|Paizo Pathfinder® Paizo Games|
|About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ|
Jason Nelson wrote:
Where's the "like" button when you need it?
Let me loudly echo Jason's post: this is a truly amazing project, with some your favorite adventure authors, a multiverse-spanning story that takes you to incredibly diverse settings and introduces a bevy of new monsters, aliens, and NPCs. I'm hard at work now on my chapter, The Scavenged Codex and am really excited by the artwork I'm seeing. Check out Jason's latest update for a preview of the cover!
As Judy mentioned above, Mayor Ballard issued an executive order essentially countermanding the governor's bill in Indianapolis. This was especially unusual as Ballard and Pence are members of the same party: no way not to see this move as anything other than a thumb in the governor's eye. Much of the politics driving this discrimination-sanctioning bill originated in the far more reactionary rural areas of the state, which exert outsized influence in the halls of government.
What made me really proud of GenCon and the values of the gamer community that it reflects (acceptance, not tolerance), is that the Con was the FIRST entity to take a public stance on the dubiously titled RFRA. All other corporate and organizational announcements followed in GenCon's wake.
I've lived in Indianapolis for the past 20-some years. Let's hope that the blowback from this ill-considered act teaches the haters that the times, they are a-changin'. With gamers in the vanguard.
See you in three weeks!
On a side note, will the idea of the Dark Tapestry play any factor in this? I am kind of hoping so as they were used to great effect in Iron Gods.
You may be aware, Kodyax, that was responsible not only for a direct Iron Gods dose of the Dark Tapestry, I also wrote the support article on the Dominion of the Black in Pathfinder #88 and had notable DT elements in both the Dragon's Demand and Pyramid of the Sky Pharaoh. So, I loves me some DarkTap. Since DT is Paizo intellectual property, however, there won't be any development of that aspect per se in the LG AP (though a DT mystery oracle or the like is certainly a possibility). That said, nothing would stop you from porting DT into your own use of the Legendary Worlds Campaign Setting. It's built specifically to accommodate "crossing the streams," so to speak.
There's minimal info re: the Order of the Torrent in currently available publications. For instance, they're historically centered in Kintargo and have dwindled to a rather small sect in more recent years. Turn of the Torrent fleshes them out a bit more.
Also: you'll become acquainted with the Silver Ravens over the course of the Hell's Rebels AP. Intimately acquainted.
Cantrip cast on a bottle cap. Sorry. ; )
GM Burglar wrote:
Frankly, I don't know what happened with the dwarves vs. Temel. I do, however, have a little suggestion for you:
GM Burglar only:
If the PCs end up in the parlor with Gamaradim Po and his tea, have the caretaker offer a toast to the Pathfinder Society as a further inducement to drink it--another GM did this at GenCon and it was a great little touch.
Greg A. Vaughan wrote:
Mike, this is a FANTASTIC adventure. I think you hit it out of the park. This is the AP I've been waiting for ever since I first read Expedition to Barrier Peaks 30 years ago, and it has not disappointed. However, I think you have done an excellent job in particular of capturing the weird horror of the Dominion of the Black and Lovecraft elements...and still making them feel different from each other. I just wanted to chime in and add my kudos. Did I mention I really like it. :-)
You made my day, Greg! Just beaming ear to ear.
Say, aren't you supposed to be rooting around in a cadaver rather than reading this stuff?
Adam Daigle wrote:
Sneaks into janitor's closet, squeezes goop from mop head into a bucket, tip toes out of Paizo offices with bucket, having animated conversation with self
Richard Pett wrote:
Valley of the Brain Collectors is just the most amazingly engaging title ever, can't wait to see what Mike has done with it...
Terrible, terrible things...
Glen Shackleton wrote:
Mike you did an awesome job. I love your work in general but this special looks like its going to be awesome. Love the part 5 twist.
Thanks for the praise, but understand that John Compton's fingerprints are all over this thing. The part 5 twist was in the assignment outline, so I can't claim credit for the concept. I love it, too!
Mark Garringer also deserves some glory for his help in brainstorming and planning. He will be serving as the overseer for the special at GenCon, only five days away! I'll be wandering around observing the mayhem and helping out if I can.
With that said, I'm going to refrain from chirping in on any specific mechanical issues from now on to avoid confusion. John and Mike Brock have the final word on such matters.
See you all at GenCon!
I'm not sure if John, Mike, and others on the PFS team have something they're going to do where the aid tokens are concerned. However, I'd recommend that GMs have a bullet-pointed player handout for their tables that lists the parameters and possible uses of the tokens for easy reference.
Also, the compass of the map of the Grand Cathedral should be pointed to the right had side of the page (it now faces what should be west).
Looking forward to seeing you guys bring this to life only five days from now!
So is the June 27 version the final version or is it still the play test version? Kinda cuttin it close if its not the final.
No, the final version hasn't been distributed yet.
But fear not! John and dozens of his whiskey swigging quasit minions are feverishly working on the final version of the scenario as we speak.
Note: Truth be told, it's only two quasits, and one of them does nothing but peel John's grapes.
Thanks, though I can't take all the creepy credit. I sent in my turnover, which I thought was pretty creepy, but then it got...
Thanks, but I'm not special — everyone on the boards deserves better. No one likes a negative critique, but it helps if the poster puts a bit of thought into it. Smug calls for punting my pudenda might give someone a chuckle, but it doesn't illuminate. Unfavorable commentary is useful if it gives some quantifiable reasons for the dissatisfaction.
This particular scenario produced some strong reactions and those reactions have had an impact on my design work. For instance, I now work harder to make the backstory discoverable for players in situ. If you're unhappy with a scenario, by all means, let Paizo and the author know, but doing so in an insulting manner is counterproductive. Deliberately cruel language may seem clever or edgy, but it just gets you marked as a creep.
Thank you so much for your thoughtful and cogent review of this scenario. I was especially charmed by your call for the brutalization of my testicles. I think I speak for many scenario authors when I say that it's this kind of insightful critique of one's work that makes all the time and labor that goes into producing PFS scenarios and other Pathfinder products worthwhile. Should you deign to participate in any other material I have written, I hope you will provide more of your adroit and penetrating commentary.
On the off chance that you are under the age of 13 — chronologically or emotionally — let me make a recommendation: while the internet provides a level of anonimity and therefore offers opportunities to ignore basic rules of courtesy, try to refrain from coarse insults. It tends to mark one as a troll and results in others making an uncharitable assessment of the poster. Indeed, some may make comparisons of the poster to specific parts of the anatomy.
- Mike Shel
It sounds like you've done about as much as you can do to steer the PCs away from disaster, but they're apparently not a very wise bunch. There's only so much you can do to encourage players to avoid total failure. Frankly, I'd let things play out as they would, given the circumstances. Let the party proceed as they wish, with the subsequent torches and pitchforks. It may be the only way they learn that subtlety, diplomacy and cooperation are tools of the trade as well.
Alternately, you could have the local constables (the more competent Gergis leading them with Lezara Dodgion along for good measure) discover the party's skulking, have them hauled up before the baroness and have her read them the riot act: come clean and do these tasks for me or sit in our lovely jail.
I have one question for GenCon Prep. I have ordered every map from the PaizoCon version of this module. I'm hoping that whatever the surprise encounter is, will be contained to one of the maps already used. If not, can you tell us what map it is, so I have time to order and ship before the con?
You won't need any additional map packs than those found in the PaizoCon version of the scenario. I'd strongly encourage GenCon GMs who can afford it to have those map packs ready for use to speed up the game and pre-draw what custom maps you can (the Brothers' Arches, for instance).
Understand that the version of the PDF you have now is the playtest version used at PaizoCon, not the one for GenCon. Corrections will be made and the aforementioned twist will add substantial content to the adventure. I'm not sure what John's release date is for the GenCon version, but it's probably 2-3 weeks out.
John is very aware of the resource challenge and we have already bandied about some ideas re: this. The journey through Jormurdun will need to get tightened up some.
But, O me Brothers & Sisters, I'm getting more and more excited about the twist: I think it'll both surprise and delight players and GMs alike.
Dorothy Lindman wrote:
Lady Ophelia wrote:
Yes, if you had to draw the entire map of some encounters you would be right to damn me. However, I had conceived of players viewing the full map of the Grand Cathedral and selecting where they would be positioned for the briefing (and therefore the subsequent combat encounters, which are actually influenced by PC location); the PCs also choose their location in the Throne Room. The GM would then draw only that area of the map for players. I haven't had a chance to read over John's developed text yet, but I'm assuming he retained this notion. Unless, of course, he wanted me to be lynched by a gang of angry GMs.