I am not sure where this goes, but I had a thought and was wondering if I could get some advice/critique for my analysis of this idea.
I have been considering the effect of Dragon Style, Dragon Ferocity and Power attack on unchained monks.
I think I have found evidence that a strength based monk can have very powerful attacks at a relatively low level. However, I am not sure if my reasoning is correct so I would appreciate any feedback to my analysis/logic chain.
BTW I will be replacing the somewhat ambiguous 1-1/2 Str notation with 1.5xStr to help with reading of this writing.
Here goes:
If a 20 STR unchained monk, (not necessary to be unchained, but the full BAB and the better HP due to D10s is nice) at level 5 takes the following feats: Power attack, Dragon Style and Dragon Ferocity I think their output attack and damage would be as follows (assuming average rolls for a D20 and a D8, the monks unarmed damage):
Using Flurry
2 X Attack = 10(D20) + 5(BAB) + 5(STR) + -2(Power attack) = 18
1st strike Damage = 4(D8) + 10(2xSTR) + 6(PA) = 20
2nd strike Damage = 4(D8) + 7(1.5xSTR) + 6(PA) = 17
I using the Power attacking bonus as -2/+6 for attack and damage rolls as opposed to the -2/+4. My reasoning is as follows:
From https://www.d20pfsrd.com/bestiary/rules-for-monsters/universal-monster-rule s/
Natural Attacks
Most creatures possess one or more natural attacks (attacks made without a weapon). These attacks fall into one of two categories, primary and secondary attacks. Primary attacks are made using the creature’s full base attack bonus and add the creature’s full Strength bonus on damage rolls. Secondary attacks are made using the creature’s base attack bonus –5 and add only .5 the creature’s Strength bonus on damage rolls. If a creature has only one natural attack, it is always made using the creature’s full base attack bonus and adds 1.5 times the creature’s Strength bonus on damage rolls. This increase does not apply if the creature has multiple attacks but only takes one. If a creature has only one type of attack, but has multiple attacks per round, that attack is treated as a primary attack, regardless of its type. You do not receive additional natural attacks for a high base attack bonus. Instead, you receive additional attack rolls for multiple limb and body parts capable of making the attack (as noted by the race or ability that grants the attacks).
I think a Monk’s unarmed strikes while using Flurry would qualify as a Primary natural weapons based on the wording above. The Primary natural weapon will use full BAB and use full strength modifiers.
Also from https://www.d20pfsrd.com/classes/core-classes/monk/
Unarmed Strike
There is no such thing as an off-hand attack for a monk striking unarmed. A monk may thus apply his full Strength bonus on damage rolls for all his unarmed strikes.
A monk’s unarmed strike is treated as both a manufactured weapon and a natural weapon for the purpose of spells and effects that enhance or improve either manufactured weapons or natural weapons.
This would not allow for the spell Strong Jaw to be applied to these strikes, because the monk is not a beast/monster his strikes would only qualify as Primary natural attacks for the purposes of feats and spells applicable to humanoids. (i.e. he would need to cast lead blades on himself, somehow, to gain increased damage dice.)
The reason I am trying to establish that a Monk’s strikes count as primary natural weapons is because according to https://www.d20pfsrd.com/feats/combat-feats/power-attack-combat-final/
Power Attack
Benefit: You can choose to take a –1 penalty on all melee attack rolls and combat maneuver checks to gain a +2 bonus on all melee damage rolls. This bonus to damage is increased by half .5 if you are making an attack with a two-handed weapon, a one handed weapon using two hands, or a primary natural weapon that adds 1.5 times your Strength modifier on damage rolls. This bonus to damage is halved (–50%) if you are making an attack with an off-hand weapon or secondary natural weapon
This would indicate that if a Monk’s Unarmed strike could do 1.5 times Strength damage it would qualify for the 1.5 times damage from Power attack, at least according to my reading of the rules.
While a normal unarmed strike does not use 1.5xStr, using Dragon style in addition to Dragon Ferocity all of a monk’s unarmed strikes will use a minimum of 1.5xStr.
From https://www.d20pfsrd.com/feats/combat-feats/dragon-style-combat/
Dragon Style (Combat)
Benefit: Further, you can add 1.5 times your Strength bonus on the damage roll for your first unarmed strike on a given round.
This feat would take care of the first strike using 1.5xStr, and would allow for a Primary Natural attack to have 1.5xStr applied and so it would allow for Power attack to use the -1/+3 as the attack/damage modifiers as opposed to the -1/+2 for the attack/damage modifiers for the first attack at least.
If we use the Dragon Ferocity feat as well then from https://www.d20pfsrd.com/feats/combat-feats/dragon-ferocity-combat/
Dragon Ferocity
While using Dragon Style, increase your Strength bonus on unarmed strike damage rolls by an additional .5 your Strength bonus, to a total of double your Strength bonus on the first attack and 1.5 times your Strength bonus on the other attacks.
I find this is often times misunderstood, but my reading of this feat application would be that the first strike from a Flurry will have 2xStr and the subsequent strikes will have 1.5xStr.
Now we have a Monk with two Primary Natural attacks the first of which uses 2xStr and the second uses 1.5xStr. This would mean that the pre-requisites for using Power attack with the -1/+3 ratio instead of the -1/+2 ratio have been met.
I know many will argue that a Monk’s weapons are not Primary Natural weapons, I would say that by RAW, they can count, because the passage on Natural attacks specifically says that a Primary Natural attack qualifies as a Primary attack by using the full BAB and STR of an attacker, and both of these requirements are fulfilled with a Monk’s unarmed strikes, and it could pretty easily be argued that a Monk’s strikes could be counted as “Slams” from a creature, seeing as how they both use a unspecified part of the body and deal blunt type damage.
This would be a pretty long feat chain, but a Monk can complete this chain fairly easily and could be doing a pretty solid 37 damage with average rolls and on a full attack. This will create a very powerful Monk, however, seeing as how a Monk is supposed to be the pinnacle of martial prowess I think flavorfully it fits this class well to be able to achieve such high damage.
I should also mention that if this is allowed, all combat will likely revolve around killing this damage monster right out of the gate by the DM. This would not be out of the ordinary, since after the first strike a group of enemies would label this monk as the most dangerous thing on the battlefield, and since this damage can only be achieved by being a frontline melee combatant it will likely result in a lot of monks getting killed very quickly. Add on top of this the fact that this is still a very MAD class that cannot have any armor on at all, and you have a very much “Striker” character.
I know this is quite long so I really appreciate it if you have stayed with me this far, and would love to hear opinions from anyone who would like to point out to me the flaws in my analysis, I am certain there are many.