I'm doing a similar character (fighter rogue). Some suggestions:
armor expert trait and sash of the war champion. With that you go to -1 ACP (an alchemical item can make that 0) and move full speed in mithril plate.
Power attack and furious focus will go a long way for you, as would an eventual headband of ninjitsu.
I'd suggest swapping the falchion for something with more direct damage. Crits aren't great for you as they'd be for the fighter, simply because you're going to be relying on stacking S.A. damage in.
The armiger's panoply or folding plate would be good options to let you armor up quickly and stay without when sneaking/acrobatics/roguey stuff needs to occur. Both let you equip full armor and a shield as a move action.
Unbreakable fighter archetype gives you end. and die hard early on, which is a small bank of extra hit points to go on if the fight goes bad.
In my build I went for a literal 1-hit wonder (usually only attacks once in combat, but that attack is gonna hurt).
By level 12 (fighter 1/rogue 10/sleepless detective 1) I use the scout archetype to S.A. with vital strike anytime I move for 2d8 + 15 + 8d6 (+2 vicious longsword and S.A.) + 6 bleed. Not a stunning DPR, but tie that in with all the skill points and an AC of 30 (+3 plate and +2 shield, 14 dex, and ring of prot +2) and the ability to still full round attack when position allows and it's fantastic.
Rest of the group is a party-buff focused bard (yay), archery-based fighter, beast totem pounce-barbarian with a falchion, and a witch.
So far I've been the scout and tank/wizard killer. I take the flanking buddy when I can get it, but with the bard and average damage I'm doing about 50-60 a hit with a single move S.A. or a feint.
I was thinking plain rogue would get me a few interesting things (I took the familiar talent for funsies, at 11 rogue the familiar gets to talk to all other animals of its type. I've done interesting things with characters that had that in the past).
Thought with the monk was a 1 level dip in MOMS for crane style (going up to 34 AC for -2 to hit when I always deny dex isn't bad...) and taking flyby attack (since overland flight is always active during the day).
That would mean perpetual flying S.A. with a retreat to relative safety each round
Interesting, though I can't do brawling armor (using full plate).
I like the crane style, at least the first feat (sword and board character means I don't get a free hand to fight with.
I do like the idea of fighting defensively and getting a persistent +4 to AC (or +7 if I kick on combat expertise with it) in fights. Might make the monk more worthwhile than more roguery.
I had been considering sleepless detective as well
So here's the deal. Character was made for a one-off which kind of..kept going. Now he's level 11 and I have no idea how to advance him. Here's what I got
Fighter 1/Rogue 10 (all stats are with magic stuff) (unbreakable and scout archetypes)
Str 23 (level up is going here)
Dex 14
Con 16
Wis 10
Int 14
Cha 12
HP 106 (I've rolled...well)
Feats: End, Die Hard, Power Attack, Furious Focus, Vital Strike, Combat Expertise, Improved Feint, Skill focus (bluff)
Current strategy is going unarmored/unarmed and activating armiger's bag (summon armor to self as standard action) and using a glove of storing to draw armor, shield, and a sword for ambushes. I use full plate and a shield.
The focus of the character has been getting one big hit pretty much every time (it's extremely rare that I don't sneak attack and vital strike in one go).
Clearly this isn't optimized for anything but that big single hit (it was a level 5 1-off...so yeah). I've beefed up bluff to get around most conversation bits, as well as sense motive. UMD is high enough to cover wands and level 5 and under scrolls with no worry. AC is 30 with armor and a shield, 36 fighting defensively with C.E.
Continuing with Rogue keeps some of my damage going and allows for more talents. Any other interesting options?
Nothing happens for a couple days. It's ignored. Maybe he gets cocky about this, maybe not.
Then the PC gets called off for a solo assignment (something silly, cleaning/sorting supplies/etc) during a quiet period. The commander happens to be nearby.
The PC falls down some stairs. Headfirst. five to ten times.
The commander remains in a very good mood for the next few days.
4d6+3 only averages 17 damage (and that's when you sneak attack). For a level 9 character, that's a joke.
A level 1 Fighter with Power attack, a Greatsword, and 18 Strength deals 2d6+9 (16 average). So, under the right conditions, you can just barely out damage a character 8 levels below you...
I think you're kind of in trouble all around here and not much is going to help you. If you're dead set on this character, I'd also have to recommend Pressure Points, so at least you can contribute something with Strength damage.
I love incredibly condescending nonsense!
you know 4d6+3 x3 (you know, because we established this character has several attacks) is an average of 51, right? That would be...just under half a CR 9's hit points? And that's with a fantastic debuff (blinding, which means those attacks will stick, and so will everyone else's) and a skill-monkey character? Yup, clearly that's awful.
...
The last rogue I built got a lot of mileage off of the climb speed trick. It's amazing how often you can get out of trouble just by going 20' up in a room. The natural +8 coupled with any ranks in climb means you can also autosucceed on just about any tough climb (9 ranks in climb +3 class skill +8 for climb speed = 30 when taking 10, so you climb..everything).
Stat damage is pretty rad, though.
I'd suggest staying rogue as the better S.A. damage and mountain of skill points work nicely with what you already have. If you're set on having some sort of magic for flavor just go for the minor and major magic talents and a bunch of UMD. If nothing else major magic gives you things like shield, which can be useful for you.
Longspears are cheap, simple, and easily distributed to the guards and a militia composed of miners (read level 1 experts with a str bonus)
A commoner with a 12 str, a (dirt cheap) longspear, and the highground advantage obtained from standing on a wall has a 50% to hit a normal orc each round for an average of 6 damage. As in all of that orc's hit points. Being high up on a wall can also provide partial cover against archers, meaning bowman or thrown javelins won't be as big of a threat.
Split the miners into shifts as militiamen and have them support your guardsmen after drilling with longspears.
If you have 50 guardsmen with good equipment (say basic chainmail armor, longspears, and crossbows) they can run the walls in shifts of 15 (with 5 floaters to cover illness/etc) and repel any number of invaders. Chain + high ground on its own puts your guards to the point where orcs need absurdly good rolls to make hits count. Issue each a heavy woooden shield. In the event of a raid/breach the frontrunners form up and go total defense with shields and short spears (AC 21 without a dex bonus) while the rear line (militia) spears everything to death.
The cleric can (with some expense) maintain a glyph of warding on the main gates. This has enough AOE damage to obliterate a squad approaching the gates themselves.
Considering you have a mine and (potentially) ample time to fortify, have the cleric use stoneshape to bolster wooden walls with stone. As the walls are magically shaped they'll be absurdly difficult to climb.
Depending on the terrain and how kind your DM is the ranger and druid might be able to pair up to bring in some domesticated animals. Bears are pretty good at wreaking havoc on an enemy. The big prize would be getting a Gray Render to consider the village its protected "pet."
I think with a wall and spearmen/archers alone you'll prove to be too annoyingly difficult for an average band of raiders to take. Even warmongers won't attack a fortification if it means losing 50% or more of their troops with only a small chance of success.
Not a halfling, but in an old 3.5 game a tribe of kobolds was guarding the MaGuffin the party needed. The fighter was a bit of a bruiser and figured he could obtain leadership through a single combat challenge.
Out comes the leader and most powerful warrior in the village, the kobold barbarian.
After the requisite laughter and taunting the fight begins. Kobold wins initiative (dex bonus and imp. init, fighter had neither), rhino charges the fighter (he had that hide armor, because who needs AC?), and put him into a small crater with his monkey-gripped greatsword.
The party found a diplomatic approach to the kobolds instead.
So instead of 1-2 characters a bard now buffs everyone with haste and inspire in round 1?
And everyone can do solid damage, magic or not?
And everyone has a big hefty hit point bank?
Yeah, I've done that game. 2 battle clerics (16 wis and str focus on both), fighter, rogue, and me as the bard. AOE wasn't an issue because we put out something like 400 DPR as a group. Before I dropped a round to buff everyone. Phantom steeded everywhere after a while.
Limiting magic is going to essentially make a combat monkey game, and if the party has a whole avenue of defense they have to worry about far less that party becomes FAR more powerful.
Unless every single villain is a primary caster, in which case it's a "the party can't have nice things" campaign, and those tend to be less fun.
For a single target Plane shift is far more dangerous. It can hit a single creature touched, willing or not. Send Gug to elemental plane of fire, use rest of round to have a sandwich.
Okay, I'm gonna have to call BS on this one. There's no way eating a sandwich is less than a full-round action.
Well, the example's too generic anyway. First we need clarification on whether it's a standard sandwich, or whether we're using one of the sandwich archetypes from Ultimate Lunches.
My fault for not being clear. My caster in question has the feat "quickened om nom nom" and keeps a gyro in his glove of storing.
Barbarian at 10th gets the ability to charge 80 feet (read, anywhere on the map in most fights) and full attack something. Add in greater trip and the Barbarian will likely 1-shot most bad guys.
Hard to end the fight with a spell if the giant horrible rage monster won initiative and murdered you.
That's the first thing that comes to mind. Every class had a challenge to overcome at the mid level. For casters that's defense. For martial that's maneuverability.
I might suggest a fighter 1/rogue 6 (scout archetype) mix. Here's why:
Access to all martial weapons/armor etc. You are now a rogue in full plate. What? You weren't stealthy, anyway.
Improved feint via fightery feats (max bluff. Skill focus, traits, etc. You want all the bluff, more on that later).
When you can invest in vital strike. Buy boots of striding and springing to offset plate movement penalties. Power attack and furious focus for other feats, anything else you want. (with a human doing this you have 3 feats at level one, 3rd level feat, 5th, 7th, and a few rogue talents to spend)
You now charge and sneak attack things with a falchion. As you use power attack and furious focus your to-hit never drops and the damage becomes nice, and uses your SA dice at every opportunity. Every other round you feint and sneak attack the bad guy (using vital strike later as available).
The rogue talent for perception offsets your wisdom and allows for trapfinding/general roguery. Offensive Defense means you have a constant bonus to your AC all fight long. If you're allowed multiple archetypes take the unbreakable fighter to stay on your feat longer in a fight (gogo gadget die hard).
It isn't optimal damage, as you're focused around always hitting once, but it is fun. Your feint check will let you virtually always SA humanoids, but the DC is far more difficult against animals, etc.
OK I'll admit I missed the "can climb corners discount" bit. However...
The incident I was talking about was my players casting Hungry Pit on a Gug.
Even if the Gug can get up the 100 feet it will take it 3 rounds at best. The Gug takes 16d6 to 22d6 damage (an average of 56-77 damage), is removed from doing anything for 3 rounds at at the end of all that is standing around like a lemon for anyone to beat up.
On top of all of that you have a strategically placed an obstacle on the battlefield that no-one wants to go near.
Tell me any other 5th level spell that controls the battlefield, does direct and continuous damage and takes three actions to get out of? I can't think of one. Even Black Tentacles (rightly regarded as a very powerful spell) can fail if the grapple check is low.
Too powerful, banned.
If a 20th level caster (pit is 10ft deep/2 levels) drops something nasty on a CR 10 bad guy I hope it puts him down. I mean, you have what, 12 more where that came from for the encounter, right?
On top of that you have a 10x10 monster with a 15 foot reach falling into a 10x10 pit. At minimum I'd give him a climb check to catch the slope on the way down and bypass the spell entirely.
Also any other giant can make an acrobatics check (significant bonus to jumping with a movement speed above 30) to simply bypass it entirely. To clear the pit with a +5 (the gug) he needs a...6? 11 if you're concerned about the slope?
You want a worse option? Black tentacles on top of the freedom of movemented fighter who sits in the radius. Doesn't matter if the grapple fails later, bad guy eats a full round attack.
Summon weapon-immune swarm and fly out of reach of ground-bound bad guys. They die.
For a single target Plane shift is far more dangerous. It can hit a single creature touched, willing or not. Send Gug to elemental plane of fire, use rest of round to have a sandwich.
Cue several rounds of the BBEG making flatulence sounds at the GS with his mouth until the GS closes to get a full attack in the face.
Lots of permanenced silent images of walls in the area. BBEG knows about them and doesn't need to make a save. party does.
Mirror images is always nice.
Fight defensively with acrobatics (+3 dodge bonus to AC) and use combat expertise. Most BBEGs have absurd to hit bonuses, turn that into dodge to AC.
Also, the bane of the GS/archer? Significant DR and elemental immunity. They have classes based around doing huge damage through multiple hits. Each hit multiplies that DR.
+1 for mad monkeys completely shutting down spellcasting
Vanish is very short-term, but amazing as a first-level spell. Particularly for a bard. 5 rounds to buff if we're ambushed? yes please.
Threefold aspect is one of the best witch spells available. Huge potential stat buffs and free disguise with a 24 hour duration.
Arrow eruption can be a fireball for rangers. Seen it used to great effect.
Seek Thoughts lets the no-charisma caster be useful during the information gathering session
Share language is a great scroll to have handy for diplomacy with unusual creatures
Vengeful outrages is a fantastic buff to hit the fighter/barbarian/etc. with right before you fight the BBEG. Yes, it's not meant as a buff, but it works nicely that way.
I'd give the barb 2-3 combat options instead of TWF/S&B feats. Maybe PA and TWF so he can open up with a longspear and close in with 2 spiked gauntlets (also gives the guy some more flavor with odd weapon choices). Give him the DR archetype to make the rogue feel good about backstabbing.
You can actually drop the CR of the elite bodyguards if they act intelligently. Maybe a 3rd-4th level shaman (witch or oracle) that buffs the boss?
The BBEG needs minions and/or an advantageous encounter. Remember, intelligent undead have decades, even centuries to plan. They're going to have an escape plan, a whole host of nasty tricks, and know when to avoid a fair fight if at all possible. A few ghoul minions and a 3rd-level minion that keeps desecrate running when the traps on the way to his chambers warn of impending adventurers. Or dump one of his knowledges for UMD and get a whole host of useful scrolls.
My witch for a campaign a while ago wound up being named "The Artificer." Not his original name, I just wound up with a LOT of crafting feats.
He didn't sign a pact or anything else, he had magical parents who acquired a fey protector (yes, Dresdenish, was before I read the books).
'Art' spent fifteen of his first twenty-five years as a raven, in the protection of a flock. The queen of them was his protector, and over time he came to know and befriend the one that would become his familiar.
Most of his abilities were tied into this. His protector had the power to kill with a thought, he learned its lesser form (slumber hex). He had the flight hex (naturally), and had max ranks in appraise (an...unhealthy attraction to baubles and shiny objects from his prior years). And while he was good at mingling with the flock (crowd) and getting his way, he had very little sense of the way the world worked.
That was how the party found the odd 'wizard' who traveled with a number of magical baubles and wore a patchwork cloak composed of seven different materials, dozens of different thread, and had all manner of trinkets sewn into it.
So, I'm putting together some ideas for this and thought I'd crowdsource:
Say you're a reasonably high-level mystic theurge (CL 16 or 17). Your adventuring party has largely disbanded, and being the knower of all things you've been entrusted with a number of powerful (and potentially very dangerous) artifacts.
Time passes and your grow older. In your twilight years you come to two realizations:
1. You will have no heirs
2. You will need to find a way to protect these artifacts.
Phneri- Rending Claws + rending fury grants +1d6 dmg if half the required attacks hit and can only be done once per round. So you'd only be getting 1d6 a round, but it would be off of one claw attack. Also, I think lowering the bite attack from -5 to -2 seems fairly worthwhile? D4+1/2 str +Power attack? You really think it wouldn't be worthwhile?
Ah, you're right, I did misread that.
Well, figuring 20 str while raging and power attack, by level 4 that bite would do d4+4 damage. By 8 it's doing d4+5.
Your main atack is at +10 to hit, the bite is +5. Multi-attack puts you at +8, which takes the chance to hit with that from 25% to 40% (ish).
Weapon focus (claw) takes your main attacks from 50% to 55%, and those are doing double damage and rend.
rending claws is terrible, it has nothing to do with its cool brother, two weapon rend: you only get an additional d6 a round. For the same reason you should stay clear from rending fury too.
Rending claws + rending fury = 2d6 extra damage a hit, which isn't shabby.
It isn't as good as two weapon rend because it doesn't cost 3 feats, 17 dex, and is available long before level 11.
Raging vitality is a poor use of a standard action for a character meant to do a ton of damage fast.
I'd honestly drop Dex to 12, or 14 at least. 16 strength benefits your hit and damage both and your barbarian doesn't need AC; he has hit points and DR. On that note more Con gives you a better fort save, more hit points, and more rage. All of these you want.
Ideally I'd say go for this:
Half-Orc (we'll get to that) Barbarian
Str 16
Con 14
Dex 12
Int 13*
Wis 10*
Cha 10
One of your traits can be Toothy, which opens up a rage power. This also gives you a non-raging natural attack.
The 13 int lets you take combat expertise and a trip ability.
Alternately 13 wisdom and half-orc opens up Keen Scent as a feat, which gives your Barbarian scent (extremely nice and fits with the were-creature theme).
Regarding rage powers I'd ditch strength surge unless you're going for combat maneuvers. Superstitious opens up a possible path to witch hunter (you want witch hunter) and offers some really nice bonuses during combats.
I'd also ditch multi-attack, as the bite attack simply doesn't do the damage output the claw attacks do. Eldritch claws would fit well for 8th (claw attacks considered magic and silver, take that DR!).
Improved Sunder + the Smasher rage power can open up some really, really mean options in melee, as you're always going to win the fight when the other guy's unarmed.
Finally, your character may be swimming in cash by later levels, as you're not buying weapons. I'd definitely keep a masterwork something around for emergencies (a scimitar or other 1h weapon you can 2h opens up options). Rhino Hide armor could be fun for the character, particularly later when you get pounce.
Just some thoughts. For traits I'd look for bonuses to knowledge (nature) and survival, as those both kind of fit your theme.
Geas. Lesser geas for the low-level guys (meaning you have a 7th-level warden on staff with an 11th level court wizard, etc. for the big guys).
"You may not use magic or leave this place"
if you don't like geas for this hit the offender with Mark of Justice. Spellcasting triggers the mark and either drops the caster's primary stat by 6 points or makes him babble incessantly every other round.
Mark of Justice requires a 9th level caster on hand.
Or bestow curse works from a 5th level cleric or witch. Dropping the sorceror's charisma by 6 and taking away his magic doodads essentially removes the majority of his power. His new CHA is 12? 14? That effectively cripples any sorceror who'd be imprisoned by 5th level characters who don't call in backup from the 7th or 9th level folk.
The argument that an ability cant be broken because I know this other spell/ability that I can stockpile 5-6 times a day thats REALLY REALLY broken is laughable. I hope you guys enjoy your games, they dont sound fun.
Good to see you getting enough confidence after a couple online games to become arbiter of what's fun/broken and not :)
You're missing the point. How many posts do you see complaining about black tentacles? Feeblemind? Summoning swarms immune to weapon damage against low-level mobs?
Those powers are largely considered fine. They are also substantially stronger than slumber in a variety of ways. This is a thing you should ponder before calling something broken, cheesy, etc.
Theorycrafting abilities in isolation isn't useful without considering the context of said ability. The above example does so, and is why I consider slumber totally fine. I also don't become dismissive or insulting when doing so.
Wow a 10th level Wizard with 5 or 6 Black Tentacle spells. No wonder Phneri doesnt see the Slumber Hex as overpowered.
I didn't declare 28 Int to be the standard for a 10th-level PFS character, J-Tone did so he could try to argue the save DCs are too hard. I'm just making use of it :)
Bluff skills works well with disguise self, alter self, and what other folks have said. It also offers some interesting potential synergy with suggestion...
At later levels things like dominate person, feeblemind, bestow curse, baleful polymorph, etc. can be useful.
As in "oh serving girl, the (dignitary I want to kill and had arranged to visit) seems to not be in his office, could you summon him after you dispatch of this nasty little mouse that seems to be in his chair?"
A combat option for the noncombatant might be to go with the summoning route. Summon/vomit swarm, summon monster #, etc. Sending forth your minions to do the dirty work and all.
Additionally when comparing it to spells there are far more defensive options to make an encounter more interesting than the every fight, supernatural effect of the Slumber Hex.
Anyway, this has gone round and round. Ive made my point several times and the fact that this is still such a hot issue over a year after the APG release should inform people on why its relative power level.
This has gone round and round the same reason 2h weapon + armor spikes, double weapons, trip, etc. have gone round and round. People want to keep talking about it.
I'll leave you with this. You say Slumber is overpowered because it's an unlimited (no it isn't) win the fight.
Black tentacles: No save, no SR, just a grapple check v. every thing in the area. This will beat virtually any medium-sized opposition. A wizard with the int stats you described earlier has 5 or six of these a day. Lasts as long as slumber, hits a MUCH larger area, and can be done from a safe distance (or while invisible)
Feeblemind: Allows SR because it's permanent. Will end the fight immediately. Wizard gets up to four of these a day. Can hit from 200 feet out (almost 3x the range of slumber).
When a similar-level primary spellcasters can have 9 or more options per day (please, please try to tell me all your PFS games run 10+ encounters a day) to immediately end a combat with a single spell at 200 feet away, often while flying and invisible, I find it baffling that you pick on a substantially weaker at-will ability to call broken.
I swiped this from something but I'm more than happy to use it for my own purposes.
Big locked door to magic doodab/plot/etc. To the side of the door is a statue of a hooded, skeletal figure. One hand is outstretched to a game board, on which eleven discs sit. The inscription reads:
"Take one, two or three, but be left with none at the end. Fail and you shall come to great harm."
The players must take one, two or three discs. The magical effect makes one, two, or three vanish each time they select. The goal is to force the gatekeeper to take the last piece, otherwise the player is hit with a harm spell cast by a 20th level cleric.
Solution:
This is basically a glorified combination lock, as only one move set will allow a good player to lose when going second. The players must start by taking 2 pieces, leaving 9. After the other side takes a number, the players must take a number of pieces that leaves the total remaining at five. At this point the other side cannot win.
At a con 4th Ed delves were being run, I was looking to introduce a couple friends to dice rolling and shenanigans, but lines were present. After discussing the issue (5 of the volunteer GMs had run way too long at lunch) I wound up with a kit, six people, and a game to run.
One delve later everyone had tokens, we all had a good time, and I got a GM screen for my trouble. It was good times.
More recently I got e-mails from some of the players in my bi-weekly hack n' slash game. I had started running for the group, though my games tend to be a bit more story-focused and less about lots and lots of combat. I've since gotten e-mails from half the group happy about the options they have in a game and interest in elements of the story and crazy subplots (that I largely make up on the spot). It's pleasing.
Equipment: Full plate +1, Falchion +1, MW armored coat, Heavy Warhorse, Cloak of Resistance +1, 1 potion of invisibility, 2 potions of bulls strength, 1 potion of heroism, 1 potion cure moderate wounds 900 GP in gems (pay)
Nathan's a mercenary who works with a small band (4-6 Goons, the NPC database has a nice entry for this). He knows he's slow but quite dangerous on his single hits (Nathan either charges for sneak attack damage or uses his improved feint to get a sneak attack). When reduced to 10 HP or less he'll down his potion of invisibility and either sneak attack the toughest remaining target after healing, or flee.
So basically your countering with an argument that I can paraphrase as Not only can my witch end fights with the Hex ability but it can do all sorts of other awesome stuff that an equal level Wizard can do.
Only if I get to paraphrase your argument by saying you don't like the slumber hex because you don't understand the game system?
You've had alternatives to this pointed out to you over and over that you simply don't want to address. Slumber IS limited, in both range, type of target, number of targets, and duration. There are significantly more powerful combat control abilities that virtually every primary spellcaster has access to, as that is the spellcaster's job.
And yes, as your ENTIRE argument has been based on "PFS bad guys don't have will omg!" I think you should leave your point to that. The second we discuss a freeform game your argument becomes moot, as you've been given a dozen options to build a challenging encounter that bypasses slumber or makes it a power, not a game-ender.
Pathfinder combat isn't 4E D&D. You don't all pile in your special moves on the bad guy until he drops. The system is deadlier, for NPCs and PCs alike.
Human fighter with quick draw, catch off guard and throw anything.
His weapon of choice? The bear trap. He opens combat by throwing a bear trap at the nearest opponent, and in combat smacks people with armed bear traps.
Or he just takes the charge (cuz he has AC and HP) and then full attacks immediately after.
Not sure your getting Full Attacks after a charge unless you mean the next round, by which time the Slumber Hex has at least a 50% chance on KOing the opponent given the examples I used before. Also the melee fighter is still contending with ACs, DR and other potential issues the supernatural ability of the Slumber Hex completely bypasses.
The fighter can choose to eat a charge from an enemy that will do minimal damage, then full attack. The Barbarian can full attack anyone within 80 feet, the archer can full attack anyone within 120 feet.
Slumber, again, has a range of 30 feet.
Yes, damage has a downside. The upside is it outright KILLS the opponent, instead of disabling him for a short number of rounds.
The slumber hex is rendered moot by a variety of racial options, a will save, or a nearby friend. It also doesn't actually kill the opponent.
J-Bone wrote:
My use of the 10th level witch using a Slumber Hex was to show its ability. Im not looking to expand this conversation with apple and oranges debated about every spell or ability in Pathfinder. Its a good example point but it can easily be examined at lvls 1,4 or even 14.
It's not apples v. oranges. Its using other available abilities to point out that far more often than not slumber is outshined by a whole host of other spells available to the witch, regardless of level. This will continue to be true whether you want to debate it or not.
J-Bone wrote:
Anyway, you ask about my experience with them, as someone who plays a lot and runs a lot of PFS both online and at Cons I have seen this particular weapon be a game-ender many many times. In PFS you may (guesstimating based on the scenarios I've played/run 60% chance), have minions that can use their standard action to wake up the victim of the Slumber Hex but your chances for that are mitigated by the higher party initiative scores.
So no specific examples, then? Allow me to provide a few.
At level 3 the party encountered a half-dozen undead. The witch had..burning hands, I think? Beyond that it was levitating and dropping alchemical items.
At 4th the slumber hex went off successfully against the midboss fighter/anti-paladin. He missed the save by about 2. And almost made the upcoming fort save. Mild success, enabled because the party was smart and managed to get around a number of mooks.
At 8th the party encountered a mixed group of humanoid archers, casters, and fighters. Slumber was never used, because things like vomit swarm and black tentacles were FAR more effective at crowd control.
at 12th level we encounter the BBEG wizard. Feeblemind. One of his minions got slumbered the next round. Its damage output would have easily 1-shotted the witch.
These were the four of the several dozen encounters I can recall in a campaign where the witch really shined. Only one of those was due to the slumber hex.
And if everyone is taking a trait and feat to get a +6 to an initiative rolls, there should be a benefit. Again, the witch is feat poor and likely not high on dex.
Started a 3.5 game with a new GM. Was told it was a crazy high-power game. Lots of splatbook stuff, lots of absurd stats.
I said ok, I have a charisma character, I have the crazy campaign, let's go warlock.
Yes, warlock. Now, this is the party full of PHB2 characters and other assorted nonsense, so I figure no worries.
We do our first encounter against a pile of orcs. Everyone murders 1 (or 2) in the first round. I look at the one coming at me and hit him with the shatter SLA, breaking his falchion.
GM HALTS the game.
GM "What ability is that?"
Me "it's (blah blah don't remember), basically gives me shatter as an at-will ability
GM "Whoa, at will? you mean you can do that all the time?"
Me "yes, against nonmagical items with a save (if they're held). It's one of the five or six abilities I'll get ever"
GM "I'll have to think about that."
We finish out the combat. At the end of the game
GM "Yeah, that's too strong, It'll have to bee 4x a day max"
Me "..."
Wound up rerolling an Orc (yes, full Orc) barbarian who monkeygripped an oversized greataxe. No objections at all.
1. Play more Pathfinder Society and you'll see how rare it is that the BBEG is one of monster classification immune to sleep.
2. A fighter on the first round generally has to move into position so he wont get that full round of attack. The Witch does not have to worry about that. Furthermore DR, high AC and other gimmicks are pretty common. Remember SR doesnt stop the Slumber Hex
3. To Pherni yeah if people are still talking about it that should mean that its still a big problem in the game.
1.And none of those BBEGs have a minion with an action nearby? Don't argue initiatives with me, you're talking about an 'overpowered' character who is feat-poor and low on dex.
2.The archer has far more range than the witch's close-range ability. FAR more. Barbarians can cap the beast totem tree to full attack off a charge. The fighter has the entire vital strike tree (and a pile of potential feats) to bump that first attack up to something nasty. Or he just takes the charge (cuz he has AC and HP) and then full attacks immediately after.
To slumber a target the witch (who is FAR poorer on defensive spells than the wizard) has to move within 30' of the target.
3. If your concern from a 10th-level caster is the slumber hex then something is wrong. A witch has a whole host of far more dangerous things that can be done in a combat (black tentacles to end the fight, mad monkeys to completely shut down an enemy spellcaster, etc).
You think slumber is bad? What about the optimized 10th level witch hitting the BBEG with feeblemind? That's just as deadly to the encounter, only now a 1HD minion can't immediately save the boss.
So I've been running games with witches and played the class both fairly consistently in the last couple years. Slumber's been really handy, but no more than any other spell. What's your direct (nontheorycrafting) experience with it?
So in all cases a pimped out Witch with the Slumber Hex has at least a 50% chance of taking out an equal lvled creature with one action.
In all cases involving an opponent who is vulnerable to sleep who doesn't have a mate with an action nearby, you mean?
Hyperbolic statement is hyperbolic.
Are people still arguing about the slumber hex being gamebreaking? Really? Yes, the witch has a chance at disabling an opponent for the duration of the combat in a round. How much chance does the equal-level, equally optimized 2h barbarian/fighter/archer of choice have of just outright killing an equal-level baddy in that same round?
First off, talk to your players. Find out what kind of game the GM runs, find out who makes what. Do they go RP heavy, or is it a hack n' slash game? I've run and played in both, and they're fun for different reasons.
Second, how do these people impact your fun? Are they making it difficult to run the game? Then throw in noncombat/skill-based encounters that let people other than the powergamer shine. If the munchkin is acting out of purpose he doesn't get xp for the session. Easy Peasy.
Now, if you're talking about being a player in someone else's game, how exactly are these guys making you have less fun? The powergamer, at best, is going to have maybe +4 or so more to do a given task than you. So specialize in a different task. Party diversity is good.
I'd also, like others above, question how these are the only folks interfering with your fun. I'm absolutely a powergamer. I've also run a half-dozen successful campaigns over the last year, make fun, interesting characters, and usually wind up being johnny-on-the-spot with rules for a group.
Also the vast majority of undead are mindless and only obey orders.
This becomes problematic when the necromancer orders the zombie horde to destroy the fighter immediately before the invisible rogue pops out and garrottes the necromancer.
I had a witch with the raven familiar, which could talk to both myself and others of its kind.
For a few silver pieces worth of bread/jerky/etc I had my familiar bribe something like every raven in a five mile radius to look for things (shiny people = armored parties, howling men for werecreatures, etc).
And yes, I had an NPC in a game I ran who I toned down in power by use of disintegrate and the beast bound ability. Instead of the powerful arcane caster it became the knowledgeable advisor (no more fine motor control for spells).
The Warlords of the Accordlands setting had a wondrous/alchemical item called the "basilisk lilly" that did this. AOE flesh to stone (think DC 16 fort).
I question that there's and "abuse" of any alignment that really necessitates this argument.
Much of this conversation has been about how others interpret alignments. That's all this really is; how it's interpreted at your table.
When I run things good characters value life. Evil characters don't. Does that make all evil characters murderers? No. But it means the evil character doesn't care who gets hurt. The neutral character is going to lean more towards the idea of "_____ had it coming."
I run law and chaos the same way. Lawful folk want order and structure. Chaotic folks want independence. Those who are neutral want something in between or don't concern themselves with it.
My neutral mercenary acts of of self-interest for his job. He'll do the work he's paid for.
My neutral evil mercenary might do things like execute potential witnesses, burn a village to cover an escape, etc. The neutral guy has some value for life, so he's less inclined.
Again, that's how my group works with alignments. I tend to run neutral characters (at least to start). They tend to be more focused on self-interest than anything else.
Have you considered the zen archer monk? Bow-focused but can still do unarmed strikes, and after 3rd level becomes largely wisdom-based (easier synergy for perception)
I'd say you guys are undervaluing the arcane bond a bit.
In addition to a free extra spell, the bond let's the bard be up one on weapon enchantments over the party at any given time.
The lower spell levels on the bard make concentration checks a bit easier as well. In the (not everyday) situation that the bard has to cast without a weapon you're looking at a DC 26 or less concentration check. If my mid-level bard is doing this I'm adding a whole lot to that.
Your benefit is being one of the only arcane options that can twf/sword and board/two-hand while casting, running separate party buffs, and do so from inside a tin can.
Arcane bond trades some noncombat options for way more combat choices. That seems to fit the flavor of the archetype well
So I've been gaming off an on for...ever, been out for over a decade, and been together with the best guy in the world for seven years. I guess I don't have a lot of strife or struggle. Kinda makes me boring.
I've been in groups that had no idea I was the gay in the village, groups that do, and groups that really had to rethink the dumb things that came out of their mouths around me. I've been pretty ok with that, mostly because I don't take myself that seriously.
I broke the 16 y/o gamer of an old group of the "that's so gay" habit by chiming in with "you're absolutely right! That is so me!" every time.
My current group is awesome; they've even let me experiment on them. For a grad school project (long story) I brought in a plant for one game and introduced the party to a whole host of uncomfortable stereotypes.
There was the kobold/human couple (lots of scales and salves were involved. Also balms)
The...detailed...classes on animal husbandry taking place in town
The cross-dressing queen ogre (that one was tough...I don't do queeny well).
It's kinda generic and silly, but I'm having a lot of fun with my fighter/rogue multiclass in a current game.
He's got improved feint and skill focus bluff, and wears full platemail. He's built to do nothing but feint and do SA + vital strike damage with a high crit-threat weapon.
I'll always love my GM's spit-take when I described the "rogue" clanking his way into the bar fight in full plate and decking local toughs with armored gauntlets.
We had a rogue/shadowdancer/skillmonkey in my last game who was notoriously terrible at making perception checks. Ludicrously bad.
Failed to notice the huge (sized) troll in a room while scouting bad.
Shortly after that (unpleasant and messy) encounter the running gag became "you see everything...but the troll." Over time the character developed a hysterical blindness towards trolls.
The dice said so.
At the end of the campaign the party succeeded and got a series of boons for dieties. The rogues?
All trolls glow in the dark. Forever. But only around her.
