Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Chraal

Rasief's page

65 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists.


RSS

1 to 50 of 65 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Some of the guides in the Guide to Class Guides have sections for recomended items.

http://zenithgames.blogspot.com/2012/11/the-comprehensive-pathfinder-guides .html

I also encounter useful the next link, although it is not intended as an exhaustive guide to items, in fact it's pretty short.

http://zenithgames.blogspot.com/2013/11/improving-your-class-with-items.htm l


Bodhizen wrote:
It appears as though the document was hacked and Google Documents is having difficulties with recovering older revisions. I am attempting to address the issue now.

Thank you for your effort and for this great guide.


I've been using the guide the last few days and since yesterday it appears without the color codes and with the images in weird sizes or black backgrounds; it seems that text styles are missing. Is this something related to google docs config in my account or is an issue with the document?


mplindustries wrote:
If I were you, I'd just dump Strength and take Piranha Strike instead.

That's exactly what my character needs, all the attacks for a feral mutagen are primary.


Archaeik wrote:

Power Attack only uses strength as a prerequisite.

The penalty and bonus damage relies on your BAB and handedness alone.

Short answer, yes this works.

Thanks for the answer, I didn't find anything that restricts that one but it's best to be sure.


I'm planning to build a dexterity based Alchemist for my next campaign and I was wondering if I can power attack with claws and bite using an agile amulet of mighty fists; I will get my strenght up to 13 and my dexterity up to 18.


They just switched the name. There are some "Pathfinder Companion" books that are for D&D 3.5, as long as I know there aren't Pathfinder versions of those.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I started to play back in the 3.0 days (near to 2001); when 3.5 came out we switched to it without any problem except for the money "lost" in our 3.0 core books. I ceased to play in 2006 because most of the crew moved away from town.

I found a D&D 4E group in 2008 but I had the misfortune to play with a bad GM (IMHO), I played with him about six months and after that I was so tired that decide not to play more; my experiences with D&D 4E were not good and I started to accept things like "all classes feel the same" as arguments against D&D 4E. I've been playing pathfinder since 2010 and I have to say I really enjoy the game.

Since last year I started to play as well Mutants & Masterminds 3E (not sword & sorcery at all) and I can tell that all characters are almost the same if you remove the fluff (no classes here, just "concepts"), and the balance is as good as D&D 4E (if not even better) with the power level limits. The funny thing here is that things I believed were bad about D&D 4E are present in M&M and I don't feel them bad anymore, I really enjoy that game too. Now I would be glad to give D&D 4E another chance but right now I don't know about available groups to play in town.

So PF and D&D 4E are different games in many concepts, similar in others, but really none of them is better than the other, your perception just depend on things you like and people you play with.


Here in Paizo's site. Hope it is what you are looking for.


Artanthos wrote:

The most recent FAQ should be all you need to demonstrate that Haste works with Spell Combat.

Even without Haste, you were already capable of using Spell Combat + Spell Strike to attack with +12/+12/+7, assuming you were casting a touch spell.

Thanks, that was what I thought, just wanted to be sure, so haste + spell combat + spellstrike allow me to make two additional attacks (of course using a touch spell), nice combo.


I have a 8th level human magus (no archetypes) who attacks with his keen scimitar a +14/+9.

Regarding the clarification that allows the use of spell combat with haste, could my magus use spell combat + spellstrike + haste to attack at +13/+13/+13/+8?

I need the proof (if it's the case) to show it to my GM in our game session tonight.


cp wrote:
Attacks of Opportunity, usually.

If the bad guy can't perceive you, he can't take an aoo.


Regarding Monk 1, he has 13 hp (1d8+5), maybe there is something I'm missing but you sould have just 1d8+4, +1 Con and +3 Toughness.


Me and my group aren't quite focused on optimization, flavor is much more important for us. For example, one of the players has a ninja with STR 12 that uses shurikens in time to time just because he's a ninja and ninjas use shurikens (of course he has a shortbow too).

I believe your monk is a good playable and versatile option. He has decent melee attack and damage, a viable ranged attack, not too bad AC.


In the Carrion Crown Adventure Path there is a research quest in the first book, as it seems to be you can retry some knowledge checks via expending a day in a library, there is no mention about there has to be a new player every time the party try.


Aratrok wrote:
According to the rules for Lay On Hands a paladin that's healed by negative energy and hurt by positive energy can still heal themselves. They straight up heal wounds, and can alternatively deal damage to undead creatures.

There is a FAQ that clarifies that Lay on Hands uses positive energy so I don't think the dhampir can use it to cure himself.


LazarX wrote:
Keep his spells and abilities the way they are. The problems he has with them are his Special Snowflake Tax.

That would be really hard for a 1st level character IMHO, so this is why I'm thinking about help the player a little.


I'm not worried about using the spells as evil acts, it's just for flavor since the spells are "evil", then it's restricted for a Paladin to use it against others.

Anyway I really don't want to mess all with another evil/paladin thread.


1 person marked this as FAQ candidate.

One of my friends is going to play a Dhampir Paladin in our new campaign (Carrion Crown) starting next saturday. Since a Dhampir functions like an undead regarding positive/negative energy, I was thinking to allow him to switch Lay on Hands/Touch of Corruption (Antipaladin's) in case he needs to cure himself, he would lose his paladin abilities if use it to harm anybody.

I also will include the cause wounds line on his spell list in order to allow him to prepare/use wand these spells, again it would be an evil act to use those to hurt anybody else.

I won't include the chanel negative energy.

What do you think, it's overpowered or not?

Regarding the Paladin's code I think it can not be problem if he limits the use of these evel spells/abilities on himsef or over a friendly undead (maybe it won't happen at all).


You can use drain or curse effects, those can't be removed via cure wounds.


As Golux said, it means there is no limit in the number of times you can do the action dayly.

It is not related with the kind of action (standard, move, full round, etc.).


Rasief wrote:
and do not mention the type of weapon (ranged, single, martial, etc. or even melee)

In fact in power attack they mentioned the two-handed weapons as an entry for extra damage, but that does not open the way for ranged attacks with power attack or something similar.


Sinde both feats (Power Attack and Deadly Aim) are described based on the type of attack (melee or ranged) and do not mention the type of weapon (ranged, single, martial, etc. or even melee) it seems to me that in RAI or RAW its clear that ranged attack can be combined with deadly aim always and never with power attack.


As Adamantine Dragon says, power attack is for melee attacks and combat manauvers, deadly aim is for ranged attacks. If you use a thrown weapon to make a ranged attack (depiste if this is a Dex based or a Str based), it's still a ranged attack so deadly aim affects this, not power attack.


Thanks for the advice, actually I'm familiar with that line of feats, not too much time ago I played a ranger archer. I asked just because in some forums there are people that mention bards as excellent archers so I suposed there had to be some special builds around that.


Hello Pathfinder experienced players, as the title says I want to play a bard archer and I'm looking for some advice in how to create a good one.

I'm not a minmaxer, I'm just looking for a reliable build, we will start at level 1, 20 pts buy system. Thanks for the advice.


Shame on you GM if you plan a TPK.


yuki_sc wrote:
However, it is not common for us to create TPK because of some problem. In Japan, it is said that character should not be died and GM should avoid character's death.

I totally agree with this statement, as a GM I try to tell a story, I usually plan the final comfrontation since the begining and usually try to lead the players to additional personal motivations on the PC's (revenge, sense of honor, a debt) to try to stop the main villian.

The death of a PC is not a desirable situation for me but if it occours it can be explained on the continuity of the story if someone else takes his place, if the entire party is killed its a bit more defficult to explain why a totally new party is trying to take their place, and the personal motivation are just lost, it would see as a different story.


Same as Cheapy said, the only difference between class skills and non-class skills is the 3 bonus ranks you receive at the begining.


Well, iron armor definitely provides protection against iron weapons, not in the form of DR but provides protection.

As for the DR entry the "-" means that there is no way for a weapon to overpass the DR, no matters his material or his magical bonus, so the adamantium armor still keeps the DR 3 against an adamantium weapon.


Cheapy wrote:
Humans now get TWO bonus feats!

Is that true? I mean the bonus feat and the +2 bonus on the abilility you want are the things that make humans one of the best classes to play (at least from my point of view).

Two bonus feats is just too much to me.


I'm our last campaign I builded a table of attacks for each of the characters in the back of their character sheets, the barbarian table was something like this (not the real stats, just and example):

Type Attack/Damage

Normal +15/+10 (2d6+8)
Power Attack +13/+8 (2d6+14)
Rage +17/+12 (2d6+14)
Reckless Abandon +17/+12 (2d6+8)
P. Attack + Rage +15/+10 (2d6+20)
P. Attack + Rage + Rec +17/+12 (2d6+20)
.
.
.

And added as many entries as possible combinations, it's a bit large but it worked perfectly for them, helping them to track their modifiers and remember their attack options.

For the fighter I added one column for one handed attacks and another for two handed, you also can include a column tracking the AC (specially for the barbarian).


I think GMing is most about story telling, so if you enjoy to create and narrate stories then you will find DMing quite enjoyable depiste the easy or hard task that could be.


Thanks for the advice, I suppose that I will need to drop some extra restoration stuff in time to time in order to keep them alive without a cleric.


As a DM I'm about to start a Carron Crown campaign, my players will be Paladin, Bard, Rogue, and Alchemist.

Is that group well balanced for the adventure? I mean, they don't have a full arcane caster nor a main healer.

Thanks for the advice.


I think that is really depending on the setting, if slavery is a common practice then it can't be seen as an evil act (certainly not a good one either).

Regarding law and chaos I think slavery is much more a lawful act, that's because it needs some degree of structure in order to work.


Gorbacz wrote:
5E is a love letter to Old School crowd with some 3E/4E innovations thrown in. WotC is going after all those folks who play OSRIC/C&C/S&W/T&T/X&Y and have no strong brand holding them. Smart move, but is it enough to satisfy the Corporate Overbeast?

That's why they need to go after Pathfinder folk as well, here is were most of the people are.


I readed the last articles on wizard's website and depiste I found most of their content quite interesting, (it seemed to be similar with 3.x/Pathfinder, i.e. class hit dice were the same, fighter d10, cleric and rogue d8, and wizard d6), right now I really don't see the need of try another system when I feel really comfortable with the on I'm playing right now for high fantasy, of course Pathfinder.

Wizards need to make a really really great game if they want the people playing Pathfinder back.


For what you two say, it seems that RotRL is quite better than most of the APs, thanks for the advice.


HangarFlying wrote:
Though, if you wait 2 months, the updated PF rise of the Runelords will be out.

We want to play, two months is too much ;)


Right now I want to avoid non PFRPG APs (like Rise of the Runelords) because I don't want to spend time making conversions from 3.5.

Regarding our regular game speed, we usually take 3 or 4 sessions per level and since APs seems to have 3 levels per booklet I assume we will take something like 80 sessions (2 years for us).

I'll give them the options of City (Council of Thieves), Horror (Carrion Crown) or Oriental (Jade Regent).

Thanks to everyone for the advice.


As DM I'm about to finish my actual Pathfinder campaign and since I usually don't have enough time to prepare sessions I'm seriously thinking to run an Adventure Path.

Can you people give me some advice regarding which AP is good to start?

I also want to know which is the usual rate of advance, I mean how many sessions per booklet can we take? we usually take 4 hours sessions.

Thanks.


Besides metamagic rods I see feats as something that a creature can achieve through continual practice, not a magic effect, so I would not allow those in my games, of course I can be totally wrong.


The mistake in your math is that you asume that both book covers have the same weight.


You also can say that death has no order or plan to act, she takes poor and rich, child and old, etc. So from that perspective she sould be chaotic.

I prefer to see her as neutral since she comes to all creatures, even gods eventually.


cranewings wrote:
I agree with LN for Death. He plays no favorites and he gets very cranky when people break the only law he cares about.

If there are in the setting a lot of sentient undead out there not being chased by death, I see no reason to believe the god of death is feeling cranky. In this case I go for the true neutral

On the contrary if in the setting the sentient undead are chased by the god of death or his worshipers then he would be lawful neutral.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

In my opinion the God of Death has to be true neutral, I see no reason to attach death to law, I mean a lawful lich can try avoid the death same as a chaotic one.


What do you exactly mean with a search tool bar? do you have any example with another Firefox pluggin?

There is already a Google search in the top-right corner of the page.


There is one divine spell that can help, Mighty Strength, it's a 4 level spell (Cleric or Paladin) that provides +8 enhacement bonus to Strength. You can find it in Dwarves of Golarion.

Since it's an enhacement bonus, can stack with Divine Power.

1 to 50 of 65 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>

©2002–2014 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.