Ashiel wrote:
I must say, I am quite offended at your flagrant stereotyping. I neither slobber nor spasm while I draw on my inner reserves of martial might (nor indeed at any other time). Additionally, I would never stoop so low as to use the nightmarish slang you suggest, such as "ho" or - even worse - "yo" as a substitute for "your". I am a barbarian, not an animal.
Fromper wrote: Yeah, I was thinking of changing a character alignment, too. I figured I just had to note it on the character sheet, since it doesn't affect any class/religious stuff for this character. I just haven't been playing my barbarian as chaotic as originally intended, so I figure he's more true neutral than chaotic neutral. Congratulations on actually reading the barbarian's alignment requirements! So many folks around here scoff at the very suggestion that a barbarian could possibly be anything other than a raving lunatic who does whatever random thing happens to enter his mind. Please accept my deepest appreciation, good sir.
Muser wrote: Or rather, you can rage whenever you want, even while eating your favorite food off a nubile slave's chest. You can even rage while sleeping, with the right feat. Which - according to popular perception - apparently means you can sleep very angrily. My suggestion is to simply not tell people your character class. End the bigotry and stereotyping!
Chris Mortika wrote:
I resent your prejudiced stereotypes. |