Ratpick's page

With respect Gorbacz if anyone is trying to start something out of nothing, anything and everything it's you. It's almost like your dissapointed that some on this board dare to like what they see in the 5E playtest document. That and not being angry or wanting to go after Wotc with pitchforks and torches. So your thinking "that's not good at all time to start some sort of anti-5E revolution on the boards". Which thankfully much cooler heads have prevailed so far. This mught change when the final product is released. Maybe I'm wrong but when one of your post is "why are people not angry with 4E being incompitable" well we have better things to do. I think slowly the D&D gamign community is getting tired of edition wars and people who go out of their way to start them.

So acting suprised that about the lack of angry reaction should be no surprise. They said a new edition was coming from the start. It would be different and it would be playtested. So no surprises unlike 4E. So Wotc was upfront for once. Great for a more moderate gamer like myself. Not so great for those who se hate for Wotc is set in adamantium.

Morgen wrote:

That's the kind of thing you do for a closed beta, not a public play test. Hasbro has too many lawyers.

Impossible. You can never have too many lawyers.

Counselor, I concur!

I don't speak for the peanut gallery's thoughts on who is paranoid and stupid, I merely expressed my opinion on paranoia and stupidity. If pressed, I'd say that concerns regarding the terms of the playtest NDA are uninformed and/or overblown, but that is not an uncommon result when someone actually reads a legal document they are signing.