. I've been slowly introducing her to horror movies in general (we loved The Witch) but she strongly dislikes depictions of violence against women. The trailer implies an abusive relationship between the characters, so my question to you is: Without spoiling the story, does the movie contain trigger scenes, themes of sexual violence and such? Would you recommend it for a somewhat newcomer to the horror genre?


Is there any chance we can get a consolidated skills version? Your sheets are simply the best and I'm torn about choosing different rules or these sheets.


Chess Pwn wrote:
yes

Thanks for the quick response.


Is the penalty always a -2?


James Jacobs wrote:
I actually try to avoid doing design work here, mostly as a time-management thing, but also because it starts to open a door to me doing free work that doesn't sit well with me... sorry!

Not a problem, thank you for the quick response and for an awesome adventure!


Regarding that Arueshalae question, could I bother you for any other suggestions? I'd like to offer some to my group so we can decide on it.


Wrath of the Righteous spoiler:
Dear JJ,

Given her free choice of any class/career to follow within the Crusade, which one would a redeemed Arueshalae choose?

Our group is very small (only 3 PCs) so she's a major character. She's been helping us mostly by scouting and providing privileged information about demons/the Abyss; we don't use her as a spy per se since we don't want to subject her to potentially traumatic experiences. Due to the terrible dangers we face, the group pooled a lot of resources to provide her with protective magic items and bring her closer to our power level.

The GM is fine with us running Arueshalae as a fourth PC, and offered us the possibility of rebuilding/retraining her. I've been tasked with doing just that, but I'd rather provide an organic evolution of her concept than just an optimal mechanical choice.

So far I've been leaning towards Ranger (which includes themes of exploration/travel, slight divine magic and demon favored enemies but I'm open to ideas.


One small suggestion on the Spellfire feat/ability: The reaction Absorb Spell is way too good. In itself it could very well be a feat (targeted by a spell, counter as a reaction?); as an incidental means of recharging is just way too much. It also encourages Spellfire users to spend all charges as quick as possible and walk around with 0 charges, thus becoming almost immune to spells.

Make it like 3e: You need to Ready an action to absorb spells as they're cast. It pretty much sucks (you have to be lucky enough that the enemy casts a single-target spell focused on you), but, honestly, the spell-absorption isn't the main draw here.

Compare it to Defensive Duelist and you'll quickly see it never scaling back.


Cay anyone with the book comment of the feasibility of playing an all-Vigilante party on Hell's Rebels? How do they measure against cleric/wizards?


Wouldn't he still attack with Str?


BretI wrote:
Just a note: that spell is not on the normal Magus spell list. They would need to take the Spell Blending arcana to get Resist or Protection from Elements.

Rhedyn's suggested Magus fix (the one I was commenting on) draws spells from the Wizard's spell list.


In my experience, the class as-is is not overpowered (in our Wrath of the Righteous campaign it is severely underpowered due to demons and their pesky resistances/immunities/SR) even with Spellstrike.

At mid-high levels they are probably balanced with the rest of the classes due to facing many hurdles to perform their shtick. On the rounds they do manage to crit their shocking grasp they are head-to-head with the pouncing barbarians (provided they don't face energy resistance or fail a concentration or SR check).


Lemmy wrote:
You no longer have the image of a warmage casting enveloping his weapon in magic before striking and you lose cool combat spells such as Bladed Dash.

Not that I'm defending Rhedyn's suggested fix (I think it would perform underwhelmingly, since so much of the Magus' efficiency depends on those crits) but that guy would still be "enveloping his weapon in magic" by using the Arcana Pool, Greater Magic Weapon spell and many many others.

Conceptually, the thing that would change is that Spellstrike-less Magus would have to make *gasp* choices on which spell to cast each round. I missed my last attack, should I buff myself more? Maybe an energy resistance spell to protect against the dragon's breath? Or should I capitalize on its fire vulnerability with a scorching ray?


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Wolfgang Rolf wrote:
That free attack that seems to be bothering a number of posters can only be done for as long as the magus has spells.

I do not care about the extra attack. I care that that ability pigeonholes an entire class into one true build with little variation (Strength vs Dexterity).

I care that that build needs so many resources (traits, feats, spells, arcana) to function at its basic level that it leaves almost no space for customization.

I care that the concept of a "functional spellcasting warrior" has become reduced to "that guy using a scimitar to deliver shocking grasp criticals".

That's bad design.


Do we have any information on the Glorious Reclamation aside what's written in Hell's Rebels/Vengeance?


1 person marked this as a favorite.

First, I love the concept of the sword-and-spell warrior. For me, a spellsword would mingle spell-use with swordplay, buffing while attacking or throwing fire rays. Conceptually, my problem with the Magus is a single ability: Spellstrike.

It is so damn good that it shoehorns an entire class into the cookie-cutter mold of high-damage touch-attack spells fishing for scimitar crits. It forces the whole class to focus on one specific (and boring) kind of spell. If magi didn't have Spellstrike, they would be buffing themselves mid-combat, throwing around a few blasting spells or dispel magic to debuff enemies. We would have buffer magi, blasting magi, debuff magi. Note those are all somewhat possible but are such inferior choices than the regular magus that they are generally ignored. It introduces those awful damage spikes (1d6/level spells were never supposed to crit on a 15) that most people negatively associate with the Magus.

The second part comes from my experience playing alongside one mid-level magus (on Rise of the Runelords) and playing with a high-level one (on Wrath of the Righteous). They tend to be one-trick ponies inside and outside of combat. Their skills are limited (they perform the "arcana" side of skills well enough but that's it), they have very few utility spells. They are too limited to fulfill a wizard's role in a group and too redundant if the party has an actual wizard (their skills simply overlap too much and the wizard will have a better bonus/more skill points/better knowledges).

They depend on too many rolls to function normally in combat. In order to achieve that "big burst", the magus has to:
1) Succeed at an attack roll (with Spell Combat's -2 penalty on top of its 3/4 BAB).
1a) Succeed on another attack roll to confirm that juicy critical (not a given).
2) Suceed on a concentration check (ALSO not a given).
3) Suceed on a caster level check against spell resistance (a swingy roll most times, specially because magi generally don't invest in this).
4) Check physical damage against DR.
5) Check energy damage against energy resistance/immunity.

Most high-level enemies have a lot of incidental resistances, spell resistance and even random immunities. Most demons have damage reducation, SR, electricity and cold immunity and other resistances valued 5 or 10.

A single bad roll can throw your entire turn out and you're left with the rest of your attacks with a low bonus and mediocre damage. When the magus works well, it does it too well for some. The rest of the time it is mediocre.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Out of curiosity, Fallyrion, where do you guys play? Outside of my group I honestly haven't met another Pathfinder player here in Brazil.


I got disconnected at the end of the game yesterday so my curiosity demands: What was written in the pot?


Aside from racial options, the players in my group always take the extra skill point. I've seen maybe one or two characters taking the HP option, but they were always one-trick martials that ended up feeling useless outside of combat.


How much would Desna like to visit this place?


James Jacobs wrote:
Strange Aeons is the AP after Hell's Venegeance; it's a Lovecraftian-flavored Adventure Path that starts with your PCs being amnesiacs imprisoned in an insane asylum, and follows their investigation into what caused this situation and their growing fight against an eldritch ancient evil.

Is there any chance that the campaign traits are going to be different mental disorders, like "Schizophrenic" or "Pyromaniac"?


I'd love to use those but I need to translate the text into Portuguese for my group. If any of the artists could provide a textless version of their art I'd be tremendously grateful.


I love gish-types, but they always seem to underwhelm compared to either full casters or full martials. It took me like 7 levels to notice my Finesse arcane duelist bard simply didn't compare to the archer ranger or the sword-and-board cavalier in terms of damage. I always thought "Well, when I get to use all my buffs I'll get there." The time finally came and he came short.

At least after that I had found my niche - buffing and supporting the party while dealing medium amounts of damage.


We converted some AD&D characters to 3rd edition and mine ended up something like a fighter 5/sorcerer 5 (he was a fighter/wizard with the swashbuckling fighting style). I had been DMing 3e and made the most of it.

First serious combat, I buff myself to oblivion (including a true strike). I charge, Power Attack AND Combat Expertise to the max, hit the monster, and deal something like 25 damage. The group's wizard casts a magic missile. 23 damage.


Awesome map, Narolas! My entire Kingmaker group loved it and asked me to convey their thanks for your hard work. Merci encore pour tous ce que vous avez fait!

1 to 50 of 557 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2016 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.