|3 people marked this as a favorite.|
And then there are the other posts with almost equally unpleasant language and accusations of incompetence or other insults, those are even more common.
While I never threw any personal insult against any member of the Paizo staff, I'll admit that I have often being a bit too vocal about my displeasure with Paizo's design policy. This year has been way too frustrating for me to contain my words.
But in my defense, seeing the erratas kicking martials in the teeth all the time, while caster/martial disparity grows more and more with each book, it's really difficult for me not to doubt Paizo's ability and/or interest in making Pathfinder a more balanced game. Especially when they continuously refuse to acknowledge the problems with game balance.
By now, I'm convinced that they either don't care or are just not very good at it.
For as long as the devs claim that Exploiter Wizard is fine, but a general Dex to damage feat is "too good even for Mythic", I can't help but question their competence at balancing game mechanics.
Am I being harsh? Yes, I am. But I'm not lying or exaggerating.