Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Sovereign Dragon

Paladin of Baha-who?'s page

Pathfinder Society Member. 1,710 posts (6,189 including aliases). 1 review. 1 list. No wishlists. 8 Pathfinder Society characters. 14 aliases.


RSS

1 to 50 of 1,710 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

5 people marked this as a favorite.

I think this calls for a piping hot cup of WTF.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

For another example, Cut-Me-Own-Throat Dibbler has a very high bonus to Profession(Sausage-seller) but a significant penalty to Craft(sausagemaking).


It's not a general rule and doesn't reflect real-life venomous creatures.


Dimension Door is useful.


If you wanted to houserule, you could combine the abilities of the familiar and the animal companion.


Skulls and Shackles is good, the first half or so of the book is replete with situations where characters with pumped up Diplomacy, Intimidate, and Bluff can do extremely well. Once out of that, it still remains very important to be able to boast about your piratical deeds so as to increase your notoriety in the Shackles.


Unfortunately, an animal can't take Improved Trip, which is kinda dumb if you think about it.


Boogie woogie woogie!


Witches frequently do not know what their patron is. There's no requirement that it be a god, demigod, or anything like one.


Dropping a starknife is a free action, yes, but picking it up is a move action that provokes and there are many circumstances in which dropping it isn't safe, e.g. swimming, flying, when it looks like you may have to retreat at any moment, etc.

Starknives are finessable, but consider this:

Human, 20 pb

STR-based warpriest:

18 STR
14 Dex
12 CON
10 INT
14 WIS
8 CHA
Bonus Feat: Weapon focus (starknife)
Feat 1: Toughness
Feat Human: Fey Foundling, Improved Initiative or Lightning Reflexes
Traits: Fate's Favored and a campaign trait

She will have an attack bonus of +5 with the weapon, do damage of 1d6+4, and with four-mirror armor and a light shield have an AC of 19. Casting Divine Favor will bring that to +7/1d6+6. Whetstone can be used on the blade to give a +1 to damage for the first successful attack.

At level 3, she will presumably take Power attack, and she will have an attack bonus of +7 when power attacking (assuming she gets at least a masterwork weapon), doing 1d6+6 damage, and +9/1d6+8 when casting Divine favor. This isn't two-handed barbarian territory, but it's not bad. Assuming she's gotten decent heavy armor, such as O-yoroi or tatami-do, her AC will be in the neighborhood of 20-22, before any magic bonuses.

Let's compare the Dex-based warpriest.

14 STR
18 Dex
12 CON
10 INT
14 WIS
8 CHA
Bonus Feat: Weapon focus (starknife)
Feat 1: Toughness
Feat Human: Weapon Finesse
Traits: Fate's Favored and a campaign trait

She'll have the same +5 bonus to the attack, but will only do 1d6+2 damage. She'll also be missing the benefit of the additional feat which was given up to take Weapon Finesse.

Since she doesn't want to lose her Dex bonus to AC, and she won't want to use a shield until she can afford a masterwork one (often-overlooked rule: weapon finesse applies the ACP of a shield to one's attack rolls) the best armor is Kikko armor which gives her, without a shield, AC of 19 = same as she would have had with the heavier armor.

At level 3, assuming she's taking power attack, she'll have the same attack roll as listed above, but for AC, ordinary armors with a max Dex of +4 don't go higher than an armor bonus of +5. To get a higher AC, she'll have to shell out for Mithral, which is much more expensive than heavy armors, in order to get a given AC -- or just get heavy armor and allow the dex bonus to be wasted. In character classes that have access to heavy armor, high Dex actually doesn't help your AC much at all.


The only problem is that if you plan to throw starknives, they don't retain the sacred weapon boost after being thrown. You might be able to get your GM to houserule that since it doesn't make a lot of sense.

I wouldn't recommend TWF because you need a hand free to cast spells. Dex can work, but strength is better since warpriests get heavy armor proficiency and don't need Dex for AC so much. Some Dex is fine, but not more than maybe 14.


Ghouls work too. You can give 'em class levels and say those are the class levels it had when it died and became a ghoul.


blahpers wrote:
Paladin of Baha-who? wrote:
There's no mention of a mishap in the section of the UMD rules that discuss activating a wand. The worst that happens is on rolling a natural 1 that fails, you can't try to activate it again for 24 hours.
The rules are under "activating an item blindly", which applies to any item that requires a command word or some other specific knowledge or technique of how to activate it.

Right, that's if you don't know what to do to activate the wand. The Use Wand option for UMD is different, and doesn't have a mishap chance.


That's the same argument they've been making the last year or so. "We don't have to give marriage to anybody! The only reason we give it to straights is that we HAVE TO in order to keep them producing children." It hasn't worked on any of the courts they've tried it on, except maybe Louisiana.


There's no mention of a mishap in the section of the UMD rules that discuss activating a wand. The worst that happens is on rolling a natural 1 that fails, you can't try to activate it again for 24 hours.


If you want to make him a little more of a challenge for a monk (or for any character with IUS), rebuild him as a Brawler from ACG. Keep the weaknesses, but at least the IUS character won't be getting AoOs as well.


Things on chronicle sheets are always legal even if they wouldn't be otherwise.


Andrew Christian wrote:


I created a Brawler (mutagentic mauler) / Bloodrager 2nd level character. When raging and mutagen enhanced I get two claw attacks for 1d6+7.

If I dipped MoMS at 3rd level and took Pummeling Charge, I could do 4d6 +28 damage on a crit.

You can't use claw attacks with Pummeling style, it's unarmed strikes only. You could take another feat, Feral Combat training, to be able to, but at that point, with that many feats invested, you'd be earning that much damage, for sure.


Yeah, I take 10 on day jobs all the time in PFS. Besides, the two have nothing to do with one another.


Bard all the way. You've already got the best features of the rogue class: trapfinding, class skills, and rogue talents. There are a few rogue talents that are good; those you can take with feats. Otherwise, the bard will make a better skill monkey than a rogue going forward, as well as a better party buffer, superior in combat, and a better face.


Paragon surge is allowed for PFS, however, observe the FAQ that toned the spell down a bit: Paragon Surge FAQ

Since most PFS scenarios happen over the course of a single day, this is significant for PFS.


There is no rule in the AP that states one cannot take 10 on the daily task checks. If your GM says you can't, then that's his rule, but he should understand that he's choosing that rule, it's not the written rules.


That's up the the GM. The rules on taking 10 are always a little contentious. I allow it, except during certain conditions. During a storm, for example, I wouldn't allow taking 10. Some GMs would say that climbing on the rigging at all is too distracting, but I figure if that were the case, we should expect at least one rigger to fall off the rigging at least once per day, which isn't realistic.


5 people marked this as a favorite.

If your players and you all have a good time and say, "That was awesome, thanks for running" then you, as a GM, have won.


When you add a spell using spell blending, it is considered to be on your class spell list, because it's a class feature of the Magus that is adding it.


We established the RAW and the RAI a long time ago. The answer to the question asked in the OP is no, and the actual objection, which was that there was a desire to cast a prepared quickened spell as a standard action, to avoid having to wait until the next round to cast it after having previously cast a quickened spell that around, is also no, clearly.

Some people argue that it should be possible at least in the case of spells. I don't disagree that maybe it ought to be, but it isn't.


There's no 'neutral' subtype.


So no archaeologist bard Pegasi then...


So unicorns are the only ones who can use arcane magic right?


I think you have confused the situation, Laurela. Taking levels of monk and feral combat training does not increase your claw damage dice. Improved natural attack is also not a very good expenditure of a feat, but if you've already taken it, you'd have to retrain to replace it.


4 people marked this as a favorite.

All hail the glow cloud. Wait, what?

Oh, wrong pop culture reference.

Regarding Bis; Part of it is that bis are invisible unless we take specific actions to reveal ourselves. If a guy has a boyfriend, he's seen as gay; if he has a girlfriend, he's seen as straight. We have to take additional steps to say "Hey, I like [gender my partner isn't] too!" This is a privilege on the whole, insulating us from homophobia, but a mixed one in that it contributes to biphobia.


4 people marked this as a favorite.

I think if you feel so strongly about pregen antipathy that you would rather walk away from a game than play with another person playing a pregen, in most cases the table is probably better off not having you as a player.


I think PK ought to be a death effect, but isn't.

Therefore BoL shouldn't work, but will, and Death Ward should provide a +4, but doesn't.

It would take an errata to change that at this point.


Being proficient in an exotic weapon is the same as having the feat for all intents and purposes.


I think you only apply the penalty when making a full attack that mixes the two types of attacks. The AoO is at full BaB.


Most likely estimates of speed would be based on biophysics -- length and articulation of bones, size of muscles (which can be estimated from the bones which show where muscles attach to them), etc.


GM discretion on what happens.


A 5ft step is not a move action; you can take it during a full attack. So yes, it is allowed.


Reach spell is very useful, especially since you can apply it like a sorceror (spontaneously as a full-round action) when you convert a prepared spell into a cure spell.


It would add them, but you wouldn't be able to add the counterpoised template unless your GM houserules it, since it replaces Celestial/Fiendish and you can't summon Celestial/Fiendish with the shadow caller.


Threadomancy!

Anyway, on the topic, since this thread was last touched, the Amulet of Mighty Fists has been reduced in price, the Bodywrap of Mighty Strikes has been created, and Pummeling style and Pummeling charge have made unarmed strikes more practical even against things that have a DR the monk can't bypass.


If the IOC used its funding to help build the infrastructure needed for the olympics, it would find itself welcomed in more places.


Well, the shadow caller is kind of a nerf compared to normal summoner. The shadow creature template is not as powerful as the fiendish/celestial template because it lacks smite. Typically, one chooses an alignment that is neutral with respect to good/evil and summons celestial creatures to take on evildoers, and fiendish creatures to take on any good creatures you end up fighting.

Shadow creatures get concealment and spell resistance, which is not tremendously useful. Since you summon for minutes/level instead of rounds/level, using summoned animals for scouting is a possibility if you can get a way to talk to them. Speak with animals could work IF your GM agrees that it will still work on Outsider (augmented animal) creatures.

So the best summoned animal per level won't change much; it just will be strictly worse than its fiendish or celestial counterpart in most cases.

As for the non-animal creatures summoned:
Summon monster II: Huge nerf. Zoogs are nearly useless. Loss of small elementals and lemures is a serious reduction in power.

Summon Monster III: same thing here. No Dretch, No lantern archon, just a useless tiny Kyton.

Summon Monster IV: Hey, we actually get something useful finally! Not sure they're necessarily better than a medium elemental, hound archon, or hellhound, but at least the incorporeal undead are useful against nearly all foes, and some foes may be entirely unable to hit them. The gloomwing is more of a debuffing summon, the allip is useful, but the shadow is the best by far, since it's going to stick around for several minutes at least, and when it kills things, they become shadows under its command. You could quickly become the controller of a whole fleet of shadow spawn.

If you get to start at a level that lets you summon these, the archetype may be worth it if you don't expect to be fighting many undead or constructs.

Summon Monster V-IX: In each case, the creatures you gain aren't worth what you give up, although most of them aren't bad. (Cloakers are pointless, however.) In most cases, I'd rather use the higher level spells to summon groups of shadows or greater shadows.


Since the familiar is what matters here, I would think it would count for that purpose.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

The effective wizard level will function as the arcane spellcaster level for this purpose, I think. I believe characters who have a familiar with Eldritch Heritage (Arcane) can take Improved Familiar.


Actually, MrRetsej, the bracers of armor, while they require mage armor during their crafting, don't actually reproduce the effects of the spell on the wearer. Also, it's not a personal spell, it's a touch spell.


I would say the cutie marks are worth at least a feat. Maybe all ponies get a bonus feat based on their cutie mark?


Merisiel: Does Golarion have Chocolate?


5 people marked this as a favorite.

That GM was a jerk, though.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Well, I own all the books I use for PFS play. However, I never bring them to a game, because the local VO's run things on the honor system, mostly to make things easier. I don't bring my books, unless they're new and not well known, on the grounds of: 1) it would aggravate my back problems, and 2) it's pretty much all on d20PFSRD and paizo.com/prd anyway.

If you don't own UE, you can ask your local VOs if it will be a problem. If they say you should own it, the PDF is only $10.

I use Whetstones all the time in PFS as it's a great damage buff at low levels.

1 to 50 of 1,710 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2014 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.