Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ

R_Chance's page

2,714 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists.


1 to 50 of 2,714 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

SmiloDan wrote:

If only there was a fellow time traveler who knows (of) the Flash AND Doctor Who....

That would be a fun crossover.

SmiloDan wrote:

And as a side note, how bad of a break-up does a couple have to go through for one half to end up in DC, and the other half in the Marvel Universe?

Taylor Swift kind of bad. Her and any of her son... er exes.

I thought that was one of Travellers more interesting features. You had to balance stacking up skills / cash / a ship versus dying and starting over. It was it's own little game, especially with Mercenary and all the later supplements year by year career progression...

I may have to pick up the Mongoose version. I have all the other older versions, excluding TNE, and T5 is a bit messy. Is Mongoose Traveller still compatible with T5?

My favorite version, mechanically and minus the Rebellion which was a bit absurd, Megatraveller.

Cool to hear that Jessica and Crystal are getting recognition / panel time at GenCon. Sad that it's so controversial / extraordinary for some people based on their gender... people can be so... annoying at times.
Anyway, Congratulations ladies. And have fun. GenCon is supposed to be fun :)

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Several people up-thread have mentioned variations on "How do they know you're really a Paladin?". Probably because the real Paladins are going to cut you into little pieces if you're not... I doubt fake Paladins are going to get off easy. So, for awhile you fake it, word gets around and your head leaves your shoulders. And the next would be fake "paladin" considers a new scam.

7 people marked this as a favorite.

I think what DigitalElf is saying is that in the old days you explored the setting, discovered the fantastical. Your character was relatively mundane, the anchor, your point of view and the really cool stuff was what you found / discovered. Now people want to *be* the cool / strange stuff (stranger than a wizard?) rather than finding it. It's like the game has moved from exploring the world to exploring your character. I still prefer exploring the world myself.

This threads back? Third time I believe. Well, time to contribute... not so much obscure as just fun and fondly remembered. Besides my D&D fixation.

Empire of the Petal Throne. And later games set in Tekumel right up to the new game, Bethorm. Incredible setting. I miss Professor Barker. If you liked Jeff Dee's art, Bethorm is his game btw...

Elric / Stormbringer. Moorcock. Angst. Philosophy. The Lords of Chaos. And I love the armor as damage reduction rule using a dice by armor type rather than hit location.

Mekton Zeta. I used it to run a Star Wars campaign. Used the vehicle construction rules to build everything from TIE Fighters to the Death Star. Star Wars fits anime themes very well.

Bushido. Feudal Japan. Great stuff. And ninja. I tinkered with a Tekumel / game using Bushido rules / ideas. Never got to run it. *sigh*

Space Opera. An rpg that came out of a set of miniature rules (rather like D&D did), Space Marine. The game was a bit of a mess, but it had a campy sci-fi flavor. A nice break from the "realistic" feel of my favorite sci-fi rpg, Traveller. I still love Traveller, and I swear I will finish reading T5 some day. And speaking of Traveller feel...

Stars Without Number. Sandbox sci-fi retro rpg goodness. Like Original D&D and Traveller had a child together...

Severe nostalgia attack oncoming. I feel the need to unpack some boxes... the wife will kill me, but the urge is strong :)

BigDTBone wrote:

TOS pretty well borked Cochrane all by themselves. He was the human who invented warp drive and he was from Alpha Centauri. So yeah... anything TNG did with that was an improvement.

He was born on Earth. He invented warp drive. On Earth. He moved off Earth. He lived on Alpha Centauri later in his life. Probably after a life time exploring and travelling. Disappeared from Alpha Centauri to be found by Kirk and company later... makes sense to me...

Snowblind wrote:

James Jacobs wrote:

Snowblind wrote:


The deity-specific paladin codes are 100% meant to exist the "normal" paladin code. The normal code is for world-neutral generic paladins, and once a paladin worships a deity on Golarion, they're no longer world-neutral and must follow deity specific codes.

If a code doesn't cover a topic, then the paladin needs to extrapolate from the code. In this case, nothing in Shelyn's code says anything about using ANY sort of poison, so she's perfectly fine using knockout poison or any other to help her live up to the code.

(Remember, while poison is often used by assassins and other evil characters, poison itself is NOT evil. Guardian nagas and couatls both have poison that can kill outright, and both of them are lawful good. It's how you use the poison that affects alignment, as with any other tool, not the mere fact that you use it.)

And there we have it.

Homebrew forum. No setting mentioned. Discussing generic Paladin Code, honor and poison. It's already been mentioned upthread that a different code might change the use of poison... and various other Paladin Codes have been mentioned. If the code in question didn't have a poison prohibition we wouldn't be having this discussion. Well, not this specific one anyway. At times people in this thread has seemed to want a distinction between lethal and non lethal poisons for the generic code. And of course the "use poison or watch children be murdered" bit has been trotted out to attack the generic poison prohibition... pretty much your standard paladin alignment / code thread :)

Makeitstop wrote:

From the paladin description under code of conduct:

Additionally, a paladin's code requires that she respect legitimate authority, act with honor (not lying, not cheating, not using poison, and so forth), help those in need (provided they do not use the help for evil or chaotic ends), and punish those who harm or threaten innocents.

Poison use isn't forbidden because of alignment, it is forbidden because of that entry about honorable behavior. A lawful good character can arguably use poison without affecting their alignment. A paladin however has both alignment and the code to worry about, and by RAW, poison use is explicitly forbidden.

I personally prefer to alter and personalize paladin codes, and prefer to allow poison use.

Given a world with absolutes of alignment, why would anyone have a problem with codes involving absolutes of behavior? Absolute prohibitions in this case. The people who do probably have problems with the alignment system too. But as Makeitstop points out this prohibition has to do with honor. For me, the no poison rule is about honor. It's not supposed to be easy. Being a Paladin. You're supposed to give, and receive, hard blows. Hard to do when the opponent is paralyzed or asleep. What have you risked then? What have you sacrificed? It's a kind of medieval mind set, but hey, my game has a strong dose of that in it.

Further I would argue that lawful good is built around codes of behavior. Hence the lawful. The Paladin's code is just pickier and more exacting than most. I would expect chaotic good characters to decide behavior on the fly, situationally btw.

All imo, of course and, as always, ymmv.

Now, could you construct a different code for a different take on Paladins? I suppose so, but then there's no need to ask questions about poison use then.

SmiloDan wrote:

I'm talking more about Henchmen classes that can be run simultaneously with a PC classed character by a player. I'm not talking about NPCs that don't level with the party or DMPCs.

For example, a gaming group has only a DM and 3 players. Say, a bard, a cleric, and a wizard. Henchmen could be a fun way to fill out the party.

In PF, we had a party of 3, and the GM gave each of us a warrior classed henchmen to control in addition to our PCs. I think our party was a half-orc inquisitor of Desna, a human fighter, and a Dark Tapestries oracle. The GM had converted an old 1st Edition module, so we needed some extra bodies to keep the PCs from being dead bodies. And it worked really well and was fun.

I've used both PC and NPC classes in that role in 3.x. My players have adventured with NPC friends and had henchmen and hirelings of various classes, PC and NPC. A simplified NPC type class is less of a burden to run (for DM or PC) than a PC class I'd agree. I imagine I'll continue to use both depending on the NPCs role and origin. For me the NPC classes are very useful in populating the world, but that population includes the people the PCs move through and around...

JoeJ wrote:

Absolutely not. Locking everybody in the universe into just a handful of classes in 3.x was one of the dumbest ideas ever.

... A handful of classes? You have large hands :D

Original D&D with just 3 classes and zero level NPCs... that was a handful of classes.

1 person marked this as a favorite.
bugleyman wrote:

No. Personally, I believe NPC classes are contrary to the spirit of 5E. The game seems to take a conscious step back from that level of simulation (and imo is better for it).

I moved into D&D from miniature wargaming (Chainmail). For us, there was always a degree of "simulation" in the game world. NPC classes (and PC classes for that matter) were a convenient way to organize and rationalize this world.

Threeshades wrote:

5th edition has an NPC class. It's called the d8.

The prefabricated NPCs in the Bestiary have been made on the same principle every other monster in the game have been made.

That, in short, is "give it hit dice until it has the desired hit points, choose ability scores, determine armor class (either by equipment or natural armor), give it attack forms (again equipment and/or natural), choose proficiencies, spellscasting and special abilities and finally determine the CR according to the DMG table from what you made"

I find this method vastly superior to having NPC classes. The NPC is much quicker to make than if you had to keep to building from a class and there are no restrictions to what it can do.

For example in PAthfinder when you build an NPC whether from an NPC class or a PC class, you have to choose a level, then build your characters ability scores, add the level bonuses, count the number of feats it gets, find how many skill ranks it has, spread those skill ranks, add them together with ability, racial and class bonuses, check its BAB add it together with everything to get the melee and ranged attack bonus, CMB and CMD, choose feats and add all bouses from those everywhere and then check what the save bonuses are and add those with all the modifiers and then choose appropriate gear and add the bonuses from that everywhere. Oh and let's not forget figuring out the spellcasting if there is any.

In 5e you put down your number of hit dice, give the character whatever ability scores, special abilities and gear you think it should have, and choose any number of proficiencies with equipment, skills and saves. Then you check what CR it has give it the appropriate proficiency bonus and add it together with each ability score you need to figure out its attack, skill and save bonuses.

So much easier, so much more open.

In short you're custom building your NPCs. That's fine in an AP. I run a sandbox and I sometimes need to produce NPCs on the fly in fairly large numbers or pre prepare a batch of NPCs to fit a role and use them as needed. An NPC class serves that goal by giving you a framework. It works for me, but ymmv. Obviously :)

I used the idea of a d8 per level for all classes btw.

Yes, it does, to answer the original question. Keep it simple. Limit them to a 10 level class on the theory that anybody higher level than that should be a PC class. They're useful for world building / populating places. Simpler than PC classes, but more flexible than the NPC types from the MM. Rough out a chart for what level different NPCs should be (plus or minus a bit). For example what level should a master smith be? What level should a typical city watchman be? One of the best features from a DMs point of view, and imho, was the NPC classes. The virtue of the cookie cutter MM NPCs is simplicity, but they have the same issue 0 level NPCs had pre 3.x. You end up using PC classes when you want something that isn't a pushover or a clone. And if you keep building tougher cookie cutter NPCs you might as well have the NPC classes in place. All in my opinion of course. Ymmv.

*edit* And yes, I'm working on my own versions based on what I used in 3.x. I started messing with them when I went to convert my own setting to 5E...

Steve Geddes wrote:
Link to the PDF.

Thanks :)

Death House. An introductory adventure for Curse of Strahd. PDF link from WotC: y%20Adventure.pdf

Downloaded it; haven't looked it over yet. It's 12 pages.

edit: Sigh, my linking skill has failed me. Just paste it into your address bar and go... and it's put a space into of "Introductory" (r y)at the end and won't let me edit it out... paste it, fix that and go.

messy wrote:

the book mentions that dragon magazine ran for over 400 issues. how did the author get that wrong?

Probably including the digital 4E Dragons.

thejeff wrote:

I dunno, we've always played with the characters being drawn into the main campaign arc from the beginning - often around the edges of the plot, but enough to set the hooks. It's worked for us.
Lots of classic fantasy stories work that way too.

The nice thing, from my point of view, is that you can have your characters initial motivations tied to the actual plot. You can use "Reluctant Heroes" and similar tropes. Rather than having to have characters who decide to start "adventuring" for different reasons and then need another hook to draw into the actual plot.

Oh, I agree, it can be done but I find it easier to set the hook in a developed character. It also allows the players more choice in the direction their characters are going to go. My PCs have walked away from epic plots. And wandered straight into others. Or just poked around and hung out with friends. A lot of players like choice in their character creation and advancement options, but don't worry too much about choices in what they do in the world (at least once the campaign starts). I've always found that odd. The most reliable way to draw players into an adventure is through their long term contacts within the setting. Players will "help a friend" or defend a place they like more readily than dive into an adventure without reason. They will dig into the mysteries of a place they are familiar with more readily than someplace they don't know. The more setting knowledge and context they have (the more buy in as it were) the better the adventure. I've run the same setting for over 40 years and it has worked for me with multiple generations of players.

Kobold Cleaver wrote:

This sounds right to me. So basically, oldschool roleplaying is a tabletop enactment of Cerberus Syndrome.

Pretty much :)

Complexity and danger build as the character became more complex and more powerful. Gritty day to day survival stories can happen in a dungeon or city for low level PCs. It builds character. And a lot of the stuff that happens to low level PCs can be funny. If occasionally fatal. More complex character driven stories take time to develop and epic stories do as well. Many APs try to do this (level 1-15+), but the epic intent is there from the start and I don't really see low level PCs as being epic material. They need to level up a bit and find their feet before they're eligible for the big time or could survive being involved with it. I see PCs percolating around the sandbox through the first 3-5 levels before they get into important stuff. Then it becomes reasonable for others (friends or enemies) to involve them. In the old days "modules" were rated by level (1-4, 5-8, 9-12 etc.) and there may, or may not, have been any connections between them (although some are famous for having that). The modules could be plugged into existing games, and many of my friends did this. I'm a bit weird -- I always did my own stuff. I always found it "fit" the setting better and often the amount of time necessary to adopt an adventure wasn't much less than doing your own.

As for content I think comedy, drama, romance and horror are all necessary for good character development :D

9 people marked this as a favorite.

I started in wargames (miniatures and board) and picked up playing D&D in 1974. I've said this before, as have others here, we didn't have backstories. The characters story was written in game. Partly it was a lack of information about the character. You had a vague idea about your fighter, he was a knight or a barbarian or a Viking or a hardened mercenary. You filled in the blanks while playing. Role playing came with knowledge of your character and his fellow adventurers. That took survival. Low level characters often had little detail to them. The character who made it to 4th or 6th level (or higher) became more "real". You had deeper story driven games with those higher level characters. My game, then and now, has a sandbox adventure area (dungeon, caverns, dark forest, etc.) where characters gain their first few levels. Players develop their characters ... character (as it were) on adventures and in town between them. As they go up in level (and have spent more time in the setting) they get more involved with the local NPCs, make friends and enemies, and do things beyond simple adventures. They wind up hip deep in a story driven game at that point. That's always worked for me (and my players).

This has always seemed fairly reasonable to me. I developed background generation systems DMing to give players a bit more information about their characters. They didn't do it, so I made up tables based on class and race. I still use them (players are free to roll or choose, always were. Nationality was also a table (or choose your own). You rolled characteristics, chose race, chose class, rolled / picked nationality and social background (tables based on class). I had to push this onto players who wouldn't have worried about how they fit into the setting. Not exactly a problem anymore :)

Personally I don't think it needs to get deeper than that for a new PC (although players are free to develop more). Fresh off the farm / manor house / squalid shanty / magical collegium characters probably don't have huge complex stories attached to them. Mostly anyway. They're beginners. Competent (hopefully), promising (maybe), inexperienced (definitely). They build that big story in game.

To me, that's old school. Ymmv, and I suspect does for pretty much everybody.

thejeff wrote:
CBDunkerson wrote:
Krensky wrote:
I've said it before, but I have to wonder how much of Fox's stubbornness regarding the Richards family is due Fox and Disney supposed positions on the opposite sides of the culture war.


Is Disney considered somehow 'progressive' in some lower circle of Hell that I am unaware of?

You're aware of it. We normally call it Fox. :)

Actually, I have no real idea if there's any truth to that. The entertainment side of Fox has always been less culture war driven than the news side.

As I recall, Fox does not have a "news division" anymore. Fox News is part of the Entertainment Division. Which might explain their version of the news...

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Douglas Muir 406 wrote:

Well, I can't really say that's "equivalent". I mean, it's nice. But it's two books. The PFSRD is 60+ books plus all rules, feats, NPCs and monsters from every module and AP, all lavishly hyperlinked to each other, and the whole thing regularly updated by a devoted fanbase. This is not really in the same class.

Doug M.

There's not that much 5E material yet. The two basic books and the Unearthed Arcana free articles are a good start though. There have been a half dozen (? 7 now) or so UA articles.

WotC hasn't finalized a license for 5E, so no equivalent to the PFSRD or SRD yet. And you won't get that until (and if) they settle licensing issues and determine what (if anything) is "open content". A lot of the current 3PP material is produced using the existing OGL. Except the WotC hardbacks produced by partners...

Personally I'm fine with the lack of material. It's not difficult to create / adapt things for 5E and I enjoy doing it myself.

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Krensky wrote:
That's why you should have bought a PS4. ;)

You meant PC right? :)

Ogre is a great game. Just tell them to read Keith Laumer's Bolo books. In one the Bolo is referred to as a "troll" by post apocalyptic humans. Hence the game "Ogre".

2 people marked this as a favorite.

A lot said about "old school" that I remember, some, not so much. Games differed. A couple of things I recall though and haven't seen too much on in this thread...

It wasn't about the PCs progression, it was about exploring a world. It could be a dungeon / nearby village or a massive city and huge setting but what was around the bend was important and unknown. And exciting. Exploration. And mapping it yourself :)

And character "story / backstory" really was written in game not pre game. What was important was what happened with your friends. That's where the stories were.

Campaigns weren't meant to go "1-20", they just went. Until they didn't.

Our games were sandbox, very little overarching save the world type stories. Possibly because getting to high level took forever without a "Monty Haul" DM :) Players set their goals in the world and the DM expanded his game to accommodate the players direction.

I run the same homebrew campaign today that I started with in original D&D. It's changed edition by edition (except 4th - I stuck with 3.5 and then PF). I'm not sure if it's really "old school" or "new". I'm immersed in it, it's built a history and mythology for itself. The adventures practically write themselves (and I have recycled material on occasion). And it saves me from spending a small fortune on adventure paths :D

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Kthulhu wrote:
It is representative of my deep and abiding love of kittens.

And how did you like them? Baked, fried, barbecued, kabobs... raw? Or was it in soup? Maybe as incense? :D

R_Chance. Random Chance. Been using variations on it for years. Played a lot of shooters with it (Doom series, Quake series, Unreal Tournament series, etc.). Got to the point where I answered to it. As for the avatar... I'm old, it fits :)

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Gark the Goblin wrote:
Bump. K6BD is on hiatus right now so it's a great time to catch up. White Chain is very good.

And I think I'll do just that...

1 person marked this as a favorite.
knightnday wrote:

Did I miss some postings or has anyone outside of DrDeth said anything about being an "OG"? I mean, I've seen people saying I've played since X years or Y box, but no one saying that they mowed Gygax's yard and was rewarded by him GMing a game for them, or having claimed to have written something for Chainmail.

I assumed "original gamer" was just another term for old timer myself. I started in 1974 but I wouldn't consider myself an "OG" in the sense of being in some kind of inner circle or being published, just an "old geezer" (I'm 56). OG in that sense would be a literal handful of people. We played Chainmail (both straight medieval and fantasy) and transitioned into D&D. No contact with GG and company other than buying the game from the FLGS...

Yea i mean... Im only 22. Some people have been playing D&D for longer than I have been alive. But I hate when my age seems to invalidate me because some old fart played first edition.

You missed my point (? or not?). My point was that young / old doesn't matter that much. Experience is useful for some things but knowledge is not limited to old farts like me. My problem is with any group being categorized as annoying / grumpy / etc. That's why I brought up my experience. I don't make it a habit of annoying people, bringing up arguments about the "good old days" or "the one true way to play". Despite my age / experience :) My experience is that there are annoying people in every group. Young. Old. In between. That's just people. You need to learn to let that go. No use being annoyed by certain people. Easier said than done, I know.

Besides, us *real* old farts started with the original D&D game... 1E is for youngsters :)

6 people marked this as a favorite.

I think generalization is a problem. About players. I've played D&D since 1974. Every version except 4E (I read it and decided to stick with 3.5), and, of course, Pathfinder. Among many other games. I manage to talk about it without, I think, being too annoying. There are grumpy, argumentative, dogmatic players of every age, play style and level of experience around here. Still not as many as on other sites I know.

2 people marked this as a favorite.
SmiloDan wrote:

Yeah, just level them up. Missing a session is punishment enough. No need to punish them further by making them struggle at below the average party level. Just level the playing field and everyone is happy. :-)

Some people actually want to play their characters through without being "boosted up". Check with the PC. If they don't want to start at the higher level look at the situation. If the difference is too great talk to the player and start them at a minimum level for survival. If their party has any brains they'll cover for them.

Of course I run a sandbox game (always have) and that makes a difference. I have adventure threads in the game, but if the players are careful they can manage a level difference. If you're running an AP that might be difficult. I can't say for sure (not running APs myself), but logically when you have an adventure requiring players be level "X" for threat "Y" that would seem to be the case...

Thank you.

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Seen and enjoyed. The critics complaints that it's tied to other Terminator movies / scenes and is "derivative" is misplaced. That's the point. Seeing the familiar and then having it play out differently is part of the fun.

As the title says, I would like to cancel my Pathfinder RPG subscription. I do not want the Occult Adventures book. Thank you.

Lol. Sorry, but thanks for the laugh :)

baron arem heshvaun wrote:
R_Chance wrote:
Canon is the six movies, The Clone Wars and, now, Rebels according to Disney. Anything else is a maybe. Disney made that announcement in April 2014 iirc. Anything else is a maybe / alternate thing.
The new novels are now considered as part of this umbrella.

Yep, and every thing going forward from post Disney Lucas Arts and licensees (comic books, novels, etc.). Given the variable nature of games outcomes I think they will be the exception.

Canon is the six movies, The Clone Wars and, now, Rebels according to Disney. Anything else is a maybe. Disney made that announcement in April 2014 iirc. Anything else is a maybe / alternate thing.

baron arem heshvaun wrote:

Yeah they are!

[The question from Return of the Jedi was deliberately leading councilor]

I figured it was. I just enjoyed watching the orbital bombardment too much to avoid mentioning it :)

Orbital bombardment judging by the in game footage :)

Rynjin wrote:
R_Chance wrote:
Albatoonoe wrote:

With Wolfenstein and now Doom, I wonder if it's too much to hope for a new Heretic/Hexen game...

Yeah. Hexen 3 would do nicely....

Fallout 4, Doom and Battlefront all look good. Now, I just have to figure out how to squeeze a few hours to play during the school year. I have a fairly heavy teaching load this coming year *sigh*

What do you teach?

Maybe there's a way to work it into your curriculum. =p

AP Government, AP US History and CP Government. A ton of grading and no explosions in sight... unless... Omaha Beach in Battlefront! Well, probably not a good idea.

Albatoonoe wrote:
R_Chance wrote:
Albatoonoe wrote:

With Wolfenstein and now Doom, I wonder if it's too much to hope for a new Heretic/Hexen game...
Yeah. Hexen 3 would do nicely....
As long as it's a reboot, yes. All the Serpent Riders are dead as of Hexen 2, and I'd certainly love to revisit them and all of their minions.

Oh, one of their minions bringing them back... something could be arranged :) Or hey, a new villain endangering the worlds... I'm easy. I loved that game.

Albatoonoe wrote:

With Wolfenstein and now Doom, I wonder if it's too much to hope for a new Heretic/Hexen game...

Yeah. Hexen 3 would do nicely....

Fallout 4, Doom and Battlefront all look good. Now, I just have to figure out how to squeeze a few hours to play during the school year. I have a fairly heavy teaching load this coming year *sigh*

Scythia wrote:

Hama wrote:

New PC. Trust me. You can always borrow a console.

The console has advantages. I don't have to worry if it will be able to run games that come out in two years, and my TV is bigger than my monitor.

Also I much prefer using a controller to mouse/keyboard.

It's a Bethesda game. Think mods. For the PC. The engine isn't the shiniest (in all likelihood so the mod community can keep up) so you don't need a monster gaming rig. The engine they used for the Elderscrolls games like Morrowind, Oblivion and Skyrim (and Fallout 3 / NV) allowed for a thriving mod community. As I recall it's the same engine being used in Fallout 4. So mods... :)

4 people marked this as a favorite.

I download my files, unzip them, rename the PDFs, drop them into organizational folders and put a copy on an external hard drive in case my laptop hard drive crashes. It's simple and not that time consuming. In short the present system works fine for me. I have zero interest in using cloud storage for proprietary files of any type or for any files I need access to at will. On the other hand I have no problem with other people having that option as long as I do not have to use it.

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Drejk wrote:

Terquem wrote:

Now we get stuck with adds when all we want to do is read a decent on line magazine

Thanks, Drizzt!

I don't want to read online magazine.

Once you download it, it's not online. It's just not paper. I miss the old days too. I have every issue of The Dragon / Dragon from #3 on (before it went out of print and turned 4E) and most of it's predecessor the Strategic Review. I wasn't all that impressed with the first couple of TD issues although the last Strategic Review was great. I've seen a half dozen other masgazines come and go as well. And I currently collect dead tree and pdf versions of Gygax magazine. Print magazines with an audience as niche as RPGs are not really profitable. Dragon+ (may) work because once it's done the only cost is bandwidth and it's an advertising tool. Some content swapped for you being targeted by ads which, after all, are for a product you are interested in and may very well spend money on. It's a pretty good strategy.

1 person marked this as a favorite.
houser2112 wrote:

LazarX wrote:

Unless you're trying to get brownie points with the Slashdot crowd, or get some use out of a computer that's a bit long in the tooth to run current Mac/Windows OS. there isn't a real compelling reason to run Linux as anything other than a dedicated server implementation such as a Plex media station for example.
I can think of at lea$t one very real compelling rea$on to run Linux in$stead of Mac/Window$ O$.

Depends on how much your time is worth. I used to build my own rigs too, but my last couple of gaming laptops (including the one I'm typing this on) have been Sager (or before that Alienware desktops). I don't know the current status of Linux, but it used to take a lot of putzing around with it. Or a dual boot. And then you find yourself spending most of your time in Windows. I know they were trying to reduce the amount of annoying that went with Linux. It was fun when I had the time though...

2 people marked this as a favorite.
thejeff wrote:

I'm running Linux. And Win7 at work.
I might be able to get it to run under wine, but I probably won't bother just to check it out.

When it would have been cheaper and easier to make it in some ebook format that anything can work with.

I haven't run Linux since before Win 7 myself. I skipped 8 / 8.1. Win 10 is looking very good however...

I think they are trying to reach as wide an audience as possible with Dragon+. They are starting with an app aimed at phones / tablets (ios or android). They are, apparently, planning on expanding to PC and Mac. They wanted to minimize their format issues (hence an app to present the content and make "subscriptions" possible. The subscription relieves people of the minimal effort required to otherwise find / download each issue. It ensures the maximum audience for Dragon+. Given that it is free, and essentially ad supported, they want to maximize their audience. The ads are essentially targeted at their audience as it is...

thejeff wrote:

So the PC version will be a Windows 10 specific application? Why? There are plenty of generic ereader type formats.

No, they were looking at doing a Win PC port before the Build Conference made it obvious that porting Android apps would be about as simple as the developer clicking a button and recompiling the code. They haven't specifically mentioned which version of Windows they were considering outside of mentioning the PC. Given the free upgrade from Win 7 and 8.1 to 10 (and the good reviews on Win 10 RC / preview) I'd imagine a lot of people will upgrade in any event. I skipped win 8 myself, but am planning on upgrading to Win 10.

*edit* And apparently just as easy for ios mobile apps to be ported to Win 10. I hadn't considered that (since I don't have any ios devices) but I thought I remembered it being so for ios and it is. Nice.

1 person marked this as a favorite.
thejeff wrote:

Kthulhu wrote:

R_Chance wrote:

So, you get free content and advertisement for other D&D related material that does cost.

So like any other magazine. Except free. And electronic.

You know, I'm pretty sure Dragon has always had ads. Even with that company with the golem logo was publishing it.

And, at least for the moment, only on the Iphone (or other I devices)

I can't comment on it because I can't read it.

You're giving it away for free. Put it up on the web where I can get at it.

It's up for ios now, soon for Android with PC coming later. Based on information about Win 10 it should be a simple port to it. Once you have the application it's dead simple to get the magazine. Just subscribe for free and you're good to go. There are a number of emulators that allow you to run Android apps on a Win PC for that matter (i.e. Bluestacks). I have an ASUS tablet I should update and dust off for that matter. I find phone screens too small for a good read.

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Forever Slayer wrote:

Steve Geddes wrote:

It's probably on mine, somewhere. :)

What I meant is that I wonder if they now require you to advise "in app purchases", even if it's free. As I say - I subscribed and there was no mention of a cost.

Perhaps, being more cynical, there's going to be a period of no cost so people get in the habit of checking it and then they'll introduce a nominal charge per issue "to meet costs we've been covering up until now".

I would say that the subscribe option means you will receive the mags which you will then have to pay a fee to get full access to each issue.

According to them: "Dragon+ is indeed free, and our plan is to keep it that way... Yes, the content will be free but there are ads that point to our products and partner products."

So, you get free content and advertisement for other D&D related material that does cost.

The quote is off an article on EN World about Dragon+. From WotC.

1 to 50 of 2,714 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2016 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.