I'm not claiming my opinion is truth. Every claim I put forward can be tested and proven true or false. That makes it a fact. Are you denying that there are people out there that seek out "balanced tactical options"? If not then what I am posting is actual fact.
The very claim that everything you have said is provable fact is itself untrue. Everything you have put forth is your opinion that you keep asserting is fact. That is what is ticking people off.
You are claiming that the WotC lied when they said they would support all play styles. This claim is based on your personal interpretation of their wording which is not shared by most the rest of us. That claim cannot be tested and proven true or false and the rest of your arguments is entirely based upon that claim. Because if they never promised to support tactical play then the advantage/disadvantage system not providing tactical options isn't an issue. Neither are any of the other "issues" you are arguing. They are only a problem if WotC said they were going to completely support tactical play.
Instead of posting a wall of text with all of your assertions and then saying "WotC lied because I can't reenact the battle of the bulge in complete realistic detail with these rules. 5e sucks! They will never make money! These are facts! Waaaaaaahhh!" Pick one topic, e.g. the advantage/disadvantage mechanic (which I happen to like as is btw). State that you personally don't like the mechanic and why and ask for the opinions of others. I think you will get a much better reception.