|Paizo Pathfinder® Paizo Games|
|About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ|
Neal Litherland wrote:
Fair point though if you really want to just Debilitate an opponent then just take a gander at Vexing Dodger it takes Dirty Tricks to a new level with upgrading sickened to nauseated as in "All your standard action Belong to Us"
plus its targeted unlike a stinking cloud so your friends can pile on
Yeah still pretty new only been here since 2008
So general consensus seems to be forget touch attacks and maybe instead look at thing that happen if a creature touches you or is next to you.
something similar to fire shield or Fire Trail
I'm kinda thinking of it as a poor mans swarm, if you can get on a creature and have a passive damage output for anything sharing your space.
Bob Bob Bob wrote:
Do you auto-succeed at touch attacks in a grapple? If so then this works. If not then this doesn't. I personally believe that you're required to make a touch attack in order to hit someone with a touch spell but the "accidental discharge" rules are poorly written enough that either is a possibility.
The ability specifically says your not grappling
10 point begs to be played with an NPC class for the full effect :D
You could acutally have quite a fun campagin focusing on character development with so little to worry about mechaincally. Long as the GM knows what he's doing its fine. GM can even go nuts with magic items to suppliment everyone since your so weak, which could be fun too.
I'm somewhat sold on the idea that a Rogue can use existing skills to do things no other class can especially if the option open up the further down Rogue you go. It would create a real reason to stick with Rogue and get something you cant find anywhere else.
and following the same logic for Rogue "faking it" the enhanced skills would allow them to start copying other classes similar to how UMD lets them copy casters.
Just having a little look over this thing and in some respects it seems superior to the summoner synthesist.
Now unless I'm completely mistaken this ability is ONLY granting the evolutions the same as if a summoner was able to cast Evolution Surge on something other than his Eidolon.
i.e. we're not calling up an eidolon we're just making the animal companion "Hulk Out".
It also means when the companion dies or is removed for whatever reason the Hunter is now the one doing the "Hulk Out" but he's not getting some eidolon shell he's just evolving his own flesh.
plus its a swift action so extremely helpful for not wasting my actions buffing once combat has started.
So you can have the evolutions without the shell meaning you can keep wearing your armor and gear unless of course your changing size or shape with extra arms and legs and then things might get a little tight under that breastplate if your not careful with your choices.
But still this is basically swift customized polymorphing for a martial weapon prof , medium armor character , 3/4BAB sure but (Ex) ability score increases which can stack with enchantments.
Seems like a pretty fun deal and dare I say the Summoner Synthesist concept done right ?
Straight Primal Hunter Companion
when you companion dies you inherit all the evolutions, either way you either have an amazing companion or your fairly amazing yourself. its like being a summoner syntheist but without the stigma or baggage ;)
plus its a nice little revenge on the GM for killing your companion to turn around and evo huge form multiattack his BBEG to death out of spite :)
Oh there's plenty of interest in Homebrew there's just little interest in "your" homebrew.
and no that not a "your" directed at you, it directed at everyone.
for the most part unless your going to benefit or use somthing most people could care less about it. hence commenting on homebrew you'll probably never be able to use yourself is probably a waste of time for most people.
plus there's only so many times you can say "that will break your game" before you get bored and move on.
unfortunately home brew forums are up against human nature and are losing
whether or not the Rogue is currently under powered or overpowered is irrelevant for the purposes of this discussion.
The question as it stands is this.
Highly subjective sure, but I'm interested in hearing what people would do.
For myself personally these would be my top 3 single changes keeping in mind you can only make one change you can certainly suggest more than one.
1.) Rogue has a full BAB
2.) Rogue levels can count as levels from another other class you multiclass in for the purposes of effective level on abilities. (Can only apply to one other class)
3.) Rogue talents include one talent (that can be taken once) that can pick one feature/ability from every other class e.g. discovery, hex, revelation, rage etc
Or perhaps your one of those people who wouldn't change anything about the Rogue in which case by all means let us hear your Rogue Love ;)
THIS REMINDS me of another thread about differing interpretations ;)
Doesn't stack from my reading
Pummeling charge modifies the charge action
in general when two abilities try and modify the same action they don't stack you need to choose.
not a great example but in the same vein that vital strike and spring attack don't stack even though it seems like they should.
To make moneypay staff
and you know generate new content for people to pick apart on their forums ;)
maybe even make a profit like a business or something ;)
think you could come up with that on the back of editing 35'000 words with a deadline in sight and another 50'000 words to go ?
This is what your looking for Sir
"Unlike other afflictions, multiple doses of the same poison “stack,” meaning that successive doses combine to increase the poison's DC and duration."
By inference stacking only applies to Poisons and since disease are an affliction they do not stack.
so once your infected that's it, single infection with requirements to roll the unmodified saves as listed in the disease effect line.
Clear and Correct by whose standards ? I can guarantee and American English major, an oxford English professor , and an Australian exchange student are all going to have different opinion about what is grammatically correct and acceptable. Grammar isn't a universal constant because language is mutable.
As to correct rule interpretations have you not seen JJ post his opinion on the forums about how a rule works only to be later contradicted by the person who wrote the rule.
The only way you can know for sure if you are interpreting a rule correctly is if the author of that rule was sitting next to you every time it came into contention to confirm that is how he or she intended it to be run.
You think what your asking is simple or easy, its just not.
I my advice assumes nothing, it doesn't matter who is asking the question the advice stands. It is up to the GM and players to decide how they are going to play this game.
Do you really want to see a 1800 page rule book that reads like a legal document ? Because that is exactly what your asking for. The sheer volume of words required to create statements that are beyond reasonable ambiguity is immense. Solicitors make entire careers out of reinterpreting unambiguous statements to make them say something completely different.
anyone looking for absolute rules are doomed to fail, there are no absolutes in language . Absolutes are the prevue of mathematics. If you want absolute rules then you'd need to write your entire rulebook using nothing but mathematical equations. Soon as you introduce language you introduce ambiguity.
Want an example ? having just read this I can guarantee your brain won't interpret it in the way I intended you to interpret it. Would using more words to explain it help ? no, in fact they would probably just make the problem worse ;)
Stealthy Alchemist Mad Bomber with fast bombs and a range or discoveries to pickup all the good bomb versions.
If you really want to put the hurt on them Mindchemist for crazy damage bombs with insane DC's .
Tactics are strike and fade at the worst possible moments for the PC's i.e. when there dealing with an encounter out pops the mad bomber to unleash a lot of pain in a very short space of time only to disappear before they can really do much to stop him.
help turn encounters they're finding too easy into real challenges.
load him up with magic gear to make quick escapes very easy.
One thing to keep in mind is you are running 6 players who collectively bring 6 standard actions a round to the table, if you are throwing less than the equivalent of that back at them then that would be why they are having an easy time.
Maybe the best solution for an antagnoist is not one NPC but 2 or 3 who are deigned to work extremely well in tandem. Just remember anything the player can do you can do better.
Errata not needed in this case, minor gramatical issues like this are the whole reason we play with a GM who can discuss with the group and make the decision.
Even rules which are very clear and well defined can and will be disputed by people's own interpretation, hence the need for a GM.
So what if a group is playing with a swashbuckler who uses a light bludgeoning weapon, as long as the GM and group have no problem with it who cares, even if it gets errated the same group would just house rule it there way.
errata is pointless if it so bloated by tiny inconsequential updates that it's impossible to find rulings on what your looking for.
How are you attacking with 2 claws and using a weapon with Swashbuckler or Bard or Daring Champion ?
Hex strike evil eye still has effect on failed save , slumber does not
also as far as monster feats go if monster feats are out then Ghoul bloodline is out too since its out of the monster codex ;)
Well two things, if you want to hit stuff with spells the Bloodrager will fill that role nicely and since you were multiclassing spells already the lower spell levels arn't going to bother you.
As far as making an Arcanist more survivable once spells run out
or if you want somting completel left field
Play a Goblin and take the Roll with It which is quite possible the most amazing feat for a caster.
i have a question can a brawler with claw attacks take feral combat training and exchange unarmed strikes for Just claws and bite? i know extra feat tax for bite
A Very strict reading of the rules says no purely because Feral combat was published before Brawler existed so only has a special exception for Monk
however if you extrapolate that brawler is a hybrid of monk and the brawler flurry is based of monk's flurry you could probably convince a GM that is an appropriate feat.
Oddly enough if your playing a brawler you can just use martial flexibility to grab weapon focus and feral combat training as they are both combat feats for 1 minute during combat and see if your GM lets it stand.
For Feral combat training you can make all the flurry of blows attacks using a single natural weapon.
Errata even cover that if the natural attack has an effect e.g. poison you can apply the poison on each flurry hit.
Brawler brings unarmed damage scaling like a monk and doesn't require hands to make unarmed strikes
While the claws take up the hand slots the feet knees and head are still free to do unarmed damage with.
Using another class that requires a hand to hold weapons your taking away one or both hand slots for claws.
While the DC might be low the frequency of saves will mitigate it somewhat plus there's always ability focus and a 14CHA to bump that DC by 4. a simple headband or cloak can bump your CHA up another 1-2pts. forcing 2 saves a round every round they going to roll low eventually. Plus there's a 1 dip way to work in a Evil Eye Hex Strike for another -2 to saves before your claws hit. At 7th I could get a DC16 which aint terrible.
Yes certain monsters with huge fort saves or outright immunity are no dice but this isn't a one trick pony, brawler with martial versatility can do many other things.
hell just off the top of my head, swift action feat Death of Glory against big critters with big fort saves to dish out some pain. and chew their immediate action if they want to hit back. swift action feat Improved Sunder to break that amazing weapon/armor on the big bad.
I'm fairly sure RAW this doesn't work simply for the face they are both full round actions but I thought I'd just put it out there.
Pummling style results in one single devastating strike of pooled damage.
Coup de grace uses a single strike damage to calculate the fort save for death.
A + B = Very high fort save or Very Very Dead
Need a rules and logic check on this if you please
Now the Brawler flurry is very clear that it and natural attacks don't mix and that fine, not what is being used here.
Now we charge with our claws an hopefully paralyze something on a +9 claw attack keeping it right where we want it for next round
We now take our Iterative Unarmed attacks of +7/+2 and add in +2/+2 for our claws and go to town damaging and hopefully keeping the paralysis going so there is no escape or retribution.
A few level later we could pickup multiattack to reduce those -5 to -2 and around the same time Ghoulish Claws paralysis is now lasting 1d4+1 rounds.
Compared to a Brawler flurry your still losing 1-2 extra attacks at the top end and claws have pitiful damage but once the 1d4+1 rounds kick in you may not need to use the claws every round and since they are a free action to grow you can use them sparingly.
As an after thought Paralysed is also helpless so Coup De Grace could be viable.
Appreciate all the suggestions :)
as for party composition
ran across a spirit summoner archetype that gets both hexes and pit spells which could have legs.
though I may end up settling on a Shaman 2/Brawler X build and prolific use of hex strike and extra hex with pummeling strike. I may just grab a wand for pit spells and find a way to pump my UMD the low DC wont matter with high brawler CMB bypassing it. martial versatility to cover a ranged option when needed
AFter playing around ther may be a much better way using mostly brawler levels, pummeling strike and hex strike with only 2 shaman levels and prolific use of the extra hex feat.
For a pummeling strike with almost guaranteed hit each round to apply Hex strike evil eye, or 1 round misfortune or CHA rounds confusion or thought stealing brain drain. also hold just enough extra combat feats to stabilize the brawler side of things to hit and do some damage.
btw Accursed Hex dosen't work with the build, hex strike bypasses the save and accursed hex only triggers after a save has been made
Say for some reason I decide multiclassing a brawler is a good idea.
But I never intend to take more than a handful of level so the brawlers flurry will never get to level 8.
Could I in theory take the improved two weapon fighting feat as a general feat choice to improve the Brawlers flurry to include an extra attack ? possibly by using martial flexibility to grab it temporarily instead of taking it as a feat ?
Or does this fall down because its a works like rather than having the TWF feat ?
I'll be the first to admit I have a problem with indecision when building a character but I just can't seem to break out of this little design loop.
It goes a little something like this, Reign of Winter Campaign
Nice stat array of course options up some options you wouldn't normally consider.
So I see Hex Strike and say that's be nice to do
So as it seems I'm doomed to not find a solution by myself I turn to you lovely folks not so much to solve this problem (although amazing if you could) but to perhaps suggest something else completely different and fun that I can pull off with that stat array of 16,16,15,13,11,10 in Reign of Winter .
Thanks in Advance