|1 person marked this as a favorite.|
I wish people would be clearer about what they're trying to debunk. There's a lot of things being suggested by the video, some of it true, some of it debatable:
Lars can literally fire at twice the rate any other archer in the world can manage.
Some / many ancient archers used a technique similar to this.
This technique was used effectively on the battlefield, not just for display purposes.
These arrows are fired with enough force to penetrate light/medium armor.
Lars has enough accuracy to shoot arrows out of the air.
Lars has enough accuracy and power to shoot arrows out of the air even when they're fired with full force by a competent archer.
Quivers of arrows weren't used in real battles.
Something something Hollywood something.
Not all battles are the same. If you're firing at French knights mired in mud, you have a couple of minutes to shoot at them before they get to you. In this situation, you only need so much rate of fire because if you're firing every two seconds you'll run out of arrows in no time. What you need is good range, and good penetration because they're going to be in high quality armor. (If rate-of-fire was everything, no-one would ever have bothered with crossbows.)
If you're fighting mongol hordes or peasant spearmen, the situation will be different. Or you might be in a siege, or fending off lions, or trying to defeat a single guy with a sword ten feet away, or in an archery contest firing at a non-moving target.
His technique is impressive, and would be useful in some of those situations, and not so useful in others.