|
|
|
Recent posts by
Madgael:
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOVED ESCAPE FROM LIMBO LIMBO CITY LIMBO!
So here's the thing... I was on Facebook the other day, doing the "Five Songs I'd Come Out To If I Was An MMA Fighter" quiz, and I realized that the Atomic Array theme song isn't on there to select. So really... what gives? That's just wrong.
Anyway, it got me thinking... There is such good music in these podcasts of yours. When can we expect to see the Atomic Array OST? Not soon enough for my money.
I see it ultimately looking something like this...
---
MOONSTEW MEMORIES
Songs Appearing On Or Inspired By The Greatest Gaming Podcasts Of All Time
1) "March of the Mutant Mambo Kings" (Atomic Array Opening Theme)
2) "The Goblin Getdown (Jason Buhlman Edition)"
3) "Contact" (RPG Countdown Intro)
4) Ed's Pick Theme (or "Is Free Strawberry Jam All I Really Am (To You)")
5) "The Fool On The Hill"
6) "Conan's Petulant Sandbox" (Ed's Pick Outro)
7) "Wolf's Watusi" (Kobold Quarterly Episode Music)
8) "Hallowed Be Thy Name"
9) "The Ryleh Rap", feat. Cthu-lou and Boyz II Shoggoth
10) "Dreamweaver" (Oh please... Oh please...)
11) "Wolf's Bounce" (Open Design Podcast theme)
12) "The Giveaway Groove" (Keep this under 30 secs please)
13) "Oops... I Punctured The Blackened Vein Again"
14) "Blammo's Beatdown" (Atomic Array Ending Theme)
Bonus Track - "Blammo's Beatdown" (Extended Lovely Acidic Butter Sauce Remix)
Bonus Track - "Dungeons of Doom (Demo)" feat. Yusef (and several representatives of the TSA who chose to accompany him to the Moonstew Studios at that time)
---
So please? Can we?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160: Civilization collapses every 2049 years during the eclipse in Asimov's "Nightfall".
161: The Total Perspective Vortex, from Adam's "The Restaurant at the End of the Universe".
162: Psychohistory from Asimov's "Foundation".
163: Winston Smith learns to love Big Brother.
164: The tripods and the capping, "The White Mountains".
165: "The Long Walk" by Bachman/King.
166: Marvin and the mattress Zem
Too many from Dune and Dune Messiah to single out.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
roguerouge wrote:
I'm curious about this topic. How long ago should something be published before it's acceptable to spoil something major without warning? Is it acceptable to give the main clue to something like Hound of the Baskervilles? How about who Emma marries in that Jane Austen novel? What about the answer to Who Killed Laura Palmer? How many years have to elapse until you can casually say what happened to the head of Hogwarts?
And is your spoiler etiquette different in person than it is on the net?
I tend to casually mention pre-emptively to passersby that if they spoil anything Harry Potter for me before the last movie comes out, I will gladly disembowl them with an ear of freshly steamed corn on the cob. (Movie first, then book for me. I get too angry at the big screen if I do it the other way around.)
That said, I have had a friend slip not once but twice with that very alleged fact which I suspect you are alluding to, and which I deeply hope you will neither confirm nor deny in any future posts.
Sigh. I miss her.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After months of anticipating and semi-planning, I finally sat down last night w/ my fiancee and her two kids (5 and 9) to try to play D&D, as from the Basic box set WotC released a few years ago.
Pregen characters helped keep attention spans at the start. The 9 year old took the elf wizard and the 5 year old took the fighter. My fiancee took the cleric and the rogue. We got through the first three encounters in the set. Results were mixed.
On the minus side, the 9 year old had a fixation for running into the rooms to search and open all the treasure chests while the other three characters were still in combat with the room's denizens. (I'm suddenly wondering now if that is a mindset from playing video games - ie: run in and get the stuff and run out before the bad guy touches you.) This lessened somewhat when we suggested items should be shared rather than first-come-first-served. That and my giving the last goblin in the second room a death speech to the effect of "Though we are defeated today, I know I can die happy having fired my last arrow at the foe of ours who showed the least amount of teamwork and cooperation in the assault. Have-at-thee!" Subtle? No. But kinda worked.
The 5 year old did ok, especially when being coached on where to go to swing his sword. Otherwise his movement patterns became somewhat erratic... Sometimes ending with the phrase "There. Now I am on the carpet." Attention spans were kind of an issue there too... At certain points, the game of "Which hand is the green die in?" seemed to take priority, and he had a habit of running around to see what other cool monsters I was hiding behind the screen.
It was tricky to explain sneak attack and why you don't get it with a ranged weapon. And why even if you did, you wouldn't get it against the skeleton. And why my fiancee should have gotten one when they jumped the goblins before, but I just plain forgot about it. We are planning some tutorial time on that though to make sure she is ready for GenCon.
They started to get the hang of it though I think, towards the end. In the last encounter, the 9 year old decided to cast Magic Missle and worked the whole thing out from idea to telling me the damage without help. But she does read at a "higher level". Than me at least when I was 9...
One unforeseen wrinkle... I have been insidiously prepping them with the D&D cartoon for the last few weeks too. I was pretty caught off guard when they asked where my Dungeon Master mini was. D'oh. "Yeah, he's not actually a real guy like that. And, no, the people on the screen aren't actually your PCs either..."
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Azzy wrote:
Turin the Mad wrote:
Krome wrote:
All this talk about cats, dogs, hamsters, ponies, mantids, crocs...
And no one has even bothered to question why a sheep doesn't have a Charisma of at least 20?
I mean really let's focus on the IMPORTANT matters!
Hrm ... I dunno ... I haven't heard THAT many tales about the formidable seductive prowess of sheep ... altough there appears to be a rumors of weresheep ... see local video store IRL, you might find the documentary in question ...
Documentary? I thought that was Scottish porn.
What's the difference between Mick Jagger and an angry Scottish sheepherder?
.
.
.
Mick Jagger says: "Hey! You! Get offa ma cloud!"
The Scottish sheepherder says: "Hey! MacLeod! Get offa ma ewe!"
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clark Peterson wrote:
Believe it or not we had two bridle items. :)
I just saw the other one now. I am amazed to see that mount-adapting items were so common this year. I thought I was really coming from leftfield working a usually-overlooked area...
Clark Peterson wrote:
I was on the fence on this one. I thought it was "a bit boring, but it is simple and clean. And it uses the channeling mechanic. I like the application of the celestial creature. I'd like to put my money where my mouth is that a low level clean item actually can make the cut. This might be the one. Inclined to keep for further consideration. And subject to the review of my esteemed colleagues."
I liked how the idea seemed really simple at first, but that the application could vary a great deal, depending what kind of mount you were using. If it was a riding dog, it was a pretty minor bump. If it was a griffon you were riding, well you definitely would get more toys to play with.
Clark Peterson wrote:
Sean and Wolf didnt feel the same. It got rejected. And I dont disagree with them. Wolf didnt like templating on the fly and had issues with some of the mechanics and wording such as "activating." Sean had issues with "standard mount" and what that means. Plus we thought the way you handled the negative level was wonky. There were better ways to do it.
That makes sense. I know the phrase "standard mount" made perfect sense to me at the time, but looking back, I don't have a clue what it means either. I didn't think templating on the fly would be quite such an issue, since I figured it would be more a PC item, and, based on players I know, they would probably have a whole special page of stats pre-written out to use when Flicka goes all Hulk. (Chomping at the bit for the chance to use it, so to speak.)
The negative level thing was kind of an afterthought, and I now wish I had spent more time coming up with something better. I had a notion that I didn't want the item abused to be making Celestial Red Dragon mounts. In the end I just basically adapted the "bad stuff happens to bad people" language from the Holy weapon description. Perhaps it would have been cooler if it worked w/ evil creatures too though?
Thanks again for all the feedback! (It was actually a lot gentler than I expected...)
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
digression wrote:
chopswil wrote:
ILLITHID
WoTC owns this, can't use it
big no-no
I thought WoTC owned "mindflayer" but not "illithid", as in one is a specific term, and the other is a general one?
I figured I'd be auto-disqualified because I didn't think those two things to be the same.... *defeated*
EDIT: Ok, lets put aside the fact that I'm a fool, overlooking something so basic... Clark, can you still give me some feedback about the general function and style of the item?
Doesn't Reaper just call them Bathalians instead to get around that?
Is the term "illithid" still verboten because it is part of the fluff for the non-OGL "mind flayer"?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This order was received yesterday, thanks.
I think there is an issue with my "Goroloth" though. There seems to be a piece missing.
If I figure right, there should be a 2-part base, a torso piece, a head piece, and one tail. Also, one set of two dorsal fins, and two sets of two side fins to attach, one set to each left and right. It is these side fins... I only got one set, but from all the pics I can see (and the holes for mounting on the mini itself) it looks like there should be two.
Can I verify this somehow? It seems like it would have had to come from Reaper like this in the first place. How would I go about getting a replacement for the missing piece?
Thanks for your help
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you sir, may I have another? :)
BRIDLE OF THE RIGHTEOUS
Aura moderate transmutation [good]; CL 7th
Slot bridle; Price 14,000 gp; Weight 1lb.
Description
This item, made primarily of dark leather covered in silvery Celestial script, appears at first glance to be a normal bit and bridle and may be worn as such by any standard non-evil mount. When activated by a good-aligned rider, however, the item channels divine power into its wearer, granting the mount the Celestial template for a duration of 10 minutes. This ability is usable 1/day.
The bridle bestows one permanent negative level on any evil creature attempting to wear or activate it. The negative level remains as long as the item is touched and disappears when that touch is broken. This negative level cannot be overcome in any way (including restoration spells) while the bridle is still being touched.
Construction
Requirements Craft Wondrous Item, Holy Smite, Bless Weapon, creator must be good; Cost 7,000 gp
--
Feels like the "Abyssal Spurs" that made it through were kinda coming from the same place as my item. Except for being totally different of course...
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patrick Curtin wrote:
Madgael wrote:
b@&&~*&s.
EDIT: I am not sure which I am more surprised by... that the filter knew that word well enough to tag, or that it apparently un-capitalized it on me.
You could always go with "B0llocks"
Thou art wise.
I knew losing Innuendo in the 3.5 conversion would someday come back to bite me on the b@&&~*&s.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
flynnster wrote:
snobi wrote:
David Fryer wrote:
Regardless of what I feel about his politics, it proves that we have begun to judge people on their ideas and character rather then their skin color.
There's only a fuss because of his skin color.
Yepp. Absolutely. And what a shame that the first non-caucasian person elected was voted in almost entirely because of their being non-caucasian.
b&*&~&*s.
EDIT: I am not sure which I am more surprised by... that the filter knew that word well enough to tag, or that it apparently un-capitalized it on me.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew Morris wrote:
True, good thing that nothing prevents a man from marrying a woman or vice versa. Even a gay or lesbian can take advantage of this. Provided of course, that they meet the licensing requirments of the state.
Or are you saying that two sx year olds should be allowed to marry?
everyone has access to that 'priviledge'
Thank you, please try again,
Common law dictates otherwise.
"Minors are the only class of persons whose rights may be disabled without a need to justify the disablement as arising from the need to resolve a conflict with the rights of others, either through statute or due process. The disablement consists of the assignment of a power to supervise the exercise of the rights under the headings of "liberty" and "property" listed above to a guardian, by default the parents, who acts as agent of the State for the purpose of nurturing the minor. The disability is normally removed by statute providing for removal when a certain age, such as 18, or condition, such as marriage, is attained."
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew Morris wrote:
I'll have to disagree with you here. The Government recognition of marriage contracts is a privledge, not a right.
That makes no difference. Just because it can be defined as a privilege doesn't make it ok for a state to discriminate against a particular portion of its citizenry.
The 14th Amendment to the US Constitution states:
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States, or shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
For me, the word "UnAmerican" doesn't really have any meaning, and usually amounts to little more than demagoguery. The nation encapsulates so many ideas and actions, good or bad, that I find it pretty inconceivable that a thing or opinion could really exist that wouldn't be found somewhere in the country. (Probably in Indiana, I am betting.) I'm a little surprised at TH throwing it around like that.
That said, calling people "UnAmerican" who don't agree with your opinion of how the place should be run is about as American as it comes. As is trying to make sure people who aren't like you don't have it as good as you. (general you)
Thank god we have Double Quarters and the Superbowl, at least.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crimson Jester wrote:
Clark Peterson wrote:
.... I cant help myself.
I absolutely love D&D. Always have. I love the creation process. So when Erik called and sheepishly asked if I wanted to be involved--telling me all the long hours and no pay--I jumped at it. It is just my cup of tea (seer's tea, in fact).
I love this process.
Back when Paizo had Dungeon and Erik was running things I told him I wanted to do an artilce for Dungeon called "Page to Table," where I talk about practical tips for running the various adventures in that month's mag at your home game table. ......
Plus I like hearing myself talk. That's probably the bigger and more honest reason :)
If I may humbly make a suggestion why don't you get a hold of Atomic Array and do an annual podcast on this subject??
There are a lot of people who would find this interesting, I count myself one of them.
Seconded.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clark Peterson wrote:
We found that most of the high advancers in the contest came from our golden ticket items--items we picked for spark and creativity, where we wanted to see what the person could do in the next rounds. I'm not sure what that says about how good we are as judges :) But it shure says that we should be inclusive and that contestants grow and learn and that we shouldnt overly nitpick editorial issues that are easily fixed. Christine is a perfect example. She barely made it into the contest and she won the darn thing!
Reminds me of a baseball analogy that has been buzzing in my head any time the spark vs. formatting thing has been alluded to in this thread...
You are a baseball coach. Two players run to first. They both have the same time, but one has perfect form, the other, lousy form. Which one do you pick?
The one with the lousy form. Because when you teach him good form, he will always beat the other player.
Ironically I learned that from watching The West Wing.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|