|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Character: Mamodia, Olman cohort cleric11
The constant, repeated of effects of Blasphemy, Chaos hammer, Unholy blight and 3 Hezrou stenches *every round* horribly incapacitated everyone in the party and nearly resulted in a TPK. Unfortunately, the cohort was the only one that could cast teleport (i.e. he was their ride home). Delfedd wrote: I, while improving, came up with a sort of amalagrim of styles, trying to convey that it wasn't a very good ship. Yup... a barely seaworthy amalgam of bits from other wrecks and repairs made from driftwood... but it has 'character' (you could still use whatever deckplan or model you have available though). Make the figurehead something notable, especially since
Maybe the 'hellfish' figurehead is a dessicated husk of something the pirates found washed ashore, like a: direshark, mantaray, aboleth corpse, giant crab (sHellfish... get it :), etc. My own group took over the Stygian shark (after losing their own ship in the naval battle with the crimson fleet)... which will be a perfect name when they start sailing the Styx. Sben wrote: Are the PCs intended to receive an XP award for successfully interacting with the couatl in the rakasta temple? It doesn't explicitly state so Really? Hm... I coulda sworn it stated this. Sben wrote: would like to know if that was the intent, or if other DMs have done that. I did. It'd be a shame if PC's that went around attacking couatls got to level up quicker. Snorter wrote: nowhere does it say that number of attacks should remain static. Actually, nowhere does it make provisions for advanced monsters to gain extra natural attacks. This has already been double-checked against other examples, and against MonsterForge. Mind you: if the Deinosuchus was armed with a manufactured weapon (like a Big brAss Sword), then it *would* gain iterative attacks based on its BAB. DMFTodd wrote: The Deinosuchus' attacks are listed as Bite OR Tail Slap. Since they are Natural Attacks, shouldn't it get both with the tail slap being -5? If it is only getting one of them, shouldn't it get reiterative attaacks since his bab is +18? Nope. The Deinosuchus is essentially just giant crocodile that has been advanced using the standard Improving Monsters rules. As such, they don't gain additional attacks. To compare, take a look at a regular T-Rex. 13 BAB, but only one attack. ellegua wrote:
Er... the DC for a 10' standing long jump is 20, but the DC for a standing high jump is 80. ... not that I would let that get in the way of a good time (... for T-T ;). Thomas Austin wrote: Given its usefulness against evil outsiders (particularly since they get no saving throw and no SR) and the frequency of same in this AP, Holy Storm seems like an excellent battlefield-shaping spell for use in the Savage Tide, especially as it's just 3rd level. Agreed. Especially with a lesser rod of maximization (or empower). Although your opponents would likely just exit the area after the first round (if allowed), this can be devastating when combined with wall spells, closed in areas, an enlarged spiked chain tripper, etc. Still, if your opponents tend to last about 3 rounds, some people like the simplicity of the good ol' fireball (especially if they have high DC's and can easily get through SR). Also, many groups don't use the spell compendium (so many options can cause madness). Jeremy Mac Donald wrote:
The Mirror of opposition is *not* a cursed item in 3.5. It is a regular (if expensive) wondrous item that's intended to be used as a 'weapon' (of sorts). Hierophantasm wrote: Because of Demogorgon's duality, and the fact that each of his two sides has their own separate clones already--Bagromar and the other one--even if he were subjected, what would be the result? Would one of the clones emerge? Cinematically, my first inclination was also to have the mirror split Demogorgon into two single-headed monsters that fought with each other (and whoever else was in the way). The players would still have to deal with the victor (who's injured, but now more focused). ... or maybe the cautious half teleports away (leaving the players to deal with the angry, destructive half) Jesus saves wrote: Rigid and overly "lawful" to the point of becoming a tyrant "in the name of Good". Note that the mirror's description doesn't say that the double has the opposite alignment. Mind you, attempting to duplicate a Demon prince (i.e. the epitome of chaos) can well have *any* effect. Any player that thinks it will necessarily have beneficial results is far to optimistic. I recently created a horde of Skinwalkers for STAP using Weresabertooth minis from Mageknight. They were rebased on 1" bases and given Macahuitls and aztec shields with Demogorgon's image on them (created using shrinky-dink printer paper). This was all was more effort than I really wanted, and they still weren't exactly right. I'm curious: what have others used as Skinwalker miniatures? red scare wrote: Any suggestions. Well, the adventure says that the PC's can walk out without too much trouble. To me this means that path they took to get in isn't getting drenched. The water will be coming in through other holes leading to Galismorga, but it'll be days before their exit path is completely flooded. It also sounds like the PC's entrance tunnel is one area where the air is escaping through (making them pretty windy). There might be some rivulets and streams forming, and some areas may no longer be accessible, but overall the path should be traversable. Mind you: any manner of creature might be trying to escape along the same path (giving the PC's a reason to move with all haste). It you just want them to get out quick, have them cast resilient sphere, then fill up the passage with water so they float out rapidly like a bubble. If they don't have resilient sphere, give them an 'escape pod'(Bead of Force with directions on how to use it and where to go in case of flooding). EATERoftheDEAD wrote:
Hmm... I would've thought the opposite. i.e.: 1) The group sounds lousy2) Compared to other campaigns, STAP seems more easily adaptable to thieving, pirate types. But maybe not. Soccer Zone wrote: What can I do to motivate these players (and their characters). It sounds like your players would rather be thieving pirates than do-gooders. Luckily, STAP can accommodate that if needed. Maybe just anticipate their mercenary attitude and give them more of a financial incentive to follow the intended path (maybe offer them more bribes while lowering the treasure during adventures, or describe the BBEG's as having phat loot). If they are getting out of hand in their lawlessness, impose logical consequences: like high level NPC's ambushing them and killing them or throwing them in jail. Don't hold back. Once one hangs from the gallows, subsequent PC's might get the message. And if they are playing in a style that you are not comfortable with (which would certainly be the case for me here), tell them outright. z28camaro90 wrote: I hope to make it You might consider making (possibly with this) the following three pieces (mounted on 8.5"x11" boards): 1) A 10' wide, 55' long hallway lined with 15'x15' jail cells2) A 40'x 55' room 3) An intersection of a 15' wide hallway and a 20' wide hallway (with a room of various size in each of the four corners). By combining these three pieces in various ways, you can create a (suitable enough) 3-D representation of most areas in the Divided Ire. It doesn't have to be a perfect match for the other players to enjoy it. You can then plan with your DM for any special areas desired. I did something similar when I ran barrier peaks. Turin the Mad wrote: "Gang" doesn't do them justice, so I stole the grouping for crows... Many thanks Sir Carborundum! Since that is also how they are referred to in the Fiendish Codex I (as seen in this article), you could probably view it as official now. P.H. Dungeon wrote: I have had trouble finding things to make good skinwalkersWeresabertooth P.H. Dungeon wrote: I'm also struggling to get minis for some of the huge sized demons Bebilith: Starwars Acklay (which is even on an actual WotC Huge base) Retriever: Acklay or huge spiderNalfeshnee: King Kong (huge) or Haunter of the Pits (gargantuan) action figure with wings glued on (taken from feathery bird figures available in craft stores) note: these are not just ideas... these are what I've been using. I do most of my modifications with a knife and a hot glue gun (both from the $1 store), and 3" disks wooden (for huge bases) can be found in most craft stores. P.H. Dungeon wrote: Its going to be annoying not to have a good huge sized demogorgon mini for the end of the campaign. I'll be using a 6" tall Iskar action figure, but replacing the head with two mandrill heads (from plastic animals figures) and replacing the arms with toy octopus arms. The base figure is only $1 here jowco wrote: Has anyone found an appropriate model for the Sea Wyvern elsewhere? From experience, my highest recommendation is for: Pirateology model Ship (Swiftbuck)(here's a picture of it assembled) This model is perfect for miniatures. Plus it's cheap ($7), sturdy, light, and easy to assemble. Note: I left the lower sails off my own model to make it easy to move miniatures around the deck. I also drew a grid directly on the deck. Other good models that I've used:
jowco wrote: Also, I started going through the adventure path, noting all of the monsters and I'd like to purchase as many of the actual D&D minis If you can provide a list of the monsters, I can provide a list of miniatures for them. I started at HTBM, and I've had to be pretty creative with Dreamblade an Mageknight miniatures (among other things). However, singles can often be obtained fairly cheaply (I can provide a list of online stores if desired). carborundum wrote: Has anyone any ideas on minis for waves of vine horrors and assassin vines? I currently use Tanglewood Spirit miniatures from Mage Knight Whirlwind (can get them cheap online). However, I previously used plastic aquarium plants (available in any pet store) as they were easier to obtain. Wow. All this effort has prompted me to try my own hand at making a model of the Wreck. Here are the parts I'll be using (most of which I found on sale at various times): The ships:
Also:
Since I already had the pirate ships anyways, this actually isn't going to be that costly. cthulhu_waits wrote: does a rogue get sneak attack when attacking the stomach of a creature to cut his way out? From the [u]3.5 FAQ[/u] (if desired): "Can a rogue who has been swallowed whole by amonster use sneak attack against it? And does this damage apply to the monster’s normal hit points? Yes and yes, though that first yes has a qualification attached. Since a creature that has used swallow whole to gulp down a foe is effectively denied its Dexterity bonus to AC, it’s potentially vulnerable to a sneak attack. (Intuitively speaking, this makes pretty good sense. It’s hard to imagine a better place to attack a monster’s vulnerable parts than from inside the monster itself.) However, keep in mind that the inside of a stomach is almost certainly pitch-black, and therefore the critter has total concealment against attacks. The rules indicate that a rogue can’t use sneak attack against a creature with concealment, so unless she’s packing a light source in there she’s probably out of luck vis-à-vis sneak attack. (The Sage imagines that most DMs ignore the 50% miss chance in such situations, which seems like a reasonable house rule.) Damage done to a creature to cut your way out is applied to its hit points as normal." Savage_ScreenMonkey wrote: Im not sure if its better to choose outsiders(evil) first and suck up the fact that it will be useless for the first three adventures to get that extra +4 to damage and skills. Any insight on this would be helpful. Couldn't you choose outsiders(evil) 2nd (i.e. at 5th level) for the same effect (which I believe is just +2 over what you have)? Par-a-dox wrote: 1. How did you play out the encounters in Chap. 7... did you go round by round, or just skip to the various Fight scenes? Kinda both. If there was no immediate combat, I still gave each player a 'turn' (which might represent a several minutes, depending on what was happening). Par-a-dox wrote: 2. Anyone know how deep Farshore Harbor is? Evidently deep enough for ships... why? Par-a-dox wrote: 3. My players, through clever use of magic, have devised a way to basically put a grouping of stone columns in the harbors bottleneck, thus preventing the pirates ships from entering ... Any ideas on how to circumvent this? The fleet would (eventually) likely direct their flesh golems knock 'em down. Each golem should be able to pound through about 1' of stone in 1.5 minutes. It can cause an excellent delay though (and maybe even damage a ship or two). The pirates on those ships would likely still be able to hit the rowboats and join the main attack as normal (though a bit more tired). Par-a-dox wrote: 4. How did the final conflict with Vanthus play out... he seems like kind of a weakling Yeah, but ideally the PC's should be worn down by all the fighting by then. Ranged spells should be at a minimum, and melee-types shouldn't be able to reach him (since he's flying and using spring attack). However, assuming the party has acquired the evil-outsider bane bow in the weapon cache (which they should have), he'll still be short work. I recommend him sundering or disarming the bow (especially since there's no AoO from an archer) as soon as he realizes what it is. Thunderstike was one of the best parts of the campaign so far. He died a nasty, off-screen death though at the hands of the Bar-lgura (after panicking and being separated from the party). Up until then, the party had been laughing off all the ominous 'Blair Witch' stuff. His horse screams echoing through the dark swamp put a stop to that. Since I had a good collection, I used about a dozen different ships (and a large playing field) for the Farshore battle. I also have about 6 different d20 supplements that detail naval battles... but I didn't use any of those... the rules would've added very little to the battle (i.e. merely slowed it down). Taking a tip for Heroes of battle, I focused only on what the players did. They would've cared very little for the actual rules covering the minutia of moving ships, ship damage, etc. anyway, so long as they got a chance to start attacking things. Some options:
carborundum wrote: the party split up and one character ended up storming the ground floor of the Vanderboren mansion singlehandedly. All XP would normally be devided among all players at the table, even if the party splits up. The theory is that the whole party still provides support (restorations, information gathering, etc.), even if they don't contribute directly to a combat. Giving separate XP is likely to encourage players to sneak ahead of the party and obtain solo kills... giving them both more XP and more 'spotlight' time (i.e. more playing time) while the other players sit around being bored *and* XP starved. DMFTodd wrote: rather than just fighting a random monster, you need a set encounter to use when it is "random monster" time. An encounter that is a bit more interesting? Anybody have some of those? Some ideas (some of them from King Kong): 1) Encounter on a large tree that has fallen across a ravine: large creature causes tree/bridge to fall in vine clogged ravine.2) Encounter in ancient Olman ruins: 3-D, creatures can climb along buildings and statues. Some fallen walls, columns or statutes provide bridging or ramps to other levels. 3) Encounter in a dinosaur stampede: Cc's have to fend off Deinonychus attacks while running along underneath gargantuan brontosaurs that are stampeding out of a canyon. Conducting any AoO-provoking action (other than non-backwards movement) will provoke an attack by a brontosaurus foot. 4) Spider encounter after falling into a very big web 5) Dinosaur protecting her young/eggs. 6) Encounter while climbing a cliff or large tree 7) Two dinosaurs competing for who gets to eat the PC's 8) While chasing prey, dinosaur notices PC's and goes after them instead. 9) Savage Olmans riding animated dinosaur skeletons 10) Encounter while the party sleeps in an abandoned Phanaton tree platform: have plenty of vines to swing on. vikingson wrote:
I suppose I could have added boctaoe after my posts, but I'm unsure what you are arguing. The statements that you quoted are useful and valid *general* observations for D&D (and were intended as such). Wealth levels are an important balance consideration... not that you *have* to follow them, and not that you *have* consider it, or to consider balance at all. But if balance is a concern, wealth levels will play an important part (whether you make an effort to consider them or not). That's just default D&D (i.e. how it is designed)... but yes, people certainly can and do play otherwise. Also, spread out purchases (example: +1 cloak, +1 ring, +1 amulet, +1 armor & +1 weapon for 8k gp) are typically more optimal than single, large purchases in D&D (example: +2 ring for 8k gp). vikingson wrote: I would disagree. Are you disagreeing for D&D in general, or specifically for the Savage Tide, Isle of dread portion of the adventure path? vikingson wrote: the inability or high difficulty for characters to acquire equipment while based in Farshore (yes, it can be done with teleport etc. but it is a time-consuming hassle ) is part of the plot Fair enough. I can indeed understand that viewpoint for the Isle o’ Dread section of Savage Tide. Mind you, many other adventures do the same thing, but my groups have *always* found a way to resupply. Still; per the authors, there is enough down-time for shopping trips, and any group past 10th level that doesn’t have access to Teleport has a serious problem imo. At 15th level, this shouldn’t really be an issue. Also, if the PC’s keep all their loot (rather than selling stuff they don’t want and buying new stuff), they’d likely be far ahead of the estimated wealth per level charts in regard to total gear. I have a spreadsheet that has been keeping (detailed) track of this for my own Savage tide campaign. My group is about in the same location (and has been relying on teleport for resupply for the last 5 levels). At worst, the players could resupply to their heart’s content (or rather, to the 40k gp per item limit) at the beginning of the next adventure in Scuttlecove. "vikingson"generally, the character will start "poorer" then the others though - simply becaue the new guy could hand-pcik his stuff, while the others had to acquire theirs ingame[/QUOTE wrote:
Cpt_kirstov wrote: object could mean one wall, plank or nail of the ship, while it would use many spells to mend the whole ship, it is possible, especially if you have more than one PC who can cast divine spells. I believe in the case of the Sea Wyvern, several masts (and sails) are actually gone, and it has a few hull sections that one would view as beyond the capabilities of the spell (i.e. effectively "warped, burned, disintegrated, ground to powder, melted, or vaporized"). Again, the very next issue of Dungeon magazine details how to repair the Ship, and what effect the Make Whole spell has on this effort. I personally would likely allow either interpretation:
However, either of these interpretations would still not derail the adventure. The Magehound wrote: They have determined that it would be unwise to try to tackle the ziggurat again, or even return to Golismorga for that matter. This seems incongruous with your earlier statement of "they are a very tough lot and suffer from a certain sense of invincibility at times" Do they realize that shadow pearls are being made there and sent abroad (thus heralding The End Of The World As We Know It)? Do they know that they can pretty much avoid the (overly powerful) ziggurat entirely by merely breaking a crumbling piece of rock (i.e. the Tear of Taloc)? If not, then you should make this information available, maybe via:
It sounds like they simply think that they are supposed to fight the entire ziggurat (and don't realize there is an alternative). >1. It seems like there are an awful lot of Skinwalkers. While they might seem tough, at the level your PC's should be at they are basically mooks. Even if swarmed, your players should still be able to teleport (or fly) away (i.e. mooks are intended to *gradually* wear down the party, so dying is more their choice rather than an accident). Besides, players tend to love swarms of mooks. >2. Khala's link to the demon at the water gate strikes me as being a serious problem. Agreed. Most of my own prep will assume that the base is aware of the PC's. >3. New pcs Make sure the group has teleporting abilities. Have someone take leadership if need be to obtain a teleporting cohort. > is there a fun and interesting way to heighten the drama of the climb? I plan to use some scenes from King Kong (the dinosaur stampede, and the tree-bridge/chasm scenes) >5. Rest and Refit: there seems to be little means to rest and refit once the pcs are on the plateau Teleport. If the big cities on the mainland are out of teleport range, Planeshifting (twice) then teleporting is a functional work around. One or two sneaky SB agents with a dozen or so feather tokens (anchor) could probably be pretty vexing to the pirates without requiring a big investment by the SB. And of course, the payment will always exceed the aid. In return, the SB might expect Farshore to act like an 'ally' (i.e. conduct missions for them, and/or pay fealty to the SB). I personally feel that destroying the Kopru facility without re-awakening the Aboleth is an excellent idea (assuming the PC's are willing to engage in such a big fight). No need to railroad them... let them try. The plot isn't harmed if they somehow succeed. On the subject: I'm surprised that the adventure expects the party to still destroy the Kopru facility after the tear is destroyed. I mean, it's seems like the Aboleth will handle the Kopru just fine.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
