Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ

Malach the Merciless's page

RPG Superstar 6 Season Dedicated Voter. 128 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists.

3 people marked this as a favorite.

... you represent the Lollipop Kids

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Wow, not to start a argument, but I would never play with that GM.

3 people marked this as a favorite.

Dwarfism in humans (real life) does not result in childlike weakness, in fact many little people can be as strong or stronger than regular sized adults if you need a real life example. This in real life is considered a "disabling condition" to a "normal human"

Translate that to halfling, which that height and mass are normal for the race? Don't see an issue.

Oh and did you see that dragons can fly?

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Jack Chick wants to post a new banned topic list

8 people marked this as a favorite.

Man do I hate Asian Guns

1 person marked this as a favorite.
John-Andre wrote:

I played 3.5e for a few years, mostly in Living Greyhawk and Living Arcanis. I've played Pathfinder for a few months. I must not be terribly intelligent or bright, because I can't figure out how some classes are inherently better than others. Apparently there are only certain classes which, according to some people, are complete wastes of time, and if someone were to want to play one, then these people would just refuse to play with the offender.

I don't get it. How does the rogue suck? How does the monk suck? Why does the paladin suck? I tried looking in the archives and got overloaded. The posts I read didn't cite reasons.

Please, tell me exactly why, in your opinion, these classes are so bad they shouldn't be included in the game -- and how you would fix them. And please, don't limit it to just the paladin, rogue, and monk. If you think any class is subpar, please, give a shout out -- and be sure to tell us how you would fix this inequity.

It is all a matter of opinion. I don't think any characters are "broken" or sucky. They all have their +'s and -'s. I love playing each of them. What some consider "broken" is only because they don't meet what they want to do with their character, so you know what, don't play that character.

People want "balance" well then only have one character type who can do everything - oh wait, that's a single player video game.

1 person marked this as a favorite.

DM: So your having relations with the bar wench, when suddenly . .

Make a fortitude save . . Fail? Oh well the bar wench is disappointed.

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Swish them around you mouth a bit, problem solved

6 people marked this as a favorite.

Charisma does not suck. I love the fact CHA is used for social skills, and is great for RPing.

©2002–2016 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.