|
|
|
Recent posts by
Pariah:
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R-type wrote:
The problem is nobody has taken my advice and created a back-up character 'just in case' the first adventure IS as deadly as people say so.
...
What I need now is quick and easy 'plug-in' backstories that fit any character, fitting them into Diamond lake.
...
Advice for working a new pc into the adventures 'mid-encounter' would be incredibly helpful.
After my first unexpected death, I ended up doing the same thing.
Cleric of Hextor - Masquerading as a Cuthbertian Flaggelant, but actually seeking to find and destroy a temple of Hextorian heretics. When he learns that the heretics are more spread out than just this temple, he stays on to destroy every last vestage of them.
Barbarian/Ranger/Warrior type - Was an indntured servant forced to work in the mines and has just recently paid off his debt and is looking to make some money. Even hunting monsters can't be as dangerous as working in the mine.
Rogue - Made a reasonably good living working the veiled corridor of the Emporium, but really doesn't like working with all the dirty miners and has a few otehr skills that may be worth turnign a coin.
Wizard - Allustan's apprentice, it's time he goes out and learns a bit about the world. Dragonchess will only get him so far.
Woodsy Type (Druid/Ranger/Scout) - Tales of unkillable undead are a great concern to the Lodge. Asked to work their way into the adventurers group and learn what they can, help if their cause will serve nature.
Monk - After a startling vision, the head of the order sends you out to stop the worms from breaking forth.
Warmage/Sorcerer/Psion - I actually don't have this one, but I would thing Demon Boy is a good example of a starting story on this one. Worked as a freak at Zalamandra's emporium.
That should be plenty to get you started, as for working them in... they all have reasons to be looking for the party and unlike some of the other modules, the party can turn back to go to town at any point they like.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Host of Angels wrote:
when the super-munchkin of the group announces that he really wants to play a psi-warrior thri-keen!!!
I'm a firm believer that in order for the game to be fun you have to set limits. In my campaign those limits were no monster levels, no creatures with an ECL +2 or higer, and any ECL +1 required DM approval. I ended up with one Aasimar Cleric, everyone else took PHB classes.
Host of Angels wrote:
1) Thrikeen are +2 ECL and +2 monster level.
If your inclined to allow it do it in the rules. At higher levels the ECL's really do kind of level the playing field when the character starts to fall behind in levels. In addition his monster levels are further going to hamper his psi-abilities pushin him further behind.
Host of Angels wrote:
3) I am running this in FR, Daggerford. Why on earth would a thri-keen be in Daggerford? And doing what?
Main attraction at Zalamandra's Emporium. ne of the mine managers had brought it in as a slave but Zalamandra purchased his contract to use as a side show act. Unlike the mine manager, Zalamandra doesn't believe if true slavery and has kept him as an indentured servant until he could work off the cost of payment. His year (or whatever) is up and he has just been released as a free person. Most of the residents in town have seen him at the freak show, and while most deffiently think he's creepy, he isn't viewed as a threat and people just avoid him, not persecute him.
Host of Angels wrote:
Question: Should I let the player go for it?
I wouldn't, but this isn't me. You've all ready described him as the "super munchkin", if you don't think you can handle it (especially when he takes multi-attack feat) don't allow it. If you think it's more important that he plays what he likes, teh go for it. You can always kill him later :)
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When I was in the planning stages it looked like I was going to have 9 players, and none of them were going to make it to every game so I knew between death and character absence I was going to have some level disparity, so before starting I sent out a house rules sheet.
Missing Games / Joining Late / Death
It's bound to happen that either someone has plans and can't play when everyone else does, someone dies, or someone wants to join in late (or maybe just for one or two mods). If you miss enough games to fall significantly behind (at least 1 level lower than the lowest regular player), you die, change characters or join late I will bump your XP to a point where you are at the minimum XP needed to be the same level as the lowest level PC in the party.
So if we have a 3rd who is almost 4th, and 3 4th lvl pcs, you come back as just having hit 3rd. Money will probably be half the recommend GP for the level, but I may fudge that based on what everyone else has.
Of course I'd love for everyone to make every game, but I'm not going to count on that.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patman wrote:
I want to make the cold Iron Longsword that my PC's Cleric/Paladin of Heironeous found a Weapon of Legacy. But, I would like the rituals and history be to campaign specific, perhaps even tuned to Kyuss himself.
Are you thinking that it is tuned to FIGHT Kyuss, or tuned to HELP Kyuss? It sounds like you are wanting it to fight Kyuss, but it might be just as fun to have it designed to help bring about the age of worms.
Players beware - the following link is of course for DM's only.
Here is some good research on Kyuss -
http://melkot.com/mysteries/kyuss.html
Patman wrote:
perhaps a few hints on what the rituals could be.
For an anti-kyuss blade, drpping a son of kyuss is deffinetly a good start. Others could be laid out with what you al ready know to be in the campaign. For example, visiting the Rift Crag would be a good one since we know it's tied to Kyuss and in the outline for the campaign. How about killing a priest of Nerull, Hextor, and Iuz (did I remember the three evil gods correctly?)
Patman wrote:
What powers might a weapon attuned to fighting Kyuss have.
I have a hunter of the Undead (or at least an aspiring one) and his plans for a weapon are Silver Ghost Touch, Bane Undead, Disrupting. Since this is Cold Iron and edged, Silver and Disrupting are out, but if you have the Libris Mortis their are plenty of cool abilities, including one that allows it to sneak attack undead (assuming the player has the sneak attack ability). Detect Undead at will would be a good one.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fraisala wrote:
Now what I've got on my hands is very VERY ticked off necromancer still alive with no spellbook, no zombies, and close ties with Smenk. What I need here is a brilliantly evil plot for revenge to hopefully make a short adventure out of.
I'm all for having Filge hire a random rogue to steal the spell book and bring it back to him at a specific location at a specific time. The rouge is of course bound to fail, and Filge knows this and expects the rogue to give him up to the party... it's merely bait to lure them either into an ambush, or away from their loved ones, or both.
So they catch said incompetant rogue, he spills the beans as to where he was supposed to take the spell book. The party goes there and is ambushed by mercenaries hired to capture or kill the party and get the book from them. Mean while, Filge expects them to have left their loved ones unprotected. He captures them. If he can manage it, turn one into a zombie from a scroll as a warning to the party and trade back teh rest of thier loved ones for his spell book. If for some chance his mercenaries actually do the job and take the party, well, then he has his spell book and can do them all in.
Might even be more fun if he escapes and ends up working for one of the Dragons in the series. You could throw in random loved ones as undead throughout the entire campaign and make them REALLY want to kill him.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GUTH wrote:
its too confusing with all the nonplaying characters, the different locations, the organizations involved, and the "biggness" of the plotline.
Well, I can think of two possible solutions, depending on what your group is and what the exact problem is.
1. If your group is used to a hack and slash campaign, you can simplify the plot. Each of the modules are written to run stand alone, they don't really need to know about the back story of diamond lake. The modules run fine without ever seeing the sheriff, the other adventurers, and even Smenk for that matter. Allustan I'd keep because he's actually going to help point the party to the next module.
2. The better way would work if your party likes the detail and just can't follow it. For at least the rest of Whispering Cairn (and possibly TFoE) provide a synopsis for the party (either email, handouts, or I really liked the Yahoo group idea). Have a list of things like
Whispering Cairn - You started off exploring this in hopes of treasure but have found that it once belonged to the wind dukes. Blah blah blah....
Wind Dukes - Your not sure how they are, but long ago they fought the forces of chaos. Perhaps you could find more information at a library or a knowledgable historian.
Smenk - You haven't met him yet, but everyone seems to agree that he's a jerk.
Allustan - Seems nice enough, and is willign to identify items for you for a small surcharge.
So then when they find some new information add it to their list. As a DM it's a lot easier to follow the plot and get to know the characters than it is as a player.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Trolls - Like them so much that I've put one in every module I've ever done... 2 normal trolls, a Troll Were-wolverine (trolls are giants and susceptable to lycanthropy), a half clay golum/troll, and most recently a spell warped advanced cave troll (for a 14th-ish lvl party).
2. Aboleths - Fish are scary...
3. Wemics - just cause they look cool
4. Shadows (wraiths, dread wraiths, allips) - nothing quite as mean as something that is incorporeal and drains abilities
5. Basalisk
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rootbeergnome wrote:
I cant find the adventure hooks anywhere!
I had a problem with that to, the hooks they list are centered around the idea that your characters are from diamond lake, they want to get out, and don't have the means to do so.
Players from Diamond lake should run into or hear of the adventurers in town looking intot he stirgenest cairn and hoping to find treasure. Players should remember visiting the Whispering Cairn and think that they should try it out.
I ran a few Roleplaying encounters in email before the start of my campaign, and when I failed to get them to decide to go to the whispering cairn themselves, I did what any self respecting GM would do... I stuck in a missing child.
So basically, while in town the party came across someone shouting for his daughter who didn't come home last night. With a little invetigating the party learned that she had been dared by some friends to stay the night at the whispering cairn. Her friends didn't tell anyone because they were covering for her and said she was staying with them. When the father or party comes looking for her, they have to break down and tell where she is at.
Party heads to the Whispering Cairn, find her stuck in a tree thanks to the wolves, and decide to investigate it themselves.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
farewell2kings wrote:
I've been using my old Dell laptop to run my game.
For my first game I dug out my old Compaq laptop and have been fairly happy with it and will probably continue to use it. I'm used to playing the RPGA Living campaigns and have never had to worry about how much XP to assign to players so I wrote an excel spreadsheet to keep track of XP for all my players and let me know when they level.
I think it's pretty cool. I just indicate if they were present or not, and what Challenge Rating they fight and it figures out how much XP they recieved (based on number of players, what level they were, and the CR of the encounter), adds it to their current total, and tells me if they level (based on new XP, current level, and whether or not the have an ECL for their character.)
In the same spreadsheet I also created a Greyhawk calander that includes every holiday I could find from other sources (what they mean and how they are celebrated). I'm keeping track of what day it is on that for my characters...
I use a heavily modified version of HeroForge for creating characters (and getting more modified by the day, adding PRC's and such).
Finally, I got sick of carting around mini's, so I started creating monster tokens for everything the party faces. I haven't finished the Black Keep ones because I'm waiting on the web enhancement, but if you want to see or use them you can find everything on my website here.
http://www.geocities.com/oneoftheunloved/aow/
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cardinal_Malik wrote:
I started at the begining of the year and had a blast with snow based movement.
I went with Readying, because I saw in one of the campaign Journals, Erik's group started then. Not having any clear guidance, I just figured if any modules relate to the weather, it's best to stay in line with them since I figured they know more.
I made a handy excel calander (which I stole all the data for from multiple internet sources, canonfire primarily) and figured I would track everything on there (including holidays, and disease incubation :)
If anyone wants a copy, I'm keeping it on my website (along with my tokens, and hyper links to valueable message board articles.)
http://www.geocities.com/oneoftheunloved/aow
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Startign Sunday, if I can find time I'll do a campaign journal, but we are doing Greyhawk.
Kira - 1/2 Drow 1/2 Grey elf Rogue, from the Bandit Kingdoms (I tried to gently push her to be from Red Hand, but she decided Stoink, and I didn't want to pressure her or make her think there was a reason I wanted Red Hand).
Mortilal - Aasimar Cleric of Pelor, thinks he's just a human, but doesn't look much like his sister.
Horus - 1/2 Drow 1/2 High Elf Warlock, (no relation to Kira, and neither one of them have any clue that they both wanted to play a 1/2 breed drow. I thought about disallowing one or the other so they weren't treading on each others character concepts, but how fair would it be if I let one and not the other).
Yet to be Named Monk - Practically average in every way, until just recently when Izenfen the Occluded had a vision of worms and this charater being at the center of it. Figuring that he was either the cause or the savior, Izenfen removed him from the monastary figuring either he needs to be out saving, or he needs to be out of the monastary to keep them safe.
Yer to be named Ranger - Still working on a history, but is planning on going Ascetic Hunter route and multi-classing monk.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Absinth wrote:
It's always mentioned that it takes years of studying to become a wizard and by multi-classing you can have this effect just by gaining a level. I never allowed this in my games because we are always playing continueing campaigns and are avoiding long time gaps.
Reminds me of OotS
http://www.giantitp.com/cgi-bin/GiantITP/ootscript?SK=126
In any case, I'm always for giving an opinion on multiclassing.
Throwing in a level of a fighter class to make your cleric a little hardier? Don't do it.. Don't even think about it... The extra feat and an extra +1 BaB over the course of 4 levels don't come close to teh cost of delaying that higher spell level. As a general rule, if you are a spell caster, be a spell caster, your power is going to come from your spells, not from a d6 of sneak attack, the ability to rage, or anything else any class is going to give you.
Of course there are exceptions to every rule, you can build a decent ray specialist by tying rogue and wizard together, but by the time you hit 9th level and are still tossing scorching rays when your buddy is dropping disintigrate, I doubt you'll think it was worth it.
Multi-classing between different fighter types is generally not as bad as most of the abilities stack well. 4 levels of fighter for weapon specialization are an acceptable trade for an extra rage attempt, dropping 1 BaB and some HP for 2d6 sneak attack and evasion is a decent trade off too.
Finally we have mutts, which can be fun, reasonably effective, but generally not as good as a straight class character. Things to watch out for are Do your abilities stack? I have a Barb/Wizard/Dervish that I thought was pretty cool until I realized that I can't rage or dance and cast spells, nor can I rage and dance at the same time. Pick classes where your abilities don't walk all over each other. Also watch out for classes that don't have the same stat requirements. A rogue/wizard works better than a rogue/sorcerer or a rogue/cleric just because Rogues and Wizards both need high int. Charisma and Wisdom are basically dump stats for the rogue (unless your going for a diplomat, in which case wisdom still isn't that great). A Paladin/Sorcerer or a Paladin/Cleric are better than a Paladin/Wizard for the same reasons.
Mutt's do excel at one thing though, and that is saving throws. Because you get a bigger hit at lvl 1 and 2 for each class, you can stick two just a few levels, be a decent fighter, and have ungodly saves. Monk2/Favored Soul2 already has the same saves as an 8th lvl monk. Favored Souls need a good charisma, throw in a level of Paladin and get your Charisma bonus to all saves. Assuming human, we arn't taking any xp penalties if we now go Favored soul 4th (giving us second level spells, no loss on BAB, and qualifies us for Pious Templar. Assuming a modest 14 charisma (we need stats in other places, I wouldn't go higher than that without magic) we have at 8th lvl
Fort - +12 (+con)
Ref - +8 (+dex)
Will - +10 (+wil)
mettle and evasion, good setup for Sacred Fist or going deeper in pious templar for Weapon Specialization and a useful Divine Sacrifice spell.
Compared to an 8th lvl monk (best save progression)
Fort - +6 (+con)
Ref - +6 (+dex)
Will - +6 (+wil)
evasion
Sorry, I'm rambling now, I'll shut up, but bottom line is I'm all for multi classing as long as your primary role isn't a caster.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Callum Finlayson wrote:
Necromancer 6, spell focus (necro) instead of sp.f(evo)
1st (6) -- cause fear, mage armour, prot vs good, ray of enfeeblement x2, shield
2nd (5) -- blindness, Melf's acid arrow (extend), spectral hand, touch of idiocy, web
3rd (4) -- summon monster III x2 (extend), vampiric touch x2
At work so I don't have the mod in front of me, but was he given a lesser metamagic rod of extend? An Extended Melf's is actually a 3rd level spell, and extended monster summoning III is a 4th lvl spell without it.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dennis Stalnaker wrote:
If you play Living Greyhawk, it's the starting location for one of the modules.
Home now, found it. COR4-19 - That Which Was Not Meant To Be Known.
But I don't see it adding a lot to your campaign. The feel of the town is slightly different all though it does quote two different cannon sources that mention Diamond Lake.
City of Greyhawk Boxed Set
Greyhawk, Gem of the Flaness page 22
2 paragraphs - no new information
The Adventure Begins, Page 3
2 short paragraphs
Only thing of interest not covered in the AoW is occasional bandit problems with teh wagon trains heading to Greyhawk, a nest of Cockatrices, and Several miners and explorers disappearing in 590CY south of the lake.
Finally the module itself describes 5 locations
The Old Wharf Inn - No real information, and the players should have enough inns without it. If you want to use it, I'd put it SW of 21 as it's described as being by the waterside.
The Well - Center of town. Social place to gather as the lake water is polluted and it's the only place to get fresh water. I may include this in my game.
Brendigund Trading House - Brendigund was a notoriously corrupt (but not a bad guy) merchant who gets redeemed in a series of LG mods. I'll probably include this also as most of my players know him.
The Docks - Nothing to add from AoW
The Cairns - Nothing to add from AoW
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
airwalkrr wrote:
Ernest Mueller wrote:
All Evil characters aren't total sociopaths...
True, but the general problem is that players who want to play evil characters rarely understand that.
So I guess a good question might be, how mature are your players? One of my favorite characters was a Lawful Evil Fighter/Cleric of a god of Vengence. When it came to playing my character, I told everyone I was a Paladin of a God of Justice. My character was evil, but he cared about his friends and did everything to protect them, just like any paladin should, but he was a bit over the top on dealin out 'Justice' and not to caring about the plight of people not in his group. It caused a little friction, but nothing that caused any party fights. Now if you allow a sociopath Evil character in, eventually he is going to fight the cleric and you'll force the party to choose sides. That could be enough to kill 1/2 the party, and even worse, break the campaign.
Of course, when you don't allow him to play NE he'll probably play the same way and just say he CN.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|