|Paizo Pathfinder® Paizo Games|
|About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ|
Nope it is just that bad.
Then again it does work on things Knock does not. Ropes for example are called out in the Knock description as immune to knock. The Chime does not have that language so it will open a chest or portal that is tied shut.
Not that that is all as they say that but it is something.
A bully wants attention. Don't give it to them. Do not respond.
They might get more demonstrative as Dave Justus mentioned but just let it go by. Do not respond, let them get bored. They are obviously not enjoying the game as they need to pick on you for entertainment. Once you stop being entertaining then there is no reason for them to be there. They may well drop the game.
However, they are also likely to simply switch targets so you may need to be ready to support the next player they choose to annoy. Once multiple players have 'enjoyed' the bullies attention the calculus of loosing one player vs. losing 2 or 3 becomes clear.
Mind you this could matter to someone with the nature Oracle capstone.
The capstone allows the oracle to explicitly change their type to among other choices, animal. Say they did this, for whatever reason.
If they then get hit by a baleful and miss the saves. Unlikely but '1's happen.
Their druid buddy then goes to the trouble of casting Awaken. What happens?
Mint you to call this an edge case is a bit of an understatement.
If they found you you were not sufficiently paranoid.
Mind you that depends on your goal. Do you want to live, do you want to provide a level appropriate challenge for the party or do you want to cackle with glee as the other players cry over the record sheets of their now dead characters?
Different answers depending on the question but the basic idea is not to play the game your pursuers are playing. If nothing else they expect you to abide by established rules and tropes. Don't.
I am always a fan of Media res starts. Once started a game with "You are on fire, tell me why!" There is also a Feng Shui adventure out there that recommends starting play by screaming trash-talk at the players as it opens in the middle of an all city league volley ball game.
Of course then there is the mob-hit. And the hopping vampires.
I also recommend you either do not use traits or at least outlaw caster level traits for Sphere casters.
By divorcing Caster level from class level Sphere-casting throws CL related traits and feats for a bit of a loop.
Example: Magical Knack +2CL so long as CL does not exceed character level.
Any level works for me. I suppose it depends on what you (Tark) see as our (the
Is this a level one zero to hero tale? A level three established but not yet bad-ass story? Or are we level five and all out of bubblegum?
Also as at least some of us will be new to the system(s) involved perhaps a lower level start will be more forgiving considering the likely number of
Aha! Good call.
As far as I can see Scarlet Throne at least does not require you to be using a discipline weapon. Just not using a shield......
Or did I miss something?
Awesome, thanks Johnnycat93. Another quick question, do you have to be using the weapons associated with your disciplines, or are those just thematic?
That depends on the specific maneuver.
D20PSfrd site, Path of War section, Systems and use page, Martial disciplines paragraph. wrote:
same page, saving throw paragraph wrote:
The Discipline Focus Feat adds 2 dam when using a discipline weapon.
Also all Broken Blade maneuvers require the user either be unarmed or using a discipline weapon. On the plus side using Broken Blade with a discipline weapon grants +2 damage to all maneuvers.
...considers the ritual caster feat....
To be honest I don't think you should. It is another thing to track, and it muddies the waters of the Does-Sphere-magic work test. On the other hand it is nice to see real material components again. Admittedly a pulley (ant haul) and some wine (identify) lacks the confusing pungency of the ol' ball of bat guano (boom) but you work with what you got.
Aha! I must have an old version. Mine lists "Casting, traditions, magical potency, spell pool, tradition power,tradition benefit, tradition secrets" on the "special" section of the level one line of "Table:The Hedgewitch" on page 77. Does the current edition just drop potency or is something substituted?
Re the 0(1): Thanks, that was confusing me. Need more coffee!
It looks like we have quite enough in making people miserable through violence department.
So I was thinking of a wizard, if that will not step on the Warlock's toes. Or a Druid but I think the shapeshifting would play merry hell with the plot. Hard to keep someone on a ship who can turn into a bird or fish.
Speaking of the Warlock: HEY KatsuneSage! Please make your google doc public or otherwise enable us poor players to see your background and crunch.
Also wasn't there going to be a
Your Benevolent etc. wrote:
"... Good Cleric of Sarenrae ...."
Did they drop out?
hmmm so I am leaning Fighter depending on how the rest shake out. With options on Druid should more magic How many players are you looking for?
I was contemplating trying to talk you into allowing the Lore and Lords Vampire but given that we start on a ship..... Well that did not work out so well for Dracula now did it.
I think the Halfling cleric of Abadar it is then. The halfling section on the Players guide notes that we hairy footed buggers wash up in the River Kingdoms from all over so that works
hmmmm likely LG, or LN to tweak Aleria.
Now Issian or could House Garess work..... How much do you/does this AP stress politics? Will we miss much without noble PC's?
Greeting Greenlanders. Looking over the characters so far I am seeing a dearth of both noble blood and divine might.
Would a cleric of Abadar (Trade & Protection domains), noble scion of house Garess be welcome?
I know Abadar is not a major deity in the region but it would create a nice conflict with Erastil's inquisitor.
Could also go Erastil if Abadar is an issue though that might be over-egging the divine pudding.
Alternately should you want to avoid politics in this game the character also works as an Issian halfling priest of Hanspur looking to open up a new area for trade and maybe make a bit of Brevory into a halfling homeland.
Looking at a caster/support cleric. Though like any cleric able to hold the line with the fighters at least until the spells run out.
Let me know if the concept grabs you, I'll be fleshing it out as time passes.
I would love to GM one of these, but I want to ensure that there are enough people interested before I create the actual recruitment for one.
There are. Players are easy to find.
I personally recommend going for whichever one you feel best about. GM burnout is the real campaign killer in these parts.
Scott Wilhelm wrote:
Re rule sets: Assume no Unchained , no 3.5, and no 3pp.
Re:Punishing Kick: Wow those requirements are steep! It is pretty much a Monk/Brawler only feat and neither of them can flurry with the Hook-Hammer.
Re: Harder they fall. Nice but I really see another player giving up their action to help me attempt a trip. Maybe with a trip focused fighter but that is a big investment for a maneuver that can be ignored by so many monsters. Mind you a Maneuver Monk 1 / Lore Warden-Martial master X could likely make this work even with the -1CMB for a Gnome.
Purple Dragon Knight wrote:
Don't gnomes get Cha boost? Seems like a paladinX/unchainedrogue4 would work well. Dex to damage plus sneak plus debilitating injury with effortless lace, all of that stacking with the pally damage bonus? And healing and good saves etc.
No access to Unchained, sounds really interesting. Though TWF paladins seem even more feat starved than a Ranger.
Thought of that but you don't really get anything other than the SA and the avoiding the 13 Int requirement for feats from Striker.
Internal Alchemist-Vivisectionist however brings Mutagen and extracts to the party. Plus Sneak attack and the whole needing to breathe only a couple times a day thing which while not being amazing does seem more Gnomish than just being able to hit things a bit better.
Is dipping for one level to get 1d6 sneak attack worth the loss of one BAB?
The, on average, +3 damage seems worth it with the freebooter getting and granting an extra +2 vs flanked enemies at character level 5. (Sneak attack providing class1/Ranger5)
Add in Freebooters bane and at character level 6 my gnome is granting themselves and their flank partner +3 to hit +1 damage. Add in the normal +2 for flank and TWF power attacking starts looking viable. Heck at +5hit +1damage 1d3 augmented SM/SNA 1 critters could fill open flank spots to decent effect.
Toss in a Bard adding a +2/+2 competence performance and one is looking at +7 to hit +4 Damage. I feel the occasional move action is worth granting a summoned eagle 3 +10/1d4+5 attacks a turn. This makes a first level spell a threat that a CR6 something w/o DR will need to remove.
At least that is what I see.
The freebooter is party dependent, Freebooters bane is just inferior Weapon training with out folks to multiply the effect but is that really a large problem with 4-6 person parties?
Or perhaps it is just impossible to solve the damage issue w/o sneak attack.
Tried a 7th level build and was looking at 12/7/12 with a +1/+1 hammer before either Freebooter bonus or Power attack, but was only pulling +4/+4/+2 damage.
Best case, both Freebooter bonuses active and power attack looked like +16/+11/+16 with +10/+10/+6 which beats the un-buffed iconic fighter but that is not saying much.
At the same level a Slayer is getting +2/+2 self only as a swift and adding a d6 sneak
so best result assuming otherwise identical build would be +14/+9/+14 and assuming a (4 on SA die) +14/+14/+10 which is a marked improvement.
Hmmmmm I wonder if +1d6 sneak is worth a level delay? Perhaps via Vivisectionist? Hmmm Internal Alchemist/Vivisectionist 1. Freeboter X.
Hmmm what comes faster? Freebooters Bane, move action to grant you and all allies within a 30' burst +1/+1 vs a selected target, Bonus increases by +1 every 5 levels, is a level one ability.By level seven the Freebooter is granting the party +2/+2 vs the selected target. That party wide bonus is tough to beat. I will happily allow that the Slayer will have better solo numbers but how to factor in the Thief hitting more often, or the Wizard's ray's hitting more and harder, or summoned creatures.
It gets even tougher when you consider Freeboter's bond (4th level, move to grant +2 to hit to any ally flanking with the Freeboter or anyone else effected by this ability.) Now you and your flank partner are each getting +6/+2 untyped against the main target.
Is this something like the fireball vs haste thing? Fireball will let the Wizard do more damage on their own but with a party haste is the more damaging choice.
Eh likely a 6 of one half dozen of the other thing. Slayer far better if you are the sole Martial/semi-martial in a group but Freeboter for groups.
Yes I love that old school vibe!
Strength: 4d6 ⇒ (1, 5, 1, 6) = 13 drop the one for 12
Yes a perfect zero point build!!!
Hmmmm Str & Wis are double digit so why not a dwarf cleric!
God, Torag protection and good domains.
This looks quite interesting.
The system needs to be hashed out, but I was thinking of giving downtime between missions. This can either be used for crafting or to earn extra gold.
The simplest way would to use Edward Sobel's idea of reequipping to WBL between adventures. The gm's character is just assumed to be on another adventure off-screen. This avoids penalizing the gm by shorting loot/xp and avoids penalizing the players who could not access the "GMs only" downtime club.
I would also recommend dropping xp as something you need to tack. If the adventure you want to play is level 3 then *poof* all the characters are level 3. Fast and simple, It may mean some rebuilding if GM a ran a lvl10 adventure and then GM b wants to run a lvl5 but I have yet to see players turn down a chance to rebuild. Or players could have a different character for each gm.
I also wonder if different GMs can have different rules? Say one GM dislikes psi, or Synthesist summoners, or Gnomes, or the color green, could each gm ban or allow as they see fit? This might result in players having more than one character, but if all inactive characters are treated like the GM's character this should not pose a problem. This idea could even be expanded to allow differing GMs to use different game systems.
So the slayer drops Favored Enemy in favor of the Freebooter's version except it only helps the Salyer and drops all spells for sneak attack.
At least that is what I am seeing is this correct? Sneak attack is a big help for a TWF but is is worth losing spells? Or am I missing something?
Gnome weapon focus is on the list of wanted feats.
So I am wondering if it is possible to build an effective gnome martial who uses the hook hammer as a double weapon.
I am not looking for an awesome fighter I know all the other races are better at this than poor gnomes but I am wondering if an effective gnome hook hammer artist can be built.
Would like to see:
~Freebooter ranger and using Bond to the land and Fey magic gnome racial traits to supplement Rangers Favored terrain.
~Going TWF fighter and focusing on as many of the gnome or small size feats as can fit.
So can it be done? Can a Gnome wielding their racial weapon be an effective party member?
Maybe but it takes active buy in from the party and GM to make non-violent options available.
How does the pacifist feel about the party slayer coup de graceing the folks who you went to the trouble of enchanting/sleeping/beating to unconsciousness?
How does the party Hooded Champion/sniper feel about trying to one shot mooks from cover being off the table?
Does the GM need to create prisons. Would Sandpoint, which offers a bounty on Goblin ears, bother to leave the greenskins alive if our pacifist brought a string of goblin prisoners into town?
A pacifist in Pathfinder is largely just outsourcing the bloodletting.