|Paizo Pathfinder® Paizo Games|
|About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ|
THey deliver a lot of feat with CE as a prerequisite to make sure that feat is useful...evil genius.
That part of the bible is no more nor less outdated than the rest. What part of the bible is important and what is going to be conveniently ignored is a personal choice. How are you suppose to tell what intolerance/fundamentalism/discrimination is fine and which is not?
How exactly he get shot in the eye?
A) There is no body part damage in standard PF, so He just get the damage and his eyes are just fine.
B) You use the called shot optional rule for it.
The folks who want this spell to be as powerful as Dominate Monster, aren't going to be swayed by any further argument
You do understand that the fact that some people read a spell in certain way doesn't imply they do it because they want to break PF in munchkin/powergaming way right? or it is that just too much to ask?
Bob Bob Bob wrote:
Ninja ninja ninja, ninja ninja. ...Bard bardbard bard bard BARD bard bard bard bard. Investigator investigator investigator, ranger ranger ranger, slayer slayer.
Dude, don't be rude...alchemist.
Except the part when you can give them orders and if they fail the opposed check they obey. That's the actual problematic part that should not be in the game IMHO.
Marco Massoudi wrote:
While they could be cool, that would be like 30 pages that almost never would get used.
There is no off-hand attacks outside full attacking TWF*, there is no penalty associated to TWF for AoO*.
*(with the exception of two weapon warrior fighter archetype).
I've been very lucky with the Mikazemas in the past, due to the generosity of fellow forum members I own some high quality products like Cerulean seas campaign setting, Varisia birthplace of legend and Obsidian Apocalypse among others.
So, to restore the balance I will give one of the following to the first three people that ask for them, (the catch if that is someone else have already asked for one of them the next person have to choose from the remaining.)
And the the first ten people that post can participate in the raffle for one of the following
I also would like that the happy winner compromise to write a review about their product.
Disclaimer : Between you choosing a product and me buying it it may pass some weeks, or not, not sure at the moment.
I always cared about the fact that PF basically enforce ranged characters to be stand still machine-guns or suck. IMHO, guns and crossbow should be slower to reload but with powerful shots, or something.
Well, here we go: Divine protection vs "no, swashbuckler can't have cha to will because that would be overpowered"
Insain Dragoon wrote:
And balance issues and uninspired mechanics I would add. But in order to be not totally negative,it does have nice things and the possibility to have lots of more of nice thing if some thing get polished.
The fear is that a consumer, knowing there are errata (available) may decline to buy an in-stock book from a FLGS expecting that there's a second printing coming soon.
It is a no win situation it seems, because the other alternative is that the customer may decline to buy it due to the low quality of the product.
Like 12 years ago we were kicked out of a house because one of the players was stealing some starfruit/carambola from a tree of the house next to the one we were playing.
It is funny when remembered, but at the time the host had problem with his mom and the neighbors.
Coming back to CE, the situation is obnoxious but it would be something if at least no other feat is ever released with CE as prerequisite (unless said feat have actually something to do with fighting defensively).
EDIT: And if Dazing monsters for 1 round shuts down an entire encounter, the Wizard isn't doing it alone.
You probably want to reread some rules before continuing.
Charisma is great. It just sadly doesn't work well for melee characters. Cha to AC, saves, initiative, yada yada is all great when you have an offensive ability to grow off of it. I don't know of a consistent way to get Charisma to hit/damage in Pathfinder. Smite gets you part of the way there.
When you are adding cha to so many thing you can happily allow yourself to buy a big strength.
There is a range of levels where martial and casters contribution in and outside combat are comparable (assuming no extreme cheese on any part). But then there is a point where full caster just win in both.
Getting rid of the big 4 (cloack, amulet, ring, stat booster) is one of the best houserule ever.
Sometimes I have the feeling that some people believe themselves heroes when they mention "power gamers" in a contemptuous way.
I agree as long as the difference is reasonable, wich is not the case with cases like the barbarian favored bonus for humans and for half-elves. Everyone mileage vary of course.
So, you take an improvement to BAB when it does not matter, but are behind most of the time when it matters.
Before 10-12th level or so, MT are indeed unable to handle appropiate encounters. IMHO.
It Was the way it worked before that FAQ. that FAQ was actually a change to the rule.
Douglas Muir 406 wrote:
There is no solution because there is no problem to start with...this is just an RP opportunity. Just make sure t not punish the paladin if end in the middle of a no win situation.
... You'd think that could prepare him for anything players could throw at him. Two of the party members actually helped create 3.0/3.5 D&D as well...
He could very well be able to deal with whatever the players throw at him, that have nothing to do with actually wanting to deal with it.
I'm not seeing a rules question so I'm just going to assume it's this: "Is my DM allowed to tell me that I can't pick traits during character creatation?" The answer is "Yes, refer to rule 0."
I think the default rule is no traits (unless extra trait feat). The 2 traits at character creation are an aditional post-CRB optional rule.
Takeme Onadate wrote:
Any succubus worth her salt will be inventive enough to be stoped by that.
For random stuff that you have favorite in the past for making you smile, laugh or you just agree with.
Lincon hills on stuff we see everyday on the forum:
Lincoln Hills wrote:
MIkaze giving an example I agree with:
Thornborn with a nice poem:
ROberta Yang -WHY THE ROGUE IS NOT UNDERPOWERED:
"Rogues are uniquely good at UMD because everyone else is so good at having actual class features that they don't even need to bother putting ranks in UMD" - an actual argument people are making in Rogues' favor
Doobledug - The ukraine thingy:
'You just don't in the 21st Century behave in 19th Century fashion by invading another country on completely trumped-up pretext,' Mr Kerry told the CBS program Face the Nation."
[Laughs until he passes out]