Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Market Patron

Mysterious Stranger's page

1,991 posts. No reviews. No lists. 1 wishlist.


RSS

1 to 50 of 1,991 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

You could also reverse the rolls. For example if he rolls a 20 count it as a 1. A 7 on a d8 would be a 2.


As several people have already said the best time for healing is out of combat. This means that a cleric is no longer absolutely necessary for a party. Also what books are allowed in your campaign? Unless you are using only the core rulebook there are a lot of classes that can heal as well if not better than a cleric.

Healing HP is only a small part of what a healer needs to do. As Dave Justus mentioned condition removal is actually more important. While healing HP is more common it is also the easiest to replace or supplement. Wands of cure light wounds are pretty much a staple of the game and are the most economical healing available. Even for condition removal potions and scrolls should be a big part of your healing strategy. If the party is smart they will pool their resources and purchase appropriate magic items. This way the healer is using all his resources for what really should be a group expense.

The life oracles are actually considered to be the best healer in the game. He can out heal even a dedicated cleric without much trouble. Alchemists, Hedge Witches and some Paladin Archetypes can also replace a cleric as the primary healer. The other thing to take into account is that a lot of classes make decent secondary healer. Bards, Inquisitors, Oracles, Rangers, Paladins, and Witches can all heal to some extent. While none of these will be able to carry the entire burden of healing working together they can often heal well enough that a cleric is not needed. Especially if the party is pulling together, to purchase appropriate magic items.


If he is using a bastard sword one handed he still needs the exotic weapon profecency. As Greg.Everham stated a bastard sword is a one handed weapon that has special rules allowing it to be used two handed as a martial weapon.

Description of a Bastard sword
A bastard sword is about 4 feet in length, making it too large to use in one hand without special training; thus, it is an exotic weapon. A character can use a bastard sword two-handed as a martial weapon.

FAQ
If a weapon is wielded two-handed as a martial weapon and one-handed with an exotic weapon proficiency, can I wield it one-handed without the exotic proficiency at a –4 penalty?

No.

Note that normally you can't wield a two-handed weapon in one hand. A bastard sword is an exception to that rule that you can't wield a two-handed weapon in one hand, but you must have special training to use the bastard sword this way. Without that special training, wielding a bastard sword one-handed is as impossible as wielding a greatsword one-handed. (The same goes for other weapons with this one-handed exotic exception, such as the dwarven waraxe.)

It is pretty clear that to use a bastard sword in one hand requires the exotic weapon proficiency. RAW a medium character using a small bastard sword without the exotic weapon proficiency still has to use two hands.


If all you want to do is to is to pick up a few social skills why not just pick up the social skills. There is nothing in the rules that state you cannot put more than one rank into a skill when you level up. Rangers have plenty of skill points so at your level you could put +6(+7 with favored class bonus to skill) skill points into diplomacy when you hit 8th level. When you hit 9th level use your feat to pick up diplomacy and maybe another social skill as a class skill.

I would also see about retraining your favored class bonus to skill points instead of HP. If you did that you could actually max out diplomacy at your current level. Going from a -2 diplomacy to a +5 is a pretty big jump, but if he is really trying to learn better social skills that is not that unreasonable.


Like Etonwan said presence is important in a bodyguard. Equally important is the ability to spot and handle a dangerous situation. To spot a dangerous situation you are going to want decent bonus in both perception and sense motive. While you can get DEX to damage various ways good old fashion STR is going to be hard to beat.

For the race I would suggest something with a bonus to both STR and DEX. Two races come to mind the first being the Nagaji which get a +2 bonus to perception and +2 saves vs mind affecting and poison. Both of these are going to be very useful in a bodyguard. The other race would be a Suli. They get a +2 bonus in both diplomacy and sense motive, they also 5 points of resistance vs all four of the traditional elements and the ability to add elemental damage to any attack.

For class a Bloodrager would be pretty good. The Abbysal bloodline allows you to grow to the next size category when raging which not only increases his combat ability it also is very impressive. Take intimidating powers and you will have an intimidate score through the roof.

The Suli Bloodrager will be better at social situations as it will have decent scores in diplomacy, intimidate and sense motive. If you take traits to get sense motive and diplomacy as class skills then it hands down better in social situations.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Survival should be able harvest meat from an animal. The skill butcher will allow you to do a better job with less waste and properly prepare the cuts. If all you want to do is to eat the meat survival would work. If you want to be able to sell the meat for a decent profit than butcher would be the appropriate skill.


Considering the Hellknights actually worship several gods, two of which are good. This would indicate that simply working with the order is not enough to cause a paladin to fall. Now if the knight in question is a worshiper of Asmodeus that may be a different story. Helping to build a temple to an evil god would cause a paladin to fall.

Although the Godclaw venerates aspects of Abadar, Asmodeus, Iomedae, Irori, and Torag, it is unclear from which of these gods it draws its power.

The Hellknight could just as easily have Abadar as a patron as Asmodeous.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

What you are describing is taking 20. This is also what any detective would be doing so your point about the detective is kind of pointless. You can only take 20 when you spend the extra time, and are not in danger. If for some reason the GM does not allow taking 20 then that is something you should talk over with the GM.

If you tell the GM we are carefully searching the room that should be clear enough. If he does not get it tell him straight out you are taking 20.

For a quick search you should not know the quality of your roll just the results. Once you start rerolling you are essentially taking 20 except you are actually rolling, and not being guaranteed getting the 20. If I don’t find my keys I don’t know that I rolled a 1, I just know I did not find my keys. At that point I start searching (take 20).

If you want to be more realistic you could actually roll to see how long it takes to get the 20 instead of just taking 20 times as long. To me that would end up slowing down the game too much.


Mathmuse wrote:
Mysterious Stranger wrote:
I understand what you are trying to do, but I don’t think you can do it. The problem is that barbarian’s actions while in rage are limited. It seems to me that retrieving an item from your backpack (or haversack) and using it falls under the “requires patience or concentration”. I don’t think you are going to find any kind of nonmagical healing that a barbarian can use while maintaining rage. I would not allow any barbarian to use any healing item in rage that requires any kind of action on his part. If someone uses the item on him that is different, but the superstitious rage power limits that.

Okay, taking off a backpack and rummaging through the unsorted collection of objects in the bottom would get a raging barbarian screaming in frustration. However, that does not mean it requires patience or concentration.

Dictoionary wrote:
Patience: the capacity to accept or tolerate delay, trouble, or suffering without getting angry or upset.

If the barbarian can perform the activity while angry and upset, while screaming with rage and seeing red from every little snag and delay, then the activity does not require patience. Diplomacy requires patience, Stealth requires patience, Performance requires patience. Use Magic Device requires patience. Knowledge(engineering) requires patience. Carefully organizing a backpack requires patience. But unpacking a backpack does not. Pulling a flask off his belt does not.

Using the Heal skill to Treat Deadly Wounds requires an hour, so it takes patience. But I already dismissed that as an option while raging.

Abraham Z., I missed a feat, Godless Healing from Inner Sea World Guide. It does not heal much, but the feat can heal without relying on a medicine, healer's kit, or portion.

Pulling the flask of his belt may not require patience or concentration, but opening a sealed flask would. I am assuming that any flask or other alchemical item has some sort of closure to prevent it from being spilled or evaporating.


I understand what you are trying to do, but I don’t think you can do it. The problem is that barbarian’s actions while in rage are limited. It seems to me that retrieving an item from your backpack (or haversack) and using it falls under the “requires patience or concentration”. I don’t think you are going to find any kind of nonmagical healing that a barbarian can use while maintaining rage. I would not allow any barbarian to use any healing item in rage that requires any kind of action on his part. If someone uses the item on him that is different, but the superstitious rage power limits that.

While in rage, a barbarian gains a +4 morale bonus to her Strength and Constitution, as well as a +2 morale bonus on Will saves. In addition, she takes a –2 penalty to Armor Class. The increase to Constitution grants the barbarian 2 hit points per Hit Dice, but these disappear when the rage ends and are not lost first like temporary hit points. While in rage, a barbarian cannot use any Charisma-, Dexterity-, or Intelligence-based skills (except Acrobatics, Fly, Intimidate, and Ride) or any ability that requires patience or concentration.

Other than a few rage powers that have been mentioned or items that provide continuous healing you are not going to be able to heal in combat. The only exception may be something that is not spell based that you take before you start your rage.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Normally it would not matter because from a mathematical perspective they are the same. There is on case where it does make the difference and that is when you use maximize spell on a empowered spell. There was a ruling that only the base damage of the spell is maximized. So if you had a empowered maximized Fireball(an 8th level spell) you would do 80 points plus 5d6+10 points of damage. That would indicate that the correct way for the 5th level sorcerer would be to roll 7d6+15.


When I run I use most of the rules especially encumbrance and ammo. Since fighters who dump INT lose skill points it is only fair that rouges and wizards who dump STR are also penalized. This also forces clerics and other secondary combatants to devote some resources to STR to avoid being encumbered by their armor and weapons. Using ammo is a way of keeping archers in check.

For things like rations and other minor equipment I simply have the players spend a monthly upkeep fee and consider it taken care of.

I use Hero Labs and have a copy of all characters so it keeps track of the encumbrance for me. Past first level most archers simply get durable arrows to minimize breakage. This means that they only really have to worry about ammo in two cases. The first is if they have to run before being able to collect their arrows. The second is in a very long battle. Having to pay 1GP per arrow rather than 1 per 20 arrows is not that big of a deal.


The rage power states they cannot be a willing target for a spell. To me this also means they cannot even willingly drink a potion. So unless someone else is force the potion down the barbarian’s throat they cannot use a potion while under the rage power. If someone did manage to force a potion down a raging barbarian’s throat they would be required to make a saving throw vs the effect.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Since the players are not actually able to see the seen they are relying on the GM description for everything. No matter how well you describe the scene you cannot convey every detail. This is why you should generally give the player the benefit of the doubt. If the information from the skill check is something that is not hidden or concealed you should generally ask for the appropriate skill roll.

A good rule of thumb is that if a character with the appropriate skill can make a check without having to move or having to do anything give them the roll. If the skill check involves any kind of action then wait until they actually take the appropriate action. Most knowledge skills and other informational skills will usually get a roll.

If the player specifically states they are ignoring something then I would not give them a roll. So if you tell the players they found a camp and they interact with it in any way they would probably get a roll. If on the other hand they we ignore it and move on then they don’t get a roll.


Reading the description of the feat it says you are a member of a proud noble family. It does not mention that you have to be born into the family. Simply be an adopted member of the family. Take the alternative racial trait Academician and choose knowledge nobility for your knowledge skill.


DesolateHarmony wrote:

Paladin's Sacrifice is a wonderful teamwork spell. Keep a squishy up from most anything, and make your own save or use your own LoH for a fix.

Always, Always have a hero's defiance. You staying up is vital to the group.

Mysterious Stranger wrote:
Also consider picking up improved critical and using bless weapon. Auto conforming a paladins smite evil on a weapon with a 15-20 crit range is incredibly powerful.

His scimitar is keen already. But, yes, I second bless weapon. A wand of it might be a really good purchase.

Bless Weapon specifies that the automatic conformation of critical hits do not apply to any weapon that has a magical effect related to critical hits and mentions keen by name. This is why I suggested improved critical. He already ignores all damage reduction when using smite evil.


Since you are going to be going up against undead you may want to memorize lesser restoration. Paladins get it as a 1st level spell.

Also consider picking up improved critical and using bless weapon. Auto conforming a paladins smite evil on a weapon with a 15-20 crit range is incredibly powerful.

Ghostbane Dirge is also going to be useful vs Incorporeal undead.

Bulls Strength is a good go to second level spell. Since you don’t have any wondrous items this is even more useful. Eagles Splendor would also be useful especially for saving throws and bonus to hit on smite evil.

Litany of Righteousness is also a good spell for a paladin. Declare smite in the first round and then use Litany of Righteousness in the second.

Blade of Bright Victory is another good spell for dealing with incorporeal undead.


For first level spells memorize Hero’s Defiance. This spell is only used as a reaction to going below 0 HP and is cast as an immediate action.

You could also memorize healing spells to take up some load of the primary healer. Paladins get lesser restoration as a 1st level spell. Also spells like Endure Elements or Undetectable alignment have all day duration but most other casters have better spells.

Casting undetectable alignment on yourself every day would make you less likely to be spotted by detect good.


What makes an inquisitor unique is the ability to stack buffs. Judgements are sacred/profane bonuses; they also get access to divine favor/power which is a luck bonus, and also heroism for a morale bonus. All of these stack with Bane. All of these work equally well with both melee and ranged combat. While you may be going for an archer it is nice not to be completely nerfed when you cannot use a bow. Many archer builds are useless when not using a bow the inquisitor is not one of them.

Inquisitors already have good will and fort saves and can boost them further with judgements if needed.


While pathfinder characters may be slightly more powerful than their 3.5 counter parts, so are the NPC. As long as you are using the same rules system for both PC’s and NPC’s it should not be a problem. Keep in mind that everything the players can use is fair game for your NPC’s.


Alzhan wrote:
Mysterious Stranger wrote:
The best advice I can give on multiclassing an inquisitor is don’t do it. The inquisitor has too many level dependent class features to make it worth dipping into another class. Spells, Judgements, Bane, Stern Gaze, Tracking, and Discern Lies are all level dependent. They also gain multiple other abilities as they level up. Seriously the inquisitor is the absolute worst class to multiclass.
I surely agree that delaying important class abitilies like Greater Bane and Stalwart is bad, but i somehow feel that taking most of the crucial feat way earlier might be better

Are you more interested in being an archer or an inquisitor? If you want to be an archer there are classes that do this better than the inquisitor. Zen Archers are some of the best archers but to make it worthwhile you need to take too many level in monk.

Without the ability to fire a bow without provoking an attack of opportunity you will also need to be able to handle melee. The inquisitor class abilities work equally well on melee or ranged combat. This means that you are not completely shut down if you are not able to use your bow.

Inquisitors already are behind in gaining spell levels and only have limited number of spells per day. Multiclassing makes this even worse. Assuming a 3 level dip, at 12th level your highest level spell is 3rd. A straight inquisitor has 4th level spells and the cleric has 6th level spells. Your caster level is also way nerfed so the spells you do have are less effective.

To make the Zen Archer worthwhile you need to max out WIS, but you still need at least a 13 DEX. Any archer needs Deadly Aim and it requires at least a 13 DEX. You are also going to want to go to at least 3rd level for both Point Blank Master and Zen Archery. This basically means you are almost useless for the first two levels.

At 5th level the straight inquisitor picks up bane and a teamwork feat (Coordinated Shot). He also can use judgements twice a day, and the bonus for judgement of Justice is +2 compared to the +1 of the multiclass inquisitor. At this point the straight inquisitor when fully buffed will be much better than the multiclass. The Multiclass will have a slight advantage in a long fight with lots of different opponents, but for taking down the BBEG the straight inquisitor much better. He also has second level spells like Invisibility and Flames of the Faithful.


For a monster hunting campaign a inquisitor would be very useful. A combination of inquisitor for spells and special abilities and fighter for BAB and feats would be very powerful. The inquisitor can almost match a fighter for short periods of time without gestalt. Take the feat improved monster lore and put at least a single point into each monster related knowledge skill.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

The best advice I can give on multiclassing an inquisitor is don’t do it. The inquisitor has too many level dependent class features to make it worth dipping into another class. Spells, Judgements, Bane, Stern Gaze, Tracking, and Discern Lies are all level dependent. They also gain multiple other abilities as they level up. Seriously the inquisitor is the absolute worst class to multiclass.


wraithstrike wrote:
Mysterious Stranger wrote:
wraithstrike wrote:
Mysterious Stranger wrote:

Does he have the trap spotter talent or something similar? If not the perception rolls are not automatic and he has to actively be looking for the trap. If there is no danger when he encounters the trap this is probably not a problem, but if he encounters the trap during combat that is another story.

Another option is to have a trap that is multistage traps where disarming one arms another in a different location. Maybe the trap on the treasure room activates the one on the dungeon entrance/exit. This way he can find the first trap that is already disarmed so he forgets about it. After disarming the second trap the first trap is now armed. Since he already knows about the first trap he does not get another check unless he looks. If the trap is magical the first trap may not even be in existence until triggered by the second trap so there would be no roll the first time through. Be careful not to overuse this as other have stated the player invested a lot of resources in being able to find things so he should get to use what he paid for so to speak.

The trapfinder is not always the trap disabler. This could fall on another party member.

This is also the type of thing that will make players paranoid and have them rolling dice too much and slowing down gameplay. It only needs to happen once.

Considering the original poster specifies they character has the trapfinder trait, and has an equally high disarm device it is a logical assumption that he is the one disarming traps.

If a player is investing as much as this one has in dealing with traps the GM should use them. If the GM simply ignores traps, that is as bad if not worse than arbitrarily adjusting the difficulty.

As to it slowing down the game there are things that can be done to speed this up. If the player states that are looking for traps simply slow down their progress without slowing down the game. Telling the

...

These types of rolls are best done by the GM not the player. The trick is you only need to worry about the roll if there is an actual trap.

If you are using dice get in the habit of idly rolling dice while you are doing something else. The trick is you only have to pay attention when there is something actually going on. Most of the time you are simply flipping dice and ignoring them, but every once in a while pause as is you are looking at something. Then when a situation like a trap comes up it will not be an automatic give away.

I use a computer and hero labs when I am running. It has a built in dice roller so I can roll 99 rolls with a single click of the button. Since I am constantly checking things on the system and my players cannot see the screen they have no clue if I am looking up something or actually rolling a check of some sort.


wraithstrike wrote:
Mysterious Stranger wrote:

Does he have the trap spotter talent or something similar? If not the perception rolls are not automatic and he has to actively be looking for the trap. If there is no danger when he encounters the trap this is probably not a problem, but if he encounters the trap during combat that is another story.

Another option is to have a trap that is multistage traps where disarming one arms another in a different location. Maybe the trap on the treasure room activates the one on the dungeon entrance/exit. This way he can find the first trap that is already disarmed so he forgets about it. After disarming the second trap the first trap is now armed. Since he already knows about the first trap he does not get another check unless he looks. If the trap is magical the first trap may not even be in existence until triggered by the second trap so there would be no roll the first time through. Be careful not to overuse this as other have stated the player invested a lot of resources in being able to find things so he should get to use what he paid for so to speak.

The trapfinder is not always the trap disabler. This could fall on another party member.

This is also the type of thing that will make players paranoid and have them rolling dice too much and slowing down gameplay. It only needs to happen once.

Considering the original poster specifies they character has the trapfinder trait, and has an equally high disarm device it is a logical assumption that he is the one disarming traps.

If a player is investing as much as this one has in dealing with traps the GM should use them. If the GM simply ignores traps, that is as bad if not worse than arbitrarily adjusting the difficulty.

As to it slowing down the game there are things that can be done to speed this up. If the player states that are looking for traps simply slow down their progress without slowing down the game. Telling the players that it take twice as long to walk down the hall does not really take anymore game time than telling them they walk faster. While I am not a fan of the GM rolling for the player this is one time I would do it. If there are no traps just roll behind the screen and pretend to read the dice, if there is a trap then pay attention to the roll.


What kind of armor are you wearing? Most medium or heavy armor include gauntlets which count as weapons and will allow you to make an attack of opportunity.

The big downside of multiclassing is the delay of your class abilities. The question is, is an extra 1.5 points of damage worth delaying your samurai class abilities?


Does he have the trap spotter talent or something similar? If not the perception rolls are not automatic and he has to actively be looking for the trap. If there is no danger when he encounters the trap this is probably not a problem, but if he encounters the trap during combat that is another story.

Another option is to have a trap that is multistage traps where disarming one arms another in a different location. Maybe the trap on the treasure room activates the one on the dungeon entrance/exit. This way he can find the first trap that is already disarmed so he forgets about it. After disarming the second trap the first trap is now armed. Since he already knows about the first trap he does not get another check unless he looks. If the trap is magical the first trap may not even be in existence until triggered by the second trap so there would be no roll the first time through. Be careful not to overuse this as other have stated the player invested a lot of resources in being able to find things so he should get to use what he paid for so to speak.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

For players with poor social skills I allow them to use the better of the roleplay or the skill roll. The roleplay does determine what they are looking to get. So if they ask for the wrong thing then they may not get what they want, but the success is based on the skill roll.

For players with good social skills playing a character with poor social skills I do the opposite. You should not be able to use your own skills to compensate for skills your character does not have.


You could use the spell Spell Immunity and the greater version for this. As long as the method of blocking allows spell resistance it will work. This would work on an individual spell but not work on everything. I agree with Claxon that a single spell able to defeat multiple different spells and abilities should be high level and his estimate on the level sounds about right.


Normally you cannot explicitly block in pathfinder. There are a few abilities that let you do so and some of them can be done unarmed. Crane style is probably the closest thing to what you are looking for. As Blymurrkla stated you can consider a high AC to include blocking especially if you have a high DEX.

If you are looking for a game system with a more detailed combat system then Pathfinder is probably the wrong one. Pathfinder abstracts a lot of thing including combat. Hero System has a very detailed combat system including allowing for things like blocking, dodging and other actions in combat.


The primary job of a paladin is not to smite evil, but rather to protect the innocent. If you look at the breakdown of the class abilities you will notice that all offensive class abilities are limited in the number of uses per day. Even lay on hands which can be used offensively vs undead is limited. By contract all defensive and informational abilities (detect evil) are either constant or can be used an unlimited number of times per day.

Trying to use super hero ethics in a fantasy setting is not a good idea. Most super hero’s use non-lethal attacks because they are super heroes. Capitan America would be a brawler so he takes no penalty for using non-lethal damage.

Also Punisher is Lawful Evil, not Lawful Good. He uses the same tactics that he fights against, but limits his targets based on his code, hence the lawful.


Wonderstell wrote:
Arbane the Terrible wrote:
How about the Human bonus feat? Would a Human reincarnated to something else get to keep it?

Yes, since the Bonus Feat is a mental racial trait. But there are exceptions. If you had taken "Toughness" as your Bonus Feat, then one could argue that it is a physical Racial Trait, which wouldn't transfer.

Reincarnation requires the player and the GM to decide what stays and doesn't with a case-by-case process.

Feats are learned behavior not physical trait. They are defiantly not racial traits even if the prerequisite is being a certain race. A human would keep his bonus feat no matter what the feat is. He may not be able to use the feat if he no longer meets the prerequisite , but he still has it. Just like the Halfling still has Adaptable Luck, but is not able to use it. Toughness has no prerequisite so the reincarnated human would still retain the extra HP, and continue to gain extra HP as they level up.


About all you really get is bragging rights. Once you become a deity your character becomes an NPC and is no longer under your control. Your former character can now do anything the GM wants him to just like any other deity.


Several archetypes reduce the number of smite evils in compensation for other powers gained. One of these may work better for you. This way you still have smite evil but its importance is lessened.


There are a couple of tricks to running this kind of combat. First is to limit the different kinds of creatures. Having a couple of different types of undead is fine but the vast majority should be a single type with identical stats. A boss with a few lieutenants is fine, but don’t have a dozen different types each with their own individual stat blocks. Use group initiative instead of individual for the monsters.

Know how much damage your characters will be doing and figure out how many hits it will take to kill the monster and use that when you can. So don’t roll for damage if the player does +25 damage and hits twice on a 40 HP monster. If he hits one then go ahead and roll the damage but otherwise just figure out the kill point. The same is true for spells. If the fireball is going to kill the monsters even if it makes the save don’t bother rolling the save.

The most important thing is to delegate out some of the work to the players. For example have one of the players keep track of HP instead of doing yourself. Have the players move the some of the monsters instead of doing it all yourself. When you have 2-4 people moving figures it takes a lot less time. This also keeps the players interest and prevents them from getting bored

For rolls use a computer instead of actual dice. Hero Labs has die roller utility built in that allows you to make any roll you need including bonuses. It even allows multiple rolls so you can roll 99 saves with a single click of the button.

The biggest thing is don’t sweat the details. If you are off a few HP on the monsters who cares?


I use a 25 point buy in all the games I run, but I add a couple of conditions. You are only allowed a single dump stat and no stat below 6, or over 20 including racial bonuses. This leads to more rounded characters and avoids the typical village idiot type characters. I have had one player who wanted two dump stats for a concept, but I did not give him extra points for dumping the second stat. This allows players to play M.A.D. classes but Keeps the S.A.D. classes in check.

I generally prefer powerful characters in games I run so I don’t have to treat them with kid’s gloves. My monsters tend to use tactics and strategies when appropriate and often the players make poor decisions so this gives them a needed edge.


Normally any enchantment on the projectile weapon would be transferred to the ammunition. The thing is that a Suli’s Elemental Assault is not an enchantment on the projectile weapon so would not be transferred.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Fuzzy-Wuzzy wrote:
Here's another argument: the paladin code of Sarenrae, goddess of honesty, nowhere mentions honesty. I'd expect it to be in there somewhere, unless it's already included via the standard code.

Other than this line.

I am fair to others. I expect nothing for myself but that which I need to survive.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

The way I see it a paladin must follow both the standard paladin code in the core rule book, and their deity’s code. But if there is a conflict the deity’s code takes precedence over the standard code.

I am not seeing anything in Erastil’s code that really contradicts the standard paladin’s code. The only minor change seems to be the section on how you help those in need. The standard paladin would have no problem doing the work for the people or even just giving them gold to handle the problem. A paladin of Erastil is instead required to teach the person how to do it for themselves.

Torag on the other hand has a couple of differences that stand out.

• My word is my bond. When I give my word formally, I defend my oath to my death. Traps lie in idle banter or thoughtless talk, and so I watch my tongue.

• I am at all times truthful, honorable, and forthright, but my allegiance is to my people. I will do what is necessary to serve them, including misleading others.

• I respect the forge, and never sully it with halfhearted work. My creations reflect the depth of my faith, and I will not allow flaws save in direst need.

• Against my people's enemies I will show no mercy. I will not allow their surrender, except to extract information. I will defeat them, and I will scatter their families. Yet even in the struggle against our enemies, I will act in a way that brings honor to Torag.

Paladins or Torag are a lot more ruthless than other especially those of Sarenrae. A paladin of Sarenrae is expected to show mercy to his enemies, but a paladin of Torag tends to be more brutal and is not only allowed to deceive his enemies but actually almost required to.


Greater Teleport works because the sun is visible from the planet. Interplanetary teleport has fewer restrictions on seeing or having a description.


Use a limited wish to make and survive the original trip. Then use a permanent create demi plane to create your dwelling.


Have you considered a Skald? They mix the bard and barbarian but allow others to rage along with them. They also get medium armor and martial weapons.


Since there is no reason a wizard cannot actually be a thief I assume you mean rogue not thief. You also specified wizard instead of spell caster so that leaves out the obvious solution of the archeologist bard.

A wizard because of his INT will have near as many skill ranks as rogue but usually spends them on knowledges and spell craft. For the most part they also lack the proper class skills. The thing is there is nothing preventing a wizard from putting ranks into any skill he wants. If the skill in question is not a class skill all it means is they don’t get the +3 bonus. While being behind 3 points on a skill seems like a big deal it really is not for one reason spells. Many spells the wizard gets give huge bonuses to specific skills. The best example is invisibility giving a +20 to stealth, but there are also other spells that can not only overcome but actually exceed the class skill bonus. One spell also deserves special notice which is Heroism. Heroism gives a +2 bonus to all attacks, saves and skill checks, and it lasts 10 min. per level. This one third level spell almost makes every skill in the book a class skill.

Anyone with disable device can find and remove traps. To use disable device for magical traps requires Trapfinding or something similar. The thing is why would a spell caster even bother using disable device to overcome a magical trap. Wizards get the cantrip detect magic which can be use an unlimited number of times per day so they are actually better at detecting magical traps than a rouge. Simply take three rounds and you have located any magical traps. As to disabling them that is what dispel magic is for.

The only other class feature that the wizard needs to emulate is sneak attack. Instead of trying to simulate a sneak attack let’s look at what sneak attack really does. Sneak attack is designed to allow a rogue to take out a target that he surprises. There are plenty of spells that can do this starting with sleep, various touch attacks spells can also be used. Throw in a few meta magic feats like silent spell, and still spell can allow you to cast a spell without drawing attention to yourself. Yes if someone sees you casting they may still be able to figure it out, but if you cast without them seeing this will often be enough to avoid drawing attention to yourself.

If the wizard really needs to cast a spell and cannot avoid being noticed then simply hold a piece of paper or a stick and pretend to use the skill use magic device. They could also carry colored water in potion containers and pretend to drink a potion. Use the cantrip prestidigitation to make the tip of the stick glow purple so people really think it is a magic wand.


Spend a feat.


Considering you are going into mystic theurge to get arcane spells giving up two schools may be counterproductive. You may want to consider an archetype that replaces schools. Spell sage might work. You give up arcane bond but once per day can cast a spell as if you were 4 levels higher. It does not stipulate the spell has to be a wizard spell so you could use this ability on a cleric spell.

Spell study allows you to use two of your own spells to cast any spell from the cleric, bard or druid list. If the spell is on multiple lists you use the lowest level. Again the description does not state you have to use wizard spells so you could use two cleric spells. You already have access to the cleric spell list but this would allow you to cast a spell you did not prepare. Also bards get early access to a lot of spells so you may end up being able to cast some wizard spells before you can as a wizard.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

From the new list I guess it is not core only anymore. If the Empyreal bloodline is available you could go Druid/Sorcerer. This would mean you have a single casting stat and access to two separate spell lists. You also have the flexibility of a spontaneous caster and the versatility of a prepared divine caster. Druid also gives you an animal companion, and wild shape both which will be very useful.


The only undead that I know of that does not become evil is the ghost, and even that is rare,

When a soul is not allowed to rest due to some great injustice, either real or perceived, it sometimes comes back as a ghost. Such beings are in eternal anguish, lacking in substance and unable to set things right. Although ghosts can be any alignment, the majority cling to the living world out of a powerful sense of rage and hatred, and as a result are chaotic evil—even the ghost of a good or lawful creature can become hateful and cruel in its afterlife.

It even states that if you set right what is preventing it from resting it is permanently destroyed.

Rejuvenation (Su): In most cases, it's difficult to destroy a ghost through simple combat: the "destroyed" spirit restores itself in 2d4 days. Even the most powerful spells are usually only temporary solutions. The only way to permanently destroy a ghost is to determine the reason for its existence and set right whatever prevents it from resting in peace. The exact means varies with each spirit and may require a good deal of research, and should be created specifically for each different ghost by the GM.

I would say that a worshiper of Pharasma would have no choice to figure out what needs to be done to destroy a ghost. Letting the ghost “live” would be about the greatest sin that a worshiper could ever do.


Ultimate mercy requires you to use 10 lay on hands. A 6th level paladin with a 19 CHA only has 7 lay on hands. Extra channel energy gives you 4 extra lay on hand but only to channel energy you cannot use them for lay on hands which you need to use for ultimate mercy. Even if you don’t take the hospitaler archetype you could not use the extra lay on hand gained from extra channel energy for ultimate mercy.


Quasnoflaut wrote:
Mysterious Stranger wrote:
Honestly looking over the list of infusions I am not seeing a big problem. While the list is larger than most spells know for spontaneous casters the list is really not that good. Blade Barrier seems to be the best offensive infusion which they get at 16th level. The oracle picked up this spell at 12th level. At the same level the artificer is picking up Blade Barrier the bard is picking up Mass Charm Person or Project Image.

"Blast rod," unless I'm reading it wrong, allows you to prepare a metal rod with 1d8/lvl force damage and release up to 10d8 (if you have that many) as a ray that deals force damage. At level eight, she did 8d8 damage on a ranged touch. Does the fact that that's only a few times per day balance out the amount of damage? Or am I looking at it wrong, and that's not too much damage at all for a third level spell?

At the level the artificer gets this the wizard is getting things like Enervation, Ice Storm, and Phantasmal Killer. I don’t know about you but I would rather take 8d8 points of damage than gain 1d4 negative levels. While Ice Storm does not do as much vs a single target it does hit multiple targets without having to roll to hit, and gets No saving throw, and it also gives penalties to perception and movement.

Blast rod also has a maximum range of 60 feet and requires a ranged touch attack. At 8th level it does twice the damage of a Magic Missile and has 1/3 the range. Considering Blat Rod is a 3rd level infusion being compared to a 1st level spell it looks to be pretty bad.

Seriously the Infusion list is not that good. Also consider that spontaneous casters have ways to increase their spells know. Rings of spell knowledge, mnemonic vestments and pages of spell knowledge can significantly increase the spells know of a spontaneous caster. The human favored class bonus can also increase spells known.


No it only stacks for the channel energy part. You still do not gain more lay on hands as that is a different class feature, but you do gain the extra dice. If you want to go holy vindicator it would actually be best to keep the hospitaler archetype as they get a separate pool of channel energy.

When you take a class or archetype you get what it says you get no more, no less. The fact that you may be at a disadvantage compared to another class does not matter.

1 to 50 of 1,991 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2016 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.